Literature DB >> 31371889

Transverse Changes in Mandible Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Advancement.

Tushar Deshmukh1, N K Sahoo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: BSSRO is the most frequently performed surgical procedure for mandibular advancement. However, the effect of advancement on proximal segment is not clearly understood. AIM AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the radiographic transverse changes in mandible following BSSRO advancement and to compare the amount of transverse displacement of the proximal segment with the amount of surgical advancement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cases of skeletal class II deformity undergoing fixed orthodontic mechanotherapy and requiring mandibular advancement were selected for the study. Pre-operative (T0) PA ceph and OPG were used to measure the linear distances from right to left Co-Go, Go-Me, Go-Go, Co-Co, Rp-Rp and Co-Me points. The cases were operated for BSSRO mandibular advancement. Post-operative (T1) PA ceph and OPG were used to compare the changes in linear measurements. RESULT: There were six male and six female patients with an average age of 19.5 years. The average mandibular advancement was 6.5 mm. Post-operative radiographic changes in transverse measurements of Go-Me, Go-Go, Co-Co, Rp-Rp and Co-Me were statistical significant. The changes in Co-Go measurements were statistically not significant. We could not establish any correlation between mandibular advancement and amount of transverse changes.
CONCLUSION: Significant changes were noticed in transverse dimensions of mandible following BSSRO advancement in both PA ceph and OPG. The transverse changes had no clinical implication during the post-operative follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BSSRO; OPG; PA ceph; Transverse changes

Year:  2018        PMID: 31371889      PMCID: PMC6639501          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-018-1161-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  17 in total

1.  Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation.

Authors:  C Dolce; J E Van Sickels; R A Bays; J D Rugh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Management of severe mandibular retrognathia in the adult patient using traditional orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Myron R Tucker
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism.

Authors:  G DAL PONT
Journal:  J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv       Date:  1961-01

4.  Short-term changes of condylar position after sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement.

Authors:  M E Alder; S T Deahl; S R Matteson; J E Van Sickels; B D Tiner; J D Rugh
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1999-02

5.  Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.

Authors:  Tancan Uysal; Asli Baysal; Ahmet Yagci
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.

Authors:  E M Ongkosuwito; M M J Dieleman; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; P G H Mulder; J W van Neck
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2008-06-03

Review 7.  Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature.

Authors:  W H Schreuder; J Jansma; M W J Bierman; A Vissink
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Factors influencing condylar position after the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy fixed with bicortical screws.

Authors:  M D Harris; J E Van Sickels; M Alder
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 9.  Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy.

Authors:  Jonas P Becktor; Joe Rebellato; Karin B Becktor; Sten Isaksson; Phillip D Vickers; Eugene E Keller
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy: a comparison of lag screw fixation versus miniplates with monocortical screw technique.

Authors:  Jonas P Becktor; Joe Rebellato; Ola Sollenius; Poul Vedtofte; Sten Isaksson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.