Literature DB >> 19767093

Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study.

Tudor Ciuleanu1, Thomas Brodowicz, Christoph Zielinski, Joo Hang Kim, Maciej Krzakowski, Eckart Laack, Yi-Long Wu, Isabel Bover, Stephen Begbie, Valentina Tzekova, Branka Cucevic, Jose Rodrigues Pereira, Sung Hyun Yang, Jayaprakash Madhavan, Katherine P Sugarman, Patrick Peterson, William J John, Kurt Krejcy, Chandra P Belani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown the efficacy, tolerability, and ease of administration of pemetrexed-an antifolate antineoplastic agent-in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We assessed pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in patients with this disease.
METHODS: This randomised double-blind study was undertaken in 83 centres in 20 countries. 663 patients with stage IIIB or IV disease who had not progressed on four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2), day 1) plus best supportive care (n=441) or placebo plus best supportive care (n=222) in 21-day cycles until disease progression. Treatment was randomised with the Simon and Pocock minimisation method. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment. All patients received vitamin B(12), folic acid, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival and the secondary endpoint of overall survival were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00102804.
FINDINGS: All randomly assigned participants were analysed. Pemetrexed significantly improved progression-free survival (4.3 months [95% CI 4.1-4.7] vs 2.6 months [1.7-2.8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.61, p<0.0001) and overall survival (13.4 months [11.9-15.9] vs 10.6 months [8.7-12.0]; HR 0.79, 0.65-0.95, p=0.012) compared with placebo. Treatment discontinuations due to drug-related toxic effects were higher in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group (21 [5%] vs three [1%]). Drug-related grade three or higher toxic effects were higher with pemetrexed than with placebo (70 [16%] vs nine [4%]; p<0.0001), specifically fatigue (22 [5%] vs one [1%], p=0.001) and neutropenia (13 [3%] vs 0, p=0.006). No pemetrexed-related deaths occurred. Relatively fewer patients in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group received systemic post-discontinuation therapy (227 [51%] vs 149 [67%]; p=0.0001).
INTERPRETATION: Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed is well tolerated and offers improved progression-free and overall survival compared with placebo in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. FUNDING: Eli Lilly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19767093     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61497-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  337 in total

1.  Second-line epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors followed by third-line pemetrexed or the reverse sequence: a retrospective analysis of 83 Chinese patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tingting Hong; Ruxia Zhang; Dongyan Cai; Xiaohong Wu; Dong Hua
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Patient selection in non-small cell lung cancer: Histologic versus molecular subtypes?

Authors:  Tianhong Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  The importance of a satisfactory biopsy for the diagnosis of lung cancer in the era of personalized treatment.

Authors:  L M Ofiara; A Navasakulpong; N Ezer; A V Gonzalez
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Maintenance chemotherapy: an evolving and increasingly acceptable strategy in cancer management.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Molecular testing in lung cancer: the time is now.

Authors:  Haiying Cheng; Xunhai Xu; Daniel B Costa; Charles A Powell; Balazs Halmos
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Predictors and impact of second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: real-world considerations for maintenance therapy.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Drew W Rasco; Phat Le; Jingsheng Yan; Jonathan E Dowell; Yang Xie
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Single-institutional experience of clinicopathological analysis and treatment for lung cancer patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Authors:  Satoshi Takahashi; Yusuke Okuma; Kageaki Watanabe; Yukio Hosomi; Akifumi Imamura; Tatsuru Okamura; Akihiko Gemma
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-06

8.  Erlotinib therapy after initial platinum doublet therapy in patients with EGFR wild type non-small cell lung cancer: results of a combined patient-level analysis of the NCIC CTG BR.21 and SATURN trials.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Federico Cappuzzo; Tudor Ciuleanu; Larry Leon; Barbara Klughammer
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

Review 9.  Update on the evidence regarding maintenance therapy.

Authors:  Jeong Eun Lee; Chae-Uk Chung
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2014-01-29

Review 10.  Non-small-cell lung cancer: treatment of late stage disease: chemotherapeutics and new frontiers.

Authors:  Ronald J Scheff; Bryan J Schneider
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.