| Literature DB >> 31366993 |
Bartosz Kiersztyn1, Ryszard Chróst2, Tomasz Kaliński2, Waldemar Siuda2, Aleksandra Bukowska2, Grzegorz Kowalczyk2, Karolina Grabowska2.
Abstract
We present the results of an analysis of the 16S rRNA-based taxonomical structure of bacteria together with an analysis of carbon source utilization ability using EcoPlate (Biolog, USA)Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31366993 PMCID: PMC6668414 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47577-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The basic characteristics of the studied lakes.
| LAKE | Przystań | Mamry | Dargin | Kisajno | Niegocin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area [ha] | 115 | 2 504 | 3 030 | 1 896 | 2 600 | |
| Max depth [m] | 22.8 | 43.8 | 37.6 | 25 | 39.7 | |
| Coordinates of sampling location | 54.207241, 21.657892 | 54.157234, 21.723144 | 54.145939, 21.731939 | 54.042000, 21.738594 | 54.009215, 21.738598 | |
| Mean TSI | 42 ± 2 | 40 ± 9 | 43 ± 1 | 53 ± 3 | 49 ± 3 | |
| Trophic state | ME | ME | ME | ME | ME | |
| Temp [°C] | 21.35 ± 0.06 | 21.68 ± 0.141 | 22.50 ± 0.02 | 21.64 ± 1.56 | 22.38 ± 0.74 | |
| Cond [μScm2] | 297.00 ± 0.0 | 295.00 ± 0.0 | 302.00 ± 0.0 | 324.00 ± 6.0 | 370.00 ± 1.4 | |
| Oxygen [mgL−1] | 9.77 ± 0.03 | 10.05 ± 0.03 | 10.19 ± 0.0 | 10.27 ± 1.08 | 10.47 ± 0.26 | |
| pH | 8.38 ± 0.01 | 8.32 ± 0.05 | 8.50 ± 0.0 | 8.40 ± 0.09 | 8.45 ± 0.0 | |
| Turbidity [NTU] | 0.03 ± 0.06 | 4.35 ± 5.3 | 0.30 ± 0.14 | 0.87 ± 0.50 | 1.20 ± 0.14 | |
| Chl a [µgL−1] | 3.77 ± 0.40 | 0.94 ± 1.13 | 3.37 ± 0.57 | 12.26 ± 1.69 | 5.29 ± 0.28 | |
| TP[µgL−1] | 15.05 ± 0.53 | 15.67 ± 1.34 | 15.67 ± 0.53 | 30.16 ± 1.54 | 26.97 ± 0.64 | |
| P-PO43− [µgL−1] | 3.68 ± 0.35 | 3.13 ± 0.21 | 3.48 ± 0.62 | 3.58 ± 0.30 | 14.26 ± 0.92 | |
| TN [µgL−1] | 367 ± 58 | 633 ± 115 | 533 ± 152 | 650 ± 71 | 600 ± 0 | |
| DOC [mgL−1] | 8.43 ± 0.07 | 8.09 ± 0.07 | 9.11 ± 0.08 | 9.23 ± 0.1 | 11.26 ± 0.03 | |
| HNF [cellmL−1] | 3.92 ± 0.77 × 103 | 2.10 ± 0.76 × 104 | 1.47 ± 0.2 × 104 | 2.69 ± 0.44 × 104 | 2.13 ± 032 × 104 | |
| Bacteria Number [cellml−1] | 3.9 ± 0.39 × 106 | 5.2 ± 0.21 × 106 | 4.2 ± 0.41 × 106 | 4.9 ± 0.31 × 106 | 4.9 ± 0.24 × 106 | |
| Area [ha] | 183 | 420 | 523 | 154 | 327 | |
| Max depth [m] | 25 | 37.4 | 28.5 | 2.9 | 39.5 | |
| Coordinates of sampling location | 53.967407, 21.758265 | 53.945283, 21.721688 | 53.918687, 21.697991 | 53.891046, 21.633682 | 53.880376, 21.560412 | |
| Mean TSI | 50 ± 4 | 58 ± 3 | 59 ± 2 | 58 ± 1 | 56 ± 3 | |
| Trophic state | ME | E | E | E | E | |
| Temp [°C] | 20.95 ± 0.01 | 22.03 ± 0.03 | 21.65 ± 0.01 | 20.87 ± 0.01 | 21.48 ± 0.91 | |
| Cond [μScm2] | 373.00 ± 0.0 | 354.00 ± 0.0 | 354.00 ± 0.0 | 354.50 ± 0.71 | 361.00 ± 5.2 | |
| Oxygen [mgL−1] | 10.05 ± 0.01 | 10.08 ± 0.08 | 9.55 ± 0.01 | 7.61 ± 0.03 | 9.82 ± 0.16 | |
| pH | 8.44 ± 0.06 | 8.44 ± 0.0 | 8.42 ± 0.01 | 8.02 ± 0.01 | 8.31 ± 0.04 | |
| Turbidity [NTU] | 1.57 ± 0.31 | 3.77 ± 0.11 | 3.60 ± 0.28 | 2.95 ± 0.35 | 1.90 ± 0.1 | |
| Chl a [µgL−1] | 7.93 ± 0.15 | 23.23 ± 1.56 | 24.07 ± 0.42 | 18.11 ± 0.64 | 19.05 ± 0.40 | |
| TP[µgL−1] | 31.80 ± 1.52 | 35.19 ± 0.18 | 40.13 ± 0.36 | 37.35 ± 1.25 | 30.67 ± 0.71 | |
| P-PO43− [µgL−1] | 6.17 ± 0.46 | 3.73 ± 0.21 | 3.43 ± 0.21 | 3.38 ± 0.46 | 2.78 ± 0.17 | |
| TN [µgL−1] | 433 ± 58 | 700 ± 100 | 700 ± 100 | 667 ± 153 | 867 ± 153 | |
| DOC [mgL−1] | 11.12 ± 0.29 | 11.99 ± 0.08 | 10.08 ± 0.05 | 10.28 ± 0.03 | 11.52 ± 0.11 | |
| HNF [cellmL−1] | 2.60 ± 0.70 × 104 | 2.54 ± 0.37 × 104 | 3.83 ± 0.5.4 × 104 | 1.15 ± 0.14 × 104 | 3.93 ± 0.53 × 104 | |
| Bacteria Number [cellml−1] | 5.0 ± 0.53 × 106 | 4.3 ± 0.24 × 106 | 4.2 ± 0.33 × 106 | 6.4 ± 0.21 × 106 | 3.8 ± 0.29 × 106 | |
| Area [ha] | 1 160 | 671 | 498 | 941 | 11 340 | |
| Max depth [m] | 50.8 | 20.2 | 25.9 | 46 | 23.4 | |
| Coordinates of sampling location | 53.813409, 21.567998 | 53.935961, 21.544402 | 53.801142, 21.570925 | 53.686344, 21.578000 | 53.766621, 21.842127 | |
| Mean TSI | 59 ± 4 | 60 ± 1 | 59 ± 2 | 60 ± 1 | 42 ± 4 | |
| Trophic state | E | E | E | E | ME | |
| Temp [°C] | 22.66 ± 0.07 | 22.59 ± 0.11 | 21.72 ± 0.86 | 23.50 ± 0.11 | 23.58 ± 0.13 | |
| Cond [μScm2] | 306.33 ± 0.58 | 309.33 ± 0.58 | 310.33 ± 5.0 | 256.00 ± 0.0 | 291.36 ± 1.4 | |
| Oxygen [mgL−1] | 11.52 ± 0.50 | 9.90 ± 0.04 | 10.12 ± 0.94 | 12.65 ± 0.05 | 13.58 ± 0.4 | |
| pH | 8.54 ± 0.03 | 8.40 ± 0.0 | 8.40 ± 0.11 | 8.63 ± 0.01 | 8.46 ± 0.02 | |
| Turbidity [NTU] | 6.17 ± 0.38 | 4.23 ± 0.06 | 4.80 ± 3.0 | 7.03 ± 0.15 | 0.45 ± 0.11 | |
| Chl a [µgL−1] | 12.30 ± 5.54 | 20.99 ± 0.68 | 20.86 ± 3.00 | 23.74 ± 0.93 | 2.05 ± 1.58 | |
| TP[µgL−1] | 58.32 ± 0.64 | 43.42 ± 0.82 | 48.86 ± 0.36 | 45.57 ± 1.41 | 16.28 ± 0.31 | |
| P-PO43− [µgL−1] | 4.48 ± 0.0 | 3.38 ± 0.17 | 4.48 ± 0.30 | 3.58 ± 0.30 | 3.78 ± 0.17 | |
| TN [µgL−1] | 800 ± 58 | 633 ± 0 | 700 ± 100 | 1000 ± 100 | 700 ± 0 | |
| DOC [mgL−1] | 9.05 ± 0.07 | 9.5 ± 0.02 | 9.15 ± 0.11 | 7.55 ± 0.07 | 8.02 ± 0.05 | |
| HNF [cellmL−1] | 2.42 ± 0.75 × 104 | 3.96 ± 1.2 × 104 | 2.35 ± 0.36 × 104 | 4.28 ± 0.41 × 104 | 9.21 ± 2.8 × 103 | |
| Bacteria Number [cellml−1] | 5.5 ± 0.2 × 106 | 5.6 ± 0.12 × 106 | 5.6 ± 0.4 × 106 | 5.2 ± 0.35 × 106 | 4.9 ± 0.51 × 106 |
±Are the standard deviation of mean values. Temp: temperature; Cond: special conductivity; Oxygen: Dissolved oxygen concentration; Turbidity: nephelometric turbidity; Chl a: chlorophyll a concentration; TP: total phosphorus; P-PO43−: dissolved orthophosphates; TN: total nitrogen; DOC: dissolved organic carbon; HNF: number of heterotrophic nanoflagellates; Bacterial number: number of DAPI-stained bacteria; Trophic state E: Lake belongs to the group of eutrophic lakes; Trophic state ME: Lake belongs to the group of meso-eutrophic lakes; Mean TSI: Mean Trophic State Index calculated on the basis of the concentration of chlorophyll a, total phosphorus and the visibility of the Secchi disc.
Figure 1(a) PCA-based grouping of lakes according to physicochemical parameters. The lakes marked in red are eutrophic (E), and lakes marked in green are meso-eutrophic (ME). (b) Principal component analysis (PCA) results. Projection of variables on the factor planes of PCA analyses of physicochemical variables. The variables in red squares are supplementary and have no influence on the principal components of the analysis. Cond.: conductivity [µscm−2], DOC: dissolved organic carbon [mgL−1]. Chl a: chlorophyll a concentration [µgL−1], HNF: heterotrophic nanoflagellates [cellmL−1], TN: total nitrogen concentration [µgL−1], Turbid: nephelometric turbidity [NTU], Temp.: temperature [°C], DO: dissolved oxygen concentration [mg O2L−1], TP: total phosphorus concentration [µgL−1], PO43−: orthophosphate concentration [µgL−1], mean TSI: mean trophic state index, BN: bacteria number [cellmL−1].
Figure 2Relative sequence abundance of dominant bacterial phyla associated with different lakes. Only phyla whose relative share exceeded 1% were taken into account as individual units. Spearman correlations between the TSI and microorganisms belonging to the dominant phyla were found.
Figure 3(a) The graphical results of the Bray-Curtis-based NMDS analysis of sequence data, binned by taxonomic assignment to family. The whole domain Bacteria was taken into consideration. The lakes marked in red are eutrophic (E), and lakes marked in green are meso-eutrophic (ME). (b) The graphical results of the Bray-Curtis-based NMDS analysis of sequence data, binned by taxonomic assignment to family, after excluding 25 families belonging to phylum Cyanobacteria from the analysis. The lakes marked in red are eutrophic (E), and lakes marked in green are meso-eutrophic (ME).
The SIMPER test results of the contribution and cumulative percentage of families mainly responsible for the observed differences between groups of eutrophic (E; consisting of eight lakes, TSI from 56 to 60) and mesotrophic-eutrophic (ME; consisting of seven lakes, TSI from 40 to 53) lakes.
| Family | Contrib. % | Cumulative % |
|---|---|---|
| p_Actinobacteria; c_Actinobacteria; o_Actinomycetales; f_ACK-M1 | 13.42 | 13.42 |
| p_Proteobacteria; c_Alphaproteobacteria; o_Rickettsiales; f_Pelagibacteraceae | 12.35 | 25.77 |
| p_Verrucomicrobia; c_Spartobacteria; o_Chthoniobacterales; f_Chthoniobacteraceae | 9.503 | 35.27 |
| p_Cyanobacteria; c_Synechococcophycideae; o_Pseudanabaenales; f_Pseudanabaenaceae | 5.066 | 40.34 |
| p_Verrucomicrobia; c_[Methylacidiphilae]; o_Methylacidiphilales; f_LD19 | 4.11 | 44.45 |
| p_Planctomycetes; c_Planctomycetia; o_Pirellulales; f_Pirellulaceae | 3.072 | 47.52 |
| p_Cyanobacteria; c_Synechococcophycideae; o_Synechococcales; f_Synechococcaceae | 3.025 | 50.55 |
| p_Proteobacteria; c_Betaproteobacteria; o_Burkholderiales; f_Comamonadaceae | 2.648 | 53.19 |
| p_Verrucomicrobia; c_Opitutae; o_Cerasicoccales; f_Cerasicoccaceae | 2.52 | 55.71 |
| p_Bacteroidetes; c_Flavobacteriia; o_Flavobacteriales; f_Cryomorphaceae | 2.296 | 58.01 |
| p_Cyanobacteria; c_; o__; f_ | 2.104 | 60.11 |
| p_Actinobacteria; c_Actinobacteria; o_Actinomycetales; f_Mycobacteriaceae | 2.043 | 62.16 |
| p_Planctomycetes; c_Phycisphaerae; o_Phycisphaerales; f_ | 1.861 | 64.02 |
| p_Bacteroidetes; c_Cytophagia; o_Cytophagales; f_Cytophagaceae | 1.593 | 65.61 |
| p_Bacteroidetes; c_Flavobacteriia; o_Flavobacteriales; f_Flavobacteriaceae | 1.559 | 67.17 |
| p_Actinobacteria; c_Acidimicrobiia; o_Acidimicrobiales; f_C111 | 1.476 | 68.65 |
| p_Chloroflexi; c_Anaerolineae; o_Caldilineales; f_Caldilineaceae | 1.417 | 70.06 |
| p_Cyanobacteria; c_Oscillatoriophycideae; o_Oscillatoriales; f_Phormidiaceae | 1.397 | 71.46 |
| Unassigned | 1.319 | 72.78 |
| p_Cyanobacteria; c_Nostocophycideae; o_Nostocales; f_Nostocaceae | 1.226 | 74 |
| p_Chlorobi; c_OPB56; o_; f_ | 1.199 | 75.2 |
| p_Cyanobacteria; c_Oscillatoriophycideae; o_Chroococcales; f_Microcystaceae | 1.19 | 76.39 |
| p_Actinobacteria; c_Actinobacteria; o_Actinomycetales; f_ | 1.162 | 77.56 |
| p_Bacteroidetes; c_[Saprospirae]; o_[Saprospirales]; f_Chitinophagaceae | 1.022 | 78.58 |
Richness (number of taxa or used carbon sources) and Simpson’s diversity index characterizing the studied lakes.
| Lake | Phylogenetic Richness | Phylogenetic Simpson 1-D index | Number of used Carbon source | Used Carbon source Simpson 1-D index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Przystań | 105 | 0.5733 | 30 | 0.937 |
| Mamry | 127 | 0.5889 | 25 | 0.9458 |
| Dargin | 108 | 0.5963 | 25 | 0.9277 |
| Kisajno | 122 | 0.6453 | 27 | 0.9264 |
| Niegocin | 110 | 0.633 | 24 | 0.9247 |
| Boczne | 129 | 0.6191 | 22 | 0.9283 |
| Jagodne | 140 | 0.6951 | 28 | 0.9368 |
| Szymoneckie | 137 | 0.707 | 28 | 0.9391 |
| Szymon | 135 | 0.6719 | 31 | 0.9456 |
| Tałtowisko | 138 | 0.6791 | 30 | 0.9439 |
| Tałty | 132 | 0.6733 | 18 | 0.9126 |
| Ryńskie | 123 | 0.6979 | 25 | 0.9399 |
| Mikołajskie | 136 | 0.6702 | 21 | 0.9302 |
| Bełdany | 132 | 0.7058 | 17 | 0.9234 |
| Śniardwy | 90 | 0.555 | 17 | 0.8976 |
In the case of taxonomic diversity at the family level, OTU richness and diversity were positively correlated with the mean TSI of the studied lakes. In the case of metabolic fingerprinting, we did not find a significant correlation between the TSI and the number of bacterial carbon sources (richness equivalent) or Simpson’s diversity index.
Figure 4The average relative respiration of carbon sources assigned to the basic groups of compounds. Only the relative respiration rates of complex carbon sources were significantly negatively correlated with the mean TSI.
Figure 5Bray-Curtis-based NMDS analysis of the relative respiration of 31 different carbon sources by bacteria in the studied lakes. The lakes marked in red are eutrophic (E), and lakes marked in green are meso-eutrophic (ME).
Figure 6Locations of sampling sites within the Great Masurian Lakes System (GMLS).