Literature DB >> 31372676

[Implementation of a fast track program : Challenges and solution approaches].

C van Beekum1, B Stoffels2, M von Websky2, J-P Ritz3, B Stinner4, S Post5, W Schwenk6, J C Kalff2, T O Vilz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For more than a decade the evolving concept of fast track surgery has been implemented, predominantly in colorectal surgery. The practice of fast track surgery has yielded excellent results concerning reduction of postoperative complications and hospital stay and has been shown to increase patient satisfaction; however, several studies have shown a sometimes alarmingly low rate of implementation of the individual fast track measures and the rate is a maximum of 44%.
OBJECTIVE: In this review, obstacles for implementation of fast track surgery are investigated. Advice is given on possible solutions to circumvent obstacles and facilitate successful establishment of multimodal recovery protocols in individual institutions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The current international literature is critically evaluated and discussed with a particular focus on prospective clinical trials and expert recommendations.
RESULTS: The reasons for a lack of adherence to fast track surgery principles have been shown to be multifactorial. Time-consuming expenditure, logistic difficulties, lack of support by colleagues as well as limitations in the healthcare system and patient-dependent factors appear to complicate implementation of fast track programs.
CONCLUSION: Successful implementation and long-term perpetuation can be achieved only by an interdisciplinary team with a low level hierarchy, continuous training and a positive feedback culture. An early inclusion and clarification of personnel and patients should be firmly integrated into the fast track concept. This results in a higher satisfaction of patients and personnel and subsequently stronger adherence to the fast track concept.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal Surgery; Compliance; Fast Track Surgery; Introduction; Obstacles; Perioperative medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31372676     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-019-1009-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  23 in total

1.  A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection.

Authors:  L Basse; D Hjort Jakobsen; P Billesbølle; M Werner; H Kehlet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Variation in care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: protocol adherence in 12 European hospitals.

Authors:  Ruben van Zelm; Ellen Coeckelberghs; Walter Sermeus; Anthony De Buck van Overstraeten; Arved Weimann; Deborah Seys; Massimiliano Panella; Kris Vanhaecht
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Douglas W Wilmore
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A qualitative study assessing the barriers to implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery.

Authors:  Alison Lyon; Michael J Solomon; James D Harrison
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Early versus traditional postoperative oral feeding in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Cheng-Le Zhuang; Xing-Zhao Ye; Chang-Jing Zhang; Qian-Tong Dong; Bi-Cheng Chen; Zhen Yu
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 6.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Implementation: From Planning to Success.

Authors:  Didier Roulin; Peter Najjar; Nicolas Demartines
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 1.878

7.  A multicentre qualitative study assessing implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program.

Authors:  D Martin; D Roulin; F Grass; V Addor; O Ljungqvist; N Demartines; M Hübner
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 7.324

8.  Consensus on Training and Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Delphi Study.

Authors:  Nader K Francis; Thomas Walker; Fiona Carter; Martin Hübner; Angela Balfour; Dorthe Hjort Jakobsen; Jennie Burch; Tracy Wasylak; Nicolas Demartines; Dileep N Lobo; Valerie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Enhanced Recovery Pathways Using an Implementation Framework: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexander B. Stone; Christina T. Yuan; Michael A. Rosen; Michael C. Grant; Lauren E. Benishek; Elizabeth Hanahan; Lisa H. Lubomski; Clifford Ko; Elizabeth C. Wick
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guideline and Implementation Strategy Based on the Knowledge-to-action Cycle.

Authors:  Robin S McLeod; Mary-Anne Aarts; Frances Chung; Cagla Eskicioglu; Shawn S Forbes; Lesley Gotlib Conn; Stuart McCluskey; Marg McKenzie; Beverly Morningstar; Ashley Nadler; Allan Okrainec; Emily A Pearsall; Jason Sawyer; Naveed Siddique; Trevor Wood
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Challenges of fast-track arthroplasty in Germany].

Authors:  U Nöth; L Rackwitz; M Clarius
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Intervention of WeChat Group Guidance in Rapid Rehabilitation after Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Yingying Lin; Ying Wei; Xiuying Chen; Yuping Wang; Longxin Zhang; Min Zhou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.682

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.