Literature DB >> 27706140

Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications.

Martin Franke1,2, Daniel M Ibrahim1,2,3, Guillaume Andrey1, Wibke Schwarzer4, Verena Heinrich2,5, Robert Schöpflin5, Katerina Kraft1,2, Rieke Kempfer1, Ivana Jerković1,2, Wing-Lee Chan2, Malte Spielmann1,2, Bernd Timmermann6, Lars Wittler7, Ingo Kurth8,9, Paola Cambiaso10, Orsetta Zuffardi11, Gunnar Houge12, Lindsay Lambie13, Francesco Brancati14,15, Ana Pombo3,16, Martin Vingron5, Francois Spitz4, Stefan Mundlos1,2,3,17.   

Abstract

Chromosome conformation capture methods have identified subchromosomal structures of higher-order chromatin interactions called topologically associated domains (TADs) that are separated from each other by boundary regions. By subdividing the genome into discrete regulatory units, TADs restrict the contacts that enhancers establish with their target genes. However, the mechanisms that underlie partitioning of the genome into TADs remain poorly understood. Here we show by chromosome conformation capture (capture Hi-C and 4C-seq methods) that genomic duplications in patient cells and genetically modified mice can result in the formation of new chromatin domains (neo-TADs) and that this process determines their molecular pathology. Duplications of non-coding DNA within the mouse Sox9 TAD (intra-TAD) that cause female to male sex reversal in humans, showed increased contact of the duplicated regions within the TAD, but no change in the overall TAD structure. In contrast, overlapping duplications that extended over the next boundary into the neighbouring TAD (inter-TAD), resulted in the formation of a new chromatin domain (neo-TAD) that was isolated from the rest of the genome. As a consequence of this insulation, inter-TAD duplications had no phenotypic effect. However, incorporation of the next flanking gene, Kcnj2, in the neo-TAD resulted in ectopic contacts of Kcnj2 with the duplicated part of the Sox9 regulatory region, consecutive misexpression of Kcnj2, and a limb malformation phenotype. Our findings provide evidence that TADs are genomic regulatory units with a high degree of internal stability that can be sculptured by structural genomic variations. This process is important for the interpretation of copy number variations, as these variations are routinely detected in diagnostic tests for genetic disease and cancer. This finding also has relevance in an evolutionary setting because copy-number differences are thought to have a crucial role in the evolution of genome complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27706140     DOI: 10.1038/nature19800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  34 in total

1.  Deletions, Inversions, Duplications: Engineering of Structural Variants using CRISPR/Cas in Mice.

Authors:  Katerina Kraft; Sinje Geuer; Anja J Will; Wing Lee Chan; Christina Paliou; Marina Borschiwer; Izabela Harabula; Lars Wittler; Martin Franke; Daniel M Ibrahim; Bjørt K Kragesteen; Malte Spielmann; Stefan Mundlos; Darío G Lupiáñez; Guillaume Andrey
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 2.  Genomic rearrangements and sporadic disease.

Authors:  James R Lupski
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner.

Authors:  Alexander Dobin; Carrie A Davis; Felix Schlesinger; Jorg Drenkow; Chris Zaleski; Sonali Jha; Philippe Batut; Mark Chaisson; Thomas R Gingeras
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Large-scale analysis of the regulatory architecture of the mouse genome with a transposon-associated sensor.

Authors:  Sandra Ruf; Orsolya Symmons; Veli Vural Uslu; Dirk Dolle; Chloé Hot; Laurence Ettwiller; François Spitz
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping.

Authors:  Suhas S P Rao; Miriam H Huntley; Neva C Durand; Elena K Stamenova; Ivan D Bochkov; James T Robinson; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Arina D Omer; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes.

Authors:  Adrian L Sanborn; Suhas S P Rao; Su-Chen Huang; Neva C Durand; Miriam H Huntley; Andrew I Jewett; Ivan D Bochkov; Dharmaraj Chinnappan; Ashok Cutkosky; Jian Li; Kristopher P Geeting; Andreas Gnirke; Alexandre Melnikov; Doug McKenna; Elena K Stamenova; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  An inwardly rectifying K+ channel is required for patterning.

Authors:  Giri Raj Dahal; Joel Rawson; Brandon Gassaway; Benjamin Kwok; Ying Tong; Louis J Ptácek; Emily Bates
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Autosomal sex reversal and campomelic dysplasia are caused by mutations in and around the SRY-related gene SOX9.

Authors:  T Wagner; J Wirth; J Meyer; B Zabel; M Held; J Zimmer; J Pasantes; F D Bricarelli; J Keutel; E Hustert; U Wolf; N Tommerup; W Schempp; G Scherer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-12-16       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The SOX9 upstream region prone to chromosomal aberrations causing campomelic dysplasia contains multiple cartilage enhancers.

Authors:  Baojin Yao; Qiuqing Wang; Chia-Feng Liu; Pallavi Bhattaram; Wei Li; Timothy J Mead; James F Crish; Véronique Lefebvre
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  222 in total

1.  19p13 microduplications encompassing NFIX are responsible for intellectual disability, short stature and small head circumference.

Authors:  Aurélien Trimouille; Nada Houcinat; Marie-Laure Vuillaume; Patricia Fergelot; Cécile Boucher; Jérôme Toutain; Cédric Le Caignec; Marie Vincent; Mathilde Nizon; Joris Andrieux; Clémence Vanlerberghe; Bruno Delobel; Bénédicte Duban; Sahar Mansour; Emma Baple; Colina McKeown; Gemma Poke; Kate Robertshaw; Eve Fifield; Antonella Fabretto; Vanna Pecile; Paolo Gasparini; Marco Carrozzi; Didier Lacombe; Benoît Arveiler; Caroline Rooryck; Sébastien Moutton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Models of polymer physics for the architecture of the cell nucleus.

Authors:  Andrea Esposito; Carlo Annunziatella; Simona Bianco; Andrea M Chiariello; Luca Fiorillo; Mario Nicodemi
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2018-12-19

3.  Preformed chromatin topology assists transcriptional robustness of Shh during limb development.

Authors:  Christina Paliou; Philine Guckelberger; Robert Schöpflin; Verena Heinrich; Andrea Esposito; Andrea M Chiariello; Simona Bianco; Carlo Annunziatella; Johannes Helmuth; Stefan Haas; Ivana Jerković; Norbert Brieske; Lars Wittler; Bernd Timmermann; Mario Nicodemi; Martin Vingron; Stefan Mundlos; Guillaume Andrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Understanding 3D genome organization by multidisciplinary methods.

Authors:  Ivana Jerkovic; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Identifying high-confidence capture Hi-C interactions using CHiCANE.

Authors:  Erle M Holgersen; Andrea Gillespie; Olivia C Leavy; Joseph S Baxter; Alisa Zvereva; Gareth Muirhead; Nichola Johnson; Orsolya Sipos; Nicola H Dryden; Laura R Broome; Yi Chen; Igor Kozin; Frank Dudbridge; Olivia Fletcher; Syed Haider
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 6.  Limb development: a paradigm of gene regulation.

Authors:  Florence Petit; Karen E Sears; Nadav Ahituv
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  SOX9 chromatin folding domains correlate with its real and putative distant cis-regulatory elements.

Authors:  Marta Smyk; Kadir Caner Akdemir; Paweł Stankiewicz
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.197

8.  Genome organization: Add a TAD of duplication.

Authors:  Eytan Zlotorynski
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Chromatin: Going a TAD out on a limb.

Authors:  Linda Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Chromatin Hyperacetylation Impacts Chromosome Folding by Forming a Nuclear Subcompartment.

Authors:  Celeste D Rosencrance; Haneen N Ammouri; Qi Yu; Tiffany Ge; Emily J Rendleman; Stacy A Marshall; Kyle P Eagen
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.