Literature DB >> 31367610

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Is There a Real Advantage? The Baltic View.

Saulius Mikalauskas1,2, Simonas Uselis1, Digne Jurkeviciutė2, Tomas Poskus1,2, Eligijus Poskus1,2, Kestutis Strupas1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The novel surgical procedure transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has rapidly become an interest of research in order to overcome the shortcomings of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of middle and low rectal cancer. taTME is a new natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery modality combining three rectal surgery techniques.
METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was conducted in a single centre for a period of 3 years, and herein we report on our first 25 taTME procedures in patients with middle and lower third rectal adenocarcinoma.
RESULTS: The main demographics were evaluated. The mean age of patients was 64 ± 12 years. There were predominantly males (72%) and 7 female patients (28%) with an average body mass index of 29 ± 4.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. High blood pressure, obesity, chronic heart insufficiency, chronic atrial fibrillation, and diabetes mellitus were commonly diagnosed in all patients. A circumferential resection margin >1 mm was achieved in 16% (n = 4), >2 mm in 40% (n = 10), and >3 mm in 44% (n = 11) of operated patients. The average CRM was 1.8 ± 0.9 cm. In 24% of cases, the distance of a tumour from the mesorectal fascia (MRF) was <1 mm; meanwhile, for 76% of patients, the tumour margin was >1 mm from the MRF. Recovery to flatus was 3 ± 1 days. The average length of hospital stay was 11 ± 3 days. The overall postoperative morbidity was 8%, i.e. one (4%) complication classified as Clavien-Dindo degree I and one (4%) major (IIIb) complication. Subsequently, all patients successfully recovered and were discharged from hospital. During the follow-up period no cancer recurrence was observed.
CONCLUSION: Our results nicely demonstrate that taTME can be safely performed with acceptable perioperative complications in patients with middle or lower third rectal cancer. In addition, the perioperative morbidity is also acceptable. However, taTME remains a technically highly demanding operation but is feasible and safe after the appropriate experience is gained. Nevertheless, larger multi-centre prospective randomised studies are ongoing to confirm the safety and to verify oncological results when compared to laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive; Rectal cancer; Surgery; Total mesorectal excision; taTME

Year:  2019        PMID: 31367610      PMCID: PMC6616097          DOI: 10.1159/000495309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Visc Med        ISSN: 2297-4725


  35 in total

1.  Acute phase response in laparoscopic and open colectomy in colon cancer: randomized study.

Authors:  S Delgado; A M Lacy; X Filella; A Castells; J C García-Valdecasas; J M Pique; D Momblán; J Visa
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance.

Authors:  Patricia Sylla; David W Rattner; Salvadora Delgado; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Corrie A M Marijnen; Elma Klein Kranenbarg; Cornelis J H van de Velde; J Han J M van Krieken
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer.

Authors:  T E Bernstein; B H Endreseth; P Romundstad; A Wibe
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy.

Authors:  Eduardo M Targarona; Carmen Balague; Juan Carlos Pernas; Carmen Martinez; Rene Berindoague; Ignasi Gich; Manuel Trias
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Anastomotic leaks after bowel resection: what does peer review teach us about the relationship to postoperative mortality?

Authors:  Neil H Hyman; Turner Osler; Peter Cataldo; Elizabeth H Burns; Steven R Shackford
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Martijn Hgm van der Pas; Eva Haglind; Miguel A Cuesta; Alois Fürst; Antonio M Lacy; Wim Cj Hop; Hendrik Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.