Literature DB >> 18083423

Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy: a comparison of lag screw fixation versus miniplates with monocortical screw technique.

Jonas P Becktor1, Joe Rebellato, Ola Sollenius, Poul Vedtofte, Sten Isaksson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare lag screw fixation versus miniplates with monocortical screw technique with respect to the amount of transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy (BSO) for mandibular advancement surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective investigation of 82 patients who underwent a mandibular advancement with BSO and rigid internal fixation. Forty-five patients from Denmark and Sweden, the miniplate fixation group, received a rigid fixation consisting of miniplates with monocortical screws. Thirty-seven patients from the Mayo Clinic, the lag screw fixation group, received a rigid fixation with lag screw fixation of the mandible. The transverse displacement and angulation of the proximal segments were measured on posterior-anterior cephalometric radiographs, using the best-fit method.
RESULTS: After BSO, 44 of 45 patients in the miniplate fixation group showed an increased transverse intergonion distance with a mean of 5.0 mm and an increase transverse interramus width with a mean of 2.4 mm. Thirty-six of 37 patients in the lag screw fixation group had an increased intergonial width with a mean of 5.6 mm, and 35 of 37 patients showed an increased transverse interramus width with a mean of 3.3 mm. t tests showed that there were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to these 2 variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that transverse displacements of the proximal segments occur after BSO surgery with both miniplate or lag screw fixation technique. Attention and future studies should focus on possible complications that transverse displacement of the proximal segment may cause.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18083423     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  4 in total

1.  Three-dimensional regional displacements after mandibular advancement surgery: one year of follow-up.

Authors:  Alexandre T Motta; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Felipe A R Carvalho; Marco A O Almeida; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Counterclockwise maxillomandibular advancement surgery and disc repositioning: can condylar remodeling in the long-term follow-up be predicted?

Authors:  L R Gomes; L H Cevidanes; M R Gomes; A C Ruellas; D P Ryan; B Paniagua; L M Wolford; J R Gonçalves
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Transverse Changes in Mandible Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Advancement.

Authors:  Tushar Deshmukh; N K Sahoo
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 4.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.