MOTIVATION: Genome-wide association studies have revealed that 88% of disease-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reside in noncoding regions. However, noncoding SNPs remain understudied, partly because they are challenging to prioritize for experimental validation. To address this deficiency, we developed the SNP effect matrix pipeline (SEMpl). RESULTS: SEMpl estimates transcription factor-binding affinity by observing differences in chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing signal intensity for SNPs within functional transcription factor-binding sites (TFBSs) genome-wide. By cataloging the effects of every possible mutation within the TFBS motif, SEMpl can predict the consequences of SNPs to transcription factor binding. This knowledge can be used to identify potential disease-causing regulatory loci. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SEMpl is available from https://github.com/Boyle-Lab/SEM_CPP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Genome-wide association studies have revealed that 88% of disease-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reside in noncoding regions. However, noncoding SNPs remain understudied, partly because they are challenging to prioritize for experimental validation. To address this deficiency, we developed the SNP effect matrix pipeline (SEMpl). RESULTS: SEMpl estimates transcription factor-binding affinity by observing differences in chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing signal intensity for SNPs within functional transcription factor-binding sites (TFBSs) genome-wide. By cataloging the effects of every possible mutation within the TFBS motif, SEMpl can predict the consequences of SNPs to transcription factor binding. This knowledge can be used to identify potential disease-causing regulatory loci. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SEMpl is available from https://github.com/Boyle-Lab/SEM_CPP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2001-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Ryan McDaniell; Bum-Kyu Lee; Lingyun Song; Zheng Liu; Alan P Boyle; Michael R Erdos; Laura J Scott; Mario A Morken; Katerina S Kucera; Anna Battenhouse; Damian Keefe; Francis S Collins; Huntington F Willard; Jason D Lieb; Terrence S Furey; Gregory E Crawford; Vishwanath R Iyer; Ewan Birney Journal: Science Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Husen M Umer; Marco Cavalli; Michal J Dabrowski; Klev Diamanti; Marcin Kruczyk; Gang Pan; Jan Komorowski; Claes Wadelius Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Kiran Musunuru; Alanna Strong; Maria Frank-Kamenetsky; Noemi E Lee; Tim Ahfeldt; Katherine V Sachs; Xiaoyu Li; Hui Li; Nicolas Kuperwasser; Vera M Ruda; James P Pirruccello; Brian Muchmore; Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson; Jennifer L Hall; Eric E Schadt; Carlos R Morales; Sissel Lund-Katz; Michael C Phillips; Jamie Wong; William Cantley; Timothy Racie; Kenechi G Ejebe; Marju Orho-Melander; Olle Melander; Victor Koteliansky; Kevin Fitzgerald; Ronald M Krauss; Chad A Cowan; Sekar Kathiresan; Daniel J Rader Journal: Nature Date: 2010-08-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Alan P Boyle; Eurie L Hong; Manoj Hariharan; Yong Cheng; Marc A Schaub; Maya Kasowski; Konrad J Karczewski; Julie Park; Benjamin C Hitz; Shuai Weng; J Michael Cherry; Michael Snyder Journal: Genome Res Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Victor G Levitsky; Ivan V Kulakovskiy; Nikita I Ershov; Dmitry Yu Oshchepkov; Vsevolod J Makeev; T C Hodgman; Tatyana I Merkulova Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: B N Prabhu; S H Kanchamreddy; A R Sharma; S K Bhat; P V Bhat; S P Kabekkodu; K Satyamoorthy; P S Rai Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 4.256