Literature DB >> 27648947

Diversity of SCCmec Elements in Staphylococcus aureus as Observed in South-Eastern Germany.

Stefan Monecke1,2,3, Lutz Jatzwauk4, Elke Müller2,3, Hedda Nitschke5, Katharina Pfohl1, Peter Slickers2,3, Annett Reissig2,3, Antje Ruppelt-Lorz1, Ralf Ehricht2,3.   

Abstract

SCCmec elements are very important mobile genetic elements in Staphylococci that carry beta-lactam resistance genes mecA/mecC, recombinase genes and a variety of accessory genes. Twelve main types and a couple of variants have yet been described. In addition, there are also other SCC elements harbouring other markers. In order to subtype strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) based on variations within their SCCmec elements, 86 markers were selected from published SCC sequences for an assay based on multiplexed primer extension reactions followed by hybridisation to the specific probes. These included mecA/mecC, fusC, regulatory genes, recombinase genes, genes from ACME and heavy metal resistance loci as well as several genes of unknown function. Hybridisation patterns for published genome or SCC sequences were theoretically predicted. For validation of the microarray based assay and for stringent hybridisation protocol optimization, real hybridization experiments with fully sequenced reference strains were performed modifying protocols until yielded the results were in concordance to the theoretical predictions. Subsequently, 226 clinical isolates from two hospitals in the city of Dresden, Germany, were characterised in detail. Beside previously described types and subtypes, a wide variety of additional SCC types or subtypes and pseudoSCC elements were observed as well as numerous composite elements. Within the study collection, 61 different such elements have been identified. Since hybridisation cannot recognise the localisation of target genes, gene duplications or inversions, this is a rather conservative estimate. Interestingly, some widespread epidemic strains engulf distinct variants with different SCCmec subtypes. Notable examples are ST239-MRSA-III, CC5-, CC22-, CC30-, and CC45-MRSA-IV or CC398-MRSA-V. Conversely, identical SCC elements were observed in different strains with SCCmec IVa being spread among the highest number of Clonal Complexes. The proposed microarray can help to distinguish isolates that appear similar or identical by other typing methods and it can be used as high-throughput screening tool for the detection of putative new SCC types or variants that warrant further investigation and sequencing. The high degree of diversity of SCC elements even within so-called strains could be helpful for epidemiological typing. It also raises the question on scale and speed of the evolution of SCC elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27648947      PMCID: PMC5029946          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the major pathogens in hospitals and the community. MRSA is not only resistant to methicillin (which serves as indicator for this phenotype) but against all beta-lactam antibiotics with the two recently developed compounds (ceftobipirole and ceftaroline) being notable exceptions. Resistance is caused by a modified penicillin binding protein, PBP2a, which is encoded by alleles [1] of the gene mecA. In 2011, a second gene, mecC has been discovered that also causes methicillin/beta-lactam resistance [2,3]. Both genes are situated on large, potentially mobile genetic elements, so-called SCCmec elements (staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec). These elements also harbour regulatory genes, recombinase genes and a variety of accessory genes. Twelve different types of SCCmec elements have so far been described ([4,5,6,7,8]; http://www.sccmec.org/Pages/SCC_TypesEN.html). Their nomenclature relies on the identity of the mec complex, i.e., the immediate surroundings of mecA, including its regulatory genes, and on the identity of the recombinase gene (ccr) complex [6]. Furthermore, there are the so-called J-regions (“joining” or “junkyard” region) that might include a variety of other genes, including additional resistance or virulence determinants. Due to variations within the J-regions some SCCmec types can further be differentiated into subtypes. Truncated SCCmec elements lacking ccr recombinase genes are known as pseudo-SCCmec elements [7]. In addition to SCCmec elements, a variety of different SCC elements have been described and/or sequenced that might lack the mecA/mecC genes but that carry a fusidic acid resistance marker fusC [9], various heavy metal resistance genes or other genes such as the arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) or a high-affinity ATP-driven potassium transport system catalysing the hydrolysis of ATP coupled with the exchange of hydrogen and potassium ions (kdp locus). Their presence suggests that SCC elements as a system facilitating horizontal gene transfer between staphylococci predates the emergence of SCCmec elements, and that mecA/C genes could be regarded as just one “payload” for SCC elements among others. Since MRSA are associated with high morbidity and mortality, rapid molecular tests without culture would be useful for infection control and timely guidance of treatment. SCC elements and mecA can also be found in other, clinically less relevant staphylococci, so that a mere PCR for the detection of mecA from a patient sample is not sufficient to diagnose the presence of MRSA. Additional markers need to be detected to prove that mecA was present in S. aureus and thus to ensure discrimination of MRSA from possibly colonising methicillin-resistant “coagulase-negatives”. Integration sites of SCCmec elements can be targeted for that purpose designing molecular tests in which one primer detects the species-specific sequences within the core genome while the other one aims on a primer-binding site within the SCCmec element. However, it is necessary to ensure to identify and to cover all relevant alleles of a potential primer-binding site in order to avoid false negatives. The constant evolution of MRSA and the emergence and/or geographic spread of new strains that could displace and marginalise previously epidemic strains requires close monitoring of these trends and a constant adaption of molecular tests because otherwise a decreasing performance of said tests is to be expected. Another reason for studying variability of SCCmec elements could be their use for high-resolution typing purposes. Many strains that share more or less the same core genome (and thus yield identical spa and MLST types) differ in SCCmec elements. Detecting more SCCmec-related markers could allow a higher degree of discrimination and might be helpful especially for subtyping abundant and widespread strains. For these reasons, a DNA hybridisation array was designed that in addition to a previously characterised system, facilitates detection of a total of 83 SCCmec-related markers, which were previously shown to be situated in SCCmec elements. It was used for validation with reference strains of known genome sequences as well as for characterisation of a collection of clinical isolates collected within 15 years at two primary care hospitals in the city of Dresden in Germany.

Material and Methods

Strain collection

The study was performed at a tertiary care hospital in Dresden, Saxony, i.e., in South-Eastern Germany. The hospital has approximately 1,200 beds and treats 57,000 in-patients per year (https://www.uniklinikum-dresden.de/de/das-klinikum/jahresberichte/). Isolates were collected routinely from intensive care units, diabetological or surgical wards, suspected transmissions or because of symptoms suggesting PVL-associated disease [10]. Approximately 1,300 isolates collected between 2000 and 2015/2016 were thus characterised using the previously described [11,12] arrays allowing assignment to clonal complexes, epidemic strains and main SCCmec types (Table 1). Additional isolates were obtained from another, secondary care hospital in the same city (http://www.khdn.de/). Here, no systematic typing was performed. Isolates were collected because of conspicuous susceptibility tests, clinical conditions or travel history, and they were typed using the same methods [11,12].
Table 1

Clonal complexes, strains and SCC elements as identified by array hybridisation.

Prevalence data (percentages and absolute numbers) refer to routine MRSA typing from the Dresden University Hospital, 2000—April 2016 (n = 1277).

CCStrainPrevalence dataSCCmec subtypesNumber of isolates subtyped
CC1CC1-MSSA-SCCfusSporadic°fus+tir+ccrA/B-1 (MSSA476)1
CC1-MRSA-IV0.6% (n = 8)SCCmec IVa (MW2)5
CC1-MRSA-V (PVL+)Sporadic°°SCCmec V (Bengal Bay)1
CC1-MRSA-V+fus (PVL+)Sporadic°°SCCmec V+fus+tir+ccrA/B-1*1
CC5ST228-MRSA-I, “South German EMRSA”2.9% (n = 37)SCCmec I (COL)9
2.0% (n = 26)PseudoSCCmec, class B mec complex*3
CC5-MRSA-SCC [I+fus], “Geraldine Clone”0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec I+fus+tirS (Geraldine Clone)1
CC5-MRSA-II, “USA300Rhine-Hesse EMRSA“20.2% (n = 258)SCCmec II (JH1/JH9)14
CC5-MRSA-II+ccrA/B-40.3% (n = 4)SCCmec II+czrC+ccrA/B-4*2
SCCmec II+speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4*2
CC5-MRSA-IV, “Paediatric clone”0.5% (n = 6)SCCmec IVa (MW2)1
SCCmec IVb/d/i (JCSC1978/6668/4469)3
SCCmec IVc (IS-105) [merA/B+]2
CC5-MRSA-IV (PVL+)0.2% (n = 2)SCCmec IVc (TCH60)2
CC5-MRSA-V0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec V*1
CC5-MRSA-[IV+ccrA/B-4]0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec IVc+speG+ccrA/B-4 (SA_ST125)1
CC6CC6-MRSA-IV0.2% (n = 3)SCCmec IVa (MW2)3
CC7CC7-MRSA-IV0.2% (n = 3)SCCmec IVa (MW2)1
SCCmec IVb/d/i (JCSC1978/6668/4469)2
CC7-MRSA-VTSporadic°°°SCCmec VT (var.1)*1
CC7-MRSA-[VI+fus]0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec VI+fus (MRSA18)1
CC8CC8-MSSA with SCC elementsSporadic°speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4*3
ACME II*3
ACME II+speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4*3
ST247-MRSA-I, “North German EMRSA”0.2% (n = 2)SCCmec I (PSP1996)1
ST8-MRSA-IIA/B/D, “Irish AR13/14”Sporadic°°°SCCmec IIA/B/D without ccrA/B-4 (Irish AR13/14)1
CC8-MRSA-IV, “UK-EMRSA-14”0.2% (n = 2)SCCmec IVc (TCH60)1
SCCmec IVh/j (HO50960412/JCSC6670)1
CC8-MRSA-IV, “Lyon Clone”0.4% (n = 5)SCCmec IVc (TCH60)1
SCCmec IVc (IS-105)1
CC8-MRSA-IV, “USA500”0.2% (n = 3)SCCmec IVa*1
SCCmec IVb/d/i (Strain 21209)2
ST8-MRSA-[IV+ACME] (PVL+), “USA300”0.5% (n = 6)SCCmec IVa+ACME1+Cu (USA300-TCH1516)3
CC8-MRSA-IV (PVL+), ACME-negative0.2% (n = 3)SCCmec IVc+Cu/Hg (MRSA177)3
SCCmec IVa (MW2)1
Sporadic°°PseudoSCCmec, class B mec complex+Cu/Hg*1
CC8/ST254-MRSA, “Hannover EMRSA”0.2% (n = 3)SCCmec IVa+ccrC*2
0.5% (n = 7)PseudoSCCmec, class B mec complex+Hg*3
CC8-MRSA-VT0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec VT+czrC (SO385)1
CC22CC22-MSSA with SCC elementsSporadic°speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4*6
arsB+ccrA/B-4*1
CC22-MRSA-IV, “UK-15/Barnim EMRSA”48.6% (n = 621)SCCmec IVh/j (HO50960412/JCSC6670)16
SCCmec IVa (CMFT503)1
SCCmec IVc (TCH60)1
SCCmec IVc (IS-105)1
CC22-MRSA-IV (tst1+), “Gaza EMRSA”0.2% (n = 2)SCCmec IVa (CMFT503)2
CC22-MRSA-IV (PVL+)0.4% (n = 5)SCCmec IVh/j (HO50960412/JCSC6670)3
SCCmec IVc (IS-105)1
SCCmec IVa (MW2)1
CC22-MRSA-[IV+ACME]0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec IVh/j+ACME2 (M08-0126)1
CC22-MRSA with SCCmecIV/composite elements0.3% (n = 4)SCCmec IV+speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4 (var.1)*2
SCCmec IV+speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4 (var.2)*1
SCCmec IV+speG+Cu/czrC+ccrA/B-4*1
CC22-MRSA with SCCmecV/composite elementsSporadic°°SCCmec V+speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4*1
CC22-MRSA-[V+fus]0.3% (n = 4)SCCmec VT+fus+czrC*3
CC30ST36/39-MRSA-II, “UK-EMRSA-16”0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec II (N315/Mu50)1
CC30-MRSA-IV (PVL+),0.2% (n = 3)SCCmec IVa (MW2)7
“Southwest Pacific /WSPP”SCCmec IVa (H131520133)1
SCCmec IVb/d/i+Cu*1
CC30-MRSA-VT0.2% (n = 3)SCCmec VT (var.2)*1
CC45CC45-MRSA-IV (aphA3/sat+), „Berlin EMRSA“13.7% (n = 175)SCCmec IVa (MW2)12
CC45-MRSA-IV (aphA3/sat -), „Berlin EMRSA“1.3% (n = 17)SCCmec IVa (MW2)5
SCCmec IVb/d/i (JCSC1978/6668/4469)2
SCCmec IVc (TCH60)4
CC45-MRSA-IV+ACME0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec IVa+ACME II*1
CC45-MRSA-VSporadic°°SCCmec VT (PM1)1
SCCmec VT (var.3)*1
CC45-MRSA-V+ACMESporadic°°SCCmec VT+ACME II*1
CC59CC59-MRSA-VT (PVL+), “Taiwan Clone”0.2% (n = 2)SCCmec VT (PM1)3
ST72ST72-MRSA-IV A0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec IV A (CN1)1
CC80atypical CC80-MSSA-SCC (ORF CM14, PVL+)Sporadic°°°°ACME III+ccrA/B-1 (Strain 21342)1
CC80-MRSA-IV (PVL+)0.9% (n = 11)SCCmec IVc (TCH60)8
CC88CC88-MRSA-IV0.2% (n = 2)SCCmec IVa (MW2)1
SCCmec IVa (CMFT503)1
SCCmec IVc (TCH60)1
CC88-MRSA-IV (PVL+)0.3% (n = 4)SCCmec IVa (MW2)2
SCCmec IVa (H131520133)1
ST93CC93-MRSA-IV (PVL+) “Queensland Clone”Sporadic°°SCCmec IVa (MW2)2
CC97CC97-MRSA-IV0.2% (n = 2)SCCmec IVa (MW2)2
CC97-MRSA-[V+fus]Sporadic°°SCCmec V+fus*1
CC130CC130-MRSA-XI0.2% (n = 2)SCCmec XI (LGA251/M10-61)2
CC152CC152-MRSA-V (PVL+)0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec VT (GR1)1
CC182CC182-MSSA-SCCSporadic°kdp+ccrA/B-2*1
ST239ST239-MRSA-III0.7% (n = 8)SCCmec III+Cd/Hg+ccrC (SK1585)3
SCCmec III+Cd/Hg+ccrC (Bmb9393)1
SCCmec III+ccrC+Cd (CN79)1
SCCmec III+ccrC+Cd*1
CC398CC398-MRSA-IV0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec IVc (WW2703/97)1
CC398-MRSA-V, “Livestock-assoc. MRSA”1.3% (n = 16)SCCmec VT+czrC (SO385)13
SCCmec VT+czrC (as in SO385, but ydhK-negat.)*1
0.1% (n = 1)SCCmec VT+Cu/czrC+ccrA/B-1*1
0.1% (n = 1)PseudoSCCmec, class C mec complex+As/Cu*1
ST617ST617-MRSA-IVSporadic°°SCCmec IVa (MW2)1
ST772ST772-MRSA-V, “Bengal Bay Clone”0.4% (n = 5)SCCmec V (Bengal Bay)5

° Since routine typing of MSSA is not performed, no reliable data on the prevalence of this strain can be provided. However, based on data from other regional studies that included MSSA [32,33,34,35], it appears locally not to be common.

°° This strain was only identified in sporadic cases from Dresden Neustadt Hospital (where no systematic typing was performed). The absence from Dresden University Hospital indicates that it either generally very rare in Saxony, and/or that infections might be associated with travel and thus randomly detected.

°°° This strain was accidentally detected in one healthy carrier, not in a patient. Thus it is not included into the routine typing figures.

°°°° This strain was found once in an imported case tested for diagnostic purposes.

* Unknown variant, no matching sequence identified among published genome or SCC sequences. For details see Table 3.

Clonal complexes, strains and SCC elements as identified by array hybridisation.

Prevalence data (percentages and absolute numbers) refer to routine MRSA typing from the Dresden University Hospital, 2000—April 2016 (n = 1277). ° Since routine typing of MSSA is not performed, no reliable data on the prevalence of this strain can be provided. However, based on data from other regional studies that included MSSA [32,33,34,35], it appears locally not to be common. °° This strain was only identified in sporadic cases from Dresden Neustadt Hospital (where no systematic typing was performed). The absence from Dresden University Hospital indicates that it either generally very rare in Saxony, and/or that infections might be associated with travel and thus randomly detected. °°° This strain was accidentally detected in one healthy carrier, not in a patient. Thus it is not included into the routine typing figures. °°°° This strain was found once in an imported case tested for diagnostic purposes. * Unknown variant, no matching sequence identified among published genome or SCC sequences. For details see Table 3.
Table 3

SCC elements as identified by array hybridisation in this study, reference sequences, their gene contents, distributions across clonal complexes and their estimated abundances in MRSA from Dresden (2000–2016; based on prevalence data from Table 1 and [10]).

SCCmec subtypesGenBank accession and/or referencemec complexOther payloadRecombinase genesSCC terminiIdentified in CCEstimated prevalence
SCCmec I (COL)CP000046.1mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, cstB-SCC2, Q9S0M4, plsSCCccrA/B-1dcsCC53%
SCCmec I (PSP1996)ANHUmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1cstB-SCC2, Q9S0M4, plsSCCccrA/B-1dcsCC8<0.5%
SCCmec I+fus+tirS (Geraldine Clone)MRSA7 in [15]mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, fusC, tirSccrA/B-1dcsCC5<0.1%
SCCmec II (JH1/JH9)CP000736,CP000703.1mecA, ugpQ, mecR, mecI, psmMEC, xylRcstB-SCC1, kdpccrA/B-2dcsCC520%
SCCmec II (N315/Mu50)BA000018.3,BA000017.4mecA, ugpQ, mecR, mecI, psmMEC, xylRmvaS, cstB-SCC1, kdpccrA/B-2dcsCC30<0.1%
SCCmec II+czrC+ccrA/B-4*unknownmecA, ugpQ, mecR, mecI, psmMEC, xylRcstB-SCC1, kdp, czrCccrA/B-2, ccrA/B-4dcsCC5<0.5%
SCCmec II+speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4*unknownmecA, ugpQ, mecR, mecI, psmMEC, xylRcstB-SCC1, kdp, speG, czrCccrA/B-2, ccrA/B-4dcsCC5<0.5%
SCCmec IIA/B/D without ccrA/B-4 genes (Irish AR13/14)AHVOmecA, ugpQ, mecR, mecI, psmMEC, xylRcstB-SCC1, mvaS-SCC, speGccrA/B-2dcsCC8<0.1%
SCCmec III+ccrC+Cd (CN79)ANCJmecA, ugpQ, mecR, mecI, psmMEC, xylRmvaS, cstB-SCC1, D1GU38, Q933A2, D1GU55, cadDccrA/B-3, ccrCdcs, SCCterm2ST239<0.1%
SCCmec III+ccrC+Cd*unknownmecA, ugpQ, mecR, mecI, psmMEC, xylRmvaS, cstB-SCC1, D1GU38, Q933A2, D1GU55, cadD, Q4LAG7, Q9S0M4ccrA/B-3, ccrCdcs, SCCterm2, 5ST239<0.1%
SCCmec III+Cd/Hg+ccrC (Bmb9393)CP005288.1mecA, ugpQ, mecR, mecI, psmMEC, xylRmvaS, cstB-SCC1, D1GU38, Q933A2, merA/B, cadDccrA/B-3, ccrCSCCterm2ST239<0.1%
SCCmec III+Cd/Hg+ccrC (SK1585)AYLTmecA, ugpQ, mecR, mecI, psmMEC, xylRmvaS, cstB-SCC1, Q93IB7, D1GU38, Q933A2, merA/B, cadDccrA/B-3, ccrCSCCterm1, 2ST239<0.5%
SCCmec IVa (MW2)BA000033.2mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, cstB-SCC2ccrA/B-2dcsCC1, CC5, CC6, CC7, CC8, CC22, CC30, CC45, CC88, ST93, CC97, ST61716.5%
SCCmec IVa (H131520133)BioSample SAMEA2385424mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1cstB-SCC2ccrA/B-2dcsCC30<0.5%
SCCmec IVa*unknownmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, cstB-SCC2ccrA/B-2SCCterm4CC8<0.1%
SCCmec IVa (CMFT503)HF569113.1mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, cstB-SCC2, Q93IB7ccrA/B-2SCCterm1CC22, CC88<1%
SCCmec IVa+ACME I+Cu (USA300)CP000255.1CP000730.1mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, cstB-SCC2, ydhK, ACME I°, adhC, speG, copA2-SCCccrA/B-2dcsCC8<0.5%
SCCmec IVa+ACME II*UnknownmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, cstB-SCC2, ACME II°ccrA/B-2dcs, SCCterm3CC45<0.1%
SCCmec IVa+ccrC*unknownmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, cstB-SCC2, D1GU38ccrA/B-2, ccrCdcs, SCCterm1CC8<0.5%
SCCmec IVb/d/i (JCSC1978/6668/4469)AB063173.1 (IVb), AB097677 .1(IV d), AB425823.1 (IV i)mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaSccrA/B-2dcsCC5, CC7, CC45<1%
SCCmec IVb/d/i (Strain 21209)AGRPmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1-ccrA/B-2dcsCC8<0.5%
SCCmec IVb/d/i+Cu*unknownmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, ydhK, copA2-SCCccrA/B-2dcsCC30<0.1%
SCCmec IVc (IS-105)AHLRmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1B2Y834, (variably, merA/B)**ccrA/B-2dcsCC5, CC8, CC22<1%
SCCmec IVc (TCH60)CP002110.1mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, B2Y834ccrA/B-2dcsCC5, CC8, CC22, CC45, CC80, CC882%
SCCmec IVc (WW2703/97)ACSWmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, B2Y834ccrA/B-2SCCterm4CC398<0.1%
SCCmec IVc+speG+ccrA/B-4 (SA_ST125)ASTHmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1B2Y834, speGccrA/B-2, ccrA/B-4dcs, SCCterm7CC5<0.1%
SCCmec IVc+Cu/Hg (MRSA177)AECPmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, B2Y834, ydhK, Q4LAG7, merA/B, copA2-SCC, mcoccrA/B-2dcsCC8<0.5%
SCCmec IVh/j (HO50960412/JCSC6670)HE681097.1 (IVh), AB425824.1 (IV j)mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, B6VQU0ccrA/B-2dcsCC8, CC2247%
SCCmec IVh/j+ACME2 (M08-0126)FR753166.1mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, B6VQU0, Q9S0M4, ACME II°ccrA/B-2dcs, SCCterm3, 5CC22<0.1%
SCCmec IV+speG+Cu/czrC+ccrA/B-4*unknownmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, cstB-SCC2, ydhK, speG, copA2-SCC, czrCccrA/B-2, ccrA/B-4dcs, SCCterm7CC22<0.1%
SCCmec IV+speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4 (var.1)*unknownmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, speG, czrCccrA/B-2, ccrA/B-4dcs, SCCterm7CC22<0.5%
SCCmec IV+speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4 (var.2)*unknownmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1speG, czrCccrA/B-2, ccrA/B-4dcs, SCCterm7CC22<0.1%
SCCmec IV A (CN1)CP003979.1mecA, Delta mecR1B2Y834ccrA/B-2dcsST72<0.1%
SCCmec V (Bengal Bay)HF569096.1,AZBTmecA, ugpQ,mvaS, Q4LAG7ccrAA, ccrCSCCterm11ST772, CC1<0.5%
SCCmec V*unknownmecA, ugpQ,mvaS, Q4LAG7ccrAA, ccrCSCCterm10CC5<0.1%
SCCmec V+fus*unknownmecA, ugpQmvaS, Q4LAG7, fusCccrAA, ccrCSCCterm3, 10CC97<0.1%
SCCmec V+fus+tir+ccrA/B-1*unknownmecA, ugpQmvaS, Q4LAG7 fusC, tirSccrA/B-1, ccrAA, ccrCSCCterm3, 6, 11CC1<0.1%
SCCmec V+speG+ czrC+ccrA/B-4*unknownmecA, ugpQmvaS, Q4LAG7, Q8CU82, speG, czrCccrC, ccrA/B-4SCCterm7CC22<0.1%
SCCmec VT (GR1)AJLXmecA, ugpQmvaS, D1GU38, Q4LAG7ccrAA, ccrCSCCterm2CC152<0.1%
SCCmec VT (PM1)BAFAmecA, ugpQmvaS, D1GU38, DUF1958, Q4LAG7ccrAA, ccrCSCCterm2CC45, CC59<0.5%
SCCmec VT (var.1)*unknownmecA, ugpQmvaS, D1GU38ccrCSCCterm2CC7<0.1%
SCCmec VT (var.2)*unknownmecA, ugpQD1GU38, DUF1958, Q4LAG7ccrAA, ccrCSCCterm2CC30<0.1%
SCCmec VT (var.3)*unknownmecA, ugpQmvaS, D1GU38, DUF1958, Q4LAG7, Q9S0M4ccrAA, ccrCSCCterm2, 5CC45<0.1%
SCCmec VT+ACME II*unknownmecA, ugpQ,mvaS, D1GU38, Q4LAG7ccrAA, ccrCSCCterm2CC45<0.1%
SCCmec VT+Cu/czrC+ccrA/B-1*unknownmecA, ugpQmvaS, cstB-SCC2, D1GU38, B2Y834, ydhK, Q4LAG7, copA2-SCC, czrCccrA/B-1, ccrAA, ccrCSCCterm2, 7CC398<0.1%
SCCmec VT+czrC (SO385)AM990992.1mecA, ugpQmvaS, cstB-SCC2, ydhK, D1GU38, Q4LAG7, czrCccrAA, ccrCSCCterm2CC8, CC3981%
SCCmec VT+czrC (as in SO385, but ydhK negative)*unknownmecA, ugpQmvaS, cstB-SCC2, D1GU38, Q4LAG7, czrCccrAA, ccrCSCCterm2CC398<0.5%
SCCmec VT+fus+czrC*unknownmecA, ugpQmvaS, cstB-SCC2, D1GU38, Q4LAG7, fusC, czrCccrAA, ccrCSCCterm2, 12CC22<0.1%
SCCmec VI+fus (MRSA18)MRSA18 in [15]mecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, Q4LAG7, fusCccrB-4SCCterm7CC7<0.1%
SCCmec XI (LGA251/M10-61)FR823292.1,FR821779.1mecCblaZ-SCCmec XI, C5QAP8-M10-61, arsB-SCCccr(A/B)°°- °°°CC130<0.5%
PseudoSCCmec, class B mec complex+Hg*unknownmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, (merA/B)**-dcsCC8<1%
PseudoSCCmec, class B mec complex+Cu/Hg*unknownmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, ydhK, Q4LAG7, merA/B, copA2-SCC, mco-dcsCC8<0.1%
PseudoSCCmec, class B mec complex*unknownmecA, ugpQ, Delta mecR1mvaS, cstB-SCC2, Q9S0M4, plsSCC-dcsCC52%
PseudoSCCmec, class C mec complex+As/Cu*unknownmecA, ugpQmvaS, ydhK, arsB-SCC, arsC, copA2-SCC-SCCterm10CC398<0.1%
ACME II*unknown-ACME II°, Q9S0M4-SCCterm3, 5CC8MSSA only
ACME II+speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4*unknown-ACME II°, speG, czrC, Q9S0M4ccr(A***)/B-4SCCterm3, 5, 7CC8MSSA only
fus+tir+ccrA/B-1 (MSSA476)BX571857.1-Q4LAG7, fusC, tirSccrA/B-1SCCterm3, 6CC1MSSA only
kdp+ccrA/B-2*unknown-kdpccrA/B-2-CC182MSSA only
arsB+ccrA/B-4*unknown-mvaS-SCC, B6VQU0, arsB-SCCccrA/B-4dcsCC22MSSA only
ACME III+ccrA1 (Strain 21342)AHKU-ACME III°ccrA/B-1SCCterm7CC80MSSA only
speG+czrC+ccrA/B-4*unknown-speG, czrC,ccr(A***)/B-4SCCterm7CC8, CC22MSSA only

* Unknown variant, no matching sequence identified among published genome or SCC sequences.

** In absence of genome sequence data, it cannot be decided whether this operon was localised on SCCmec or on a plasmid.

*** Weak reactivity might indicate a divergent allele.

° ACME I = arc and opp genes, ACME II = arc genes only, ACME III = opp genes only.

°° Recombinase genes in SCCmec XI are described as ccrA1/B3 (http://www.sccmec.org/Pages/SCC_TypesEN.html) but yielded weak signals with probes for ccrB1/A3

°°° There is one unique SCC terminal sequence associated to SCCmec XI but no primers and probes were designed for it.

A subset of 226 isolates from both sites was selected for SCCmec subtyping aiming on a high diversity of isolates (see S1 Table). For that purpose, epidemiologically linked or consecutive isolates from a single patient were excluded, while isolates from different years and different wards were prioritised as well as isolates that differed in carriage of additional resistance or toxin genes.

Bacteriological procedures

MRSA isolates passed through standard clinical routine diagnostics. After primary culture and subculturing of single colonies, clumping factor was detected utilising the Pastorex StaphPlus kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, Munich, Germany). Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed by VITEK 1 or VITEK 2 systems (BioMerieux, Nuertingen, Germany). Methicillin resistance was confirmed by detection of PBP2a using the Innogenetics MRSA-screen agglutination assay (Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium). Isolates were stored frozen using cryobank tubes (Microbank, Pro-Lab Diagnostics, Richmond Hill, Canada) at -80°C. Only one isolate per patient was considered.

Linear DNA amplification, labelling and array procedures

An initial characterisation of the isolates was performed using StaphyType DNA microarrays (Alere Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany). This array covers 333 different targets that correspond to approximately 170 distinct genes and their allelic variants. These genes include species and typing markers, toxin genes and resistance genes. Detailed descriptions have been published previously [11,12,13]. This array also covers several SCC-associated markers such as mecA, mecC, fusC, recombinase genes etc. that are listed in Table 2 as well as in S2 Table.
Table 2

SCC-associated markers used for this study, sorted alphabetically, references and estimated abundances in MRSA from Dresden (2000–2016; based on prevalence data from Table 1 and [10]).

Gene/MarkerGene product/FunctionCommentsReference sequenceReference for probes and primersEstimated prevalence
adhC (FPR3757)Alcohol dehydrogenase, zinc-containingPart of ACME 1 and ACME 3 clusters, that occurs alone or in combination with SCCmec elements. Consensus marker. Allele from the “USA300”CA-MRSA strain (FPR3757, GenBank CP000255.1 and TCH1516, GenBank CP000730.1)CP000255.1, 64125…65222This paper<0.5%
arcA-SCCArginine deiminasePart of ACME 1 and ACME 2 clusters, that occurs alone or in combination with SCCmec elements. Common in Coagulase-negatives, present in the “USA300”CA-MRSA strain (FPR3757, GenBank CP000255.1 and TCH1516, GenBank CP000730.1)CP000255.1, 73113…74348[11,12,13]<0.5%
arcB-SCCOrnithine carbamoyltransferasePart of ACME 1 and ACME 2 clusters, that occurs alone or in combination with SCCmec elements. Common in Coagulase-negatives, present in the “USA300”CA-MRSA strain (FPR3757, GenBank CP000255.1 and TCH1516, GenBank CP000730.1)CP000255.1, 69839…70837[11,12,13]<0.5%
arcC-SCCCarbamate kinasePart of ACME 1 and ACME 2 clusters, that occurs alone or in combination with SCCmec elements. Common in Coagulase-negatives, present in the “USA300”CA-MRSA strain (FPR3757, GenBank CP000255.1 and TCH1516, GenBank CP000730.1)CP000255.1, 68890…69819[11,12,13]<0.5%
arcD-SCCArginine/ornithine antiporterPart of ACME 1 and ACME 2 clusters, that occurs alone or in combination with SCCmec elements. Common in Coagulase-negatives, present in the “USA300”CA-MRSA strain (FPR3757, GenBank CP000255.1 and TCH1516, GenBank CP000730.1)CP000255.1, 71606…73027[11,12,13]<0.5%
arsB-SCCArsenical pump membrane proteinThree different probes were designed for SCC-born allele(s) of that gene, as for instance in JCSC6943, JCSC6945, M10/0061FR823292.1, 28161…29450; AB505628.1, 31886…33175; AB705453.1, 2380…3669This paper<0.5%
arsC-SCCArsenate reductaseProbe was designed for SCC-born allele(s) of that gene, as for instance in JCSC6943, JCSC6945AB505628.1, 31467…31868This paper<0.1%
B2Y834Abortive phage resistance proteinSubtyping SCCmec IV, i.e., identification of SCCmec IV A, G, c and SCCmec MRSAZH47AE015929.1, 50641…51441This paper3,5%
B6VQU0Putative proteinSubtyping SCCmec IV, i.e., identification of SCCmec IVh/jAB425824.1, 19950…20882This paper47%
blaZ (SCCmec XI)Beta-lactamaseSolely present in SCCmec XI; this is a different blaZ allele than in ubiquitous staphylococcal plasmidsFR821779.1, 34736…35587[11,12,13]<0.5%
C5QAP8 (SCCmec XI)Putative proteinIdentification of SCCmec XIFR821779.1, 53134…53913This paper<0.5%
cadD (R35)Cadmium transport protein DProbe was designed for SCC-born allele(s) of that gene, as for instance in strain R35, GenBank L10909.1 or strain 85/2082, GenBank AB037671.1L10909.1, 5577…6194This paper<1%
cadX (JCSC6943)Putative regulator of cadmium effluxProbe was designed for SCC-born allele(s) of that gene, as for instance in JCSC6943, GenBank AB505628.1AB505628.1, 31106…31447This paper0%
cap 1Locus encoding SCC associated capsule type 1Individual probes for probes for cap H1, J1, K1U10927.2This paper0%
cas1 (M06-0171)CRISPR-associated endonuclease 1Present in M06/0171, GenBank HE980450.1HE980450.1, 48518…49423This paper0%
ccrA-1Cassette chromosome recombinase A, type 1Cassette chromosome recombinase A allele found in SCCmec I, IX, X, SCCfus (as in MSSA476, GenBank BX571857.1) and in composite SCCmec/fus elementsCP000046.1, 47998…49347[11,12,13]3%
ccrA-2Cassette chromosome recombinase A, type 2Cassette chromosome recombinase A allele found in SCCmec II and IV elementsBA000033.2, 48017…49366[11,12,13]90%
ccrA-3Cassette chromosome recombinase A, type 3Cassette chromosome recombinase A allele found in SCCmec III elementsAB037671.1, 5430…6776[11,12,13]<1%
ccrA-4Cassette chromosome recombinase A, type 4Cassette chromosome recombinase A allele found in SCCmec VI and SCCmec VIII elementsAF411935.3, 7849…9210[11,12,13]<1%
ccrAA“Cassette chromosome recombinase AA”Gene for a hypothetical protein accompanying the ccrC gene in SCCmec V and SCCmec VT elements. Two separate probes were used that usually, but not always, yield identical resultsAB121219.1, 14264…15907; AM292304.1, 5654…7273[11,12,13]3%
ccrB-1Cassette chromosome recombinase B, type 1Cassette chromosome recombinase B allele found in SCCmec I, IX, SCCfus (as in MSSA476, GenBank BX571857.1) and in composite SCCmec/fus elementsGU122149.1, 11999…13624[11,12,13]3%
ccrB-2Cassette chromosome recombinase B, type 2Cassette chromosome recombinase B allele found in SCCmec II and IV elementsBA000033.2, 46367…47995[11,12,13]90%
ccrB-3Cassette chromosome recombinase B, type 3Cassette chromosome recombinase B allele found in SCCmec III elementsAB037671.1, 6797…8425[11,12,13]<1%
ccrB-4Cassette chromosome recombinase B, type 4Cassette chromosome recombinase B allele found in SCCmec VI and SCCmec VIII elementsAE015929.1, 58592…60220[11,12,13]<1%
ccrC (85–2082)Cassette chromosome recombinase CCassette chromosome recombinase C allele found in in SCCmec V, SCCmec VT and SCCmec VII elementsAB037671.1, 6797…8425[11,12,13]4%
copA2-SCCcopper exporting ATPaseProbe was designed for SCC-born allele(s) of that gene, as for instance in FPR3757, GenBank CP000255.1 or JCSC6943, GenBank AB505628.1CP000255.1, 86055…88118This paper<1%
cstB-SCC1 (Q2G1R6)CsoR-like sulfur transferase-regulated genes B/metallo-beta-lactamase superfamily protein. Pseudogene containing two stop codonsSubtyping SCCmec II (usually present, but absent in Irish SCCmec II variants A to E) and III (usually present, but absent in CMFT492 GenBank HF569112.1). Also present in SCCmec VIII and irregular elements such as Staphylococcus fleurettii GenBank AB546266BA000017.4, 50957…52291This paper21%
cstB-SCC2 (Q2G1R6)CsoR-like sulfur transferase-regulated genes B/metallo-beta-lactamase superfamily protein.Present in SCCmec IVa (truncated) and SCCmec X, variably present in SCCmec I (usually present, but absent from MR1 GenBank ACZQ, Geraldine Clone) and VT. The corresponding probe was used in this study to distinguish SCCmec IVa from other SCCmec IV subtypes.CP000046.1, 53428…54756This paper25%
czrCCadmium and zinc resistance gene C, heavy metal translocating P-type ATPaseFrequently associated with SCCmec elements from livestock MRSAAE015929.1, 64066…66000This paper2%
D1GU38Putative proteinSubtyping SCCmec III, identification of SCCmec VT, SCCmec ZH47, SCCmec VII because of an association with (additional/second) ccrC copiesFN433596.1, 34888…35751This paper3%
D1GU55Putative membrane proteinSubtyping SCCmec III, additional marker for SCCmec VIIFN433596.1, 52909…53208This paper<0.5%
D3JD07Putative proteinPresent in some composite SCC elements such as, e.g., M06/0171, GenBank HE980450.1 and 45394F, GenBank GU122149.1GU122149.1, 8985…9797This paper0%
Delta mecR1Truncated methicillin resistance operon repressor 1Truncated mecR1 is present in SCCmec I, IV, V, VI, VII; complete absence of mecR1 from SCCmec V, IX, XBA000033.2, 41708…42682[11,12,13]76%
DUF1958Putative proteinSubtyping SCCmec VT. Present, e.g., in PM1, GenBank BAFA but absent, e.g., in Strain 3957, GenBank AOFUGQ902038.2, 38193…38519This paper<0.5%
fusC (Q6GD50)SCC-associated fusidic acid resistance genePresent alone in “SCCfus” elements or together with mecA in composite elements. Most common in CC1 and CC5 strainsBX571857.1, 52820…53458[11,12,13]<0.5%
kdpA-SCCPotassium-translocating ATPase A, chain 2Present in SCCmec II (although absent from Irish SCCmec II variants A to E)BA000018.3, 77116…78792[11,12,13]20%
kdpB-SCCPotassium-transporting ATPase B, chain 1Present in SCCmec II (although absent from Irish SCCmec II variants A to E)BA000018.3, 78811…80832[11,12,13]20%
kdpC-SCCPotassium-translocating ATPase C, chain 2Present in SCCmec II (although absent from Irish SCCmec II variants A to E)BA000017.4, 80809…81366[11,12,13]20%
kdpD-SCCSensor kinase proteinPresent in SCCmec II (although absent from Irish SCCmec II variants A to E)BA000018.3, 74179…76899[11,12,13]20%
kdpE-SCCKDP operon transcriptional regulatory proteinPresent in SCCmec II (although absent from Irish SCCmec II variants A to E)BA000018.3, 73509…74204[11,12,13]20%
mco-SCCMulti copper oxidaseProbe was designed for SCC-born allele(s) of that gene, as for instance in JCSC6943, GenBank AB505628.1AB505628.1, 35823…37256This paper<0.5%
mecAModified penicillin binding protein (PBP2a)Modified penicillin binding protein (PBP2a) causing oxacillin/methicillin resistance and thus defining MRSABA000017.4, 44992…46998[11,12,13]>99.5%
mecCAlternate gene encoding a modified penicillin binding proteinPresent in, and characteristic for, SCCmec XIFR821779.1, 35681…37678[11,12,13]<0.5%
mecIMethicillin-resistance regulatory proteinPresent in SCCmec II (although absent from Irish SCCmec II variants C and E), SCCmec III, SCCmec VIIIBA000017.4, 48855…49226[11,12,13]21%
mecR1Methicillin resistance operon repressor 1Un-truncated sequence in SCCmec II, SCCmec III, SCCmec VIIIBA000017.4, 47098…48855[11,12,13]21%
merAMercury reductasePart of a mercury resistance operon that is plasmid born, although the plasmid can be integrated into SCCmec elements (for instance, in strains 85/2082, GenBank AB037671.1 or TW20, GenBank FN433596.1)AB037671.1, 38289…39932[11,12,13]<1%
merBAlkylmercury lyasePart of a mercury resistance operon that is plasmid born, although the plasmid can be integrated into SCCmec elements (for instance, in strain TW20, GenBank FN433596.1)AB037671.1, 37557…38207[11,12,13]<1%
mvaS-SCCTruncated 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA synthaseSubtyping SCCmec I, II, IV, VBA000033.2, 37179…37531This paper78%
opp3B (opp3B (C427) and opp3B (FPR3757))Oligopeptide permease, channel-forming proteinPart of ACME 1 and ACME 3 clusters that occurs alone or in combination with SCCmec elements. A consensus probe as well as specific probes for alleles known from coagulase-negatives and from the USA 300 CA-MRSA strain (FPR3757, GenBank CP000255.1 and TCH1516, GenBank CP000730.1) were usedACSQ01000050.1, 4183…5139; CP000255.1, 81950…82906This paper<0.5%
opp3C (C427)Oligopeptide permease, channel-forming proteinPart of ACME 1 and ACME 3 clusters that occurs alone or in combination with SCCmec elements. Allele from known coagulase-negativesACSQ01000050.1, 5139…5906This paper0%
opp3C (FPR3757)Oligopeptide permease, channel-forming proteinPart of ACME 1 and ACME 3 clusters that occurs alone or in combination with SCCmec elements. Allele from the USA 300 CA-MRSA strain (FPR3757, GenBank CP000255.1 and TCH1516, GenBank CP000730.1)CP000255.1, 82906…83673This paper<0.5%
pls-SCC (COL)Plasmin-sensitive surface protein, prevents bacterial adhesion in vitro, located in SCC, close to mec operonSubtyping SCCmec I (Note: an additional, but unrecognised allele is also present in the irregular SCC element of WA MRSA-40: JQ746621.1)CP000046.1, 57212…61858This paper5%
PSM-mecPhenol soluble modulin from SCCmecPresent in SCCmec II (although absent from Irish SCCmec II variants C and E), SCCmec III, SCCmec VIIIBA000017.4, 49311…49379This paper21%
Q3YK51Putative proteinSubtyping SCCmec IV, i.e., identification of SCCmec IV gDQ106887.1, 196…1944This paper0%
Q4LAG7Putative protein located within SCCmec type V/SCCfus elementsIdentification of SCCmec V/VT elements and of SCCfus elementsAM990992.1, 50512…50940 (V/VT); BX571857.1, 55452…55880 (fus)This paper3%
Q8CU82Putative proteinPresent in some SCCmec/fus composite elements such as, e.g., CMFT120, GenBank HF569094.1 and CMFT2, GenBank HF569101.1AE015929.1, 32604…32786This paper<0.1%
Q933A2Putative ADP-ribosyltransferaseSubtyping SCCmec III and SCCmec IXFN433596.1, 101805…102377This paper<1%
Q93IB7LytTR domain DNA-binding regulatorSubtyping SCCmec III (present in, e.g., TW20 GenBank FN433596.1, but absent in, e.g., Bmb9393 GenBank CP005288.1) and IV (usually absent, but present in, e.g., CMFT503 GenBank HF569113.1)FN433596.1, 67873…68115This paper1%
Q9S0M4Putative proteinSubtyping SCCmec I, SCCmec/ACME composites and SCCmec from WA40JQ746621.1, 10406…11456This paper5%
Q9XB68-dcsLocated at the terminus of SCCmec directly next to orfX.This locus comprises the downstream constant segment (dcs) that in turn comprises a copy of the SCC direct repeat DR_SCC (AGAAGCTTATCATAAGTAA)dcs: CP000046.1, 34192…34371; Q9XB68: CP000046.1, 34372…35667[11,12,13]95%
SCC terminus 01SCC integration site alternate to dcsGU235983.1, 488…808This paper1%
SCC terminus 02SCC integration site alternate to dcsFN433596.1, 34140…34456This paper3%
SCC terminus 03SCC integration site alternate to dcsFR753166.1, 481…568This paper<0.5%
SCC terminus 04SCC integration site alternate to dcsACSW01000146.1, 46259…46316This paper<0.5%
SCC terminus 05SCC integration site alternate to dcsAB425427.1, 606…1027This paper<0.5%
SCC terminus 06SCC integration site alternate to dcsAssociated mainly to SCCfus (as in MSSA476, GenBank BX571857.1)BX571857.1, 34169…34545This paper<0.1%
SCC terminus 07SCC integration site alternate to dcsGU122149.1, 119…222This paper<1%
SCC terminus 09SCC integration site alternate to dcsAB121219.1, 898…1198This paper0%
SCC terminus 10SCC integration site alternate to dcsAB505630.1, 581…881This paper<0.5%
SCC terminus 11SCC integration site alternate to dcsHF569096.1, 746…1034This paper<1%
SCC terminus 12SCC integration site alternate to dcsCP003808.1, 34287…34414This paper<0.1%
SCC terminus 13SCC integration site alternate to dcsARXY01000001.1, 131181…131299This paper0%
SCC terminus 14SCC integration site alternate to dcsHF569093.1, 481…644This paper0%
speG (FPR3757)Spermidine N-acetyltransferaseUsually associated with ACME or composite SCCmec/ACME elementsCP000255.1, 63100…63597This paper<1%
tirSStaphylococcal TIR-protein binding proteinSubtyping SCCfus because it is frequently, but not always, accompanying fusCBX571857.1, 50640…51482This paper<0.5%
ugpQGlycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesteraseAccompanies mecA in all SCCmec sequences except SCCmec IV A from CN1 GenBank CP003979.1 and an irregular/composite element from Staphylococcus epidermidis, BCM-HMP0060 GenBank ACHEBA000018.3, 43717…44460[11,12,13]>99.5%
xylR/mecR2Methicillin resistance operon repressor 2, Homolog of xylose repressorLocated next to mec operon downstream of mecI (not present if mecI is truncated). Present in SCCmec II (although absent from Irish SCCmec II variants C and E), SCCmec III, SCCmec VIIIBA000018.3, 49738…50882[11,12,13]21%
ydhK (FPR3757)Putative lipoproteinPresent in some composite elements comprising SCCmec and heavy metal resistance genes including the one in FPR3757, GenBank: CP000255.1CP000255.1, 88136…88681This paper2%
yeeAPutative DNA methyltransferaseSubtyping SCCmecIV/fus composite elementsHF569093.1, 2580…5294This paper0%
A further characterisation of SCCmec elements of selected isolates (see above) was performed using probes and primers for new targets also listed in Table 2. Criteria for the selection of these target genes are discussed below, in the Results section. Probes and primers for SCC-related targets are described in S2 Table. The procedures for all array experiments were identical and they have been described previously [11,12]. S. aureus was cultured and cloned on Columbia blood agar plates, harvested and enzymatically lysed. DNA was purified using Qiagen spin columns. A linear amplification was performed using one specific primer per target. Biotin-16-dUTP was randomly incorporated into the amplicons during that step. After incubation with the array and after washing steps, hybridization to probes immobilised to the array was detected using streptavidin-horseradish-peroxidase that catalyses a local precipitation of a dye. Microarrays were then photographed and analysed using a designated reader and software (Iconoclust, Alere Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany). This allowed establishing the presence or absence of certain genes or alleles as well as, by automated comparison of resulting patterns to a database, an assignment to clonal complexes, strains and SCCmec types.

Virtual hybridisations

For comparison of real-life experiments with published genome sequences, a computer-based method for predicting DNA array hybridization patterns from full genome sequences was used. Predicted patterns were generated either from fully finished genomic sequences (all gaps closed) or from partially assembled sequences as typically obtained from next generation sequencing (NGS). A large number of partially assembled sequences of staphylococci is available in the WGS section of NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/wgs/). The computational method identified the binding sites of the hybridisation probes in the genomic sequences. For simplicity, only the probe binding sites were determined, while the binding sites of the labelling primers were not considered. If more than one binding site was found, only the one with the highest number of matches between probe and target was taken into account. The number of mismatches between probe and target sequence was used to predict the strength of the normalized hybridization signal. Perfect matches (i.e., no mismatches) were set to the maximum signal, while four or more mismatches were set to no signal at all. One mismatch yielded a slightly attenuated maximum signal, two mismatches yielded half of the maximal signal, and three mismatches yielded a weak signal which is set slightly above the noise level. The computation method thus resulted in datasets comparable to those from real experiments. This approach was validated by comparing experimental to predicted data of fully sequenced, well known reference strains (such as MSSA476, GenBank BX571857; N315, GenBank BA000018; COL, GenBank CP000046; MRSA252, GenBank BX571856; or strains with well-characterised SCCmec elements [14]; see S1 Table). Several predicted hybridisation patterns matched experimental results of clinical isolates characterised herein (see Table 3 and S1 Table). However, some isolates also were observed that yielded patterns for which no matching sequence could be identified (see Table 3 and S1 Table). * Unknown variant, no matching sequence identified among published genome or SCC sequences. ** In absence of genome sequence data, it cannot be decided whether this operon was localised on SCCmec or on a plasmid. *** Weak reactivity might indicate a divergent allele. ° ACME I = arc and opp genes, ACME II = arc genes only, ACME III = opp genes only. °° Recombinase genes in SCCmec XI are described as ccrA1/B3 (http://www.sccmec.org/Pages/SCC_TypesEN.html) but yielded weak signals with probes for ccrB1/A3 °°° There is one unique SCC terminal sequence associated to SCCmec XI but no primers and probes were designed for it.

Results

SCCmec typing markers

Probes including those that were used for clonal complex determination as well as detection of toxin genes and resistance genes have been previously discussed, and these probe and primer sequences were provided elsewhere [11,12]. SCC related markers together with definitions, short explanations and reference sequences are listed in Table 2. S2 Table contains, beyond this information, also the individual primers and probes utilised for this study. These markers have been selected from published genome sequences because of an unambiguous, strict linkage to SCC elements and their variable presence in those elements. Some have been annotated differently, introducing identical names or gene symbols to genes or features which are highly similar in sequence. For several genes, allelic variants were distinguished. Table 2 also shows estimated prevalences for the individual markers. This is based on strain prevalences as shown in Table 1 and [10]. It should be noted that these are projections rather than actual figures because i) not all isolates recovered were fully characterised (especially, it was not possible to include each isolate of abundant strains such as CC22-MRSA-IV “Barnim EMRSA”), ii) no systematic testing was performed in one of the two hospitals (see above) and iii) there were clear changes to the population structure of MRSA over time [10], and this also affects marker prevalences. Various resistance markers are typically located on transposons or insertion elements and are known to be occasionally associated with SCCmec elements (such as aadD, erm(A) or tet genes) were covered by the array. However, they were not used for SCCmec subtyping because DNA array hybridisation cannot provide information whether they are associated with SCC elements or carried on other mobile elements such as on plasmids or transposons. The mercury resistance operon was used for subtyping some strains, but since it can be carried outside of SCC elements, these results should be regarded as preliminary. For other heavy metal resistances, probes were designed that distinguish alleles that are known to be associated with SCC from those that were described from other mobile elements; and only the former ones were analysed for this paper.

SCC termini

SCC termini were investigated because of their relevance for the design of PCRs that span the integration sites of SCC elements into the S. aureus genome proving that a positive SCCmec/mecA amplification was attributable to the presence of MRSA in a sample rather than to mecA-positive staphylococci of other species. SCC elements insert into the chromosomes of staphylococcal species by site-specific recombination. Insertion is catalysed by the cassette chromosome recombinase which is encoded on the SCC element by genes ccrA, ccrB or ccrC. The recognition site is a stretch of 16 nucleotides located at the 3'-end of the coding sequences of orfX (a putative 23S rRNA methyltransferase). The sequence of the insertion site is doubled upon insertion giving rise to pairs of direct repeats. Composite SCC elements often have more than two direct repeats. In genomes carrying a SCC element, the terminal region of the SCC element located downstream of orfX has been called downstream constant segment (dcs). The name reflects that this region was found to be highly conserved in all the longer known sequences of SCC elements. Nowadays, a much larger and more diverse set of SCC sequences is available. The SCC terminal region is the intergenic region between orfX and the first codons annotated in the SCC element. In an analysis of complete SCC sequences from GenBank we have identified dsc but also 14 other distinct types of the intergenic region between orfX and the first codon annotated in the SCC element. For dcs and another 13 terminal integration site sequences, primers and probes were developed and used to screen isolates. A 14th sequence was identified in published genome sequences of mecC/SCCmec XI-positive strains, but it was not screened for, being redundant to the other SCCmec XI-associated markers already covered by the array. Ten terminal integration site sequences were indeed found among the isolates herein. Multiple SCC termini, in 15 different combinations, were identified in strains and isolates that harbour composite or multiple SCC elements (see Table 3). This is in accordance to published genome sequences of strains harbouring composite or multiple SCC elements, where additional SCC termini can be found also in a distance from orfX. An example is GenBank FR753166.1, where SCC terminus 3 (positions 481 to 586), dcs (24011 to 24292) and SCC terminus 5 (13044 to 13465) are found. The association of SCC termini with types and subtypes SCC elements is shown in Table 3. Given the prevalences of strains as shown in Table 1, it can be estimated that dcs is present in about 95% of isolates from the study region. However, especially among the sporadic and/or travel-associated strains, other SCC termini were observed.

Characterisation of SCC elements and subtypes

Sixty-one distinct SCC elements and subtypes were identified using the set of primers and probes described herein. An overview is given in Table 3, full data are provided in the S1 Table.

Clonal complexes and strains that were found to harbour SCC elements

Full details on CC/strain assignments, SCC elements and subtypes are provided in Table 1.

CC1-MSSA

One CC1-MSSA isolate was identified that carried a SCCfus element apparently identical to the one in MSSA476, GenBank BX571857.1.

CC1-MRSA

PVL-negative CC1-MRSA-IV were rare and all of them harboured SCCmec IVa elements apparently identical to the one in the sequenced strain MW2 (BA000033.2). SCCmec IV/SCCfus composite elements as described elsewhere [15,16,17] were not identified. One PVL-positive CC1-MRSA was identified that carried a SCCmec V element as also observed in the Bengal Bay clone (ST772, see below) and another one harboured a SCCmec V+SCC fus composite element.

CC5-MRSA

As previously described, CC5/ST228-MRSA-I, the so-called “South German” epidemic MRSA (EMRSA) strain used to be common in Dresden around the year 2000, but it nearly disappeared since [10]. With regard to SCCmec elements, two variants were observed. One appeared identical to SCCmec I from the CC8 strain COL (GenBank CP000046.1) as well as to those of CC5-MRSA-I strains from Switzerland (GenBank HE579059.1 to HE579069.1). These genome sequences also suggest that the variable presence of the mer operon in CC5-MRSA-I was related to plasmid carriage rather than to variability of the SCCmec element. A second variant harboured a pseudoSCCmec element, lacking recombinase genes. Nearly all isolates harbouring this variant were cultured within one year suggesting an epidemiological linkage. A single isolate of CC5-MRSA-I/fus, “Geraldine Clone” [18], was found in 2012 in a patient with a history of foreign travel. It carried a combined SCCmecI/SCCfus element that also included tirS matching the predicted pattern for the sequence of strain MRSA-7 [15]. CC5-MRSA-II is a common strain known as “New York/Japan clone” or, in Germany, as “Rhine-Hesse EMRSA”. Analysis of published sequences indicate that there are two different variants of SCCmec II that differ in presence (Mu50: BA000017.4, N315: BA000018.3) or absence (JH1: CP000736.1, JH9: CP000703.1) of mvaS. All tested isolates from Dresden lacked this gene. Recently (2014/2015), sporadic isolates were found that additionally carried ccrA/B-4, czrC and, variably, speG. CC5-MRSA-IV, “Paediatric clone”, was only sporadically found. SCCmec IVa, IVb/d/i and IVc were identified among PVL-negative isolates of this “strain”. All PVL-positives yielded SCCmec IVc. One CC5-MRSA-[IV+ccrA/B-4] (as in a strain from Spain, SA_ST125, GenBank ASTH) was detected in a patient with travel history to the Canary Islands. SCCmec V was only found once in a CC5 MRSA.

CC6-MRSA

Three isolates were found; and two of them originated from patients with Middle Eastern travel history. All harboured SCCmec IVa elements.

CC7-MRSA

Just five isolates were identified. Two carried SCCmec IVb/d/I; SCCmec IVa, VT and VI+fus elements were found once each.

CC8-MSSA

Three different strains of MSSA were identified that harboured SCC elements without mecA/mecC. They yielded signals for different combinations of ACME II, speG, czrC and ccA/B-4 genes (Table 1).

CC8-MRSA

Only a single isolate of ST247-MRSA-I, “North German/Iberian EMRSA”, was found. Its hybridisation pattern, with regard to SCC genes, was in concordance to the predicted pattern for strain PSP1996 (GenBank ANHU) but differed from SCCmec elements of COL (GenBank CP000046.1) and the local CC5/ST228-MRSA-I strain in the absence of mvaS-SCC. One isolate of ST8-MRSA-IIA/B/D, “Irish AR13/14” [19], was detected in a healthy carrier (a student in a microbiology course). For CC8-MRSA-IV, several different strains of PVL-negative have been described previously that could be distinguished mainly based on enterotoxin gene carriage. All were only sporadically found. “UK-EMRSA-14”, without enterotoxin genes, was found twice, harbouring SCCmec IVc or h/j. The “Lyon Clone”, i.e., sea-positive CC8-MRSA-IV yielded SCCmec IVc. “USA500” (seb-positive CC8-MRSA-IV that occasionally also carry sea, sek, seq) were found to carry SCCmec IVa (from a patient with Ethiopian background) or an mvaS-negative variant of SCCmec IVb/d/i (from two cases with infections acquired in Mozambique and Zimbabwe). USA300-like, PVL-positive CC8-MRSA could be assigned by SCCmec subtyping to four distinct strains out of which the most common one was ACME-positive. This strain harboured SCCmec IVa, an ACME I element and a copper resistance gene as present in genome sequences FPR3757, GenBank CP000255.1, and TCH1516 GenBank CP000730.1. A second strain harboured a SCCmec IVc element, two copper resistance genes (copA2-SCC, mco-SCC), and the mercury resistance operon but lacked ACME. It is likely to be identical to the SCCmec element from MRSA177, GenBank AECP. A third strain lacked ccrA/B-2 and B2Y834. A forth strain, identified once, harboured SCCmec IVa (as also present in the genome sequence of a USA300-like strain, IS-88, GenBank AHLO). At least three distinct strains could be distinguished that were originally merged under the label “Hannover EMRSA”. Two of these strains were common in Dresden around the turn of the century [10]. One harboured a pseudoSCCmec element and the mercury resistance operon. The other one harboured a composite element including SCCmec IV, ccrC and D1GU38 (a marker that accompanies “additional” ccrC, see Table 1) as well as Q2G1R6 suggesting that this composite element derived from a SCCmec IVa t. A third variant of the “Hannover Epidemic Strain” was represented by “Hannover 100–93” from the Harmony Strain Collection and UK-EMRSA-10 (courtesy of G. Coombs). However, they harboured B6VQU0 indicating relationship to SCCmec IVh/j rather than to IVa. Finally, a single CC8-MRSA-VT strain was found that carried czrC, thus resembling the SCC elements of CC398 livestock-associated MRSA.

CC22-MSSA

CC22-MSSA with two different SCC elements were identified. One element, harbouring arsB and ccrA/B-4, was identified just once. The other one comprised speG, czrC and ccrA/B-4 and it was found in several recent (2014/2015) isolates some of which showed growth on MRSA selective media.

CC22-MRSA

The vast majority of CC22 were assigned to the CC22-MRSA-IV strain known as “UK-EMRSA-15” or locally also as “Barnim EMRSA” [20]. This strain appeared first in 2001 [10] become rapidly more common and accounted nearly 80% of all genotyped MRSA isolates in 2013. These isolates harboured SCCmec IVh/j elements. Few CC22-MRSA-IV isolates were identified that yielded positive signals for fnbB (indicating that they could belong to different lineage within CC22 in which fnbA and fnbB are not fused, [21]). Some (4 out of 7) fnbB-positive isolates also carried SCCmec IVh/j elements, one had a SCCmec IVa element, and two were assigned to SCCmec IVc. Another CC22-MRSA-IV that differs from UK-15/Barnim in being positive for tst1 has been described from the Middle East and Mediterranean regions as “Gaza Strain” [22,23]. A single isolate was identified in 2015 from a patient with a Middle Eastern name, and it harboured SCCmec IVa. PVL-positive CC22-MRSA-IV were rarely found. Older isolates (one each from the years 2000, 2001 and 2002) carried SCCmec IVh/j as observed for UK-15/Barnim. More recent isolates (2014–15) yielded SCCmec IVa or IVc. A single CC22 isolate was found that carried a SCCmec IVh/j+ACME2 composite element. An apparently identical element has previously been described in a CC22 strain from Ireland [24]. A few isolates were also identified that harboured composite elements in various constellations (see Tables 1 and 3).

CC30-MRSA

CC30/ST36-MRSA-II, UK-EMRSA-16 was identified only once, in 2002 [10]. It carried a N315-like SCCmec II element. PVL-positive CC30-MRSA-IV are known as “Southwest Pacific Clone”, “WSPP” (West Samoa Phage Pattern) clone or "USA1100”. Published genome sequences indicate the presence of different SCCmec subtypes in different isolates of that “strain” (SCCmec IVb/d/i in Strain WBG10049, GenBank ACSV; SCCmec IVc in Strain 122051, GenBank AHZJ and Strain TCH60, GenBank CP002110.1). The majority of the few Dresden isolates proved to carry SCCmec IVa elements with (7 out of 9 isolates) or without (1 out of 9) mvaS-SCC; a putative composite of SCCmec IVb/d/i+copA2-SCC was found once. A CC30 strain with a SCCmec VT element was identified once in a child (with the mother carrying most likely the same strain).

CC45-MRSA

CC45-MRSA-IV (“Berlin EMRSA”) was frequently identified in the early 2000s. However, it nearly disappeared since and is only sporadically found usually in elderly patients. It was already noted that most, although not all, “Berlin EMRSA” isolates carried apha3+sat (kana-/neomycin and streptothricin resistance [10]). All aphA3+sat-positive isolates harboured SCCmec IVa. Among aphA3+sat-negatives, SCCmec IVa was found as well as SCCmec IVb/d/I and IVc. Published genome sequences of CC45-MRSA-IV also show different SCCmec IV subtypes (IVa in CIG1524 GenBank AHVI; IVb/d/I in 300–169, GenBank JASL, and 301–188, GenBank JASK). CC45-MRSA-V were rare, only two isolates (with SCCmec VT elements) were identified. CC45-MRSA-IV and -V with additional ACME I elements were found once each.

CC59-MRSA

Only three MRSA isolates were identified and assigned to CC59-MRSA-VT (PVL+), “Taiwan Clone”. Their SCCmec VT elements appeared to be identical to that of the prototypical strain PM1, GenBank BAFA.

ST72-MRSA

Although MLST indicates similarity/relationship to CC8, ST72 differs in several core genomic features such as the presence of the enterotoxin gene cluster [11]. A single isolate of that lineage was identified and it carried the same SCCmec IV A element as present in the genome sequence of the ST72 strain CN1, GenBank CP003979.1,. This element is rather unique due to the absence of ugpQ.

CC80-MSSA

One CC80-MSSA isolate was isolated from an abscess of an Eritrean refugee. It was PVL-positive, but contrarily to other CC80 it carried the enterotoxin homologue ORF CM14, and it also harboured an ACME III element.

CC80-MRSA

PVL-positive CC80-MRSA-IV were sporadically identified from 2004 on, and frequently cases were associated with travel to Mediterranean regions or the Middle East [25]. All tested isolates invariably carried TCH60-like SCCmec IVc elements.

CC88-MRSA

CC88-MRSA were only found very sporadically. PVL-negative CC88-MRSA-IV isolates harboured SCCmec IVa (although two different variants) or IVc elements. PVL-positive isolates also carried SCCmec IVa (as also found in HST-105, GenBank AZTH) but showed a variable presence of mvaS-SCC.

ST93-MRSA

Two PVL-positive isolates of ST93-MRSA-IV, “Queensland clone” [26,27], were found to carry SCCmec IVa elements.

CC97-MRSA

CC97-MRSA were found twice. Both isolates harboured MW2-like SCCmec IVa elements, as the CC97 genome sequence IS-55, GenBank AHLN does.

CC130-MRSA

CC130-MRSA-XI have been identified three times (2009, 2014, 2015). Two isolates were available for further characterisation, being positive for mecC and essentially identical to the strain M10-0061 from the strain’s original description [2].

CC152-MRSA

A single isolate of CC152-MRSA-V (PVL+) was found. It carried a SCCmec VT element that appeared identical to the one in GR1, GenBank AJLX.

CC182-MSSA

Some (but not all) CC182-MSSA carried a SCC element comprising the kdp locus and ccrA/B-2 genes.

ST239-MRSA

ST239 is a chimeric lineage in which a CC30-like stretch of genomic DNA is inserted into a CC8 parent genome. There are several genome sequences available, and their analysis shows a remarkable variability of their SCCmec elements, especially with regard to the presence of heavy metal resistance operons and an additional recombinase gene, ccrC. This strain was only sporadically found in Dresden, always related to importation. Isolates from an outbreak in 2001, with an index patient repatriated from Greece [10], showed a composite SCCmec III element including ccrC as well as cadmium and mercury resistance operons that was identical to the predicted pattern of strain SK1585 (GenBank AYLT). Another isolate was found in 2015 in a patient with history of Middle Eastern travel. It also harboured a slightly different composite SCCmec III element (see Table 3) that resembled Bmb9393, GenBank CP005288.1. One 2008 isolate from a patient with history of hospitalisation in Turkey [10] yielded a composite SCCmec III element including ccrC as well as the Cd resistance operon. It appeared to be identical to the SCCmec element in CN79, GenBank ANCJ, and 16K, GenBank BABZ. Another 2016 isolate, also from a patient with travel history, showed a similar element that matched no known sequence (see Table 3).

CC398-MRSA

“Livestock-associated” CC398-MRSA have sporadically been detected from 2005 on, with a slight increase in recent years. The majority of isolates carried the SCCmec VT/czrC composite element as the sequenced strain SO385. However, sporadic isolates with an ydhK-negative variant thereof, a SCCmec IVc, a composite SCCmec VT/heavy metal resistance element and a pseudoSCCmec element have also been observed (see Table 3).

ST617-MRSA

ST617 was described as a putative recombinant of CC8 and CC45 parents sporadically observed in Germany [28]. A single isolate was found to carry a SCCmec IVa element.

ST772-MRSA

ST772 is lineage that is by MLST related to CC1. As previously described [29], it differs in several core genomic features. One emerging community-associated MRSA strain, the “Bengal Bay Clone”, belongs to this lineage. Five isolates have been found; all carried a unique variant of SCCmec V that was also present in several published genome sequences of the “Bengal Bay Clone”.

Discussion

Although the characterised strain collection that was rather small, confined to a sampling period of a few years and a restricted geographic area, a remarkable variety of SCCmec elements was observed. For all major SCCmec types, distinct subtypes could be identified, and some additional rare or even not yet sequenced SCCmec elements were observed. When expanding the panel of genes used for SCCmec typing/subtyping, a number of additional variants of SCCmec types or subtypes can be discerned. Several common strains showed a remarkable variability of SCCmec types or subtypes. These include ST239-MRSA-III, CC5-MRSA-IV, CC22-MRSA-IV or CC398-MRSA-V/VT. Theoretically, there are two explanations for this observation. A common and widespread strain might further evolve, after geographic dissemination, by acquiring additional markers of selective advantage (such as additional antibiotic resistance genes or heavy metal resistance genes), or by losing genes that do not actually confer an advantage (such as possibly additional recombinase genes from composite elements). This could be an explanation for the different variants of ST239-MRSA-III that can harbour a number of different SCCmec III/heavy metal resistance composite elements. Another example could be the observation of SCCmec II and IVa subtypes that just differ in the presence or absence of mvaS-SCC. The most parsimonious explanation would just be a random deletion of that gene from SCCmec elements in some specimens. Another possibility is that a “strain” was in fact polyphyletic. This means that related parental MSSA from one lineage independently might have acquired different (although sometimes similar or related) subtypes of SCCmec elements. This could be the case for CC5-MRSA-IV, CC22-MRSA-IV and PVL-positive CC30-MRSA-IV. These observations also imply that the emergence of novel MRSA strains by acquisition of SCCmec elements might be rather common. Another issue is strain definition and nomenclature. While naming strains is highly practical for routine use one should be aware that a nomenclature is an artificial convention and depends on resolution power of typing methods. Traditionally, a strain or clone has been defined as a “group of isolates that can be distinguished from other isolates of the same genus and species by phenotypic characteristics or genotypic characteristics or both” [30,31]. This might be feasible when using MLST/spa or PFGE typing but is not practical when applying microarrays or genome sequencing. This might appear to be a somewhat esoteric issue but it has practical consequences, especially when ruling out or confirming identity in outbreak investigations. For practical purposes, clinicians and infection control officers need clear breakpoints indicating how many “differences” (in terms of numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms or of mobile genes being present or absent) safely rule out a possible transmission or how many might still be considered as consistent with “identity” and thus with a possible transmission. Regarding SCCmec nomenclature, the main types easily can be categorised using the framework previously provided (http://www.sccmec.org/Pages/SCC_TypesEN.html). However, microarrays and genome sequencing reveal a high degree of variability on a “subtype” level as well as a rather common presence of irregular and/or composite elements. In order to avoid cumbersome, subjective and eventually ambiguous designations, sequencing and referencing on sequence data (i.e., accession numbers or strain designations unambiguously linked to accession numbers) appears to be inevitable. Since SCCmec elements often contain repetitive and mobile sequences (such as IS431) they are especially prone to be fragmented and split across several contigs when performing NGS. As array hybridisation, NGS thus cannot always and instantly provide information on gene localisations, and it also cannot reliably recognise duplications or inversions. A set of probes and targets as used herein could not only be used in vitro for typing and for selecting isolates that warrant sequencing, but also for a computerised analysis of NGS sequences allowing a quick assignment to strains and variants. With increasing availability of NGS technology, rapid data analysis and data transfer to non-expert users will become a major challenge. The development of specific sets of markers that can be interrogated in vitro as well as in NGS datasets might help to solve that problem and might also help to find a practical solution to the problem of defining identity or non-identity as discussed above. The proposed microarray can help to distinguish isolates that appear similar or identical by other typing methods and it can be used as high-throughput screening tool for the detection of novel SCC variants that warrant detailed investigation and sequence analysis. The high degree of heterogeneity of SCC elements even within so-called strains can be utilised for epidemiological typing.

Hybridisation profiles for tested reference strains (highlighted in red) and clinical isolates as well as predicted hybridisation patterns for reference sequences (highlighted in blue).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Target genes, primers and probes.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  35 in total

Review 1.  Strain, clone and species: comments on three basic concepts of bacteriology.

Authors:  L Dijkshoorn; B M Ursing; J B Ursing
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Extensive genetic diversity identified among sporadic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered in Irish hospitals between 2000 and 2012.

Authors:  Peter M Kinnevey; Anna C Shore; Grainne I Brennan; Derek J Sullivan; Ralf Ehricht; Stefan Monecke; David C Coleman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements.

Authors: 
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Rapid microarray-based identification of different mecA alleles in Staphylococci.

Authors:  Stefan Monecke; Elke Müller; Stefan Schwarz; Helmut Hotzel; Ralf Ehricht
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  spa Typing of Staphylococcus aureus as a frontline tool in epidemiological typing.

Authors:  B Strommenger; C Braulke; D Heuck; C Schmidt; B Pasemann; U Nübel; W Witte
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Molecular epidemiology of nasal isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Jordan.

Authors:  Amin A Aqel; Hamed M Alzoubi; Anna Vickers; Bruno Pichon; Angela M Kearns
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Assignment of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to clonal complexes based on microarray analysis and pattern recognition.

Authors:  Stefan Monecke; Peter Slickers; Ralf Ehricht
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-27

8.  Clonal replacement of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in a German university hospital over a period of eleven years.

Authors:  Nicole Albrecht; Lutz Jatzwauk; Peter Slickers; Ralf Ehricht; Stefan Monecke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The molecular epidemiology of the highly virulent ST93 Australian community Staphylococcus aureus strain.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Coombs; Richard V Goering; Kyra Y L Chua; Stefan Monecke; Benjamin P Howden; Timothy P Stinear; Ralf Ehricht; Frances G O'Brien; Keryn J Christiansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Detection of mecC-positive Staphylococcus aureus (CC130-MRSA-XI) in diseased European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) in Sweden.

Authors:  Stefan Monecke; Dolores Gavier-Widen; Roland Mattsson; Lena Rangstrup-Christensen; Alexandros Lazaris; David C Coleman; Anna C Shore; Ralf Ehricht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  28 in total

1.  Genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from sepsis patients in Pakistan and detection of antibodies against staphylococcal virulence factors.

Authors:  Stefan Monecke; Muhammad Ali Syed; Mushtaq Ahmad Khan; Shehzad Ahmed; Sadia Tabassum; Darius Gawlik; Elke Müller; Annett Reissig; Sascha D Braun; Ralf Ehricht
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Pakistan: molecular characterisation by microarray technology.

Authors:  Bushra Jamil; Darius Gawlik; Muhammad Ali Syed; Asim Ali Shah; Shahid Ahmad Abbasi; Elke Müller; Annett Reißig; Ralf Ehricht; Stefan Monecke
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Targeting the Holy Triangle of Quorum Sensing, Biofilm Formation, and Antibiotic Resistance in Pathogenic Bacteria.

Authors:  Ronit Vogt Sionov; Doron Steinberg
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 4.  Description of Staphylococcal Strains from Straw-Coloured Fruit Bat (Eidolon helvum) and Diamond Firetail (Stagonopleura guttata) and a Review of their Phylogenetic Relationships to Other Staphylococci.

Authors:  Stefan Monecke; Frieder Schaumburg; Adebayo O Shittu; Stefan Schwarz; Kristin Mühldorfer; Christian Brandt; Sascha D Braun; Maximilian Collatz; Celia Diezel; Darius Gawlik; Dennis Hanke; Helmut Hotzel; Elke Müller; Martin Reinicke; Andrea T Feßler; Ralf Ehricht
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.073

5.  Diversity of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in European Wildlife.

Authors:  Stefan Monecke; Dolores Gavier-Widén; Helmut Hotzel; Martin Peters; Sebastian Guenther; Alexandros Lazaris; Igor Loncaric; Elke Müller; Annett Reissig; Antje Ruppelt-Lorz; Anna C Shore; Birgit Walter; David C Coleman; Ralf Ehricht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Emerging variants of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus genotypes in Kuwait hospitals.

Authors:  Samar S Boswihi; Edet E Udo; Stefan Monecke; Bindu Mathew; Bobby Noronha; Tina Verghese; Sajida B Tappa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Intra-Hospital, Inter-Hospital and Intercontinental Spread of ST78 MRSA From Two Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Outbreaks Established Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Megan R Earls; David C Coleman; Gráinne I Brennan; Tanya Fleming; Stefan Monecke; Peter Slickers; Ralf Ehricht; Anna C Shore
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Dissemination of high-level mupirocin-resistant CC22-MRSA-IV in Saxony.

Authors:  Stefan Monecke; Antje Ruppelt-Lorz; Elke Müller; Annett Reissig; Alexander Thürmer; Anna C Shore; David C Coleman; Ralf Ehricht; Lutz Jatzwauk
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2017-11-20

9.  A mecC allotype, mecC3, in the CoNS Staphylococcus caeli, encoded within a variant SCCmecC.

Authors:  A C MacFadyen; E M Harrison; I Drigo; J Parkhill; M A Holmes; G K Paterson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  DNA microarray analysis of Staphylococcus aureus from Nigeria and South Africa.

Authors:  Adebayo Osagie Shittu; Tomiwa Adesoji; Edet Ekpenyong Udo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.