| Literature DB >> 30700281 |
Gyeo Woon Jeong1,2, You Jin Kim3, Saejong Park4, Hyesook Kim5, Oran Kwon6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A single nutrient or dietary pattern has been associated with physical performance. However, little is still known about the association of overall dietary quality with physical performance. This study aimed to investigate the link between the recommended food score (RFS), defined as an indicator of overall diet quality, and physical performance among the Korean elderly aged over 65 years.Entities:
Keywords: Diet quality; Elderly; Hand grip strength; Physical performance; Recommended food score
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30700281 PMCID: PMC6354425 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6457-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
General characteristics of the elderly subjects
| Total ( | Men ( | Women ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± S.D. or n (%) | Mean ± S.D. or n (%) | Mean ± S.D. or n (%) | ||
| Age, yrs | 71.8 ± 4.9 | 71.7 ± 4.6 | 71.9 ± 5.2 | 0.654 |
| Height, cm | 159.0 ± 8.6 | 166.1 ± 5.6 | 152.6 ± 5.2 | <.0001 |
| Weight, kg | 60.5 ± 8.8 | 65.2 ± 8.0 | 56.3 ± 7.3 | <.0001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.9 ± 2.7 | 23.6 ± 2.5 | 24.2 ± 2.8 | 0.008 |
| Body fat, % | 29.8 ± 7.9 | 24.2 ± 5.6 | 34.8 ± 6.0 | <.0001 |
| Lean body mass, kg | 22.9 ± 4.7 | 27.0 ± 3.1 | 19.3 ± 2.3 | <.0001 |
| Income, won/mo | 0.0002 | |||
| Less than 2,000,000 | 287 (46.1) | 159 (54.1) | 128 (39.0) | |
| Over 2,000,000 | 335 (53.9) | 135 (45.9) | 200 (61.0) | |
| Education | <.0001 | |||
| Elementary/middle school | 338 (54.3) | 115 (39.1) | 223 (68.0) | |
| High school | 184 (29.6) | 101 (34.4) | 83 (25.3) | |
| College | 100 (16.1) | 78 (26.5) | 22 (6.7) | |
| Marital status | <.0001 | |||
| Single | 207 (33.3) | 42 (14.3) | 165 (50.3) | |
| Marital | 415 (66.7) | 252 (85.7) | 163 (49.7) | |
| Current smoker, yes | 39 (6.3) | 36 (12.2) | 3 (0.9) | <.0001 |
| Current drinker, yes | 235 (37.8) | 173 (58.8) | 62 (18.9) | <.0001 |
| Physical activity, METs-h/wk | 8.7 ± 9.4 | 8.4 ± 8.3 | 8.9 ± 10.3 | 0.535 |
| Recommended food score | 30.1 ± 8.2 | 29.5 ± 8.8 | 30.7 ± 7.6 | 0.065 |
| Physical performance | ||||
| 2-min step test, repㆍ120sec | 105.2 ± 23.3 | 104.5 ± 20.7 | 105.7 ± 25.5 | 0.524 |
| Timed up and go test, sec | 6.4 ± 1.6 | 6.0 ± 1.3 | 6.7 ± 1.8 | <.0001 |
| Figure of 8 walk test, sec | 27.6 ± 7.0 | 26.0 ± 5.6 | 29.1 ± 7.8 | <.0001 |
| Grip strength, kg | 27.8 ± 8.2 | 34.5 ± 6.1 | 21.8 ± 4.1 | <.0001 |
| Grip strength, % | 45.8 ± 11.0 | 53.4 ± 9.1 | 39.0 ± 7.7 | <.0001 |
| Arm curl test, frequency | 16.8 ± 5.0 | 18.3 ± 5.2 | 15.5 ± 4.3 | <.0001 |
S.D., standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; Current drinker was defined as consuming alcohol more than once a month and current smoker was defined as current smoking or cessation of smoking within the past 12 months. Marriage was defined as reporting married or living as married
Correlation between RFS and physical performances in the elderly subjects
| Men ( | Women ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | r | |||
| 2-min step test, repㆍ120sec | 0.050 | 0.390 | 0.039 | 0.487 |
| Timed up and go test, sec | −0.034 | 0.560 | −0.064 | 0.246 |
| Figure of 8 walk test, sec | 0.045 | 0.443 | −0.113 | 0.041 |
| Grip strength, kg | −0.027 | 0.648 | 0.149 | 0.007 |
| Grip strength, % | −0.113 | 0.052 | 0.097 | 0.080 |
| Arm curl test, frequency | − 0.036 | 0.544 | 0.056 | 0.309 |
Association between RFS and physical performances in the elderly subjects
| Men ( | Women ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ß | 95% CI | ß | 95% CI | |||
| 2-min step test, repㆍ120sec | ||||||
| Unadjusted | 0.119 | −0.153, 0.390 | 0.390 | 0.130 | −0.237, 0.497 | 0.487 |
| Model 1 | 0.086 | −0.179, 0.351 | 0.523 | 0.020 | −0.327, 0.367 | 0.909 |
| Model 2 | 0.096 | −0.167, 0.358 | 0.474 | 0.039 | −0.305, 0.384 | 0.823 |
| Timed up and go test, sec | ||||||
| Unadjusted | −0.005 | −0.021, 0.012 | 0.560 | −0.015 | − 0.041, 0.010 | 0.246 |
| Model 1 | −0.005 | −0.020, 0.010 | 0.480 | −0.002 | − 0.022, 0.019 | 0.878 |
| Model 2 | −0.006 | −0.021, 0.009 | 0.458 | −0.002 | − 0.023, 0.018 | 0.816 |
| Figure of 8 walk test, sec | ||||||
| Unadjusted | 0.029 | −0.045, 0.103 | 0.443 | −0.116 | −0.227, − 0.005 | 0.041 |
| Model 1 | 0.016 | −0.047, 0.079 | 0.626 | −0.057 | −0.148, 0.035 | 0.222 |
| Model 2 | 0.014 | −0.049, 0.077 | 0.660 | −0.059 | −0.149, 0.031 | 0.197 |
| Grip strength, kg | ||||||
| Unadjusted | −0.019 | −0.098, 0.061 | 0.648 | 0.081 | 0.022, 0.140 | 0.007 |
| Model 1 | 0.005 | −0.070, 0.079 | 0.905 | 0.063 | 0.007, 0.119 | 0.027 |
| Model 2 | 0.005 | −0.070, 0.080 | 0.900 | 0.066 | 0.010, 0.122 | 0.022 |
| Grip strength, % | ||||||
| Unadjusted | −0.118 | −0.236, 0.001 | 0.052 | 0.098 | −0.012, 0.209 | 0.080 |
| Model 1 | −0.013 | −0.112, 0.086 | 0.799 | 0.105 | 0.013, 0.198 | 0.026 |
| Model 2 | −0.014 | −0.113 0.085 | 0.780 | 0.109 | 0.016, 0.201 | 0.022 |
| Arm curl test, frequency | ||||||
| Unadjusted | −0.021 | − 0.089, 0.047 | 0.544 | 0.032 | −0.030, 0.095 | 0.309 |
| Model 1 | −0.025 | −0.090, 0.041 | 0.459 | 0.013 | −0.048, 0.075 | 0.668 |
| Model 2 | −0.022 | −0.087, 0.042 | 0.499 | 0.014 | −0.046, 0.075 | 0.639 |
Model 1: adjusted for age, body fat percentage, smoking, drinking, education, income, marital status
Model 2: adjusted for age, body fat percentage, smoking, drinking, education, income, marital status, physical activity