| Literature DB >> 34630998 |
Jing Wang1, Yingying Lin2, Ying Wei1, Xiuying Chen1, Yuping Wang1, Longxin Zhang1, Min Zhou1.
Abstract
Gynecological laparoscopic surgery is the current routine treatment. Although the injury is relatively small, it is still a traumatic operation and also increases the recovery speed of patients. This paper mainly explores the intervention effect of rapid rehabilitation after gynecological laparoscopic surgery by means of WeChat group guidance based on the information adoption model and UTAUT model. Gynecological patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and met the inclusion and exclusion conditions in a provincial maternal and child health hospital were selected as the research objects. The WeChat intervention group was compared with the nonintervention group, and the oral description score (VRS), comfort score (BCS), and 40-item recovery quality rating scale (QoR-40) were used as the scoring criteria. The results showed that the postoperative VRS and BCS scores in the WeChat intervention group were significantly lower than those in the nonintervention group. The total score of QoR-40 in both groups decreased compared with that before operation, reached the lowest on the first day after operation, and began to rise from the second day. This result is consistent with the patient's postoperative recovery process. After operation, the total score of the WeChat intervention group on days 1 and 2 was higher than that of the non-WeChat intervention group. By comparing the results of the patient's postoperative oral description score (VRS), comfort score (BCS), 40-item recovery quality score scale (QoR-40), etc., it can be shown that the overall recovery quality of the WeChat intervention group was better during these two days. In each section, the oral description score (VRS) and the 40-item recovery quality score scale (QoR-40) indicated that the pain sensation and emotional state scores of patients in the WeChat intervention group were higher than those in the nonintervention group, while the comfort score (BCS) was lower, indicating better comfort in the WeChat intervention group.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34630998 PMCID: PMC8494561 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8914997
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1UTAUT model.
Figure 2Wilson's information behavior model.
Figure 3Information behavior model of the WeChat group.
Figure 4Case collection.
Figure 5Comparison of VRS scores between different groups of patients.
Figure 6Comparison of BCS scores between different groups of patients.
Total score of QoR-40.
| Group | One month | Two months | Three months | Four months |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First group | W1 | 176.25 ± 2.71 | 178.95 ± 4.71 | 181.33 ± 3.24 | 187.99 ± 4.23 | 0.0002 |
| D1 | 168.32 ± 5.23 | 171.29 ± 3.76 | 174.23 ± 2.87 | 177.99 ± 6.78 | 0.0004 | |
|
| ||||||
| Second group | W2 | 175.36 ± 2.68 | 179.99 ± 2.23 | 184.29 ± 5.13 | 188.49 ± 5.21 | 0.0008 |
| D2 | 165.27 ± 3.44 | 169.22 ± 4.58 | 172.44 ± 5.32 | 176.66 ± 4.18 | 0.0003 | |
|
| ||||||
| Third group | W3 | 176.87 ± 4.98 | 181.22 ± 3.45 | 188.23 ± 4.48 | 193.34 ± 5.44 | 0.0006 |
| D3 | 165.25 ± 2.87 | 168.35 ± 2.55 | 172.34 ± 3.87 | 174.22 ± 3.55 | 0.0009 | |
|
| ||||||
| Fourth group | W4 | 176.35 ± 3.23 | 182.55 ± 2355 | 186.32 ± 4.55 | 192.35 ± 6.24 | 0.0001 |
| D4 | 168.26 ± 5.68 | 172.26 ± 4.58 | 178.46 ± 4.63 | 182.36 ± 6.56 | 0.0002 | |
Figure 7QoR-40 score trend of different groups.
Figure 8Postoperative QoR-40 scores.