Literature DB >> 31371820

Whole genome sequencing revealed new molecular characteristics in multidrug resistant staphylococci recovered from high frequency touched surfaces in London.

Rory Cave1, Raju Misra2, Jiazhen Chen3, Shiyong Wang3, Hermine V Mkrtchyan4.   

Abstract

The rise of antibiotic resistance (AMR) is one of the most important public health threats worldwide.Today, increasing attention is being paid to multidrug resistant staphylococci isolated from healthcare and non-healthcare environments as the treatment of these bacteria has become increasingly difficult. In this study, we compared staphylococci isolates recovered from high frequency touched surfaces from public areas in the community and hospitals in East and West London. 281 out of 600 (46.83%) staphylococci isolates recovered were multidrug resistant, of which 49 (8.17%) were mecA positive. There was significantly higher proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci (P = 0.0002) in East London (56.7%) compared to West London (49.96%). The most common species identified as multidrug resistant were S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus and S. hominis, whereas penicillin, fusidic acid and erythromycin were the most frequent antibiotics the isolates were resistant to. Whole genome sequenced of mecA positive isolates revealed that S. sciuri isolates carried the mecA1 gene, which has only 84.43% homology with mecA. In addition, other frequently identified resistance genes included blaZ, qacA/B and dfrC. We have also identified a diverse range of SCCmec types, many of which were untypable due to carrying a novel combination of ccr genes or multiple ccr complexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31371820      PMCID: PMC6675788          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45886-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Exemplified by S. aureus, staphylococci are known to cause nosocomial infections[1,2]. Due to resistance to multiple antibiotics, treatment of staphylococci infections has become increasingly difficult[3,4]. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) can spread in healthcare and community-associated areas by skin to skin and skin to contaminated surfaces contacts[5-7]. Previous studies have shown those non-healthcare associated environments, including recreational beaches, public buses, residential (student) and built-up areas harbour multidrug resistant S. aureus[5,8,9]. However, studies reporting similar findings for CoNS are fragmentary[5,7,8,10-13]. The development of antimicrobial resistance in staphylococci is due to selective pressure in the presence of antibiotics or due to stress factors in the environment[14]. Antibiotic resistance genes can be horizontally transferred to different strains and species via mobile elements such as plasmids, bacteriophages and transposons[15]. An example of this is the methicillin resistance gene mecA which is located on a mobile genetic element ‘staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec)’[16]. The mecA gene encodes the penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) that has a low binding affinity to all beta-lactam antibiotics[17]. The SCCmec is diverse in its genetic structure and to date 11 different SCCmec types have been characterised. SCCmec is determined by the combination of mec (A, B, C1, C2, D, E) and the chromosome cassette recombinase (ccr) (A1/B1, A2/B2, A3/B3, A4/B4, C1, A5/B3, A1/B6, A1/B3) complexes[18-20]. Different SCCmec types have evolved from two different genetic lineages, including hospital-associated and community-associated clones, however, currently, these different lineages can be found both in hospital and community environments[21]. However community-associated SCCmec types are generally smaller in size compared to their hospital associated counterparts[22]. In this study, we report the differences in the proportion of multidrug resistance in CoNS staphylococci and the carriage of the mecA gene in isolates recovered from high-frequency hand touched surfaces of inanimate objects. Whole genome sequenced (WGS) mecA positive isolates revealed new molecular characteristics of these isolates.

Results

Sample collection

A total of 600 staphylococci isolates were recovered from general public settings and hospital public areas in East (n = 224) and West London (n = 376). 182 of 600 isolates were recovered from general public settings and 418 from public areas in hospitals. Of these 97 staphylococci were recovered from public settings from East London; 85 from public areas in West London; 127 were recovered from a hospital in East London and 291 from a hospital in West London.

Identification of multidrug resistant staphylococci from high-frequency hand touched areas

281 multidrug resistant staphylococci isolates belonging to 11 species were identified. These included S. epidermidis (n = 75), S. haemolyticus (n = 61), S. hominis (n = 56) S. saprophyticus (n = 24), S. warneri (n = 16), S. capitas (n = 15), S. cohnii (n = 15), S. sciuri (n = 9), S. aureus (n = 5), S. pasteuri (n = 4) and S. equorum (n = 1). At species level S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus and S. capitis were prevalent in West London (n = 52; n = 40; n = 13), than in East London (n = 23; n = 21; n = 2), whereas S. aureus was prevalent in East London (n = 3), than in West London (n = 2). The number of isolates of S. hominis (n = 31), S. saprophyticus (n = 16), S. cohnii (n = 13) and S. pasteuri (n = 2) recovered from these two geographic areas were largely similar. In addition, S. warneri (n = 16) was recovered from West London, but not from East London, whereas S. sciuri (n = 9) and S. equorum (n = 1) were recovered from East London, but not from West London. In total, there were 10 species of staphylococci recovered from East London, compared to 9 species from West London.

The proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci recovered from different public areas

281 out of 600 (46.83%) were identified as multidrug resistant staphylococci as they showed resistance to two or more antibiotics[23]. It was found that there was significantly higher proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci (P = 0.0002) recovered from East London (56.7%) compared to those recovered from West London (49.96%) (Table 1). There was a slight significant difference (P = 0.0458) of the proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococcal isolates from public areas in the hospitals to general public settings (49.5% and 40.66% respectively) (Table 2).
Table 1

The proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci and mecA positive isolates compared with the number of isolates analysed in East and West London and the proportion of antibiotics they were resistant to compared with the number of multidrug resistant staphylococci from East and West London.

East LondonWest Londonstats to test
Total number of samples screened (N = 224)Total number of samples screened (N = 376)
N% of total number of samples screenedN% of total number of samples screened% DifferenceX2P value
Multidrug resistant staphylococci12756.7015440.9615.7413.9440.0002
mecA positive2410.71277.183.532.2460.1340
N% MR staphylococciN% of MR staphylococci% DifferenceX2P value
Oxacillin3829.923220.789.143.0970.0784
Gentamicin R1310.24138.441.790.2680.6049
Gentamicin I10.7900.000.791.2170.27
Muprcion R43.1585.192.050.7060.4006
Muprcion I2519.6942.6017.0921.879<0.0001
Amoxicillin3325.984529.223.240.3630.5468
Erythromycin R4737.019662.3425.3317.805<0.0001
Erythromycin I10.7953.252.462.0060.1567
Tetracycline3628.353824.683.670.4810.4878
Cefoxitin2922.833422.080.760.0220.8809
Cefepime R75.51106.490.980.1170.7321
Cefepime I21.5710.650.930.5570.4556
Fusidic acid9776.3810668.837.551.9710.1603
Penicillin10280.3112480.520.200.0020.9648
Chloramphenicol R10.79106.495.715.9920.0144
Chloramphenicol I10.7921.300.510.170.6997

All chi-squared test was performed with 1 degree of freedom. R = resistance; I = intermediate resistance; MR = multidrug resistant.

Table 2

The proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci and mecA positive isolates compared with the number of isolates analysed in general public settings and in hospitals; the proportion of antibiotics they were resistant to compared with the number of multidrug resistant staphylococci from general public settings and from hospitals.

General public settingsPublic areas in hospitalsChi-Square test
Total number of samples Screened (n = 182)Total number of samples Screened (n = 418)
n% of total number of samples screenedn% of total number of samples screened% DifferenceX2P value
Multidrug resistant staphylococci7440.6620749.528.863.9910.0458
mecA positive147.69337.890.200.0070.9332
Antibiotic resistanceN% MR StaphylococciN% MR staphylococci% DifferenceX2P value
Oxacillin2432.434622.2210.213.0970.0784
Gentamicin R1216.22146.769.455.790.0161
Gentamicin I00.0010.480.480.3550.5512
Mupirocin R22.70104.832.130.6030.603
Mupirocin I68.112311.113.000.5280.4674
Amoxicillin1824.326028.994.660.5910.4421
Erythromycin R3344.5911053.148.551.5890.2075
Erythromycin I11.3552.421.060.2970.5856
Tetracycline2736.494722.7113.785.3160.0211
Cefoxitin912.165426.0913.926.060.0138
Cefepime R79.46104.834.632.0490.1523
Cefepime I22.7010.482.222.5420.1109
Fusidic acid5472.9714971.980.990.0270.8706
Penicillin5675.6817082.136.451.4360.2308
Chloramphenicol R11.35104.833.481.7490.186
Chloramphenicol I00.0031.451.451.0810.2985

All chi-squared test was performed with 1 degree of freedom. R = resistance; I = intermediate resistance.

The proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci and mecA positive isolates compared with the number of isolates analysed in East and West London and the proportion of antibiotics they were resistant to compared with the number of multidrug resistant staphylococci from East and West London. All chi-squared test was performed with 1 degree of freedom. R = resistance; I = intermediate resistance; MR = multidrug resistant. The proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci and mecA positive isolates compared with the number of isolates analysed in general public settings and in hospitals; the proportion of antibiotics they were resistant to compared with the number of multidrug resistant staphylococci from general public settings and from hospitals. All chi-squared test was performed with 1 degree of freedom. R = resistance; I = intermediate resistance.

Antibiotic susceptibility of staphylococci isolates from high-frequency hand touched surfaces

All isolates were tested for their susceptibility using a panel of 11 antibiotics. Of the isolates that were shown to be multidrug resistant, 98 (34.88%) had resistance to two antibiotics; 87 (30.96%) to three antibiotics; 45 (16.01%) to four antibiotics; 15 (5.34%) to five antibiotics; 13 (4.63%) to six antibiotics; 12 (4.27%) to seven antibiotics; 9 (3.2%) to eight antibiotics and 2 (0.71%) to nine antibiotics (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Heatmap showing hierarchical clustering of isolates antibiotic resistance profiles in comparison with the species and area they were isolated from. Red tiles represent resistance, black tiles represent intermediate resistance and green represent sensitive patterns.

Heatmap showing hierarchical clustering of isolates antibiotic resistance profiles in comparison with the species and area they were isolated from. Red tiles represent resistance, black tiles represent intermediate resistance and green represent sensitive patterns. The most commonly found antibiotic that the staphylococci isolates were resistant to was penicillin 206 (80.42%); followed by fusidic acid 204 (72.4%) erythromycin 153 (54.45%), amoxicillin 78 (27.76%); tetracycline 74 (26.33%); oxacillin 70 (24.91%); cefoxitin 63 (22.42%); mupirocin 41 (14.59%); gentamycin 27 (9.61%); cefepime 20 (7.12%), and chloramphenicol 14 (4.98%) (Fig. 1). Hierarchical clustering within a heat map, showed no correlation between species and area they were isolated from, to their antibiotic resistance profile (Fig. 1). The Chi-square analyses demonstrated that there was a significantly higher proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci with erythromycin resistance (P =≤ 0.0001) and chloramphenicol resistance (P = 0.0143) from West London (62.34% and 6.49% respectively) compared to East London (37.01% and 0.79% respectively) (Table 1). The opposite was observed for mupirocin intermediate resistance with a significantly higher proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci (P =≤ 0.0001) found in East London (19.67%) compared to West London (2.60%). In the general public settings, there was a significantly higher proportion of isolates that had resistance to gentamycin (P = 0.00162) and tetracycline (P = 0.0211) (16.22% and 36.49% respectively) compared to public areas in hospitals (36.49% and 22.71% respectively) (Table 2). In contrast, a significantly higher proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci (P = 0.0143) found in public areas in hospitals (26.09%) were resistant to cefoxitin compared to general public settings (12.16%).

Detection of mecA gene

The mecA gene was identified by PCR in 49 (8.17%) of total isolates recovered. There was no significant difference in the proportion of the mecA gene determined in isolates recovered from East London (10.71%) compared to those recovered from West London (7.18%) (P = 0.1340), the general public settings (7.69%) and public areas in hospitals (7.18%) (P = 0.9332). Of the isolates that were mecA positive, 44 (62.86%) were oxacillin resistant, whereas 43 (68.25%) isolates were cefoxitin resistant. Three isolates, including one each of S. hominis, S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus that were mecA positive, were shown to be sensitive to oxacillin and 6 mecA positive isolates, all belonging to the S. sciuri species, were sensitive to cefoxitin.

Determination of MICs for oxacillin and cefoxitin

We have determined the MICs to oxacillin and cefoxitin for 49 isolates that carried the mecA gene (Table 3). Although all samples were mecA gene positive, only 44 CoNS isolates had MIC above the resistance breakpoints according to CSLI[24]. Five isolates, including S. hominis 372, 385, 387; S. epidermidis 465 and S. haemolyticus 361 that were mecA positive, were phenotypically sensitive to oxacillin. However, all five isolates were resistant to cefoxitin by zone diffusion assay. These isolates were recovered from public areas in hospitals. Neither CLSI nor BSAC recommend MIC standards for recording cefoxitin resistance[24,25]. Nevertheless, 42 out of 43 isolates in our study had MIC values of >1.5 μg/ml and were resistant to cefoxitin by a disc diffusion assay.
Table 3

The antibiotic resistance profile of 49 mecA positive isolates recovered from public areas in hospitals and general public settings.

Sample IDspeciesAreas in LondonOxaGenMupAmxErmTetFoxFepFuaPenChlOxa MIC (μg/ml)Fox MIC (μg/ml)
1S. haemolyticusELCRRSRSRRRSRS34
27S. sciuriELCRSSSSSSSRRS0.50.75
33S. sciuriELCRSSSSSSSRRS0.51
59S. sciuriELCRSSSSSSSRSS0.751
74S. sciuriELCRSSSSSSSRSS0.51
75S. sciuriELCRRISSSSSRSS0.751
93S. haemolyticusELCRRIRSSRISRS24
99S. haemolyticusELCRRSRSRRSSRS34
105S. haemolyticusELCRRSRSRRRRRS24
109S. sciuriELCRSSSSSSSRRS11
207S. hominisWLCRSSSRSRSRRS0.56
208S. hominisWLCRSSRRRRSRRS26
209S. hominisWLCRSSRRSRSRRS1.56
211S. cohniiWLCRSSSRSRRSRS44
321S. epidermidisELHRSSRRSRSRRS0.753
327S. epidermidisELHRISRSSRSRRS0.752
329S. epidermidisELHRSSRRRRSRRS0.758
343S. cohniiELHRSSRRRRSRRS1.512
349S. cohniiELHRSSRRSRSRRS1.512
355S. epidermidisELHRSSRRSRSRRS0.53
361S. haemolyticusELHSSSRSSRSRRS0.384
372S. hominisELHSSSSSSRSSRS0.256
373S. haemolyticusELHRSSRSSRSSRS18
385S. hominisELHSSSSSSRSSRS0.1251.5
386S. hominisELHRSSRRSRSRRS40.38
387S. hominisELHSSRRRSRSRRS0.06416
407S. epidermidisELHRSSRSSRSRRS0.54
435S. epidermidisWLHRRSRSSRRRRS16
436S. epidermidisWLHRSSRRRRSSRS1.58
445S. haemolyticusWLHRSIRRSRSSRR44
465S. epidermidisWLHSSSRRRRRRRR0.382
475S. epidermidisWLHRSRSRSRRRRS212
479S. hominisWLHRSSRRRRSRRS1.516
492S. haemolyticusWLHRSSSSSRSSRS0.758
506S. haemolyticusWLHRSSRRRRRSRS412
538S. haemolyticusWLHRSSRISRRRRR0.56
620S. hominisWLHRSSRSSRSSRS316
623S. hominisWLHRSSRSSRSSRS224
631S. epidermidisWLHRRSRRSRIRRS316
664S. epidermidisWLHRSSRSSRSSRS26
673S. epidermidisWLHRRSRRRRSRRS43
699S. warneriWLHRSSRSSRSSRS38
700S. warneriWLHRSSRRSRSSRS46
702S. warneriWLHRSSRRSRSSRS212
711S. epidermidisWLHRRSRRRRSSRR1224
712S. epidermidisWLHRRSRRRRSSRR1224
713S. epidermidisWLHRRSRRRRSSRR25612
715S. epidermidisWLHRSRRRRRSSRR25612
716S. epidermidisWLHRSRRRRRSSRR25612

R = resistant; I = intermediate resistance, S = sensitive; Oxa = oxacillin; Gen = gentamycin; Mup = mupirocin; Amx = amoxicillin; Erm = erythromycin; tet = tetracycline; Fox = cefoxitin; Fen = cefepime, Fua = fusidic acid; Pen = penicillin; Chl = chloramphenicol ELC = East London Community; WLC = West London Community; ELH = East London Hospital; WLH = West London hospital.

The antibiotic resistance profile of 49 mecA positive isolates recovered from public areas in hospitals and general public settings. R = resistant; I = intermediate resistance, S = sensitive; Oxa = oxacillin; Gen = gentamycin; Mup = mupirocin; Amx = amoxicillin; Erm = erythromycin; tet = tetracycline; Fox = cefoxitin; Fen = cefepime, Fua = fusidic acid; Pen = penicillin; Chl = chloramphenicol ELC = East London Community; WLC = West London Community; ELH = East London Hospital; WLH = West London hospital.

Prevalence of antibiotic genes from WGS data

The mecA gene was found in 43 out of 49 isolates that were whole genome sequenced. Of these none of S. sciuri isolates carried the mecA gene. Instead, they carried the mecA1 gene, which had only 84.43% homology to mecA gene. Apart from the mecA, 24 other antibiotic resistant genes were detected in 43 isolates (Fig. 2). BlaZ was the most commonly found resistance gene with 39 isolates (90.7%) followed by qacA/B with 22 (51.16%); dfrC with 18 (41.86%), norA with 17, ant(4′)-Ib with 17 (39.53%); AAC(6′)-Ie-APH(2”)-Ia with 15 (34.88%), fusB with 14 (32.56%), msrA with 13 (30.23%), ermC with 12 (27.91%), mphC with 9 (27.64%), tetK 8 (18.6%), mupA with 7 (16.28%), cat with 6 (13.95%), dfrG with 5 (11.63%), mgrA with 5 (9%), lnuA with 4 (9.30%), fusC 3 (6.98%), aph3-IIIa 3(6.98%) and, sat4A, vgaA, vatB which were all found in 1 isolate (2.33%).
Figure 2

Heatmap showing hierarchical clustering of isolates resistant gene profiles in comparison with the species and area they were isolated from. Red tiles indicate presence of antibiotic resistance genes; green tiles indicate absence of resistance gene.

Heatmap showing hierarchical clustering of isolates resistant gene profiles in comparison with the species and area they were isolated from. Red tiles indicate presence of antibiotic resistance genes; green tiles indicate absence of resistance gene. From these 43 isolates, 3(6.98%) had two antibiotic resistant genes, 3(6.98%) had three antibiotic resistant genes, 7 (16.28%) had four antibiotic resistant genes, 2 (4.65%) had five antibiotic resistant genes, 7 (16.28%) had six antibiotic resistant genes, 2 (4.65%) had seven antibiotic resistant genes, 3(6.98%) had eight antibiotic resistant genes, 6(13.95%) had nine antibiotic resistant genes and 5 (11.63%) had ten antibiotic resistant genes (Fig. 2). Hierarchical clustering within a heatmap of the mecA isolates resistance gene profile showed a clustering of 15 of the 17 S. epidermidis isolates as well as all S. warneri isolates and S. haemolyticus from East London community (Fig. 2). Interestingly, all S. epidermidis isolates carried the norA and dfrC genes. Barnard Exact test analysis showed that there was a significantly higher proportion of isolates with the dfrG gene (P = 0.0054) in East London (29.41%) compared to West London (0%) (Table 4). In addition, there was a significant higher proportion of isolates with the cat (P = 0.0419) and mup genes (P = 0.0238) in West London (23.08% and 26.92% respectfully) compared to East London (both 0%).
Table 4

The proportion of antibiotic resistance genes in isolates recovered from East and West London that possessed the mecA gene.

Antibiotic resistance genesEast LondonWest LondonBarnard Exact test
Total number of samples WGS (N = 17)Total number of isolate WGS (N = 26)
% of total number of samples% of total number of samplesDifferenceP value
NWGSNWGS
blaZ1588.242492.314.070.7224
tetK317.651119.231.580.9565
ant(4)-Ib529.411246.1516.740.3766
AAC(6)-Ie-APH(2)-Ia423.531142.3118.780.2291
aph3-IIIa211.7613.857.910.4623
lnuA317.6513.8513.80.1749
DfrG529.410029.410.0054
DfrC635.291246.1510.860.7546
fusB635.29830.774.520.6665
fusC211.7613.857.920.4623
qac952.9413502.940.9565
msrA317.651038.4620.810.2175
Sat4A0013.853.850.4872
mphC317.65519.231.580.9565
norA529.411246.1516.740.3766
mgrA423.5313.8519.680.0657
ermA00311.5411.540.2065
ermC423.53830.777.240.7224
mupA00726.9226.920.0238
cat00623.0823.080.0419
vgaA0013.853.850.4872
vgaB0027.697.690.3766
vatB0027.697.690.3766
The proportion of antibiotic resistance genes in isolates recovered from East and West London that possessed the mecA gene. For general public settings there was a significant higher proportion of aph2-III (P = 0.024), lnuA (P = 0.0116) and dfrG genes (P = 0.0031) (25%; 37.5% and 50% respectively) compared to public areas in hospitals (0%; 0% and 2.86% respectfully) (Table 5). The opposite was observed in isolates carrying the dfrC (P = 0.0238), and norA genes (P = 0.0238) with a significantly higher proportion found in public areas in hospitals (51.43% and 48.57% respectively) compared with general public settings (both 0%).
Table 5

The proportion of antibiotic resistant genes in isolates recovered from general public setting and public areas in hospitals that possessed the mecA gene.

Antibiotic resistance genesGeneral public settingsPublic areas in hospitalsBarnard Exact test
Total number of samples WGS (N = 8)Total number of isolate WGS (N = 35)
% of total number of samples% of total number of samplesDifferenceP value
NWGSNWGS
blaZ787.53291.433.931
tetK337.5514.2923.210.1810
ant(4)-Ib4501237.1412.860.8026
AAC(6')-Ie-APH(2)-Ia4501131.4318.570.4519
aph3-IIIa337.50037.50.0024
lnuA337.512.8634.640.0116
DfrG450182.8647.140.0031
DfrC001251.4351.430.0238
fusB625225.710.711.0000
fusC112.5205.716.790.8026
qacB225957.1432.140.1808
msrA450025.7124.290.2078
Sat4A112.57012.50.1664
mphC225172051.0000
norA00548.5748.570.0238
mgrA00314.2914.290.3686
ermA00128.578.570.5992
ermC00734.2934.290.1664
mupA00620200.1945
cat00117.1417.140.2668
vgaA0022.862.860.8160
vgaB0025.715.710.8026
vatB0025.715.710.8026
The proportion of antibiotic resistant genes in isolates recovered from general public setting and public areas in hospitals that possessed the mecA gene.

Determination of SCCmec types using WGS data

The SCCmec types were determined in 49 mecA positive isolates by mapping for genetic markers from whole genome sequencing data (Table 6). 17 (34.70%) of 49 isolates harboured previously reported SCCmec types. These included SCCmec type IV (n = 11) which was exclusively found in S. epidermidis isolates from public areas in hospitals; followed by SCCmec type V (n = 5) found in S. haemolyticus and S warneri and type VIII (n = 1) found in a S. hominis isolate. The SCCmec element was absent in the genomes of 6 (12.45%) isolates. 5 (10.20%) isolates harboured pseudo-SCCmec as they had mec complex but lacked the ccr complex and 3 (6.12%) isolates had an untypable mec complex. We could not assign SCCmec types for the remaining 21 (42.86%) isolates as they either had a novel combination of mec and ccr complexes (n = 5); or had multiple ccr complexes (n = 13) or novel ccr complexes (n = 2); or had an untypable mec complex (n = 1). A select few of these SCCmec structures is illustrated in Fig. 3.
Table 6

The diversity of SCCmec types of the 49 coagulase negative staphylococci isolates recovered from public areas from the community and general public areas in hospitals.

Sample noAreaSpeciesmec complexccr complexSCCmec type
1ELCS. haemolyticusC2CV
27ELCS. sciuriNo SCCmec element
33ELCS. sciuriNo SCCmec element
59ELCS. sciuriNo SCCmec element
74ELCS. sciuriNo SCCmec element
75ELCS. sciuriNo SCCmec element
93ELCS. haemolyticusUntypablePseudo
99ELCS. haemolyticusC2C A1/B1Untypable
105ELCS. haemolyticusC2CV
109ELCS. sciuriNo SCCmec element
207WLCS. hominisAPseudo
208WLCS. hominisAA1/B1, A4/B4Untypable
209WLCS. hominisAA1/B1, A4/B4Untypable
211WLCS. cohniiAA1/B3Untypable
321ELHS. epidermidisBA2/B2IV
327ELHS. epidermidisBA2/B2IV
329ELHS. epidermidisBA2/B2IV
343ELHS. cohniiAA1, A3/B3Untypable
349ELHS. cohniiAA1, A3/B3Untypable
355ELHS. epidermidisAC, A2/B2Untypable
361ELHS. haemolyticusC2Pseudo
372ELHS. hominisAA1/B1Untypable
373ELHS. haemolyticusUntypablePseudo
385ELHS. hominisAC, A1/B3Untypable
386ELHS. hominisAA1/B1Untypable
387ELHS. hominisC2A1/B1Untypable
407ELHS. epidermidisC2C, A2/B2Untypable
435WLHS. epidermidisAC, A2/B2Untypable
436WLHS. epidermidisBC, A3/B3/, A4/B4Untypable
445WLHS. haemolyticusAA2/B2IV
465WLHS. epidermidisBA1/B1Untypable
475WLHS. epidermidisAA2/B2IV
479WLHS. hominisAA4/B4VIII
492WLHS. haemolyticusUntypableC B4/A4Untypable
506WLHS. haemolyticusC2Pseudo
538WLHS. haemolyticusC2A4/B4Untypable
620WLHS. hominisAA1/B2Untypable
623WLHS. hominisBA1/B2Untypable
631WLHS. epidermidisBA2/B2IV
664WLHS. epidermidisBC A2/B2Untypable
673WLHS. epidermidisC2C A2/B2Untypable
699WLHS. warneriC2CV
700WLHS warneriC2CV
702WLHS warneriBCV
711WLHS. epidermidisBA2/B2IV
712WLHS. epidermidisBA2/B2IV
713WLHS. epidermidisBA2/B2IV
715WLHS. epidermidisBA2/B2IV
716WLHS. epidermidisBA2/B2IV

ELC = East London Community; WLC = West London Community, ELH = East London Hospital; WLH = West London Hospital.

Figure 3

A selection of SCCmec structures from staphylococci isolates recovered from high-frequency touched surfaces. (A) Isolate 1: S. haemolyticus SCCmec type V; (B) 475: S. epidermidis SCCmec type IV, (C) 479S. hominis SCCmec type VIII; (D) 99S. haemolyticus with mec C2 complex and ccrC, ccrA1/B1 complex; (E) 208S. hominis with a ccrA1/B1, ccrB4/A4 complex and (F) 211S. cohnii with a mec A complex and a ccrB3/A1 complex.

The diversity of SCCmec types of the 49 coagulase negative staphylococci isolates recovered from public areas from the community and general public areas in hospitals. ELC = East London Community; WLC = West London Community, ELH = East London Hospital; WLH = West London Hospital. A selection of SCCmec structures from staphylococci isolates recovered from high-frequency touched surfaces. (A) Isolate 1: S. haemolyticus SCCmec type V; (B) 475: S. epidermidis SCCmec type IV, (C) 479S. hominis SCCmec type VIII; (D) 99S. haemolyticus with mec C2 complex and ccrC, ccrA1/B1 complex; (E) 208S. hominis with a ccrA1/B1, ccrB4/A4 complex and (F) 211S. cohnii with a mec A complex and a ccrB3/A1 complex.

MLST typing for Staphylococcus epidermidis

MLST was determined for S. epidermidis isolates inferred from whole genome sequencing. 10 different sequence types (ST) were assigned to 17 S. epidermidis isolates (Table 7). ST2 was the most common (n = 5) sequence type, followed by ST66 (n = 3) and ST87 (n = 2). Two new sequence types were identified which have been assigned ST771 and ST779.
Table 7

MLST types of S. epidermidis isolates.

Sample NoAreaSequence type (ST)
321ELH66
327ELH66
329ELH66
355ELH558
407ELH59
435WLH188
436WLH771
465WLH54
475WLH5
631WLH87
664WLH779
673WLH87
711WLH2
712WLH2
713WLH2
715WLH2
716WLH2

ELH = East London Hospital; WLH = West London Hospital.

MLST types of S. epidermidis isolates. ELH = East London Hospital; WLH = West London Hospital.

Discussion

Antibiotic resistance is a global public health concern. Increasingly, antibiotic resistant bacteria are emerging from different ecological niches[5,7,8,10-12]. It has been documented that surfaces in hospitals and non-hospital areas can be potential reservoirs for antibiotic resistant staphylococci, however studies comparing general public areas and that of public areas in hospitals are fragmentary[8,26]. In this study we compare the levels of antibiotic resistant staphylococci in general public areas and that of public areas in hospitals in two different geographical areas in London and provide insights into the molecular characterisation of these isolates. 281 multidrug resistant staphylococci isolates belonging to 11 species were identified in this study. The most prevalent species were S. epidermidis (n = 74) and S. haemolyticus (n = 61). S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus have previously been reported as the most common CoNS isolated from surfaces in public settings and hospitals[26]. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that S. aureus (n = 5) was less prevalent on high-frequency hand touched surfaces. This may be due to the fact that S. aureus is more commonly carried in the nasal passages than on hands[27]. S. aureus is the most virulent species of staphylococci and the most common cause of infection in hospitalised patients[28]. However, S. epidermidis, S. hominis and S. haemolyticus are amongst the most frequent nosocomial pathogens responsible for minor skin infections to life-threatening diseases[1,29]. In addition, community associated CoNS have also been reported to cause infections[30]. Amongst the staphylococci isolates we detected increased susceptibilities toward penicillin (80.42%), fusidic acid (72.4%), and erythromycin (54.45%). Xu et al. reported increased susceptibilities toward penicillin, fusidic acid, erythromycin, and cefepime among staphylococci isolates recovered from surfaces of inanimate objects in London hotel rooms[7]. It has been reported that in primary care in England 48.8% of antibiotics prescribed were penicillin’s and 13.4% were macrolides, lincosamide and streptogramins[31]. The high usage of these antibiotics might relate to why it is common to see penicillin and erythromycin resistance from staphylococci isolates from general public settings. Areas in East and West London harboured high levels of antibiotic resistant staphylococci in proportion to the number of isolates that were examined. Significantly higher proportion (P = 0.0002) of multidrug resistant staphylococci was observed from East London (56.7%) compared to West London (49.96%). This may be due to East London having a higher population density (9.7 thousand per square km; 2017 estimate) compared to West London (8.9 thousand per square km; 2017 estimate)[32]. Previous studies have shown that there is a linkage in population density to the development of antibiotic resistant[33]. There was no difference in distribution of these multidrug resistant isolates at species level in two geographical areas at species level, apart from that S. warneri isolates were exclusively recovered from West London, but not from East London, whereas S. sciuri and S. equorum were recovered from East London only. In this study, we isolated high levels of multidrug resistant staphylococci in public areas in hospitals and general public settings. Statistically, there was a significantly higher proportion (P = 0.0458) of multidrug resistant staphylococci in public areas in hospitals (49.5%) compared to that in general public settings (40.66%) which was expected due to the increase use of antibiotics in hospitals than in the community[34]. However, the proportions of multidrug resistant bacteria isolated from general public settings in our study (46.83%) were less than that reported in similar studies from a university campus in Thailand (61%) and hotel rooms in London (86%)[7,11]. In this study isolates were recovered from areas in hospitals that were accessible to the general public and not just to the hospital staff or patients. These areas included reception areas, public washrooms, corridors and lifts. The high levels of multidrug resistant staphylococci recovered from these areas in hospitals suggest a cross-contamination between community-associated and hospital-associated staphylococci. We did not detect a significant difference in the carriage of mecA gene in isolates recovered from East (10.71%) and West London (7.18%) and from general public settings (7.69%) and public areas in a hospital (7.18%). The prevalence of the mecA gene in general public settings was less than that reported from the university campus in Thailand (20.5%) and hotel rooms in London (29.6%)[7,11]. In this study, the prevalence of the mecA gene in hospitals (7.89%) was also less than it was reported from a hospital in Thailand (70.1%). For the latter it was expected because of the high levels of antibiotic exposure as the isolates were recovered from the hospital wards in Thailand[26]. Interestingly, we found that the 6 S. sciuri isolates that were resistant to oxacillin and were mecA positive (determined by PCR), carried a homolog of mecA designated as mecA1 (Table 3). mecA1 is considered to be the ancestry gene of mecA which historically did not have resistance towards oxacillin[35]. A recent study has shown that S. sciuri has developed oxacillin resistance using a variety of mechanisms from diversification of the non-binding domain of native PBPs, change in the mecA promoter, acquiring the SCCmec element and the adaptation of the bacterial genetic background[36]. In this study we found that there was a large diversity of antibiotic resistant genes encoding resistance to different antibiotics. Of these genes, we found blaZ (90.7%) and qacA/B (51.16%) were the most common. Previous studies on the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes in CoNS from clinical and environmental sources are limited but some reports have shown that blaZ is of one the most common antibiotic resistance genes found in staphylococci[37,38]. QacA/B has been previously reported to high prevalence from University campus in Thailand (60.4%). This gene has an important role for the survival of the bacteria within the environment as they encode multidrug efflux pump which has shown cross resistance-towards antiseptic and disinfectant compounds used to reduce bacterial contamination from surfaces[39]. In addition, we also found that S. epidermidis isolates were quite similar in their antibiotic resistance profile from our hierarchy clustering analysis even if they came from different areas. This may be due to that all isolates had the fluoroquinolone efflux pump gene norA and trimethoprim resistance dihydrofolate reductase gene dfrC[40,41]. It is possible that these genes are essential for S. epidermidis survival, especially as norA like qacA/B has shown reduce susceptibility to antiseptic and disinfectant substances. SCCmec was detected in 36 out of the 49 isolates that were whole genome sequenced, however SCCmec types were assigned only to 17 isolates. The most common type was SCCmec type IV (n = 11), followed by SCCmec type V (n = 5) and SCCmec type VIII (n = 1). These results are consistent with previously reported studies of clinical and environmental isolates[11]. In our study SCCmec type IV was exclusively found in S. epidermidis isolates. This is in keeping with others reporting a high association between SCCmec type IV and S. epidermidis[42]. SCCmec type V was associated with S. haemolyticus and S. warneri isolates but is mainly reported to be associated with S. haemolyticus in clinical isolates[43]. The remaining SCCmec types were untypeable as they harboured a novel ccr complex or multiple ccr complexes. Multiple ccr complexes have previously been described in clinical and community associated isolates[42] but to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of such SCCmec types determined in isolates recovered from the general public environments. It has been reported that multiple ccr complexes have shown to produce more stable mecA mRNA transcription compared to single elements as well as having a better cell wall integrity[42]. This suggests that isolates with multiple ccr complexes may have increased susceptibilities to oxacillin or cefoxitin, however not always correlate with their phenotypic data. It is possible that this adaptation helps the bacteria to survive longer periods under persistent antibiotic pressure. MLST data showed a wide range of genetic variability among S. epidermidis isolates. ST2 was the most common sequence type identified which was consistent with previous reports studying multidrug resistant clinical isolates[24,25,44]. Although in our study isolates that harboured ST2 sequence types were isolated from public areas in hospitals, others reported that this sequence type was widely disseminated in clinical isolates recovered from patients[24,44,45]. In addition, in this study two new sequence types designated as ST771 and ST779 were identified in isolates recovered from a hospital in West London. In conclusion, general public areas and common public areas in hospitals in London can be reservoirs for multidrug resistant staphylococci. These multidrug resistant bacteria can be found at high levels on high-frequency touched surfaces. A diverse range of SCCmec types were determined from general public settings and public areas in hospitals of which many were untypeable due to having either a novel ccr or an extra ccr complex. These SCCmec structures have not been previously reported in isolates recovered from environmental surfaces in general public settings. Additional comparative genomics analyses are being conducted to decipher the genetic features of multidrug resistant staphylococci recovered from general public settings and to further our understanding of the origin and evaluation of these isolates.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and screening of staphylococcal isolates

Samples were recovered from high-frequency hand touched surfaces of inanimate objects (door handles, stair handrails, toilet flushers, toilet seats, taps, lift buttons, chair armrests) from four locations in general public settings, two locations from East London and two locations from West London. Public settings included shopping centres (concourses, escalators lifts, public washrooms) and train stations (entry gates, public washrooms, escalators). Isolates were also recovered from a hospital setting where the general public had easy access, without being a patient or visiting a patient (reception area, public washrooms, corridors, lifts) (Table S1). From each location, 50 areas were randomly sampled using COPAN dry swabs (Copan Diagnostics Inc., USA). In total 600 isolates were screened of which 224 were from East London and 376 from West London. 182 of the isolates were from the community area and 418 from Hospital area. 97 from East London community area and 85 from West London community. 224 from East London hospital and 376 from West London hospital. All samples were inoculated onto mannitol salt agar (MSA, Oxoid Basingstoke, UK) within 1–3 hours of recovery and incubated aerobically for 24–72 hours at 37 °C. The colonies were then screened for potential staphylococci characteristics, including performing catalase and coagulase tests. Prolex™ staph latex kits (ProLab Diagnostics, Neston, UK) was used to distinguish S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing

The samples were tested for their susceptibility against a panel of 11 antibiotics by using a standard disc diffusion method[46]. The antibiotics tested were the following: oxacillin (1 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), mupirocin (20 µg), amoxicillin (10 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), tetracycline (10 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), fusidic acid (10 µg), penicillin (1 unit) and chloramphenicol (30 µg) (Mast Group, Merseyside, UK). Antibiotic profiles of each isolate ware determined according the recommendation of the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC)[46,47]. In addition, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for oxacillin and cefoxitin were determined using E-tests (Biomerieux, Basingstoke, UK)[46,47].

Identification of multidrug-resistance staphylococci recovered from high-frequency hand touch areas

Potential staphylococci isolates were initially identified by conventional methods, including gram staining catalase and coagulase tests. All the isolates were identified at species level using Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass-spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF-MS, Microflex LT, Bruker Daltonics, Coventry, UK) in a positive linear mode (2000–20,000 m/z range). Samples were prepared as described previously[7]. MALDI-TOF Biotyper 3.0 software (Bruker Daltonics, Coventry, UK) was used to analyse the spectra and to identify the bacterial species. Bacterial test standard Escherichia coli DH5α (Bruker Daltonics, Coventry, UK) was used for calibration and as a standard for quality control. The detection of the mecA gene was carried out by PCR for all staphylococci isolates. Freshly grown samples were suspended into 40 µl of sterile distilled water and boiled at 100 °C then cooled on ice for 5 minutes. The samples were then centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 1 minute and the supernatant was used for the PCR providing the DNA template. The PCR was performed using Met1 and Met2 primers as described previously[48]. PCR reactions were performed in a 20 µl volume for each sample which consists of 10 µl of Phusion Master Mix;1 µl of met1, 1 µl of met2, 6 µl of sterile distilled water and 1 µl of isolates DNA template. The PCR condition for this reaction was 94 °C for 5 minutes followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 seconds, annealing at 52 °C for 30 seconds and extension at 72 °C for 1 minute with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes.

WGS and bioinformatic analyses

Forty-nine staphylococci mecA positive isolates were whole genome sequenced using Illumina HiSeq platform. Thirteen out of 49 isolates were whole genome sequenced by MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK) and the remining isolates were sequenced at Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Genomic DNA was extracted using TIANamp Bacteria DNA kit (Tiangen, China) and paired-end sequencing libraries were constructed using Nextera XT DNA Sample Preparation kits or TruSeq DNA HT Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, USA) following manufacturer’s instruction. The short read sequencing data were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive, under the study PRJEB30498. The accession numbers for individual samples are included in Supplementary data (Table S2). The raw reads quality was assessed using FASTQC and trimmed using trimmomatic (Version 0.35), default settings, specifying a phred cutoff of Q20[49,50]. The trimmed reads were de novo assembly by SPAdes 3.11 and annotated by Prokka 1.12[51,52]. The species of these isolates were confirmed by 16sRNA sequencing[53]. 16S rRNA sequences were extracted from assembled genomes using the barrnap software (https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap) and searched against a database of known 16S ribosomal RNA sequences using NCBI BLAST tool with a cutoff for species identity of 95% similarity[54].Antibiotic resistance genes were detected using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) server[55]. The diversity of SCCmec types were determined by searching against a database of known SCCmec molecular markers with NCBI BLAST with a cutoff e-value of 1e-5[54,56]. S. epidermidis isolates were analysed by Multi locus sequence typing (MLST) and the sequence types for each isolate were assigned using MLST2.0 online service (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MLST/)[57].

Statistical analysis

A Chi-squared test was performed to identify any significant difference in the proportion of multidrug resistant staphylococci and mecA gene in isolates recovered from general public settings and public areas in hospitals in East and West London[58]. A P value of >0.05 was considered to be significant. Barnard Exact test was performed to identify significance in the proportion of antibiotic resitance genes form WGS sample recovered from general public settings and public areas in hospitals in East and West London[59]. A two side P value of >0.05 was considered to be significant. Hirachy clustering of a heatmap for resistance gene phentype and genotype were created using the R package ‘Heatmap.plus’ (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/heatmap.plus/index.html).
  54 in total

Review 1.  Coagulase-negative staphylococci: role as pathogens.

Authors:  J Huebner; D A Goldmann
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 2.  Secrets of success of a human pathogen: molecular evolution of pandemic clones of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Duarte C Oliveira; Alexander Tomasz; Hermínia de Lencastre
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type XI carrying highly divergent mecA, mecI, mecR1, blaZ, and ccr genes in human clinical isolates of clonal complex 130 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Anna C Shore; Emily C Deasy; Peter Slickers; Grainne Brennan; Brian O'Connell; Stefan Monecke; Ralf Ehricht; David C Coleman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Bacterial stress responses as determinants of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Keith Poole
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Detection and characterization of methicillin-resistant and susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci in milk from cows with clinical mastitis in Tunisia.

Authors:  Amira Klibi; Abderrazek Maaroufi; Carmen Torres; Ahlem Jouini
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 5.283

6.  Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. isolated from US West Coast public marine beaches.

Authors:  Olusegun O Soge; John S Meschke; David B No; Marilyn C Roberts
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Applying definitions for multidrug resistance, extensive drug resistance and pandrug resistance to clinically significant livestock and companion animal bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Michael T Sweeney; Brian V Lubbers; Stefan Schwarz; Jeffrey L Watts
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Local variants of Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in sporadic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci: evidence of horizontal gene transfer?

Authors:  Anne-Merethe Hanssen; Gry Kjeldsen; Johanna U Ericson Sollid
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparison of Multi-Drug Resistant Environmental Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Recreational Beaches and High Touch Surfaces in Built Environments.

Authors:  Marilyn C Roberts; Olusegun O Soge; David No
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Contamination of public buses with MRSA in Lisbon, Portugal: a possible transmission route of major MRSA clones within the community.

Authors:  Teresa Conceição; Fernanda Diamantino; Céline Coelho; Hermínia de Lencastre; Marta Aires-de-Sousa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Infections, Antibiotic Resistance, and Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus haemolyticus.

Authors:  Hala O Eltwisy; Howida Omar Twisy; Mahmoud Hr Hafez; Ibrahim M Sayed; Mohamed A El-Mokhtar
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  One year cross-sectional study in adult and neonatal intensive care units reveals the bacterial and antimicrobial resistance genes profiles in patients and hospital surfaces.

Authors:  Ana Paula Christoff; Aline Fernanda Rodrigues Sereia; Giuliano Netto Flores Cruz; Daniela Carolina de Bastiani; Vanessa Leitner Silva; Camila Hernandes; Ana Paula Metran Nascente; Ana Andrea Dos Reis; Renata Gonçalves Viessi; Andrea Dos Santos Pereira Marques; Bianca Silva Braga; Telma Priscila Lovizio Raduan; Marines Dalla Valle Martino; Fernando Gatti de Menezes; Luiz Felipe Valter de Oliveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Reducing antibiotic prescribing and addressing the global problem of antibiotic resistance by targeted hygiene in the home and everyday life settings: A position paper.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Maillard; Sally F Bloomfield; Patrice Courvalin; Sabiha Y Essack; Sumanth Gandra; Charles P Gerba; Joseph R Rubino; Elizabeth A Scott
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Eye-Catching Microbes-Polyphasic Analysis of the Microbiota on Microscope Oculars Verifies Their Role as Fomites.

Authors:  Birgit Fritz; Karin Schäfer; Melanie März; Siegfried Wahl; Focke Ziemssen; Markus Egert
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Distribution of Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mecA (SCCmec) types among coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolates from healthcare workers in the North-West of Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Shokravi; Mehdi Haseli; Laleh Mehrad; Ali Ramazani
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.699

6.  Comparative Genomics Analysis Demonstrated a Link Between Staphylococci Isolated From Different Sources: A Possible Public Health Risk.

Authors:  Rory Cave; Raju Misra; Jiazhen Chen; Shiyong Wang; Hermine V Mkrtchyan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus cohnii and Staphylococcus urealyticus isolates from German dairy farms exhibit resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics and divergent penicillin-binding proteins.

Authors:  Tobias Lienen; Arne Schnitt; Jens Andre Hammerl; Stephen F Marino; Sven Maurischat; Bernd-Alois Tenhagen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comprehensive Compositional Analysis of the Slit Lamp Bacteriota.

Authors:  Birgit Fritz; Edita Paschko; Wayne Young; Daniel Böhringer; Siegfried Wahl; Focke Ziemssen; Markus Egert
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 9.  Antipathogenic properties and applications of low-dimensional materials.

Authors:  Z L Shaw; Sruthi Kuriakose; Samuel Cheeseman; Michael D Dickey; Jan Genzer; Andrew J Christofferson; Russell J Crawford; Chris F McConville; James Chapman; Vi Khanh Truong; Aaron Elbourne; Sumeet Walia
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria on Healthcare Workers' Uniforms in Hospitals and Long-Term Care Facilities in Cyprus.

Authors:  Pavlina Lena; Spyridon A Karageorgos; Panayiota Loutsiou; Annita Poupazi; Demetris Lamnisos; Panagiotis Papageorgis; Constantinos Tsioutis
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.