| Literature DB >> 26123054 |
Rob P A Janssen1, Maria J F van der Velden2, Marijn van den Besselaar2, Max Reijman2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft size facilitates preoperative planning of knee ligament surgery and may reduce the need for allografts in complex knee reconstructions. The aim of this study was to analyse whether length and diameter of hamstring tendon autografts can be predicted preoperatively with anthropometric parameters and patient characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: ACL; Autograft; Diameter; Hamstring; Knee ligament reconstruction; Length; Multiligament; Tendon
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26123054 PMCID: PMC5420370 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3678-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ISSN: 0942-2056 Impact factor: 4.342
Patient characteristics
| Total ( | |
|---|---|
| Age (year) | 28.7 (±10.6) |
| Gender [% female ( | 35.4 (257) |
| Weight (kg) | 76.5 (±13.4) |
| Height (cm) | 177.3 (±9) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.3 (±3.5) |
Data are presented as mean (standard deviation), unless otherwise indicated
n number, BMI body mass index
Predictors of tendon length
| Univariable | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regr. co. (95 % CI) |
| Regr. co. (95 % CI) |
| |
| Gracilis | ||||
| Age | −0.01 (−0.03; 0.01) | n.s. | – | – |
| Gender (female) | −1.9 (−2.3; −1.4) | <0.001 | 0.06 (−0.49; 0.62) | n.s. |
| Weight | 0.06 (0.04; 0.07) | <0.001 | −0.005 (−0.02; 0.01) | n.s. |
| Height | 0.15 (0.13; 0.17) | <0.001 | 0.16 (0.13; 0.19) | <0.001 |
| Semitendinosus | ||||
| Age | −0.01 (−0.03; 0.01) | n.s. | – | – |
| Gender (female) | −2.4 (−2.8; −1.9) | <0.001 | −0.03 (−0.55; 0.49) | n.s. |
| Weight | 0.07 (0.06; 0.09) | <0.001 | −0.01 (−0.02; 0.01) | n.s. |
| Height | 0.19 (0.17; 0.21) | <0.001 | 0.20 (0.17; 0.23) | <0.001 |
Regr. co. regression coefficients, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval, n.s. non-significant
Categories of body height related to tendon length
| Height (cm) | Gracilis | Semitendinosus | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <28 cm [% ( | ≥28 cm [% ( | <28 cm [% ( | ≥28 cm [% ( | |
| ≤160 ( | 87.9 (29) | 12.1 (4) | 81.8 (27) | 18.2 (6) |
| 161–165 ( | 78.7 (37) | 21.3 (10) | 61.7 (29) | 38.3 (18) |
| 166–170 ( | 68.0 (68) | 32.0 (32) | 55.0 (55) | 45.0 (45) |
| 171–180 ( | 46.4 (130) | 53.6 (150) | 30.7 (86) | 69.3 (194) |
| 181–190 ( | 23.7 (50)a | 76.3 (161)a | 13.6 (29) | 86.4 (184) |
| ≥191 ( | 16.7 (7) | 83.3 (35) | 7.1 (3) | 92.9 (39) |
| Total ( | 45.0 (321)a | 55.0 (392)a | 32.0 (229) | 68.0 (486) |
n number
aTwo missing values gracilis length
Predictors of diameter graft <8 mm
| Univariable | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| |
| Age | 0.98 (0.95; 1.01) | n.s. | – | – |
| Gender (female) | 4.5 (2.3; 8.7) | <0.001 | 4.5 (1.9; 11.0) | 0.001 |
| Weight | 0.95 (0.93; 0.98) | 0.001 | 0.97 (0.93; 1.01) | n.s. |
| Height | 0.96 (0.93; 0.99) | 0.019 | 1.04 (0.99; 1.10) | n.s. |
OR odds ratios, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval, n.s. non-significant
Gender related to diameter graft
| <8 mm [% ( | 8 mm [% ( | >8 mm [% ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male ( | 2.8 (13) | 36.8 (172) | 60.4 (282) |
| Female ( | 11.3 (29) | 73.1 (187) | 15.6 (40) |
| Total ( | 5.8 (42) | 49.7 (359) | 44.5 (322) |
Two missing values graft diameter
n number