Ali Fares1, Clément Horteur2, Morad Abou Al Ezz3, Alexandre Hardy3, Brice Rubens-Duval2, Karam Karam3, Benoit Gaulin2, Regis Pailhe2. 1. Department of Osteoarthritis and Sport Surgery, Grenoble-Alpes CHU, South Teaching Hospital, Kimberley Avenue, BP 338, 38434, Échirolles Cedex, France. md.alifares@gmail.com. 2. Department of Osteoarthritis and Sport Surgery, Grenoble-Alpes CHU, South Teaching Hospital, Kimberley Avenue, BP 338, 38434, Échirolles Cedex, France. 3. Chirurgie du Sport, Clinique du Sport Paris V, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, 75005, Paris, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This case-control study aimed to assess the influence of BMI and PTS on subsequent ACL injury affecting either ACL graft or the native ACL of the contralateral knee after primary ACL reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed using a cohort of patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between 2010 and 2020 using the same surgical procedure: Hamstring tendon autograft. The study group (group I) included all the patients (n = 94) during this period who sustained a subsequent ACL injury. The control group (group II) consisted of 94 patients randomly selected (matched Group I in terms of sex, age, and ACL graft) who did not sustain any further ACL injury. PTS was measured by two blinded surgeons on lateral knee view radiographs of the operated knee after primary ACL. BMI in kg/m2 was measured during the preoperative anesthesia consultation. Exclusion criteria were: non-true or rotated lateral knee radiographs of the operated knee post-ACLR, associated knee ligament injury requiring surgical management, iterative knee surgeries, open growth plate, and related fracture. RESULTS: The mean posterior tibial slope in group I was 7.5° ± 2.9, and 7.2° ± 2.0 in group II. A PTS angle cutoff was set at 10 degrees. The rate of patients showing a PTS ≥ 10° was significantly higher in group I compared to group II (p < 0.01). Patients with PTS ≥ 10° were 5.7 times more likely to sustain a subsequent ACL injury, (OR: 5.7 95% CI[1.858-17.486]). The Average BMI in group I was 24.5 ± 3.7 kg.m-2 compared to group II which was 23.3 ± 3.0 kg.m-2. There were no significant differences in any of the four BMI categories between both groups (p value 0.289). A series of BMI cut-offs were also analyzed at 23 to30 kg/m2, and there was no significant difference between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A posterior tibial slope equal to or above 10 degrees measured on lateral knee radiographs was associated with 5.7 times higher risk of ACL graft rupture or contralateral native ACL injury; however, BMI was not.
PURPOSE: This case-control study aimed to assess the influence of BMI and PTS on subsequent ACL injury affecting either ACL graft or the native ACL of the contralateral knee after primary ACL reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed using a cohort of patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between 2010 and 2020 using the same surgical procedure: Hamstring tendon autograft. The study group (group I) included all the patients (n = 94) during this period who sustained a subsequent ACL injury. The control group (group II) consisted of 94 patients randomly selected (matched Group I in terms of sex, age, and ACL graft) who did not sustain any further ACL injury. PTS was measured by two blinded surgeons on lateral knee view radiographs of the operated knee after primary ACL. BMI in kg/m2 was measured during the preoperative anesthesia consultation. Exclusion criteria were: non-true or rotated lateral knee radiographs of the operated knee post-ACLR, associated knee ligament injury requiring surgical management, iterative knee surgeries, open growth plate, and related fracture. RESULTS: The mean posterior tibial slope in group I was 7.5° ± 2.9, and 7.2° ± 2.0 in group II. A PTS angle cutoff was set at 10 degrees. The rate of patients showing a PTS ≥ 10° was significantly higher in group I compared to group II (p < 0.01). Patients with PTS ≥ 10° were 5.7 times more likely to sustain a subsequent ACL injury, (OR: 5.7 95% CI[1.858-17.486]). The Average BMI in group I was 24.5 ± 3.7 kg.m-2 compared to group II which was 23.3 ± 3.0 kg.m-2. There were no significant differences in any of the four BMI categories between both groups (p value 0.289). A series of BMI cut-offs were also analyzed at 23 to30 kg/m2, and there was no significant difference between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A posterior tibial slope equal to or above 10 degrees measured on lateral knee radiographs was associated with 5.7 times higher risk of ACL graft rupture or contralateral native ACL injury; however, BMI was not.
Authors: Alvin W Su; Ljiljana Bogunovic; Matthew V Smith; Simon Gortz; Robert H Brophy; Rick W Wright; Matthew J Matava Journal: J Knee Surg Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Richard Rahardja; Mark Zhu; Hamish Love; Mark G Clatworthy; Andrew Paul Monk; Simon W Young Journal: Knee Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Stephen D Fening; Jeffrey Kovacic; Helen Kambic; Scott McLean; Jacob Scott; Anthony Miniaci Journal: J Knee Surg Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Javad Hashemi; Naveen Chandrashekar; Hossein Mansouri; Brian Gill; James R Slauterbeck; Robert C Schutt; Eugene Dabezies; Bruce D Beynnon Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 6.202