| Literature DB >> 31375103 |
Kevin Yauy1, Anouck Schneider1, Bee Ling Ng2, Jean-Baptiste Gaillard1, Satish Sati3, Christine Coubes4, Constance Wells4, Magali Tournaire1, Thomas Guignard1, Pauline Bouret1, David Geneviève4, Jacques Puechberty4, Franck Pellestor1, Vincent Gatinois5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Balanced structural variants are mostly described in disease with gene disruption or subtle rearrangement at breakpoints. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Intellectual disability (ID); MEF2C; Topologically associated domains (TAD)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31375103 PMCID: PMC6679470 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-019-0558-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genomics ISSN: 1755-8794 Impact factor: 3.063
Fig. 1a GTG-banding chromosomes 3 and 5 and FISH nucleus assay. Black arrows show chromosome breakpoints on 3p26.3 and 5q14.3. A1. DAPI counterstain (blue). A2. Whole chromosome 3 painting probe (red). A3. Whole chromosome 5 painting probe (green). A4. Merging of A1, A2 and A3. b Predicted Hi C maps of der(5) from GM12878 cell line experiment (Liebermann -raw 10 kb) resolution. Black dashed line, yellow and grey bars represent predicted TAD. Blue genes & arrow are in chromosome 5 and green genes & arrow are in chromosome 3. CTCF sites are from ENCODE [13] data. c Expression of MEF2C gene in the patient’s lymphoblastoid cell lines (blue box) and three normal controls (green boxes), all assay were 3-times repeated, Y-axis shows the MEF2C RNA quantification normalized with the β-2 microglobulin housekeeping gene, ***: p < 0.001, One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD Test)
Genomic and clinical features of patients with MEF2C duplications compared to the present case
| Genetic features | Clinical features | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size (Mb) | Start | End | Inheritance | Ultrasound findings | Neonatal feeding | Microcephaly | Global developmental delay | Locomotor delay | Speech delay | Autistic trait | Eye | Facial features | MRI | Other | |
| Present case | No CNV (balanced translocation) | de novo | – | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | spread eyebrows protruding ears with a fairly simple helix | – | |||
| Le Muer et al. (2010) [ | 4.5 | 86,142,512 | 90,712,814 | de novo | NA | NA | + | + | + | + | – | NA | – | ||
| Novara F. et al. (2013) [ | 5.5 | 85,598,295 | 91,182,469 | de novo | – | poor sucking | + | + | + | + | – | hypermetropia | eye asymmetry metopic prominence occipital asymmetry | asymetric enlargement of lateral ventricles | |
| Novara F. et al. (2013) [ | 5.2 | 87,356,360 | 92,591,506 | de novo | IUGR | poor sucking | + | + | + | – | – | – | wide and flat nasal root smooth filtrum microretrognathia clinodactyly of the 4th and 1st toes | – | persistant aseptic fever |
| Cesaretti C. et al. (2016) [ | 4.6 | 86,129,664 | 90,762,803 | de novo | Tw1: mild ventriculomegaly, short CC Tw2: heart bi-ventricular hypertrophy, short CC | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
+: present; −: absent; CC: corpus callosum; CNV: copy number variation; IUGR: intrauterine growth retardation; Mb: mega base; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; NA: not available or not relevant; Tw: twin