Literature DB >> 31375103

Disruption of chromatin organisation causes MEF2C gene overexpression in intellectual disability: a case report.

Kevin Yauy1, Anouck Schneider1, Bee Ling Ng2, Jean-Baptiste Gaillard1, Satish Sati3, Christine Coubes4, Constance Wells4, Magali Tournaire1, Thomas Guignard1, Pauline Bouret1, David Geneviève4, Jacques Puechberty4, Franck Pellestor1, Vincent Gatinois5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Balanced structural variants are mostly described in disease with gene disruption or subtle rearrangement at breakpoints. CASE
PRESENTATION: Here we report a patient with mild intellectual deficiency who carries a de novo balanced translocation t(3;5). Breakpoints were fully explored by microarray, Array Painting and Sanger sequencing. No gene disruption was found but the chromosome 5 breakpoint was localized 228-kb upstream of the MEF2C gene. The predicted Topologically Associated Domains analysis shows that it contains only the MEF2C gene and a long non-coding RNA LINC01226. RNA studies looking for MEF2C gene expression revealed an overexpression of MEF2C in the lymphoblastoid cell line of the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Pathogenicity of MEF2C overexpression is still unclear as only four patients with mild intellectual deficiency carrying 5q14.3 microduplications containing MEF2C are described in the literature. The microduplications in these individuals also contain other genes expressed in the brain. The patient presented the same phenotype as 5q14.3 microduplication patients. We report the first case of a balanced translocation leading to an overexpression of MEF2C similar to a functional duplication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intellectual disability (ID); MEF2C; Topologically associated domains (TAD)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31375103      PMCID: PMC6679470          DOI: 10.1186/s12920-019-0558-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genomics        ISSN: 1755-8794            Impact factor:   3.063


Background

Intellectual disability (ID) is a common disorder affecting up to 3% of the population [1]. Between 3 and 15% of patients with ID present numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities mainly unbalanced rearrangements [2]. Only 0.6% of subjects carry an apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement such as de novo reciprocal translocations [3]. The link between balanced rearrangements and ID can be explained by several mechanisms such as subtle rearrangement at the breakpoints [2, 4], perturbation of parental imprinting [5], disruption of one or two genes at the breakpoints leading to a loss of function of these genes [6], formation of a fusion gene with a novel function [7] or perturbation of gene expression (previously called positional effect) [8] and, more recently, changes in enhancers or DNA folding modifications within Topologically Associated Domains (TAD) [9, 10]. Separated by specific and robust boundaries, TADs restrict gene expression regulation inside them. Changes in enhancer - promoter interactions and breaking TAD boundaries have been reported to be pathogenic and “TADopathies” constitute an upcoming new category of human mendelian disease [11]. Recent studies showed that disruption in chromatin organization such as TADs can impact gene expression located distantly from breakpoint [12]. In this study, we report the molecular characterization of a de novo balanced reciprocal translocation t(3;5)(p26.3;q14.3) dn in a woman with ID. The breakpoint does not lead to the disruption of a gene but is localised 228-kb upstream of MEF2C gene on chromosome 5.

Case presentation

The proband is the first child of a healthy non-consanguineous couple. Medical family history showed a paternal niece with speech delay, a paternal half-sister with mild ID and a deceased paternal cousin with unspecified malformations. The girl was born by vaginal delivery after an uneventful pregnancy. Birth parameters were at mean (birth weight: 3.200 kg; birth length: 49 cm; and occipital frontal circumference (OFC) 34 cm). She had global developmental delay diagnosed since 2 years old. She sat at 10 months and learned to walk at 22 months. At 9 years old, she was diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and delayed speech. Psychometric evaluation estimated her developmental stage at 3 years for a chronological age of 9 years. She has no autistic or stereotypic features and a unique febrile seizure episode. Facial features include spread eyebrows, protruding ears with simplified helices and abnormal dermatoglyphics. She also had bilateral fifth finger clinodactyly as her father. Spectroscopic brain MRI, EEG, audition and visual explorations, abdominal ultrasound as well as skeletal X-rays were normal. Urine and blood metabolic screening were also normal. The chromosome analysis of the patient and her parents reported a de novo apparently balanced reciprocal translocation 46,XX,t(3;5)(p26.3;q14.3)dn. FISH analysis with chromosome 3 and 5 painting probes showed the unique involvement of chromosomes 3 and 5 in this rearrangement (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1

a GTG-banding chromosomes 3 and 5 and FISH nucleus assay. Black arrows show chromosome breakpoints on 3p26.3 and 5q14.3. A1. DAPI counterstain (blue). A2. Whole chromosome 3 painting probe (red). A3. Whole chromosome 5 painting probe (green). A4. Merging of A1, A2 and A3. b Predicted Hi C maps of der(5) from GM12878 cell line experiment (Liebermann -raw 10 kb) resolution. Black dashed line, yellow and grey bars represent predicted TAD. Blue genes & arrow are in chromosome 5 and green genes & arrow are in chromosome 3. CTCF sites are from ENCODE [13] data. c Expression of MEF2C gene in the patient’s lymphoblastoid cell lines (blue box) and three normal controls (green boxes), all assay were 3-times repeated, Y-axis shows the MEF2C RNA quantification normalized with the β-2 microglobulin housekeeping gene, ***: p < 0.001, One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD Test)

a GTG-banding chromosomes 3 and 5 and FISH nucleus assay. Black arrows show chromosome breakpoints on 3p26.3 and 5q14.3. A1. DAPI counterstain (blue). A2. Whole chromosome 3 painting probe (red). A3. Whole chromosome 5 painting probe (green). A4. Merging of A1, A2 and A3. b Predicted Hi C maps of der(5) from GM12878 cell line experiment (Liebermann -raw 10 kb) resolution. Black dashed line, yellow and grey bars represent predicted TAD. Blue genes & arrow are in chromosome 5 and green genes & arrow are in chromosome 3. CTCF sites are from ENCODE [13] data. c Expression of MEF2C gene in the patient’s lymphoblastoid cell lines (blue box) and three normal controls (green boxes), all assay were 3-times repeated, Y-axis shows the MEF2C RNA quantification normalized with the β-2 microglobulin housekeeping gene, ***: p < 0.001, One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD Test) We confirmed the balanced status of the translocation using a microarray analysis which was normal (100 kb-resolution). Array painting assays and long-range PCR strategy allowed us to perform a fine mapping of these breakpoints. Breakpoints are located at chr3:920,589 and chr5:88,347,198 with the presence of a micro-homology of 3 nucleotides (TGC). No gene was interrupted in these regions. The chromosome 5 breakpoint is localized 228-kb upstream from ATG of the initiator codon of the MEF2C gene (NM_001193347). Visualisation of the 3D conformation using the 3D Genome Browser in 7 different cell types allow us to identify reliable TAD boundaries suggesting that the MEF2C gene and the LINC01226 long non coding RNA (lncRNA) exist in the same TAD on chromosome 5 [14]. The TAD on chromosome 3 contains only CNTN6 and CETN3 genes (Fig. 1b, Additional file 1: Figure S1 and Additional file 2: Figure S2). RNA studies revealed an overexpression of MEF2C in the patient’s lymphoblastoid cell line compared to 3 controls (gender- and age- matched with the patient) in experiments repeated three times (Fig. 1c). All genomic locations are based on Human Genome Build 37 (hg19).

Discussion and conclusions

Fine mapping of breakpoints on chromosomes 3 and 5 revealed no gene interruption but a breakpoint on the chromosome 5 localized 228-kb upstream of MEF2C. The MEF2C gene causes the syndrome “Mental Retardation, Autosomal Dominant 20” (MIM # 613443) by haploinsufficiency [15]. Balanced translocation in this region have already been described in the literature. Such structural rearrangements on chromosome 5 create a single TAD encompassing MEF2C, resulting in decreased MEF2C expression [16]. The pathogenicity of MEF2C haploinsufficiency is no longer questioned to explain the phenotype of individuals with severe ID, stereotypic movement and autistic features. However, the pathogenicity of MEF2C overexpression is not clearly documented in the literature. Indeed, only 3 children and monochorionic diamniotic twins have been reported with a de novo 5q14.3 microduplication including MEF2C [17, 18] and MEF2C overexpression [19]. Interestingly, they share some pathological features such as global development delay with locomotor impairment (Table 1). Other genes included within these microduplications are also expressed in the brain. The major clinical sign described is a mild ID. Pathogenicity of MEF2C overexpression could be partly explained by its interaction on others genes known in human disease. Indeed, MEF2C overexpression could lead to MECP2 and CDKL5 upregulation [20]. MECP2 duplication in females is involved in psychiatric symptoms [21] and CDKL5 duplications are reported in women with heterogeneous symptoms, from learning difficulties to autistic behaviour, developmental delay, language impairment and hyperactivity [22].
Table 1

Genomic and clinical features of patients with MEF2C duplications compared to the present case

Genetic featuresClinical features
Size (Mb)StartEndInheritanceUltrasound findingsNeonatal feedingMicrocephalyGlobal developmental delayLocomotor delaySpeech delayAutistic traitEyeFacial featuresMRIOther
Present caseNo CNV (balanced translocation)de novo+++spread eyebrows protruding ears with a fairly simple helix
Le Muer et al. (2010) [18]4.586,142,51290,712,814de novoNANA++++NA
Novara F. et al. (2013) [17], patient 15.585,598,29591,182,469de novopoor sucking++++hypermetropiaeye asymmetry metopic prominence occipital asymmetryasymetric enlargement of lateral ventricles
Novara F. et al. (2013) [17], patient 25.287,356,36092,591,506de novoIUGRpoor sucking+++wide and flat nasal root smooth filtrum microretrognathia clinodactyly of the 4th and 1st toespersistant aseptic fever
Cesaretti C. et al. (2016) [19]4.686,129,66490,762,803de novo

Tw1: mild ventriculomegaly, short CC

Tw2: heart bi-ventricular hypertrophy, short CC

NANANANANANANANANA

+: present; −: absent; CC: corpus callosum; CNV: copy number variation; IUGR: intrauterine growth retardation; Mb: mega base; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; NA: not available or not relevant; Tw: twin

Genomic and clinical features of patients with MEF2C duplications compared to the present case Tw1: mild ventriculomegaly, short CC Tw2: heart bi-ventricular hypertrophy, short CC +: present; −: absent; CC: corpus callosum; CNV: copy number variation; IUGR: intrauterine growth retardation; Mb: mega base; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; NA: not available or not relevant; Tw: twin In this article, we report the study of a patient who has ID associated with speech delay. According to the breakpoints of the translocation t(3;5), the predicted TAD in chromosome 3 only contains CNTN6 and CETN3 gene. Few studies described patients with ID carrying microdeletions/microduplications containing CNTN6 [23]. Still these CNVs have also been reported in some phenotypically normal individuals in the databases of genomic variants. They are mostly inherited from healthy parents and no patient has been identified with a point mutation of CNTN6 (ClinGen Dosage Sensitivity Map Curation https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/dbvar/clingen/). To date CETN3 is not described in human disease. In chromosome 5, we identify a possible new TAD encompassing MEF2C and LINC01266. Our results of RNA quantification showed a clear significant overexpression of MEF2C in the patient’s lymphoblastoid cell line. Further FISH studies could be performed to completely confirm that MEF2C and LINC01266 are in the same TAD. LncRNAs are known to be involved in cis transcriptional regulation and chromosomal architecture [24]. According to GTEx, LINC01266 is also expressed in brain tissue [25]. No other major regulatory elements such as enhancers are predicted to be in this new TAD [26] . Localisation of the breakpoint is close to those of published cases, thus could not explain the upregulation (Additional file 1: Figure S1). As previously reported cases with balanced translocation around MEF2C all lead to a downregulation of the gene [16], our hypothesis is that LINC01266 could be involved in the upregulation of MEF2C. To summarize, we report a disruption of chromatin organisation caused by balanced translocation t(3;5) with chromosome 5 breakpoint upstream of the overexpressed MEF2C gene, probably responsible for the patient’s phenotype. This case report adds substantial evidence of a specific phenotype associated with the overexpression of MEF2C. Figure S1. Localisation of breakpoints on Hi C maps from GM12878 cell line experiment on chromosome 3 and chromosome 5 (Liebermann -raw 10 kb resolution). Grey arrow represents the breakpoint localisation. Dashed blue arrow represent other breakpoint described by Redin et al. (Redin et al. [16]) with MEF2C downregulation. Blue genes & arrow are in chromosome 5 and green genes & arrow are in chromosome 3. (PNG 355 kb) Figure S2. Chromosome 5 TAD boundaries across 4 different cell types (IMR90, NHEK, GM12878 and KBM7). Black dashed line, yellow and grey bars represent TADs. Grey arrow represents the breakpoint localisation. Black line represents TAD boundary. (PNG 257 kb) Materials and methods. (DOCX 15 kb)
  26 in total

1.  Molecular characterization and delineation of subtle deletions in de novo "balanced" chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  A Kumar; L A Becker; T W Depinet; J M Haren; C L Kurtz; N H Robin; S B Cassidy; D J Wolff; S Schwartz
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Neurodevelopmental and neurobehavioral characteristics in males and females with CDKL5 duplications.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Szafranski; Sailaja Golla; Weihong Jin; Ping Fang; Patricia Hixson; Reuben Matalon; Daniel Kinney; Hans-Georg Bock; William Craigen; Janice L Smith; Weimin Bi; Ankita Patel; Sau Wai Cheung; Carlos A Bacino; Paweł Stankiewicz
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Diagnostic yield of various genetic approaches in patients with unexplained developmental delay or mental retardation.

Authors:  Anita Rauch; Juliane Hoyer; Sabine Guth; Christiane Zweier; Cornelia Kraus; Christian Becker; Martin Zenker; Ulrike Hüffmeier; Christian Thiel; Franz Rüschendorf; Peter Nürnberg; André Reis; Udo Trautmann
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications.

Authors:  Martin Franke; Daniel M Ibrahim; Guillaume Andrey; Wibke Schwarzer; Verena Heinrich; Robert Schöpflin; Katerina Kraft; Rieke Kempfer; Ivana Jerković; Wing-Lee Chan; Malte Spielmann; Bernd Timmermann; Lars Wittler; Ingo Kurth; Paola Cambiaso; Orsetta Zuffardi; Gunnar Houge; Lindsay Lambie; Francesco Brancati; Ana Pombo; Martin Vingron; Francois Spitz; Stefan Mundlos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Loss-of-function mutations in euchromatin histone methyl transferase 1 (EHMT1) cause the 9q34 subtelomeric deletion syndrome.

Authors:  Tjitske Kleefstra; Han G Brunner; Jeanne Amiel; Astrid R Oudakker; Willy M Nillesen; Alex Magee; David Geneviève; Valérie Cormier-Daire; Hilde van Esch; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Ben C J Hamel; Erik A Sistermans; Bert B A de Vries; Hans van Bokhoven
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Further Clinical Delineation of the MEF2C Haploinsufficiency Syndrome: Report on New Cases and Literature Review of Severe Neurodevelopmental Disorders Presenting with Seizures, Absent Speech, and Involuntary Movements.

Authors:  Irena Vrečar; Josie Innes; Elizabeth A Jones; Helen Kingston; William Reardon; Bronwyn Kerr; Jill Clayton-Smith; Sofia Douzgou
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2017-04-12

7.  Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions.

Authors:  Darío G Lupiáñez; Katerina Kraft; Verena Heinrich; Peter Krawitz; Francesco Brancati; Eva Klopocki; Denise Horn; Hülya Kayserili; John M Opitz; Renata Laxova; Fernando Santos-Simarro; Brigitte Gilbert-Dussardier; Lars Wittler; Marina Borschiwer; Stefan A Haas; Marco Osterwalder; Martin Franke; Bernd Timmermann; Jochen Hecht; Malte Spielmann; Axel Visel; Stefan Mundlos
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  The genomic landscape of balanced cytogenetic abnormalities associated with human congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Claire Redin; Harrison Brand; Ryan L Collins; Tammy Kammin; Elyse Mitchell; Jennelle C Hodge; Carrie Hanscom; Vamsee Pillalamarri; Catarina M Seabra; Mary-Alice Abbott; Omar A Abdul-Rahman; Erika Aberg; Rhett Adley; Sofia L Alcaraz-Estrada; Fowzan S Alkuraya; Yu An; Mary-Anne Anderson; Caroline Antolik; Kwame Anyane-Yeboa; Joan F Atkin; Tina Bartell; Jonathan A Bernstein; Elizabeth Beyer; Ian Blumenthal; Ernie M H F Bongers; Eva H Brilstra; Chester W Brown; Hennie T Brüggenwirth; Bert Callewaert; Colby Chiang; Ken Corning; Helen Cox; Edwin Cuppen; Benjamin B Currall; Tom Cushing; Dezso David; Matthew A Deardorff; Annelies Dheedene; Marc D'Hooghe; Bert B A de Vries; Dawn L Earl; Heather L Ferguson; Heather Fisher; David R FitzPatrick; Pamela Gerrol; Daniela Giachino; Joseph T Glessner; Troy Gliem; Margo Grady; Brett H Graham; Cristin Griffis; Karen W Gripp; Andrea L Gropman; Andrea Hanson-Kahn; David J Harris; Mark A Hayden; Rosamund Hill; Ron Hochstenbach; Jodi D Hoffman; Robert J Hopkin; Monika W Hubshman; A Micheil Innes; Mira Irons; Melita Irving; Jessie C Jacobsen; Sandra Janssens; Tamison Jewett; John P Johnson; Marjolijn C Jongmans; Stephen G Kahler; David A Koolen; Jerome Korzelius; Peter M Kroisel; Yves Lacassie; William Lawless; Emmanuelle Lemyre; Kathleen Leppig; Alex V Levin; Haibo Li; Hong Li; Eric C Liao; Cynthia Lim; Edward J Lose; Diane Lucente; Michael J Macera; Poornima Manavalan; Giorgia Mandrile; Carlo L Marcelis; Lauren Margolin; Tamara Mason; Diane Masser-Frye; Michael W McClellan; Cinthya J Zepeda Mendoza; Björn Menten; Sjors Middelkamp; Liya R Mikami; Emily Moe; Shehla Mohammed; Tarja Mononen; Megan E Mortenson; Graciela Moya; Aggie W Nieuwint; Zehra Ordulu; Sandhya Parkash; Susan P Pauker; Shahrin Pereira; Danielle Perrin; Katy Phelan; Raul E Piña Aguilar; Pino J Poddighe; Giulia Pregno; Salmo Raskin; Linda Reis; William Rhead; Debra Rita; Ivo Renkens; Filip Roelens; Jayla Ruliera; Patrick Rump; Samantha L P Schilit; Ranad Shaheen; Rebecca Sparkes; Erica Spiegel; Blair Stevens; Matthew R Stone; Julia Tagoe; Joseph V Thakuria; Bregje W van Bon; Jiddeke van de Kamp; Ineke van Der Burgt; Ton van Essen; Conny M van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Markus J van Roosmalen; Sarah Vergult; Catharina M L Volker-Touw; Dorothy P Warburton; Matthew J Waterman; Susan Wiley; Anna Wilson; Maria de la Concepcion A Yerena-de Vega; Roberto T Zori; Brynn Levy; Han G Brunner; Nicole de Leeuw; Wigard P Kloosterman; Erik C Thorland; Cynthia C Morton; James F Gusella; Michael E Talkowski
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  The Encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE): data portal update.

Authors:  Carrie A Davis; Benjamin C Hitz; Cricket A Sloan; Esther T Chan; Jean M Davidson; Idan Gabdank; Jason A Hilton; Kriti Jain; Ulugbek K Baymuradov; Aditi K Narayanan; Kathrina C Onate; Keenan Graham; Stuart R Miyasato; Timothy R Dreszer; J Seth Strattan; Otto Jolanki; Forrest Y Tanaka; J Michael Cherry
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The non-coding genome in genetic brain disorders: new targets for therapy?

Authors:  Eva Medico-Salsench; Faidra Karkala; Kristina Lanko; Tahsin Stefan Barakat
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 8.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.