| Literature DB >> 31372883 |
Raquel Rodrigues Costa Mello1, Letícia Del-Penho Sinedino2, Joaquim Esquerdo Ferreira3, Sabrina Luzia Gregio de Sousa4, Marco Roberto Bourg de Mello3.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship among functional traits (age at first calving (AFC), calving interval (CI), reproductive efficiency (RE), total milk yield (TMY), and lactation period (LP)) in Red Sindhi breed through multivariate techniques. For this goal, performance data provided by the Brazilian Association of Zebu Breeders related to 560 Red Sindhi dairy cattle from 28 different herds in Brazil, born in the period from 1987 to 2011, were used. Principal component analysis with correlation matrix was used to find the relationship among AFC, CI, RE, TMY, and LP. It was found that for all functional traits, first 3 principal components explained more than 90% of the total variation. Clustering analysis was performed based on Tocher method, and results showed physiological relationships among functional traits. By cluster analysis, twelve different groups were generated from the pool of Sindhi herds analyzed, with a great homogeneity among females for the traits evaluated and only few females generating separate groups. Four hundred and twenty-nine females were clustered in one group, representing 76.60% of the genotypes. Total milk yield (TMY) showed 71.92% of the total variation, and age at first calving (AFC) contributed with 23.06% of the variation, being the two most important traits for the variability of the data set. In conclusion, the multivariate procedures were effective in generating the correlations among the functional traits, showing that CI is correlated with RE and all these functional traits are related with total milk yield.Entities:
Keywords: Milk yield; Multivariate analysis; Reproductive efficiency
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31372883 PMCID: PMC6969864 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-019-02009-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Anim Health Prod ISSN: 0049-4747 Impact factor: 1.559
Matrix of correlation among the standard variables used in the principal component analysis
| Variables | AFC | CI | RE | TMY | LP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 1.0000 | − 0.0335 | 0.0071 | 0.0005 | 0.0969 |
| CI | − 0.0335 | 1.0000 | − 0.8417 | 0.0402 | 0.0165 |
| RE | 0.0071 | − 0.8417 | 1.0000 | − 0.0450 | − 0.0041 |
| TMY | 0.0005 | 0.0402 | − 0.0450 | 1.0000 | 0.6903 |
| LP | 0.0969 | 0.0165 | − 0.0041 | 0.6903 | 1.0000 |
AFC, age at first calving; CI, calving interval; RE, reproductive efficiency; TMY, total milk yield; LP, lactation period
Principal components, eigenvalues, percentage of variance explained by the components, and accumulated percentage of variance explained by the components
| Principal components | Eigenvalues | %VPC | %VPC (accumulated) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | 1.8590 | 37.18 | 37.18 |
| PC2 | 1.6819 | 33.63 | 70.81 |
| PC3 | 0.9986 | 19.97 | 90.79 |
| PC4 | 0.3032 | 6.06 | 96.85 |
| PC5 | 0.1572 | 3.14 | 100.00 |
PC, principal components; eigenvalues, variances; %VPC, percentage of variance explained by the components
Correlations among the variables and the principal components (PC) estimated
| Correlations | CP1 | CP2 | CP3 | CP4 | CP5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPP | − 0.0135 | 0.1420 | 0.9883 | − 0.0522 | − 0.0111 |
| IDP | 0.9214 | − 0.2673 | 0.0158 | 0.0353 | − 0.2794 |
| ER | − 0.9201 | 0.2693 | − 0.0461 | 0.0205 | − 0.2798 |
| PTL | 0.3045 | 0.8598 | − 0.1394 | − 0.3851 | − 0.0184 |
| DL | 0.2653 | 0.8824 | − 0.0043 | 0.3880 | 0.0204 |
AFC, age at first calving; CI, calving interval; RE, reproductive efficiency; TMY, total milk yield; LP, lactation period
Means of the variables regarding the 12 groups formed by the Tocher method
| Groups | AFC (days) | CI (days) | RE (%) | TMY (kg) | LP (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1242.90 | 523.77 | 71.75 | 1439.23 | 214.84 |
| 2 | 1326.09 | 651.49 | 59.46 | 2809.75 | 319.03 |
| 3 | 1205.82 | 893.76 | 42.13 | 908.06 | 131.87 |
| 4 | 1198.40 | 409.66 | 89.40 | 576.80 | 76.70 |
| 5 | 1267.75 | 1556.68 | 24.24 | 2315.70 | 284.99 |
| 6 | 1451.38 | 404.40 | 90.52 | 2266.89 | 326.10 |
| 7 | 1265.00 | 478.00 | 76.39 | 6016.55 | 324.50 |
| 8 | 5375.50 | 489.00 | 74.95 | 1390.05 | 230.00 |
| 9 | 2122.50 | 427.57 | 85.51 | 3009.25 | 177.00 |
| 10 | 7370.00 | 539.38 | 67.67 | 1495.20 | 356.00 |
| 11 | 1119.00 | 2008.76 | 18.17 | 693.60 | 68.00 |
| 12 | 817.00 | 3919.50 | 12.09 | 2125.20 | 276.00 |
| Minimum | 405.00 | 366.00 | 12.08 | 45.60 | 15.00 |
| Maximum | 7370.00 | 3019.50 | 99.72 | 6329.60 | 365.00 |
AFC, age at first calving; CI, calving interval; RE, reproductive efficiency; TMY, total milk yield; LP, lactation period
Relative contribution of traits for the divergence among the 560 Red Sindhi dairy cattle by the method of Singh (1981)
| Variables | Variance ( | Value (%) |
|---|---|---|
| TMY | 248296894892.4695 | 71.9206 |
| AFC | 79618758911.0 | 23.0620 |
| CI | 15105771881.8236 | 4.3755 |
| LP | 2139860196.6864 | 0.6198 |
| RE | 7639396.6991 | 0.0221 |
TMY, total milk yield; AFC, age at first calving; CI, calving interval; LP, lactation period; RE, reprodutive efficiency
Fig. 1Scatter plot contrasting the principal components 1 (PC1), 2 (PC2), and 3 (PC3)