Literature DB >> 26578718

Comparison of Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 15-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kate E Webster1, Julian A Feller2, Nigel Hartnett2, Warren B Leigh2, Anneka K Richmond2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have compared patellar tendon (PT) and hamstring tendon (HS) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in the short to midterm, but fewer long-term results have been published. HYPOTHESIS: There will be no difference in functional outcome between ACL reconstruction performed with PT and HS grafts, but PT grafts will have more donor site morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS: Sixty-five patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were randomized to receive either a PT graft or a 4-strand HS graft. Early results were reported at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36 months. Forty-seven patients (22 of 31 PT and 25 of 34 HS) were reviewed at a mean of 15.3 years.
RESULTS: Four graft ruptures (1 PT, 3 HS) and 6 contralateral ACL injuries (4 PT, 2 HS) occurred in the group that was reviewed. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for any of the variables measured. There was a similar incidence of anterior knee pain and kneeling pain in both groups. The previously observed increased extension deficit in the PT group at 3 years was not present at 15 years, and there was no significant between-group difference in knee laxity. A higher proportion of patients in the PT group were participating in sport on a weekly basis (73% PT, 48% HS; P = .05). There was no difference in the degree of osteoarthritis between the groups.
CONCLUSION: This randomized controlled trial showed that HS and PT ACL reconstructions have comparable results at an average 15-year follow-up. Contrary to the study hypothesis, some of the graft differences seen at earlier review were not present at 15 years, and patients with PT grafts were more active in sport participation. Overall, both graft types provided good long-term subjective and objective outcomes.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; hamstring tendon; long-term follow-up; patellar tendon

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26578718     DOI: 10.1177/0363546515611886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  48 in total

1.  Predicting adequacy of free quadriceps tendon autograft, for primary and revision ACL reconstruction, from patients' physical parameters.

Authors:  Anthony Ugwuoke; Farhan Syed; Sam El-Kawy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A decade of Australian and New Zealand orthopaedic publications: a bibliometric trend analysis from 2008 to 2018.

Authors:  Agesilaus W Churchill; Eva Malacova; Simon F Journeaux; Martin Richardson; Ross Crawford; Mark L Vickers
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Network meta-analysis of knee outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with various types of tendon grafts.

Authors:  Xiong-Gang Yang; Feng Wang; Xin He; Jiang-Tao Feng; Yong-Cheng Hu; Hao Zhang; Li Yang; Kunchi Hua
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Duration of postoperative immobilization affects MMP activity at the healing graft-bone interface: Evaluation in a mouse ACL reconstruction model.

Authors:  Yusuke Nakagawa; Amir H Lebaschi; Susumu Wada; Samuel J E Green; Dean Wang; Zoe M Album; Camilla B Carballo; Xiang-Hua Deng; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Kinematic outcomes following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Naendrup; Jason P Zlotnicki; Tom Chao; Kanto Nagai; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

6.  Returning to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in amateur sports men: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Angela Notarnicola; Giuseppe Maccagnano; Federico Barletta; Leonardo Ascatigno; Leopoldo Astuto; Antonio Panella; Silvio Tafuri; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-02-12

Review 7.  Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction Based on Graft Type: Are all Grafts Equivalent?

Authors:  Matthew Widner; Mark Dunleavy; Scott Lynch
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

8.  Primary ACL reconstruction using the LARS device is associated with a high failure rate at minimum of 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  Scott John Tulloch; Brian Meldan Devitt; Tabitha Porter; Taylor Hartwig; Haydn Klemm; Sam Hookway; Cameron John Norsworthy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Long term results of bone-patella-tendon-bone ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Max Ettinger; Friedel Etter; Tilman Calliess; Michael Bohnsack; Christoph Becher
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-11-01

10.  Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; James R Borchers; Angela D Pedroza; Laura J Huston; Amanda K Haas; Kurt P Spindler; Rick W Wright; Christopher C Kaeding; Christina R Allen; Allen F Anderson; Daniel E Cooper; Thomas M DeBerardino; Warren R Dunn; Brett A Lantz; Barton Mann; Michael J Stuart; John P Albright; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Christopher C Annunziata; Robert A Arciero; Bernard R Bach; Champ L Baker; Arthur R Bartolozzi; Keith M Baumgarten; Jeffery R Bechler; Jeffrey H Berg; Geoffrey A Bernas; Stephen F Brockmeier; Robert H Brophy; Charles A Bush-Joseph; J Brad Butler; John D Campbell; James L Carey; James E Carpenter; Brian J Cole; Jonathan M Cooper; Charles L Cox; R Alexander Creighton; Diane L Dahm; Tal S David; David C Flanigan; Robert W Frederick; Theodore J Ganley; Elizabeth A Garofoli; Charles J Gatt; Steven R Gecha; James Robert Giffin; Sharon L Hame; Jo A Hannafin; Christopher D Harner; Norman Lindsay Harris; Keith S Hechtman; Elliott B Hershman; Rudolf G Hoellrich; Timothy M Hosea; David C Johnson; Timothy S Johnson; Morgan H Jones; Ganesh V Kamath; Thomas E Klootwyk; Bruce A Levy; C Benjamin Ma; G Peter Maiers; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Gregory M Mathien; David R McAllister; Eric C McCarty; Robert G McCormack; Bruce S Miller; Carl W Nissen; Daniel F O'Neill; Brett D Owens; Richard D Parker; Mark L Purnell; Arun J Ramappa; Michael A Rauh; Arthur C Rettig; Jon K Sekiya; Kevin G Shea; Orrin H Sherman; James R Slauterbeck; Matthew V Smith; Jeffrey T Spang; Steven J Svoboda; Timothy N Taft; Joachim J Tenuta; Edwin M Tingstad; Armando F Vidal; Darius G Viskontas; Richard A White; James S Williams; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; James J York
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.