Cheryl Oncken1,2, Ellen A Dornelas1,3, Chia-Ling Kuo4, Heather Z Sankey5, Henry R Kranzler6, Erin L Mead1, Ms Sheila D Thurlow1. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT. 3. Division of Oncology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT. 4. Connecticut Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA. 6. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
Background: Smoking during pregnancy is a serious public health problem in need of better treatments. Nicotine replacement treatment (NRT) (patch or gum) has not been shown in randomized placebo-controlled trials to be efficacious for smoking cessation during pregnancy. However, the nicotine inhaler may have advantages over other NRTs as it replicates some of the sensory effects of smoking. Objective: The purpose of the study was examine the efficacy and safety of the nicotine inhaler for smoking cessation during pregnancy. We hypothesized that the nicotine inhaler compared to placebo would increase quit rates and reduce smoking during treatment and at the end of pregnancy, result in a higher birth weight and gestational age in the offspring, and reduce the incidence of preterm birth and low birth weight infants. Study Design: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the nicotine inhaler for smoking cessation during pregnancy. Pregnant women who smoked ≥5 cigarettes daily receivedbehavioral counseling and random assignment to a 6-week treatment with nicotine or placebo inhaler, followed by a 6-week taper period. Throughout treatment, we assessed tobacco exposure biomarkers, cessation rates, and adverse events. We also obtained information on birth outcomes. The primary outcome was smoking cessation at 32-34 weeks gestation; secondary outcomes were smoking reduction, birth weight and gestational age, and the incidence of preterm birth or low birth weight infants. We compared treatment groups on these measures using t-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate linear and logistic regression. Results: Participants in the placebo (n=67) and nicotine (n=70) groups were comparable on baseline characteristics, though women in the placebo group reported a higher motivation to quit (p=0.016). Biochemically-validated smoking cessation rates were similar with nicotine and placebo (after 6 weeks of treatment: 4% (3/70) vs. 3% (2/67), respectively, p< 0.99, and at 32-34 weeks gestation: 10% (7/70) vs. 18% (12/67), respectively, p=0.220). Cigarettes per day (CPD) decreased over time in both groups (p< 0.001), with the nicotine inhaler group having a greater decrease than the placebo group two (p=0.022) and six weeks after the quit date (p=0.042), but not at 32-34 weeks gestation (p=0.108). Serum cotinine levels, birth weight, gestational age and reductions in carbon monoxide did not differ by group. However, the incidence of preterm delivery was higher in the placebo than the nicotine group: 15% (10/67) vs. 4% (3/67), respectively, p=0.030). The incidence of delivering a low birth weight infant was also higher in the placebo than the nicotine group: 15% (10/67) vs. 6% (4/67), respectively, p=0.035, but not after adjusting for preterm delivery p=0.268. Conclusions: Although the nicotine inhaler group did not have a higher quit rate during pregnancy than the placebo group, the outcome of preterm delivery occurred less frequently in the nicotine group.
RCT Entities:
Background: Smoking during pregnancy is a serious public health problem in need of better treatments. Nicotine replacement treatment (NRT) (patch or gum) has not been shown in randomized placebo-controlled trials to be efficacious for smoking cessation during pregnancy. However, the nicotine inhaler may have advantages over other NRTs as it replicates some of the sensory effects of smoking. Objective: The purpose of the study was examine the efficacy and safety of the nicotine inhaler for smoking cessation during pregnancy. We hypothesized that the nicotine inhaler compared to placebo would increase quit rates and reduce smoking during treatment and at the end of pregnancy, result in a higher birth weight and gestational age in the offspring, and reduce the incidence of preterm birth and low birth weight infants. Study Design: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the nicotine inhaler for smoking cessation during pregnancy. Pregnant women who smoked ≥5 cigarettes daily received behavioral counseling and random assignment to a 6-week treatment with nicotine or placebo inhaler, followed by a 6-week taper period. Throughout treatment, we assessed tobacco exposure biomarkers, cessation rates, and adverse events. We also obtained information on birth outcomes. The primary outcome was smoking cessation at 32-34 weeks gestation; secondary outcomes were smoking reduction, birth weight and gestational age, and the incidence of preterm birth or low birth weight infants. We compared treatment groups on these measures using t-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate linear and logistic regression. Results:Participants in the placebo (n=67) and nicotine (n=70) groups were comparable on baseline characteristics, though women in the placebo group reported a higher motivation to quit (p=0.016). Biochemically-validated smoking cessation rates were similar with nicotine and placebo (after 6 weeks of treatment: 4% (3/70) vs. 3% (2/67), respectively, p< 0.99, and at 32-34 weeks gestation: 10% (7/70) vs. 18% (12/67), respectively, p=0.220). Cigarettes per day (CPD) decreased over time in both groups (p< 0.001), with the nicotine inhaler group having a greater decrease than the placebo group two (p=0.022) and six weeks after the quit date (p=0.042), but not at 32-34 weeks gestation (p=0.108). Serum cotinine levels, birth weight, gestational age and reductions in carbon monoxide did not differ by group. However, the incidence of preterm delivery was higher in the placebo than the nicotine group: 15% (10/67) vs. 4% (3/67), respectively, p=0.030). The incidence of delivering a low birth weight infant was also higher in the placebo than the nicotine group: 15% (10/67) vs. 6% (4/67), respectively, p=0.035, but not after adjusting for preterm delivery p=0.268. Conclusions: Although the nicotine inhaler group did not have a higher quit rate during pregnancy than the placebo group, the outcome of preterm delivery occurred less frequently in the nicotine group.
Authors: Nina G Schneider; Richard E Olmstead; Mitchell Nides; Freny Vaghaiwalla Mody; Pamela Otte-Colquette; Kim Doan; Shilpan Patel Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2004 Jan-Feb
Authors: Ellen A Dornelas; Jeffrey Magnavita; Tryfon Beazoglou; Edward H Fischer; Cheryl Oncken; Harry Lando; John Greene; Jeremy Barbagallo; Roxanne Stepnowski; Elizabeth Gregonis Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2006-07-21
Authors: Cheryl Oncken; Ellen Dornelas; John Greene; Heather Sankey; Allen Glasmann; Richard Feinn; Henry R Kranzler Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Henry R Kranzler; Yukiko Washio; Leah R Zindel; E Paul Wileyto; Sindhu Srinivas; Dennis J Hand; Matthew Hoffman; Cheryl Oncken; Robert A Schnoll Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM Date: 2021-01-22
Authors: Peter Hajek; Dunja Przulj; Francesca Pesola; Chris Griffiths; Robert Walton; Hayden McRobbie; Tim Coleman; Sarah Lewis; Rachel Whitemore; Miranda Clark; Michael Ussher; Lesley Sinclair; Emily Seager; Sue Cooper; Linda Bauld; Felix Naughton; Peter Sasieni; Isaac Manyonda; Katie Myers Smith Journal: Nat Med Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 87.241
Authors: Joshua L Karelitz; Erin A McClure; Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger; Lauren R Pacek; Karen L Cropsey Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Katarzyna Campbell; Thomas Coleman-Haynes; Katharine Bowker; Sue E Cooper; Sarah Connelly; Tim Coleman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-05-22
Authors: Ravinder Claire; Catherine Chamberlain; Mary-Ann Davey; Sue E Cooper; Ivan Berlin; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Tim Coleman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-03-04