Literature DB >> 11859207

Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.

Iris D Nagtegaal1, Corrie A M Marijnen, Elma Klein Kranenbarg, Cornelis J H van de Velde, J Han J M van Krieken.   

Abstract

Despite improved surgical treatment strategies for rectal cancer, 5-15% of all patients will develop local recurrences. After conservative surgery, circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement is a strong predictor of local recurrence. The consequences of a positive CRM after total mesorectal excision (TME) have not been evaluated in a large patient population. In a nationwide randomized multicenter trial comparing preoperative radiotherapy and TME versus TME alone for rectal cancer, CRM involvement was determined according to trial protocol. In this study we analyze the criteria by which the CRM needs to be assessed to predict local recurrence for nonirradiated patients (n = 656, median follow-up 35 months). CRM involvement is a strong predictor for local recurrence after TME. A margin of < or = 2 mm is associated with a local recurrence risk of 16% compared with 5.8% in patients with more mesorectal tissue surrounding the tumor (p <0.0001). In addition, patients with margins < or = 1 mm have an increased risk for distant metastases (37.6% vs 12.7%, p <0.0001) as well as shorter survival. The prognostic value of CRM involvement is independent of TNM classification. Accurate determination of CRM in rectal cancer is important for determination of local recurrence risk, which might subsequently be prevented by additional therapy. In contrast to earlier studies, we show that an increased risk is present when margins are < or = 2 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11859207     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200203000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  169 in total

1.  Prognostic relevant factors within pT3 rectal carcinomas: depth of invasion or circumferrential resection margins?

Authors:  Benno Mann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer patients: is there any indication?

Authors:  Benno Mann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the truth lies underneath.

Authors:  Jesús A Fernández-Represa; Julio M Mayol; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life.

Authors:  P G Vaughan-Shaw; T Cheung; J S Knight; P H Nichols; S A Pilkington; A H Mirnezami
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Adjuvant radiotherapy following total mesorectal excision for stage IIA rectal cancer: is it beneficial?

Authors:  Jin Soo Kim; Nam Kyu Kim; Byung Soh Min; Hyuk Hur; Joong Bae Ahn; Ki Chang Keum
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  What is the significance of the circumferential margin in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy?

Authors:  Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga; Mithat Gonen; Jinru Shia; Karyn A Goodman; Garrett M Nash; Larissa K Temple; José G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Prostate cancer that is within 0.1 mm of the surgical margin of a radical prostatectomy predicts greater likelihood of recurrence.

Authors:  Jason P Izard; Lawrence D True; Philip May; William J Ellis; Paul H Lange; Bruce Dalkin; Daniel W Lin; Rodney A Schmidt; Jonathan L Wright
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Pathologic response grade after long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation does not influence morbidity in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer resected by laparoscopy.

Authors:  Filippo Landi; Eloy Espín; Victor Rodrigues; Francesc Vallribera; Aleix Martinez; Cecile Charpy; Francesco Brunetti; Daniel Azoulay; Nicola de'Angelis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The pathologist's role in rectal cancer patient assessments.

Authors:  Joseph E Willis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  Management of locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Johannes H W de Wilt; Maarten Vermaas; Floris T J Ferenschild; Cornelis Verhoef
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.