Literature DB >> 18362627

Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy.

Eduardo M Targarona1, Carmen Balague, Juan Carlos Pernas, Carmen Martinez, Rene Berindoague, Ignasi Gich, Manuel Trias.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The laparoscopic approach for colon resection is widely accepted but its definitive role in rectal tumors is controversial due to the technical difficulties associated with this procedure. Tumor size and volume, and pelvic dimensions may influence intraoperative and/or immediate outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of anatomic and pathologic features on immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal resection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included a prospective series of 60 patients submitted to laparoscopic resection for rectal tumors. A preoperative computed tomography was performed in all patients. Three-dimension reconstruction of the pelvis, rectal tumor, and prostate was computed. Tumor and prostate volume and diameters were calculated, as were main pelvic diameters (subsacrum-retropubic, coccyx pubis, and promontorium coccyx), and lateral diameters, at the tumor level (3D Doctor Software package). Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), tumor height, previous radiotherapy treatment, and type of procedure (anterior resection, low anterior resection, and abdominoperineal resection) were recorded. Immediate outcome (morbidity, mortality, and stay) was also collected. Dependent variables were operative time, intraoperative difficulty, conversion, and postoperative morbidity. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed (SPSS package).
RESULTS: The series included 36 men and 24 women, with a mean age of 72 years (range, 38-87). Surgical procedures were 10 anterior resections, 31 low anterior resections, and 19 abdominoperineal resections. Conversion rate was 9 of 60 (15%), operative time: 172 minutes (range, 90-360), morbidity: 31% and stay: 9 days (range, 6-43). Multivariate analysis showed tumor craniocaudal length was an independent predictive factor for conversion (P < 0.04, odds ratio [OR]: 1.5, confidence interval [CI]95%: 1-2.2). Pubic coccyx axis (P < 0.005) and sex (P < 0.009) showed independent values for operative time, and BMI (P < 0.02, OR: 1.2, CI 95%:1-1.5) was related to postoperative morbidity. When a subanalysis was performed in relation to sex, independent factors differed between males and females, with a predominance of anatomic and tumor measures in men.
CONCLUSION: Local anatomy and pathologic features directly affect surgical outcome in the laparoscopic approach to the rectum. Sex, BMI, lower pelvis diameter, and tumor size are independent predictors for conversion, operative time, and morbidity. These data should be taken into account when planning this kind of procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18362627     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181612c6a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  58 in total

1.  Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1485-0: evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contradiction.

Authors:  Sonia Fernández-Ananín; Eduard M Targarona; Carmen Balagué; Carmen Martínez; Pilar Hernández; Manuel Trías
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Reply to: doi:10.1007/s0046-4-010-1485-0: Re: Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis" is not a contraindication (Surg Endosc 2011 Jan;25:1907-1912): What factors should be considered in the preoperative planning of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery?

Authors:  Satoshi Ogiso; Takashi Yamaguchi; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tim Killeen; Saswata Banerjee; Vardhini Vijay; Zaid Al-Dabbagh; Daren Francis; Steve Warren
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective.

Authors:  Beat M Künzli; Helmut Friess; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-27

Review 5.  Shifting Paradigms in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Applications of Transanal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Grace Clara Lee; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

6.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy.

Authors:  Se Jin Baek; Chang Hee Kim; Min Soo Cho; Sung Uk Bae; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Applications of computed tomography pelvimetry and clinical-pathological parameters in sphincter preservation of mid-low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiaocong Zhou; Meng Su; Keqiong Hu; Yinfa Su; Yinghai Ye; Chongquan Huang; Zhenlei Yu; Xiaoyang Li; Hong Zhou; Yaozhong Ni; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

8.  Predicting the pathological features of the mesorectum before the laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sonia Fernández Ananín; Eduardo M Targarona; Carmen Martinez; Juan Carlos Pernas; Diana Hernández; Ignasi Gich; Francesc J Sancho; Manuel Trias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Analysis of conversion factors in robotic-assisted rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Rosa M Jiménez Rodríguez; Fernando De la Portilla De Juan; José M Díaz Pavón; Alberto Rodríguez Rodríguez; Emilio Prendes Sillero; Jean Marie Cadet Dussort; Javier Padillo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Low Cerebral Glucose Metabolism: A Potential Predictor for the Severity of Vascular Parkinsonism and Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Yunqi Xu; Xiaobo Wei; Xu Liu; Jinchi Liao; Jiaping Lin; Cansheng Zhu; Xiaochun Meng; Dongsi Xie; Dongman Chao; Albert J Fenoy; Muhua Cheng; Beisha Tang; Zhuohua Zhang; Ying Xia; Qing Wang
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 6.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.