Literature DB >> 31360177

Association of systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure with microalbuminuria in treatment-naïve hypertensive patients.

Nianjin Xie1, Xida Li1, Qi Zhong1, Dan Zhou1, Anping Cai1, Ying Zhang1, Yingling Zhou1, Yingqing Feng1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the association between blood pressure components and microalbuminuria (MAU) in newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve hypertensive patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1858 newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve hypertensive patients were enrolled. Based on 24 h urine albumin concentration, all patients were divided into MAU and normo-albuminuria groups. The associations between blood pressure (BP) components, namely systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) and pulse pressure (PP) and MAU, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of each BP component in predicting MAU, were evaluated.
RESULTS: Compared to the normo-albuminuria group, patients in the MAU group were older and had significantly higher SBP and PP (p < 0.05). Serum levels of fasting blood glucose, total protein and creatinine were significantly higher in the MAU group (p < 0.05). 24-hour urine albumin excretion was significantly higher in the MAU group than the normo-albuminuria group (182.5 ±156.5 mg vs. 17.6 ±7.1 mg, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses revealed that SBP and PP were significantly associated with MAU, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.010 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005-1.016, p < 0.001) in SBP and OR of 1.009 (95% CI: 1.003-1.015, p = 0.003) in PP. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve for SBP to predict MAU was 0.541 ±0.013, and PP was 0.536 ±0.013. The difference in predicting MAU by SBP or PP was non-significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve hypertensive patients, increased SBP and PP were independently associated with MAU.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arterial hypertension; blood pressure; microalbuminuria

Year:  2018        PMID: 31360177      PMCID: PMC6657244          DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2018.77727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Sci        ISSN: 1734-1922            Impact factor:   3.318


Introduction

Arterial hypertension reflected as increased systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [1, 2] and reduction of BP was associated with reduced cardiovascular events [3, 4]. In addition, it has been well demonstrated that long-term BP elevation is associated with renal function impairment and chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is a common complication of arterial hypertension [5, 6]. Notably, hypertensive patients with CKD have increased risk of CVD versus their hypertensive counterparts without CKD [7]. Therefore, it is clinically important and relevant to identify hypertensive patients who have an early change of renal function so as to prevent CKD development. Microalbuminuria (MAU) is a sensitive and specific marker to reflect minor and early-stage impaired renal function [8, 9]. It is reported that diabetes mellitus or metabolic syndrome is significantly associated with MAU [10-12]. Nonetheless, the evidence regarding the association between blood pressure components and MAU is limited. In our present cross-sectional study, we enrolled 1858 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension but without previous anti-hypertensive therapy. The aim of our current study was to evaluate whether BP components, namely SBP/DBP and pulse pressure (PP), and MAU after adjustment for potential covariates were independently associated with MAU after adjusting for potential covariates, and also to study which BP component is better associated with MAU. We considered that data from our current study would help us to better understand the association of BP components and early renal function impairment in treatment-naïve hypertensive patients.

Material and methods

Participants’ enrollment

All participants were enrolled from Liaobu Town of Dongguang, Guangdong Province, and informed consent was obtained before enrollment. All the participants were older than 18 years and were newly diagnosed with arterial hypertension in accordance with the diagnostic criteria [13]. Those with secondary hypertension, who had acute coronary syndrome or cerebrovascular diseases in the last 3 months, who were incapable of completing the questionnaire because of intellectual impairment and other conditions, who had other severe diseases with less than 1 year life expectancy, or who were unwilling to take part in the present study, were excluded. A total of 1858 participants with newly diagnosed hypertension and without previous anti-hypertensive therapy were finally enrolled and included in the analysis.

Data collection

Demographics including age and gender, SBP/DBP, PP, body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio, and heart rate at rest were extracted from the electronic health record. To be specific, BP measurements were based on the JNC 7 guideline recommendation [14], where patients sat quietly for 10 min and an appropriate cuff size was applied to the non-dominant arm with the bladder encircling at least 80% of the arm (HEM7200, Omron Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan). The patient’s back was supported and the arm was placed on the desk parallel to the level of the heart. Blood pressure measurement was performed 3 times with a 1-minute interval and the last two readings were averaged. Fasting venous blood was drawn for lipid profiles, fasting blood glucose (FBG), serum levels of albumin, creatinine (Cr), blood urine nitrogen (BUN), and uric acid detections.

Urine albumin concentration detection

Patients were instructed on how to collect 24 h urine by trained staff. Specific containers were provided and required storage in a cool environment during urine collection. The first urine in the first morning was discarded and thereafter urine was collected throughout the period until the first urine on the second morning. After that, 24 h urine was sent back to core lab for urine albumin concentration assessment. In accordance with the diagnostic criterion, MAU was defined as 24-hour urine albumin excretion between 30 and 300 mg. On the basis of urine albumin concentration, all participants were divided into the MAU (n = 967) and the normo-albuminuria (n = 891) groups. Comparisons were performed between groups, and the associations between blood pressure components and MAU as well as the sensitivity and specificity of blood pressure components in predicting MAU were evaluated.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (IQR) appropriately, and between-group differences were tested using Student’s t-test when data were normally distributed; otherwise they were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Categorical data were presented as percentage and compared using the χ2 test. Logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were performed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Comparisons of baseline characteristics

As presented in Table I, compared to the normo-albuminuria group, patients in the MAU group were older and had higher SBP and PP (p < 0.05 for all comparisons), but DBP was comparable. Additionally, serum levels of FBG, total protein, Cr, BUN and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were also significantly higher in the MAU group than the normo-albuminuria group (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Moreover, 24-hour urine albumin excretion in the MAU group was significantly higher than that in the normo-albuminuria group (182.5 ±156.5 mg vs. 17.6 ±7.1 mg, p < 0.001).
Table I

Comparison of baseline characteristics between groups

VariablesNormo-albuminuriaMAUP-value
N (%)891 (47.9)967 (52.1)
Age [years]64.76 ±13.1467.38 ±13.25< 0.001
Male, n (%)465 (52.2)497 (51.4)0.037
SBP [mm Hg]141.6 ±15.9144.6 ±18.4< 0.001
DBP [mm Hg]85.5 ±10.186.3 ±11.70.094
PP [mm Hg]56.1 ±14.658.3 ±16.20.002
BMI [kg/m2]25.1 ±3.725.4 ±40.052
W-H ratio0.92 ±0.070.92 ±0.060.053
Heart rate [bpm]73 ±8.173.1 ±8.20.911
FBG [mmol/l]5.2 ±1.15.6 ±1.8< 0.001
24 h albumin excretion [mg]17.6 ±7.1182.5 ±156.5< 0.001
Total protein [mg/l]71.52 ±5.8572.09 ±5.670.036
Albumin [mg/l]45.51 ±3.7645.37 ±3.780.429
Cr [µmol/l]76 ±24.879.9 ±40.70.014
BUN [mmol/l]5.31 ±1.695.51 ±2.070.026
TC [mg/dl]193 ±40.6195.5 ±43.30.199
TG [mg/dl]195.1 ±607.8196.8 ±160.70.932
LDL-C [mg/dl]113.2 ±31111.9 ±31.20.379
HDL-C [mg/dl]51.1 ±13.152.5 ±13.50.033
Uric acid [µmol/l]379.8 ±104.7382.1 ±106.50.636

W-H ratio – waist hip ratio, bpm – beats per minute, UAC – urine albumin concentration.

Comparison of baseline characteristics between groups W-H ratio – waist hip ratio, bpm – beats per minute, UAC – urine albumin concentration.

Logistic regression analyses

Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the odds ratio (OR) of BP components for MAU in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension but without previous anti-hypertensive treatment. As revealed in the analyses, both SBP and PP were significantly and positively associated with MAU, with OR of 1.010 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005–1.016, p < 0.001) in SBP and OR of 1.009 (95% CI: 1.003–1.015, p = 0.003) in PP, respectively. No significant association between DBP and MAU was observed.

Sensitivity and specificity of SBP and PP in predicting MAU

We further used the receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of SBP and PP in predicting MAU. As revealed in Figure 1, the area under the curve for SBP to predict MAU was 0.541 ±0.013 (p = 0.002), and PP was 0.536 ±0.013 (p = 0.006). The difference between SBP and PP in predicting MAU was non-significant, suggesting that the sensitivity and specificity of SBP and PP in predicting MAU were comparable.
Figure 1

ROC curve. Area under the curve for PP and SBP

ROC curve. Area under the curve for PP and SBP

Discussion

Renal dysfunction has been recognized as one of the most intractable complications of arterial hypertension, and identifying those who are at increased risk of developing renal dysfunction should confer profound benefits for reducing the incidence of renal dysfunction, resistant hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Microalbuminuria may be one of the useful and helpful markers in identifying those who are at increased risk of renal dysfunction [15]. Data from our present research indicated that in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension and without previous anti-hypertensive treatment, the prevalence of MAU was 52.1%, suggesting the clinical importance of detection of MAU in these patients as a screening marker for early renal function impairment. Moreover, as analyzed by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, SBP and PP could be useful for identifying those patients who have MAU and are at increased risk for CKD. However, underlying mechanisms need to be further investigated. Accumulating evidence has consistently shown that diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome are significantly associated with MAU development, suggesting that diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome are independent risk factors for CKD development. Managing these comorbidities should be beneficial for reducing and deterring the progression of MAU in these populations. Long-standing arterial hypertension is also known to be an important risk factor for CKD [14, 16]. Nonetheless, the data on the association of newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve hypertension and MAU are limited. Data from our preliminary research showed that in the community population, the prevalence of MAU in the newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve hypertensive patients was up to 52.1%, suggesting that renal injury was one of the commonly encountered complications associated with arterial hypertension and it is critical and essential to routinely perform MAU screening in these newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. However, since it was not possible to identify the exact duration from the beginning of hypertension in this patient population, we could not be certain whether there was a linear relationship between the duration of BP elevation and the degree of MAU. As regards the value of SBP and PP to predict the prevalence of MAU in the studied patients, logistic regression analyses were performed. After adjustment for traditional risk factors including age, fasting blood glucose, body mass index and lipid profiles, both the SBP and PP were still significantly and independently associated with MAU, suggesting that increased SBP or PP was associated with MAU in treatment-naïve hypertensive patients. To our best knowledge, this finding might be due to the following mechanisms. Generally, increased SBP directly results in increased glomerular pressure and glomerular infiltration rate (GFR). Data from basic research revealed that in rats infused with angiotensin II, intra-glomerular pressure was profoundly increased, which contributed to trans-membrane protein escape and then proteinuria [17, 18]. In addition, increased intra-glomerular pressure could also leads to an increase of membrane permeability, thereby resulting in increased protein trans-membrane excretion [19, 20]. Findings from clinical studies further supported this notion. Lee et al. reported that compared to the normoalbuminuric population, patients with MAU had significantly higher GFR values [21]. Another study also showed that blood pressure levels correlate significantly with MAU in hypertensive patients [22]. However, unlike previous studies, we enrolled newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve hypertensive patients. Therefore, we could exclude confounding effects related to the use of medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. In addition, our present study revealed, for the first time, the comparable value of SBP and PP in association with MAU in newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve hypertensive patients, suggesting that PP was also an important biomarker reflecting the pathophysiological effects of increased BP on renal function impairment. Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of SBP and PP in predicting MAU were also comparable, as revealed by the receiver operating characteristic curve. The clinical implications of our current findings are two-fold: on one hand, it is reasonable and clinically relevant to screen MAU in newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve hypertensive patients; on the other hand, evaluating MAU could be helpful and useful to predict the risk of developing CKD in these populations. Future studies should focus on whether improving BP control, especially SBP and PP, would reduce MAU and thereby deter CKD development. In conclusion, data from our preliminary research indicate that after adjusting for traditional risk factors, increased SBP and PP are associated with increased prevalence of MAU in newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve hypertensive patients.
  22 in total

1.  JNC 7--it's more than high blood pressure.

Authors:  Thomas E Kottke; Robert J Stroebel; Rebecca S Hoffman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Microalbuminuria and early endothelial activation in essential hypertension.

Authors:  S Cottone; G Mulè; E Nardi; M C Lorito; M Guarneri; R Arsena; C Briolotta; A Vadalà; G Cerasola
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Angiotensinogen Expression Is Enhanced in the Progression of Glomerular Disease.

Authors:  Maki Urushihara; Hiroyuki Kobori
Journal:  Int J Clin Med       Date:  2011-09-01

4.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Impaired pressure natriuresis resulting in salt-sensitive hypertension is caused by tubulointerstitial immune cell infiltration in the kidney.

Authors:  Martha Franco; Edilia Tapia; Rocio Bautista; Ursino Pacheco; Jose Santamaria; Yasmir Quiroz; Richard J Johnson; Bernardo Rodriguez-Iturbe
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2013-01-30

6.  Microalbuminuria, macroalbuminuria and uncontrolled blood pressure among diagnosed hypertensive patients: the aspect of racial disparity in the NHANES study.

Authors:  Xuefeng Liu; Kesheng Wang; Liang Wang; Dennis Tsilimingras
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.872

7.  Microalbuminuria in relation to metabolic control and blood pressure in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Maja Ješić; Silvija Sajić; Miloš Ješić; Mirjana Kostić; Amira Peco-Antić; Zoran Vujnović; Svetislav Necić
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad; Josep Redon; Anna Dominiczak; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter M Nilsson; Michel Burnier; Margus Viigimaa; Ettore Ambrosioni; Mark Caufield; Antonio Coca; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland E Schmieder; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Thierry C Gillebert; Michal Tendera; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Stefan D Anker; Johann Bauersachs; Jana Brguljan Hitij; Mark Caulfield; Marc De Buyzere; Sabina De Geest; Geneviève Anne Derumeaux; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Christian Funck-Brentano; Vjekoslav Gerc; Giuseppe Germano; Stephan Gielen; Herman Haller; Arno W Hoes; Jens Jordan; Thomas Kahan; Michel Komajda; Dragan Lovic; Heiko Mahrholdt; Michael Hecht Olsen; Jan Ostergren; Gianfranco Parati; Joep Perk; Jorge Polonia; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Lars Rydén; Yuriy Sirenko; Alice Stanton; Harry Struijker-Boudier; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Massimo Volpe; David A Wood
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Cardiac and renal protective effects of irbesartan via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorγ-hepatocyte growth factor pathway independent of angiotensin II Type 1a receptor blockade in mouse model of salt-sensitive hypertension.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kusunoki; Yoshiaki Taniyama; Hiromi Rakugi; Ryuichi Morishita
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Blood pressure trajectories in early adulthood and subclinical atherosclerosis in middle age.

Authors:  Norrina B Allen; Juned Siddique; John T Wilkins; Christina Shay; Cora E Lewis; David C Goff; David R Jacobs; Kiang Liu; Donald Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 157.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.