| Literature DB >> 31369583 |
Won Rak Choi1, Jae-Hyuk Yang2, Soo-Young Jeong1, Jin Kyu Lee1.
Abstract
Non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is mostly caused by a pivot shift mechanism including valgus collapse and internal tibial rotation. In female athletes, the incidence of ACL rupture has been reported to be significantly higher than in their male counterparts. However, to date, there have been limited reports and controversy regarding sex differences underlying injury mechanisms of ACL and severity of injury. In this study, we hypothesized that 1) in patients with non-contact ACL rupture, the incidence and severity of pivot shift injury, which are determined by injury pattern on MRI, would be significantly higher in females, and 2) anatomical factors associated with pivot shift injury would be significantly associated with female sex. A total of 148 primary ACL ruptures (145 patients) caused by non-contact injury mechanisms were included in this study. Among them, 41 knees (41 patients) were female and 107 knees (104 patients) were male. The status of the osseous lesions, lateral and medial tibial slope, depth of the medial tibial plateau, collateral ligaments, and menisci were assessed by MRI and compared between sexes. The severity of osseous lesions at the lateral tibial plateau, lateral femoral condyle, medial tibial plateau, and medial femoral condyle were comparable between sexes. There were no significant differences between sexes in the location of tibial contusions (p = 0.21), femoral contusions (p = 0.23), or meniscus tears (p = 0.189). Lateral tibial slope was found to be significantly larger in females (8.95° vs. 6.82°; p<0.0001; odds ratio = 1.464), and medial tibial depth was significantly shallower in females (1.80mm vs. 2.41mm; p<0.0001; odds ratio = 0.145). In conclusion, females showed greater lateral tibial slope and shallower medial tibial depth compared to males, however it did not affect the sex differences in injury pattern.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31369583 PMCID: PMC6675514 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1(A) shows the longitudinal axis of the tibia which is an extended line connecting 2 midpoints of the two circles. (B) shows the MTS at midsagittal plane of the medial tibial plateau with preserved longitudinal axis. (C) shows the LTS at midsagittal plane of the lateral tibial plateau with preserved longitudinal axis. (D) shows MTD at midsagittal plane of the medial tibial plateau. The perpendicular distance between the 2 lines was measured.
Demographics and sports activity level at the time of injury.
| Age | 23.95±4.08 | 24.86±3.17 | 0.153 |
| Height | 162.75±5.44 | 175.49±6.82 | 0.000 |
| Weight | 63.41±11.24 | 76.57±10.64 | 0.000 |
| BMI | 23.95±4.08 | 24.86±3.17 | 0.153 |
| Sports activity level at injury | 0.022 | ||
| ADL | 7 (17.1%) | 10 (9.3%) | |
| Light | 3 (7.3%) | 5 (4.7%) | |
| Moderate | 18 (43.9%) | 29 (27.1%) | |
| Strenuous | 13 (31.7%) | 63 (58.9%) |
BMI, body mass index; ADL, activity of daily living
Severity of osseous lesion by location.
| Lateral tibial plateau | 0.094 | ||
| 0 | 7 (17.1%) | 9 (8.4%) | |
| 1 | 6 (14.6%) | 16 (15.0%) | |
| 2 | 15 (36.6%) | 26 (24.3%) | |
| 3 | 13 (31.7%) | 56 (52.3%) | |
| Lateral femoral condyle | 0.113 | ||
| 0 | 16 (39.0%) | 26 (24.3%) | |
| 1 | 8 (19.5%) | 20 (18.7%) | |
| 2 | 14 (34.1%) | 37 (34.6%) | |
| 3 | 3 (7.3%) | 24 (22.4%) | |
| Medial tibial plateau | 0.902 | ||
| 0 | 19 (46.3%) | 53 (49.5%) | |
| 1 | 11 (26.8%) | 24 (22.4%) | |
| 2 | 8 (19.5%) | 24 (22.4%) | |
| 3 | 3 (7.3%) | 6 (5.6%) | |
| Medial femoral condyle | 0.134 | ||
| 0 | 37 (90.2%) | 92 (86.0%) | |
| 1 | 2 (4.9%) | 14 (13.1%) | |
| 2 | 1 (2.4%) | 1 (0.9%) | |
| 3 | 1 (2.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Fig 2T2-weighted MRI of typical patterns of osseous lesions in acute non-contact ACL ruptures.
Sagittal (A) and coronal (B) images of a male patient show osseous lesions in the central aspect of the distal lateral femoral condyle and the posterior aspect of the lateral and medial tibial plateau. Sagittal (C) and coronal (D) images of a female patient show the same pattern of osseous lesions.
Frequency of injury site by location.
| Site: Location | F (n = 41) | M (n = 107) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tibia | 0.211 | ||
| Medial only | 1 (2.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Lateral only | 13 (31.7%) | 44 (41.1%) | |
| Medial and lateral | 21 (51.2%) | 54 (50.5%) | |
| Neither | 6 (14.6%) | 9 (8.4%) | |
| Femur | 0.232 | ||
| Medial only | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Lateral only | 21 (51.2%) | 66 (61.7%) | |
| Medial and lateral | 4 (9.8%) | 15 (14.0%) | |
| Neither | 16 (39.0%) | 26 (24.3%) | |
| Meniscus | 0.189 | ||
| Medial only | 13 (31.7%) | 19 (17.8%) | |
| Lateral only | 7 (17.1%) | 25 (23.4%) | |
| Medial and lateral | 1 (2.4%) | 9 (8.4%) | |
| Neither | 20 (48.8%) | 54 (50.5%) | |
| Compartments | 0.198 | ||
| Medial only | 3 (7.3%) | 4 (3.7%) | |
| Lateral only | 9 (22.0%) | 38 (35.5%) | |
| Medial and lateral | 26 (63.4%) | 62 (57.9%) | |
| Neither | 3 (7.3%) | 3 (2.8%) | |
| Most severe site of tibial contusion | |||
| Medial = lateral | 7 (20.0%) | 18 (16.8%) | 0.712 |
| Medial > lateral | 1 (2.9%) | 2 (1.9%) | |
| Lateral > medial | 27 (77.1%) | 77 (72.0%) | |
| Neither | 6 (14.6%) | 10 (9.3%) |
Analysis of associated injuries in ligament, menisci, and Segond’s fracture.
| F (n = 41) | M (n = 107) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCL | 3 (7.3%) | 13 (12.1%) | 0.558 |
| MCL | 9 (22.0%) | 27 (25.2%) | 0.831 |
| FCL | 7 (17.1%) | 18 (16.8%) | 1.000 |
| MM | 14 (34.1%) | 28 (26.2%) | 0.415 |
| LM | 8 (19.5%) | 34 (31.8%) | 0.158 |
| Segond’s | 1 (2.4%) | 4 (3.7%) | 1.000 |
PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; MCL, medial collateral ligament; FCL, fibular collateral ligament; MM, medial meniscus; LM, lateral meniscus
Univariate analysis of anatomical factors including tibial slope and medial tibial depth.
| LTS (°) | 8.95±2.61 | 6.82±2.32 | <0.0001 |
| MTS (°) | 8.59±2.95 | 6.36±2.66 | <0.0001 |
| MTD (mm) | 1.80±0.51 | 2.41±0.62 | <0.0001 |
LTS, lateral tibial slope; MTS, medial tibial slope; MTD, medial tibial depth
Multivariate logistic regression analysis with variables of p<0.05 from univariate analysis.
| Odds ratio | P-value | |
|---|---|---|
| LTS (°) | 1.464 (1.217–1.761) | <0.0001 |
| MTS (°) | 1.166 (0.945–1.438) | 0.153 |
| MTD (mm) | 0.145 (0.064–0.330) | <0.0001 |
LTS, lateral tibial slope; MTS, medial tibial slope; MTD, medial tibial depth