Suresh S Ramalingam1, Suzanne E Dahlberg2, Chandra P Belani3, Joel N Saltzman4, Nathan A Pennell5, Gopakumar S Nambudiri6, John C McCann7, Jerome D Winegarden8, Mohammed A Kassem9, Mohamed K Mohamed10, Jan M Rothman11, Alan P Lyss12, Leora Horn13, Thomas E Stinchcombe14, Joan H Schiller15. 1. Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 2. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. 3. Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA. 4. University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH. 5. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 6. St John's Hospital, Maplewood, MN. 7. Baystate Health, Springfield, MA. 8. St Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI. 9. Sinai Cancer Care and Infusion Center, Chicago, IL. 10. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, Greensboro, NC. 11. Hillman Cancer Center, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. 12. Missouri Baptist Medical Center, St Louis, MO. 13. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. 14. Duke University, Durham, NC. 15. Inova Schar Cancer Center, Fairfax, VA.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Pemetrexed or bevacizumab is used for maintenance therapy of advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The combination of bevacizumab and pemetrexed has also demonstrated efficacy. We conducted a randomized study to determine the optimal maintenance therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC and no prior systemic therapy receivedcarboplatin (area under the curve, 6), paclitaxel (200 mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) for up to four cycles. Patients without progression after four cycles were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg), pemetrexed (500 mg/m2), or a combination of the two agents. The primary end point was overall survival, with bevacizumab serving as the control group. RESULTS: Of the 1,516 patients enrolled, 874 (57%) were randomly assigned after induction therapy to one of the three maintenance therapy groups. With a median follow-up of 50.6 months, median survival with pemetrexed was 15.9 months, compared with 14.4 months with bevacizumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; P = .12); median survival with pemetrexed and bevacizumab was 16.4 months (HR, 0.9; P = .28); median progression-free survival was 4.2, 5.1 (HR, 0.85; P = .06), and 7.5 months (HR, 0.67; P < .001) for the three groups, respectively. Incidence of worst grade 3 to 4 toxicity was 29%, 37%, and 51%, respectively, for bevacizumab, pemetrexed, and the combination regimen. CONCLUSION:Single-agent bevacizumab or pemetrexed is efficacious as maintenance therapy for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Because of a lack of survival benefit and higher toxicity, the combination of bevacizumab and pemetrexed cannot be recommended.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Pemetrexed or bevacizumab is used for maintenance therapy of advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The combination of bevacizumab and pemetrexed has also demonstrated efficacy. We conducted a randomized study to determine the optimal maintenance therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC and no prior systemic therapy received carboplatin (area under the curve, 6), paclitaxel (200 mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) for up to four cycles. Patients without progression after four cycles were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg), pemetrexed (500 mg/m2), or a combination of the two agents. The primary end point was overall survival, with bevacizumab serving as the control group. RESULTS: Of the 1,516 patients enrolled, 874 (57%) were randomly assigned after induction therapy to one of the three maintenance therapy groups. With a median follow-up of 50.6 months, median survival with pemetrexed was 15.9 months, compared with 14.4 months with bevacizumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; P = .12); median survival with pemetrexed and bevacizumab was 16.4 months (HR, 0.9; P = .28); median progression-free survival was 4.2, 5.1 (HR, 0.85; P = .06), and 7.5 months (HR, 0.67; P < .001) for the three groups, respectively. Incidence of worst grade 3 to 4 toxicity was 29%, 37%, and 51%, respectively, for bevacizumab, pemetrexed, and the combination regimen. CONCLUSION: Single-agent bevacizumab or pemetrexed is efficacious as maintenance therapy for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Because of a lack of survival benefit and higher toxicity, the combination of bevacizumab and pemetrexed cannot be recommended.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Leena Gandhi; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Shirish Gadgeel; Emilio Esteban; Enriqueta Felip; Flávia De Angelis; Manuel Domine; Philip Clingan; Maximilian J Hochmair; Steven F Powell; Susanna Y-S Cheng; Helge G Bischoff; Nir Peled; Francesco Grossi; Ross R Jennens; Martin Reck; Rina Hui; Edward B Garon; Michael Boyer; Belén Rubio-Viqueira; Silvia Novello; Takayasu Kurata; Jhanelle E Gray; John Vida; Ziwen Wei; Jing Yang; Harry Raftopoulos; M Catherine Pietanza; Marina C Garassino Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Solange Peters; D Ross Camidge; Alice T Shaw; Shirish Gadgeel; Jin S Ahn; Dong-Wan Kim; Sai-Hong I Ou; Maurice Pérol; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Rafael Rosell; Ali Zeaiter; Emmanuel Mitry; Sophie Golding; Bogdana Balas; Johannes Noe; Peter N Morcos; Tony Mok Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Benjamin Besse; Sylvestre Le Moulec; Julien Mazières; Hélène Senellart; Fabrice Barlesi; Christos Chouaid; Eric Dansin; Henri Bérard; Lionel Falchero; Radj Gervais; Gilles Robinet; Anne-Marie Ruppert; Roland Schott; Hervé Léna; Christelle Clément-Duchêne; Xavier Quantin; Pierre Jean Souquet; Jean Trédaniel; Denis Moro-Sibilot; Maurice Pérol; Anne-Catherine Madroszyk; Jean-Charles Soria Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alan Sandler; Robert Gray; Michael C Perry; Julie Brahmer; Joan H Schiller; Afshin Dowlati; Rogerio Lilenbaum; David H Johnson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-12-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tudor Ciuleanu; Thomas Brodowicz; Christoph Zielinski; Joo Hang Kim; Maciej Krzakowski; Eckart Laack; Yi-Long Wu; Isabel Bover; Stephen Begbie; Valentina Tzekova; Branka Cucevic; Jose Rodrigues Pereira; Sung Hyun Yang; Jayaprakash Madhavan; Katherine P Sugarman; Patrick Peterson; William J John; Kurt Krejcy; Chandra P Belani Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Yuhui Huang; Jianping Yuan; Elda Righi; Walid S Kamoun; Marek Ancukiewicz; Jean Nezivar; Michael Santosuosso; John D Martin; Margaret R Martin; Fabrizio Vianello; Pierre Leblanc; Lance L Munn; Peigen Huang; Dan G Duda; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain; Mark C Poznansky Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mark A Socinski; Corey J Langer; Jane E Huang; Margaret M Kolb; Peter Compton; Lisa Wang; Wallace Akerley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Blythe J S Adamson; Xinran Ma; Sandra D Griffith; Elizabeth M Sweeney; Somnath Sarkar; Ariel B Bourla Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 2.732