| Literature DB >> 31370245 |
Mikyeong Jung1,2, Saejong Park3, Hyesook Kim4, Oran Kwon5,6.
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence that links nutrition to muscle mass and function in the elderly, suggesting that it has an important role to play both in the prevention and management of age-related sarcopenia. Some nutrients have been studied, but less is known about the influence of overall diet quality on the loss of skeletal muscle mass and function. This study investigated the interrelationship between the recommended food score (RFS), as an indicator of overall diet quality, and muscle mass function among the Korean elderly. The sample consisted of 521 participants (263 men and 258 women), aged >65 years, who participated in the 2014-2015 National Fitness Award project. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Low muscle mass was defined as having an ASM corrected for height lower than the cutoff value established by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Muscle function, assessed by handgrip strength (HGS), was defined as low if it was below the 20th percentile of elderly men and women. Low muscle mass-function, defined as low muscle mass with low muscle strength (HGS), was found in 29 men (11.0%) and 22 women (8.5%). In elderly men, the low muscle mass-function group had significantly lower RFS values than the normal group after adjustments for age, body fat percentage, drinking, smoking, education, and physical activity (p = 0.019). However, there was no association between RFS and muscle mass-function in elderly women. Our findings suggest that better diet quality may be associated with higher muscle mass in elderly Korean men.Entities:
Keywords: Korean elderly; diet quality; low muscle mass-function; recommended food score
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31370245 PMCID: PMC6696159 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16152733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
General characteristics of the elderly subjects.
| Variable 1 | Total 2 ( | Men ( | Women ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 71.6 ± 5.1 | 71.9 ± 4.9 | 71.4 ± 5.3 | 0.271 |
| Height (cm) | 159.1 ± 8.4 | 165.5 ± 5.8 | 152.6 ± 5.0 | <0.0001 |
| Body mass (kg) | 60.2 ± 8.8 | 64.1 ± 8.5 | 56.3 ± 7.3 | <0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 2.9 | 23.4 ± 2.8 | 24.2 ± 2.9 | 0.002 |
| Body fat (%) | 29.5 ± 8.2 | 24.0 ± 5.9 | 35.0 ± 6.3 | <0.0001 |
| Lean body mass (kg) | 22.9 ± 4.6 | 26.5 ± 3.1 | 19.2 ± 2.2 | <0.0001 |
| Education ( | <0.0001 | |||
| ≤Middle school | 281 (53.9) | 100 (38.0) | 181 (70.2) | |
| High school | 145 (27.8) | 82 (31.2) | 63 (24.4) | |
| College | 95 (18.2) | 81 (30.8) | 14 (5.4) | |
| Marital status ( | <0.0001 | |||
| Single | 165 (31.7) | 42 (16.0) | 123 (47.7) | |
| Marital | 365 (68.3) | 221 (84.0) | 135 (52.3) | |
| Current smoker ( | 17 (3.3) | 16 (6.0) | 1 (0.4) | 0.0003 |
| Current drinker ( | 237 (45.5) | 178 (65.8) | 64 (24.8) | <0.0001 |
| Physical activity (METs-h/week) 4 | 6.5 ± 6.8 | 5.8 ± 6.6 | 7.1 ± 7.0 | 0.031 |
1 BMI, body mass index. Marital status was defined as reporting married or living as married. Current smoker was defined as current smoking or cessation of smoking within the previous 12 months, and current drinker was defined as consuming alcohol more than once a month. 2 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, or number (percentage). 3 p-Values based on the Student’s t-test for continuous variables, and chi-square test for categorical variables. 4 METs-h/week, metabolic equivalent task hours per week.
Diet quality, and muscle mass and function of the subjects.
| Variable | Total 1 ( | Men ( | Women ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diet quality | ||||
| Recommended food score | 29.8 ± 8.1 | 29.4 ± 8.5 | 30.2 ± 7.6 | 0.290 |
| Muscle mass | ||||
| Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (kg) | 17.3 ± 3.9 | 20.5 ± 2.6 | 14.2 ± 1.9 | <0.0001 |
| Muscle function | ||||
| Hand grip strength (kg) | 28.1 ± 8.1 | 34.3 ± 5.9 | 21.9 ± 4.2 | <0.0001 |
1 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. 2 p-Values based on the Student’s t-test.
The cutoff values and prevalence of low muscle mass and low muscle function.
| Variable | Men ( | Women ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cutoff Value | Prevalence (%) | Cutoff Value | Prevalence (%) | |
| Low muscle mass 1 | ||||
| Skeletal muscle mass index (kg/m2) | 7.23 | 35.4 | 5.67 | 27.9 |
| Low muscle function 2 | ||||
| Hand grip strength (kg) | 29.0 | 19.0 | 18.5 | 19.8 |
1 Defined based on appendicular skeletal muscle mass adjusted for height (ASM/height2), as proposed by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP). 2 Defined based on the 20th percentile of handgrip strength of elderly men and women.
Recommended food score (RFS) values according to the muscle mass-function status.
| Variable | Men ( | Women ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| RFS 1 |
| RFS | |||||
| Model 1 2 | Model 2 3 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
| Low muscle mass-function group 4 | 29 | 26.1 ± 8.4 | 0.018 * | 0.019 * | 22 | 28.0 ± 7.7 | 0.379 | 0.425 |
| Normal group | 234 | 29.8 ± 8.5 | 236 | 30.4 ± 7.5 | ||||
1 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. 2 Model 1: Adjusted for age and body fat (%). 3 Model 2: Adjusted for age, body fat (%), drinking, smoking, education, and physical activity. 4 Defined as low skeletal muscle mass (appendicular skeletal muscle mass divided by the height squared ≤7.23 kg/m2 in men and ≤5.67 kg/m2 in women), as proposed by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP), and low hand grip strength (<29.0 kg in men, <18.5 kg in women), defined using the cutoff values for the 20th percentile values of elderly men and women, respectively. * p < 0.05.