Mahsa Rahimi1,2, Ali Sharifi-Zarchi2, Nosratollah Zarghami1, Lobat Geranpayeh3, Marzieh Ebrahimi4, Effat Alizadeh5. 1. Department of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. 2. Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.Electronic Address: mebrahimi@royaninstitute.org. 5. Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Electronic Address: alizadehe@tbzmed.ac.ir.
Breast cancer is the second-most prevalent cancer
between females worldwide (1) and effective treatment of
breast cancer is faced to a number of hurdles including
resistance to therapies, metastasis and recurrence (2).
There are several evidences regarding the heterogeneity
of breast cancer cell population, initiated from a very
slight subset of cells named cancer stem cells (CSCs)
(3). CSCs with self-renewal capacity are responsible
for initiation of tumorigenesis in immunodeficient
models (4) as well as maintenance and clinical
outcomes of treatments (5). Although CSCs play central
role from clinical points of view, molecular mechanisms
and pathways involved in their survival and maintenance
has not fully been identified (6). Increasing our knowledge
in the field of tumor biology could consequently lead to
suggestion of effective diagnostic and prognostic methods,
as well as more impressive treatment for breast cancer.
Moreover, recent progress has highlighted the important
role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in regulating stemness
and metastasis of CSCs. In this way, several miRNAs are
known to be differentially expressed in CSCs or normal
stem cells, part of which has been studied in targeting genes
and networks involved in cancer stemness properties (7).
On the other hand, the regulatory role of miRNAs has been
defined in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), as an
important process through tumor progression (8). Although
it is known that miRNAs could contribute to tumorigenesis
as tumor suppressors or oncogenes (9, 10), the role of
miRNAs targeting both self-renewal and EMT pathways in
breast CSCs (BCSCs) has largely been remained unknown.Recently, with regards to the new technologies
innovation, data mining and bioinformatics approaches
have tremendously been developed in the field of
genomic analysis large-scale endeavors created useful
databases. We hypothesized that identification of
common miRNAs targeting stemness-EMT network
will improve our understanding of CSCs in metastatic
breast cancer. To date, several investigations have
been performed to find deregulated miRNA expression
during EMT and metastasis of breast cancer or BCSCs.
In this study, our approach is systematic analysis of
combined clinical and molecular data to find common
miRNAs deregulated in mammospheres, as BCSCs
model, and metastatic breast cancer. To reach that, we
integrated candidate miRNA expression profiles with
their target mRNA gene expression data obtained from
the same samples. In summary, our findings resulted
to understand the important role of miR-200c and
miR-30c in maintenance of stemness as well as EMT
process in BCSCs. Therefore, we suggested that down-
regulation of miR-200c combined with increasing level
of miR-30c may be a signature of BCSCs enrichment
in patients post neo-adjuvant therapy. These miRNAs
may have potential to extent into both diagnostic filed,
as biomarker, and therapeutic approach for BCSCs in
patients who are under chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
In this experimental study, breast cancer tissues were
collected between January 2017 and January 2018,
upon the approval of Farmanieh Hospital and Sina
Oncologic Hospital (both from Tehran, Iran) according
to local authorities. All contributors signed a written
informed consent form to participate in this study.
All procedures performed in studies including human
patient involvements were in accordance with the ethical
standards that approved by Tabriz University of Medical
Sciences (5/D/25333) and Royan Institute Ethical
Committee (IR.ACECR.ROYAN.REC.1396.229),
as well as the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later
amendments or comparable ethical standards. Patients
histopathological information, including tumor size
and depth of invasion, lymph-vascular and perineural
invasion, grade and clinical tumor/node/metastasis,
were recorded and pathologically staged using the
tumor-nodes-metastasis (TNM) staging method (11).
Informed consent was obtained from all participants
included in the present study in Sina and Farmanieh
hospitals, Tehran, Iran.Seven female breast cancer patients who underwent
surgery at Farmanieh Hospital and Sina Oncologic Hospital
were included in this research. The inclusion criteria for
selection of female patients were 25 years of age and
older, from all ethnicity. Breast cancer malignancy was
confirmed based on histopathological examination and
immunohistochemical studies of estrogen receptor (ER)
and progesterone receptor (PR) expressions, performed
on surgical resection tissue samples of the tumors based
on the standard methods. Three samples were undergoing
neo-adjuvant therapy before sampling. Normal adjacent
biopsies, as negative controls, were collected from all
seven patients. For sampling, surgeon removed the tumors
and small part of them was cut for cultivation, which
transferred to phosphate buffer saline (PBS) containing
penicillin/streptomycin and the reminding part of tissues
were fixed for pathological evaluation. Adjacent breast
tissues or the areas around tumor sites were removed
and transferred to transferring media (PBS containing
penicillin/streptomycin) in the separate tube. Later on,
these samples are called as normal tissues in the present
study.
Literature mining and computational analysis
First we performed a systematic literature review on
PubMed and COREMINE website using the following
keywords: "breast cancer tissue, stem cell, self-renewal,
stemness, miRNA, metastasis or EMT". The studies
with incomplete data were excluded from this analysis,
providing that: i. The papers are review articles or letters,
ii. Studies with insufficient or inaccessible data, and iii.
Studies that are not related to CSCs and homo-sapiens. We
also excluded nine articles, due to limitation to access to
their full texts. Moreover, miRNA expression profiles were
searched with the same keywords on NCBI GEO database.
In overall, we found the most frequent miRNAs targeting the
stemness and metastasis genes. Then, we used miRNA target
prediction tools including TargetScan (12) and miRWalk
(13), to find target genes of each candidate miRNA. We only
preserved the target genes with at least two-fold expression
change and P<0.05, between human breast cancer versus
human normal breast (the first group) and mammosphere
versus MCF-7 adherent culture (the second group). Custom
R scripts were used to rank miRNAs for targeting at least
three stemness and two metastasis genes. Subsequently, we
computed differential expression fold-changes and P values
(using two-sided Student’s t test) between breast cancers vs.
normal breast (as the first group) and also mammospheres
vs. MCF-7 adherent culture (as the second group).
Enricher (14) and GO functional enrichment analysis on
KEGG 2017 pathways were used to identify pathways
and biological functions that were affected by the target
genes of each miRNAs.
Cell line and monolayer culture
MCF-7 is an estrogen-dependent human breast
adenocarcinoma cell line that was purchased from Iranian
Biological Resource Center (IBRC), Iran. The cells were
cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM,
Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% heat inactivated
fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen, USA), 1% nonessential
amino acid (NEAA) , 2 mM L-glutamine and
1% penicillin/streptomycin (all from Life Technologies,
USA) at 37°C and 5% CO2 using standard cell culture
incubator.
Formation of spheroid cultures from MCF-7
The standard tissue culture plates were covered with
poly 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (poly-HEMA)
preventing cell attachment to plate surface. Subsequently,
the monolayer MCF-7 cells were enzymatically detached
into single cells suspension with trypsin (Gibco, USA)
and harvested. 2×104 single cells were seeded at low
attachment plate, in serum-free DMEM medium enriched
with 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF, Royan
Institute, Iran), 20 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor
(bFGF, Royan Institute, Iran), 2% B27 (Gibco, USA) and
2 mM L-Glutamine (Life Technologies, USA). The media
was refreshed every 48 hours and mammospheres were
formed after 14 days.
Mammosphere-forming efficiency assay
When the spheroids reached to about 50 µm diameters,
they were accumulated by gentle centrifugation at 1000
rpm for 5 minutes, and then were enzymatically separated
with trypsin. About 2×104 cells were plated into poly-
HEMA coated six-well plates in 2000 µl of serum-free
DMEM medium per well. Mammosphere-forming
efficiency (MFE) was calculated by dividing the number
of mammospheres, which are greater than 60 µm or
larger in size in the cells seeding density per well using
a microscope fitted with magnitude. All experiments on
each generation of mammospheres were performed in
triplicates.
Colony-forming test
To compare colony forming capacity of the adherent
cells and mammospheres, 200 cells of each group were
counted and re-plated in a complete medium containing
DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% NEAA,
2 mM L-glutamine and 1% penicillin/streptomycin
in six-well-plates. After 10 days, cell colonies were
fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and stained with
0.05% crystal violet (Sigma, USA). Ultimately, the
round shape colonies with more than 400 µm diameter
were counted using an inverted microscope (Japan
Microscope brand, Japan).
Transmembrane migration and invasion assay
Adherent cells and mammospheres were grown up to
80% confluence. Then adherent cells were starved in
serum-free medium the day before assay. The next day,
the cells were dissociated into single cells with trypsin,
counted and added at 1×105 cells/well density onto
the top chambers of trans-well inserts of 8 µm pore
size filter (BD, USA) coated with 0.5 mg/ml Matrigel
(BD, USA) in a six-well plate. DMEM containing
10% of FBS was added to the bottom of chambers
and the cells were then cultured for 24 hours at 37°C
in a 5% humidified CO2 incubator. Finally, the cells
on the top surface of filter were removed from filter
surface by using a cotton-swab, and cells at the bottom
of filter were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde
(Merk, Germany), stained with 0.05% crystal violet
(Sigma, USA) for 30 minutes. Very carefully, to avoid
washing off the fixed cells, the membrane was dipped
into distilled water to remove the excess crystal violet.
Trans-well membrane was next allowed to dry.The cells were observed using an inverted microscope
with either ×4 or ×10 objective lens and number of the cells
were quantified in different fields of view to get an average
sum of cells invaded through the membrane and attached
to the underside of membrane. For migration assay, all
steps were carried out similar to those in the invasion
assay, except the matrigel coating. All experiments were
performed in triplicates.
Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction
analysis of gene expression
Tumor and normal breast tissue fragments (<3×3 mm)
were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized with
a ceramic pestle in TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA).
Total RNAs with the aim of small RNA retentions were
extracted from the adherent cells (as control groups) and
mammospheres (as experimental groups) using TRIzol
reagent, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The
concentration and purity of extracted RNA were determined
by UV absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (260/280 nm) in
spectrophotometer. The integrity of RNA samples was
checked by gel electrophoresis. 2 µg total RNAwas subjected
to generate complementary DNA using cDNA synthesis
kit (TaKaRa, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Expression level of stemness and metastasis
genes was evaluated by Applied Biosystems real-time PCR
Instrument (ABI, Thermo Fisher, USA) in 10 µl reactions
containing 2.5 µl SYBR Green PCR mix (TaKaRa, Japan)
and 1 µl of each primer with 5 pmol/µl concentration.
Specific human primers -including stemness related genes
(OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, c-MYC and KLF4) and metastasis
related genes (CDH1, CDH2, SNAIL1, TWIST1, TWIST2
and ZEB1) were used (Table S1) (See Supplementary Online
Information at www.celljournal.org). PCR program was
incubated at 95°C for 10 minutes, 40 cycles of denaturation
at 95°C for 10 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 20 seconds
and elongation at 72°C for 20 seconds. A final melting curve
analysis from 65°C to 95°C was performed and the relative
levels of expression were analyzed using 2-ΔΔCt values.
ß-Actin was used as house-keeping gene.
miRNA expression profiling
miRNA expression levels were studied by performing
SYBR Green qRT-PCR. In brief, 1 µg total RNA
containing miRNAs was poly adenylated by poly (A)
polymerase and reverse transcribed to cDNAusing reverse
transcriptase enzyme first strand cDNAsynthesis reaction,
provided from Parsgenome miR-Amp kit (Parsgenome,
Iran) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each
reaction was performed in a final volume of 10 µl,
containing diluted cDNA and PCR master mix, and all
reactions were run in triplicates. qRT-PCR reaction was
performed using Applied Biosystems Real-Time PCR
Instruments according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Expression levels of miRNA were normalized against
internal controls U6, as a housekeeping control.
Statistical analysis
In vitro characterization of MCF-7 cell mammosphere
and primary breast cancer tissue are presented as the
mean ± SD of at least three different experiments.
Two-tailed Student’s t test and analysis of variance
(ANOVA) were performed to evaluate the difference
between the mean values. The Spearman’s rank
correlation test was used to evaluate miRNAand mRNA
correlation. A two-tailed analysis with P<0.05 was
considered statistically significant for all experiments.
For functional enrichment analysis, target genes of the
selected miRNAs were submitted to Enrichr database.
Subsequently, biological process, cellular component
and molecular function were analyzed by Gene
Ontology (GO) and pathways analysis was applied by
KEGG 2017 (P<0.05).
Results
Computational analysis to identify common miRNA in
stemness and EMT network
A total of 328 articles were yielded after the literature
reviews, finally limited to 142 papers due to our exclusion
criteria (mentioned in the method section). Full-text
reviews were resulted in proposing 56 candidate miRNAs
that have key role in BCSCs: 24 up-regulated and 32
down-regulated molecules. Among them, we chose miR-200c
and miR-30c targeting at least three stemness and
two EMT genes (Fig .1).
Fig.1
Flowchart of studies represent systematic analysis to find miRNAs targeting both self-renewal and EMT pathways. EMT; Epithelial-mesenchymal
transition, qRT-PCR; Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction, GO; Gene ontology, KEGG; Kyoto Encyclopedia of genes and genomes-genomenet,
GEO; Gene expression omnibus, and BSCs; Breast cancer stem cells.
Flowchart of studies represent systematic analysis to find miRNAs targeting both self-renewal and EMT pathways. EMT; Epithelial-mesenchymal
transition, qRT-PCR; Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction, GO; Gene ontology, KEGG; Kyoto Encyclopedia of genes and genomes-genomenet,
GEO; Gene expression omnibus, and BSCs; Breast cancer stem cells.
Mammospheres derived from MCF-7 as a model of
breast cancer stem cells
MCF-7 cells were grown similar to adherent epithelial-
like monolayer cells in culture (Fig .2A). Under serum-
free and low-attachment conditions, MCF-7 cells grew
into 3D non-linkage mammospheres within 24-48 hours,
in comparison with their 2D adherent culture. Shape and
appearance of spheres are solid and tightly packed in
rounded margin, but we observed the mammospheres form
looser and less rounded spheres over passages (Fig .2B-D).
The secondary spheres were subsequently cultured up to
three passages and MFE was calculated based on their
size (> 60 µm, Fig .2E). The spheroid cells indicated about
two folds increase (P<0.05) in MFE during three passages
(Fig .2E). The results showed that MCF-7 cell-derived
mammospheres had more colonogenic potential up to 5.5
fold. Indeed, the number as well as size of colonies was
dominantly increased in mammospheres, in comparison
with adherent cells (P<0.05, Fig .2F).
Fig.2
Colony and mammosphere formation abilities in MCF-7 and mammospheres. A. Parental cells cultured in 2D monolayer condition (magnification:
×4, scale bar: 100 µm), B-D. Serial mammospheres derived from the first generation of mammospheres (up to passage 3) showing progressive loss of cell
cohesion and formed loos spheroid (magnification: ×20, scale bar: 100 µm), E. Mammosphere forming efficacy (MFE) was calculated from the first to third
generation. Data are based on the mean percentages of the formed spheres quantity within a culture relative to the initial cell seeding number (mean ±
SD, n=3), F. The percentage of colonies increased in cells derived from mammospheres in compare to the adherent cells. (mean± SD, n=3), G. Evaluation
of migration and invasion abilities of the cells isolated from mammospheres and MCF-7 monolayer. Left panel shows crystal violet stained cells, passing
through the matrigel coated filter insert (as invasive cells) or uncoated filter insert (as migratory cells), and H. Quantification of migratory and invasive cells
in adherent vs. mammosphere cells. Mammospheres revealed higher migration and invasion rate than their parental cells. Bars indicated mean ± SD of
three independent experiments. **; P<0.01 and ***; P<0.001.
Mammospheres revealed increased ability of migration
and invasion
The migratory capability of mammospheres was
increased (about 1.7 fold). However, invasiveness
potential of the isolated cells from mammospheres was
significantly increased (about 3.35 fold), in comparison
with adherent cells (Fig .2G, H).
Patients’ demography
Seven female breast cancer patients (mean age of 48
± 8.04 years) were included in the study after signing
written informed consent. The clinicopathological data
of all patients has been shown in Table 1. All tumors
were classified as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).
Immunohistochemical study of ER and PR expressions
were performed on surgical resection tissue samples of
the tumors based on the standard methods. Three samples
were positive for ER, PR and HER2 and four patients
were undergoing neo-adjuvant therapy before sampling.
Expression of miR-200c-3p and miR-30c-5p in tumor/
normal tissues and mammospheres/adherent cells
Findings showed that miR-200c was decreased in
mammospheres, compared to parental MCF-7 cells
(P=0.0025, Fig .3A, Right). Furthermore, this expression
was down-regulated in breast cancers with metastatic
conditions (patients I, II and V, Fig .3A, Left). In
contrast, expression of miR-30c was overexpressed in
mammospheres, compared to adherent cells (P=0.0011),
and it was also up-regulated in three of patients with
grade II/III who received neo-adjuvant therapy (Fig .3A).
Fig.3
Expression level of miRNAs and genes. Expression levels of miR-200c and miR-30c as well as stemness and metastasis genes in human breast
cancer versus normal breast (the first group), and mammospheres versus MCF-7 adherent cells (the second group) were determined by quantitive real
time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). A. Expression of each miRNA was normalized to the levels of U6. Each cell line represents n=3 and tumor
represents n=1. B, C. Scatter plot of stemness and metastasis gene expression levels in breast cancer and normal breast tissues (control). The line
represents mean value, D, and E. Expression level of stemness and metastasis genes in mammospheres related to adherent cells (control), determined by
qRT-PCR. ß-Actin
was used as the housekeeping gene. Statistically significant difference was determined by paired t test with GraphPad Prism 6 software.
Bars indicated mean ± SEM.
Gene expression in tumor/normal tissues and
mammospheres/adherent cells
In the next step, expression level of stemness related
genes (OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, c-MYC and NANOG) and EMT
transcription factors (CDH1, CDH2, SNAIL1, TWIST1,
TWIST2 and ZEB1) were evaluated in all tumor samples and
mammospheres. Interestingly, expression level of OCT4, SOX2
and c-MYC was significantly increased in mammospheres
and three malignant breast tumors who were under neoadjuvant
therapy (patients I, II and V, Fig .3B, C). KLF4 was
down-regulated in both tumor samples and mammospheres.
Meanwhile, expression of NANOG was not changed in
mammospheres, but it was down-regulated in tumors (Fig .3B).
Among EMT-related genes, CDH2, SNAIL1, TWIST1/2 and
ZEB1 were also overexpressed in mammospheres. However,
tumors differentially expressed EMT related genes. Expression
of CDH2, SNIL1 and ZEB1 were up-regulated in three malignant
breast tumors (patients I, II and V), but the others were down-
regulated (Fig .3D, E). This demonstrates that signature of
self-renewal related gene expressions and some EMT genes in
malignant breast tumor of patients who underwent neo-adjuvant
therapy are similar to that of mammospheres, as BCSC model.Clinicopathological features of breast cancer patientsIDC; Invasive ductal carcinoma, ER; Estrogen receptor, PR; Progesterone receptor, and NA; Not available.Colony and mammosphere formation abilities in MCF-7 and mammospheres. A. Parental cells cultured in 2D monolayer condition (magnification:
×4, scale bar: 100 µm), B-D. Serial mammospheres derived from the first generation of mammospheres (up to passage 3) showing progressive loss of cell
cohesion and formed loos spheroid (magnification: ×20, scale bar: 100 µm), E. Mammosphere forming efficacy (MFE) was calculated from the first to third
generation. Data are based on the mean percentages of the formed spheres quantity within a culture relative to the initial cell seeding number (mean ±
SD, n=3), F. The percentage of colonies increased in cells derived from mammospheres in compare to the adherent cells. (mean± SD, n=3), G. Evaluation
of migration and invasion abilities of the cells isolated from mammospheres and MCF-7 monolayer. Left panel shows crystal violet stained cells, passing
through the matrigel coated filter insert (as invasive cells) or uncoated filter insert (as migratory cells), and H. Quantification of migratory and invasive cells
in adherent vs. mammosphere cells. Mammospheres revealed higher migration and invasion rate than their parental cells. Bars indicated mean ± SD of
three independent experiments. **; P<0.01 and ***; P<0.001.Expression level of miRNAs and genes. Expression levels of miR-200c and miR-30c as well as stemness and metastasis genes in human breast
cancer versus normal breast (the first group), and mammospheres versus MCF-7 adherent cells (the second group) were determined by quantitive real
time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). A. Expression of each miRNA was normalized to the levels of U6. Each cell line represents n=3 and tumor
represents n=1. B, C. Scatter plot of stemness and metastasis gene expression levels in breast cancer and normal breast tissues (control). The line
represents mean value, D, and E. Expression level of stemness and metastasis genes in mammospheres related to adherent cells (control), determined by
qRT-PCR. ß-Actin
was used as the housekeeping gene. Statistically significant difference was determined by paired t test with GraphPad Prism 6 software.
Bars indicated mean ± SEM.
Correlation of miR-200c and miR-30c with stemness
and EMT genes, and with overall survival of breast
invasive carcinoma
In next step, correlation of miR-200c and miR-30c with
stemness and metastasis gene expressions were assessed
in both mammospheres and tumor tissues. As shown in
Table 2, miR-200c was negatively correlated to SOX2
and KLF4 stemness genes, as well as SNAIL and TWIST1
EMT genes. However, expression of miR-30c strongly
displayed positive correlation with expression of most
stemness related gens “OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and NANOG”
and all EMT related genes. Moreover, miR-200c had
negative correlation with miR-30c (R=-0.8, P=0.04). All
aforementioned data indicates discriminatory potential
of miR-30c and miR-200c to target both EMT and self-
renewal pathways in BCSCs and malignant breast tumors.
Target genes and pathways analyses for miR-200c-3p
and miR-30c-5p
In order to recognize the potential miRNA efficacy
for breast cancer tracing, we predicted target genes of
miR-200c-3p and miR-30c-5p. They were listed to GO
annotation dataset for analysis of molecular function,
biological processes and cellular component by Enricher.
The result was sorted based on p-value. The lowest P value
is related to more specific term. GO analysis showed that
targeted genes of the differentially expressed miRNAs
were enriched in the molecular functions of E-box
binding, DNA binding, N-box binding, estrogen response
element binding, cadherin binding involved in cell-cell
adhesion and miRNA binding (Fig .4A). The biological
process of these genes included cell-cell adhesion, stem
cell proliferation process, cell cycle, angiogenesis and
EMT process (Fig .4B). In terms of cellular component,
most of the genes belong to the nucleolus and cytoplasmic
organelles (Fig .4C). Finally, KEGG pathway analysis also
showed similar results, in terms of the number of genes
involved in the adhesion junction, pathways in cancer,
MAPK signaling pathway, Wnt signaling pathway, PI3KAKT
signaling pathway, HIF-1 signaling pathway, TGF-
beta signaling pathway, as well as the signaling pathways
regulating pluripotency of stem cells, P53 signaling
pathway and cell cycle (Fig .4D). Additionally, using
PROGmiR (14), we were able to create a significant
diagnostic plot between the expression level of individual
miR-200c and miR-30c, and overall survival rate of the
patients. Actually, simultaneous deregulation of miR200c
and miR-30c could significantly reduce the survival
rate of breast invasive carcinoma cells via up-regulation
of OCT4, SOX2, c-MYC, SNAI1, ZEB1, CDH2 and down-
regulation of CDH1 (P=0.02, Fig .4E).
Fig.4
Gene ontology (GO), KEGG Pathway analysis using Enrichr and diagnostic plots creation with PROGmiR. A. Molecular function of stemness and
epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) regulated genes through the differentially expressed miRNAs, B. Biological process, C. Cellular component of
these genes. Only the top ten enriched GO terms are represented, D. KEGG pathways with their P values. The most significant pathways bear the smallest
P value listed from top to down, and E. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was associated with overall survival in patients’ breast invasive carcinoma cells.
The patients were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups according to median of each miRNA.
Spearman’s rho for stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) genes*; P<0.05, **; P<0.01, and ***; P<0.001.Gene ontology (GO), KEGG Pathway analysis using Enrichr and diagnostic plots creation with PROGmiR. A. Molecular function of stemness and
epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) regulated genes through the differentially expressed miRNAs, B. Biological process, C. Cellular component of
these genes. Only the top ten enriched GO terms are represented, D. KEGG pathways with their P values. The most significant pathways bear the smallest
P value listed from top to down, and E. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was associated with overall survival in patients’ breast invasive carcinoma cells.
The patients were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups according to median of each miRNA.
Discussion
This study evaluates expression of miRNAs targeting
both stemness and metastasis pathways in BCSCs.
To provide BCSC model, we used MCF-7 derived
mammospheres representing higher ability to sphere and
colony formations, compared to their parental cells, as
well as more invasion and migration capabilities. Our data
are in agreement with the previous studies (15, 16) that
observed MCF-7 derived mammospheres contain highest
CSCs population (17, 18) with CD44+/CD24-phenotype
(19, 20). Although, we did not evaluate tumorigenicity
of the mammospheres in vivo, but adequate studies have
determined tumorigenic ability of the cells originated
from MCF-7-mammospheres in less than 1000 cell per
injection (21).To specify miRNAs involved in both stemness and
metastasis regulation, systematic analysis was done
using the important genes contributed to both pathways.
The results implicated that has-miR-200c-3p and has-miR-
30c-5p could potentially regulate these pathways.
These miRNAs have been identified in different studies
to control major transcription factors of EMT and induce
metastasis (22, 23). It has also been reported that miR-200c
controls BCSC functions (24, 25). Meanwhile,
few studies implicated the role of miR-30c in BCSCs.
Interestingly, the mammospheres of this study had
similar expression pattern of miR-200c and miR-30c to
three patients (I, II and V); these patients were at grade
III/II and received neo-adjuvant therapy before sample
collection. They showed significant down-regulation
of miR-200c and up-regulation of miR-30c; however,
miR-200c and miR-30c expression were both down-
regulated in patients number six and four, among seven
patients. Thus, by considering this similarity, we figured
out the expression level of stemness related genes in
mammospheres as well as all tissue samples. Impressively,
expression of OCT4, SOX2 and c-MYC was up-regulated
in mammospheres and the same three previous patients (I,
II and IV). KLF4 expression, as another stemness related
gene, was diminished in mammospheres and most of the
tumor tissues, and NANOG was just significantly down-
regulated in patient samples, but not in mammospheres.
Moreover, transcription of miR-30c displayed positive
correlation with OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and NANOG
expressions. In addition, miR-200c had negative
correlation with expression of SOX2 and KLF4. Indeed,
miR-200c significantly exhibited negative correlation
with miR-30c. Similar to our data, miR-200c clusters
(miR-200c-141, miR-200b-200a-429 and miR-183-96-182)
have been reported to be down-regulated in isolated
BCSCs from eleven human breast cancers tissues, normal
mammary stem cells (26, 27) and carcinoma cells (28).
Furthermore, lower expression of miR-200c in patients
could be considered as a prognostic factor of breast cancer
metastasis, since its down-regulation associates with poor
survival rate. Up-regulation of this miRNA correlates
with inhibition of cell proliferation and regulates cancer
stem cell functions (29-31). In addition, miR-200c plays
an important role in inhibiting proliferation of breast
cancer cells by targeting the stemness related genes
such as NANOG, SOX2 and KLF4 that are located in
down-stream of miR-200c. It also inhibits tumor growth,
differentiation and self-replication of CSCs by targeting
TUBB3 and as a result it would be involved in restoring
sensitivity to microtubule-targeting drugs (32).In this study, miR-30c represents stronger correlation
with most of the stemness related genes. This miRNA has
previously been reported as a breast cancer prognostic
biomarker (33) and its expression is various among different
breast cancer subtypes. Higher miR-30c expression
level was reported in luminal-A tumors and low miR30c
expression level was observed in basal-like tumors
(34). In fact, few evidences are available representing
effect of miR-30c in regulation of stemness, with mainly
focus on EMT regulation. In one study, Yu et al. (35)
showed down-regulation of miR-30 family, exclusively
miR-30e, interferes with tumor beginning BCSCs (in
mammospheres as well as primary BCSCs acquired from
breast cancer patients) through up-regulation of ubiquitinconjugating
enzyme 9 (Ubc9) and integrin b3 (ITGB3).
This up-regulation results in reduced self-renewal and
anti-apoptotic features of BCSCs. Overexpression of
miR-30a considerably decreased the sphere creation
capability of MCF-7 cells, while deterrence of miR-30a
intensely enhanced the number of mammospheres in the
human breast cancer cell line, MCF-7(36).Consistent with other studies, the present study
demonstrated correlation of miR-200c and miR-30c with
expression of important EMT transcription factors (SNAI,
TWIST and ZEB1), in tumors and mammospheres. miR200c
not only is a malignancy biomarker, but also promote
metastasis in poor metastatic cells in vivo, presence of
which in serum of metastatic breast cancer patients can be
indicated for brain metastases (37). miR-200c maintains
cells in an epithelial state condition , via the regulation
of mesenchymal genes such as CDH2, SNAI1, SNAI2,
TWIST1, TWIST2 and ZEB1 (27). miR-30c contributes
to miRNA-cytoskeleton regulation network and its target
genes (i.e. VIM, TWF1, and IL-11) represent invasion,
EMT and chemo-resistance molecular mechanisms (35).
In treatment of breast cancer cells, miR-200c was also
reported to induce apoptosis (38) and sensitize the cells
to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and trastuzumab using
therapy. Down-regulation of this molecule is known as
marker for drug resistance in female genital tumors, such
as ovarian, cervical and breast cancers (39).We further employed bioinformatics tools to find out
the target genes and pathways of miR-200c and miR-30c
coordinating stemness and metastasis. Pathway analysis
indicated that these genes considerably associate with
"adherens junction pathway", "pathways involved in
cancer", "MAPK signaling pathway", "Wnt signaling
pathway", "PI3K-Akt signaling pathway", "regulating
pluripotency of stem cells", "P53 signaling pathway",
"TGFß signaling pathway" and "HIF-1 signaling".
All of these pathways have been reported to be related
to several cellular activities including proliferation,
migration, invasion, cell cycle, regulation of ER signaling
in cancer and CSCs. Adherens junction pathways are
also of the major mechanisms presented in stem cells,
where raising documents have illustrated that remodeling
of the cytoskeletal proteins could characterize stem cell
destiny (40). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
experiment comparing mammospheres as BCSCs model
with signature pattern of metastatic patients (pre or post
neo-adjuvant therapy). Because of similarity of miR-200c
and miR-30c expression levels in mammospheres
and some of our patients (I, II and V), we suggest that
combination of these miRNAs might predict outcome
of adjuvant therapy or metastasis in patients. Down-
regulation of miR-200c and up-regulation of miR-30c
suggest that metastatic breast tumors and mammospheres
are similar and they contribute to communal molecular
mechanisms regulating stem cell functions such as self-
renewal, proliferation, EMT and resistance to drug.
Conclusion
The present study demonstrates that down-regulation of
miR-200c and up-regulation of miR-30c promote BCSC
features toward malignant breast tumors, leading to their
resistance to neo-adjuvant therapy. These findings suggest
a signature to predict metastasis post chemotherapy in
breast cancer patients. However, further experiments are
required in this regard.
Table 1
Clinicopathological features of breast cancer patients
Patients
Age (Y)
Histological subtype
Ki-67
Grade
ER status
PR status
HER2 status
Metastasis
Neo-adjuvant
Case I
56
IDC
>10%
III
>80%
>80%
Negative
Yes
Yes
Case II
51
IDC
>30%
III
60%
20%
30%
Yes
Yes
Case III
45
IDC
NA
I
NA
NA
NA
No
Yes
Case IV
50
IDC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
No
NA
Case V
39
IDC
>50%
II
>80%
>80%
>30%
Yes
Yes
Case VI
58
IDC
NA
I
NA
NA
NA
No
No
Case VII
37
IDC
NA
I
NA
NA
NA
No
No
IDC; Invasive ductal carcinoma, ER; Estrogen receptor, PR; Progesterone receptor, and NA; Not available.
Table 2
Spearman’s rho for stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) genes
Authors: Yohei Shimono; Maider Zabala; Robert W Cho; Neethan Lobo; Piero Dalerba; Dalong Qian; Maximilian Diehn; Huiping Liu; Sarita P Panula; Eric Chiao; Frederick M Dirbas; George Somlo; Renee A Reijo Pera; Kaiqin Lao; Michael F Clarke Journal: Cell Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Muhammad Al-Hajj; Max S Wicha; Adalberto Benito-Hernandez; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-03-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dawn R Cochrane; Nicole S Spoelstra; Erin N Howe; Steven K Nordeen; Jennifer K Richer Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Erik Kudela; Marek Samec; Lenka Koklesova; Alena Liskova; Peter Kubatka; Erik Kozubik; Tomas Rokos; Terezia Pribulova; Eva Gabonova; Marek Smolar; Kamil Biringer Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-10-17 Impact factor: 5.923