Literature DB >> 11928096

Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy.

Jonas P Becktor1, Joe Rebellato, Karin B Becktor, Sten Isaksson, Phillip D Vickers, Eugene E Keller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the transverse displacement of the proximal segment and ramus rotation after a bilateral sagittal osteotomy (BSO) with rigid internal fixation (RIF) using bicortical LAG screws. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 37 patients (14 males and 23 females, age range of 14 to 55 years) who underwent a mandibular advancement with BSO and RIF. Posteroanterior and lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained 1 to 8 weeks before and 1 to 4 weeks after surgery. The transverse displacement and angulation of the proximal segments after surgery were measured on posteroanterior radiographs, using the best-fit method. The amount of mandibular advancement was compared with the amount of transverse displacement of the proximal segments.
RESULTS: In the 1 to 4-week postoperative period after a BSO, 36 of 37 subjects showed an increased transverse intergonion distance (5.6 mm) (P <.0001) and 35 of 37 patients showed an increased transverse interramus width (3.3 mm) (P <.0001). No correlation was found between mandibular advancement and transverse displacement of the proximal segment.
CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that transverse displacements of the proximal segments occur with BSO and RIF. The clinical impact on temporomandibular joint symptomatology or surgical relapse with such displacement was not assessed in the study. Future studies that address these issues may help to determine whether there is an association between proximal segment displacement and surgical relapse, temporomandibular dysfunction, or both. Copyright 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11928096     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2002.31227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  11 in total

Review 1.  Stability and predictability of orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  L 'Tanya J Bailey; Lucia H S Cevidanes; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Assessment of mandibular advancement surgery with 3D CBCT models superimposition.

Authors:  Alexandre Trindade Simões da Motta; Felipe de Assis Ribeiro Carvalho; Lúcia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Marco Antonio de Oliveira Almeida
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2010-01

3.  Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular advancement 1 year after surgery.

Authors:  Felipe de Assis Ribeiro Carvalho; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Alexandre Trindade Simões da Motta; Marco Antonio de Oliveira Almeida; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Long-term stability and condylar remodeling after mandibular advancement: A 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lauren Ehardt; Antonio Ruellas; Sean Edwards; Erika Benavides; Matthew Ames; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Three-dimensional regional displacements after mandibular advancement surgery: one year of follow-up.

Authors:  Alexandre T Motta; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Felipe A R Carvalho; Marco A O Almeida; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Transverse Changes in Mandible Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Advancement.

Authors:  Tushar Deshmukh; N K Sahoo
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 7.  A novel method for the management of proximal segment using computer assisted simulation surgery: correct condyle head positioning and better proximal segment placement.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Lee; Hong-Bum Sohn; Sung-Keun Kim; On-Yu Bae; Jang-Ha Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-08-04

Review 8.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Condylar response to large mandibular advancement combined with maxillary impaction and counterclockwise rotation: A computed tomographic study.

Authors:  Francisco Vale; Inês Francisco; Jessica Scherzberg; Adriana Guimarães; Francisco Caramelo; Luísa Maló
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-09-01

10.  The outcome of skeletofacial reconstruction with mandibular rotation for management of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity: A three-dimensional computer-assisted investigation.

Authors:  Ting-Yu Wu; Rafael Denadai; Hsiu-Hsia Lin; Cheng-Ting Ho; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.