Literature DB >> 3137615

Low doses of methylphenidate (Ritalin) may alter the delay-of-reinforcement gradient.

T Sagvolden1, K Slåtta, E Arntzen.   

Abstract

The present study investigated effects of methylphenidate on spatio-temporal distributions of responses generated by a fixed interval 60-s schedule of reinforcement. A response panel with 20 different response locations (holes) made it possible to distinguish effects of the drug on the procedurally-correct response (correct according to the contingencies) and effects on other topographically similar responses acting as functionally-adequate responses. Detailed flow charts show how the dynamics of responding changed with dose and segment of the fixed interval. The number of holes visited was increased after low and medium doses, but decreased after high doses. The spatial differences between responses in the initial and the final parts of the fixed interval gradually disappeared after 6 mg/kg or higher doses as the functionally-adequate responses moved to earlier segments of the fixed interval. Few results could, however, be described as response rate dependent. Distributions of responses around the correct hole illustrated differences between procedurally-correct and functionally-adequate classes. The number of holes included in the latter class changed by dose in an inverted U-shaped fashion. Perseverations and stereotyped responding increased with increasing dose. Most of the effects may be described as motor stimulatory. One way of explaining the stimulatory effect is in terms of a lengthened delay-of-reinforcement gradient. The rate-dependent effect of methylphenidate on the procedurally-correct class after some doses may have been due to the combined effects of a lengthened delay gradient increasing the response rates early in the interval and interference from perseverations having their most detrimental effects on the high rates late in the interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3137615     DOI: 10.1007/bf00181938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  21 in total

Review 1.  Rate-dependent effects of drugs: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D J Sanger; D E Blackman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Studies on behavior. II. The effects of pentobarbital, methamphetamine and scopolamine on performances in pigeons involving discriminations.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Development of complex, stereotyped behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. III. Responding maintained with response-produced electric shocks.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Variability of response location on fixed-ratio and fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J J Boren; J M Moerschbaecher; A A Whyte
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stereotyped and non-stereotyped behaviour in rats induced by various stimulant drugs.

Authors:  R Fog
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1969

Review 8.  Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  Ergeb Physiol       Date:  1968

9.  Stereotyped activities produced by amphetamine in several animal species and man.

Authors:  A Randrup; I Munkvad
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1967

10.  Differential effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine on stereotyped behavior in the rat.

Authors:  R Pechnick; D S Janowsky; L Judd
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of methylphenidate and morphine on delay-discount functions obtained within sessions.

Authors:  Raymond C Pitts; A Patrick McKinney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement delay.

Authors:  Wei-Min Ta; Raymond C Pitts; Christine E Hughes; Anthony P McLean; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Prefrontal cortical α2A-adrenoceptors and a possible primate model of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Chao-Lin Ma; Xuan Sun; Fei Luo; Bao-Ming Li
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  The effect of methylphenidate and rearing environment on behavioral inhibition in adult male rats.

Authors:  Jade C Hill; Pablo Covarrubias; Joel Terry; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Age-dependent and age-independent human memory persistence is enhanced by delayed posttraining methylphenidate administration.

Authors:  Iván Izquierdo; Lia R Bevilaqua; Janine I Rossato; Ramón H Lima; Jorge H Medina; Martín Cammarota
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Tactile-kinesthetic system of rats as an animal model for minimal brain dysfunction.

Authors:  J Elsner
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  A dopamine transport inhibitor with markedly low abuse liability suppresses cocaine self-administration in the rat.

Authors:  Antonio Ferragud; Clara Velázquez-Sánchez; Vicente Hernández-Rabaza; Amparo Nácher; Virginia Merino; Miguel Cardá; Juan Murga; Juan J Canales
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The effects of methylphenidate on resting-state striatal, thalamic and global functional connectivity in healthy adults.

Authors:  Olivia M Farr; Sheng Zhang; Sien Hu; David Matuskey; Osama Abdelghany; Robert T Malison; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.176

9.  What would Karl Popper say? Are current psychological theories of ADHD falsifiable?

Authors:  Katherine A Johnson; Jan R Wiersema; Jonna Kuntsi
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.759

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.