Norrina B Allen1, Juned Siddique1, John T Wilkins1, Christina Shay2, Cora E Lewis3, David C Goff4, David R Jacobs5, Kiang Liu1, Donald Lloyd-Jones1. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 2. College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City. 3. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham. 4. Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora. 5. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Single measures of blood pressure (BP) levels are associated with the development of atherosclerosis; however, long-term patterns in BP and their effect on cardiovascular disease risk are poorly characterized. OBJECTIVES: To identify common BP trajectories throughout early adulthood and to determine their association with presence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) during middle age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort data from 4681 participants in the CARDIA study, who were black and white men and women aged 18 to 30 years at baseline in 1985-1986 at 4 urban US sites, collected through 25 years of follow-up (2010-2011). We examined systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mid-BP (calculated as [SBP+DBP]/2, an important marker of coronary heart disease risk among younger populations) at baseline and years 2, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, and 25. Latent mixture modeling was used to identify trajectories in systolic, diastolic, and mid-BP over time. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Coronary artery calcification greater than or equal to Agatston score of 100 Hounsfield units (HU) at year 25. RESULTS: We identified 5 distinct mid-BP trajectories: low-stable (21.8%; 95% CI, 19.9%-23.7%; n=987), moderate-stable (42.3%; 40.3%-44.3%; n=2085), moderate-increasing (12.2%; 10.4%-14.0%; n=489), elevated-stable (19.0%; 17.1%-20.0%; n=903), and elevated-increasing (4.8%; 4.0%-5.5%; n=217). Compared with the low-stable group, trajectories with elevated BP levels had greater odds of having a CAC score of 100 HU or greater. Adjusted odds ratios were 1.44 (95% CI, 0.83-2.49) for moderate-stable, 1.86 (95% CI, 0.91-3.82) for moderate-increasing, 2.28 (95% CI, 1.24-4.18), for elevated-stable, and 3.70 (95% CI, 1.66-8.20) for elevated-increasing groups. The adjusted prevalence of a CAC score of 100 HU or higher was 5.8% in the low-stable group. These odds ratios represent an absolute increase of 2.7%, 5%, 6.3%, and 12.9% for the prevalence of a CAC score of 100 HU or higher for the moderate-stable, moderate-increasing, elevated-stable and elevated-increasing groups, respectively, compared with the low-stable group. Associations were not altered after adjustment for baseline and year 25 BP. Findings were similar for trajectories of isolated systolic BP trajectories but were attenuated for diastolic BP trajectories. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Blood pressure trajectories throughout young adulthood vary, and higher BP trajectories were associated with an increased risk of CAC in middle age. Long-term trajectories in BP may assist in more accurate identification of individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis.
IMPORTANCE: Single measures of blood pressure (BP) levels are associated with the development of atherosclerosis; however, long-term patterns in BP and their effect on cardiovascular disease risk are poorly characterized. OBJECTIVES: To identify common BP trajectories throughout early adulthood and to determine their association with presence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) during middle age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort data from 4681 participants in the CARDIA study, who were black and white men and women aged 18 to 30 years at baseline in 1985-1986 at 4 urban US sites, collected through 25 years of follow-up (2010-2011). We examined systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mid-BP (calculated as [SBP+DBP]/2, an important marker of coronary heart disease risk among younger populations) at baseline and years 2, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, and 25. Latent mixture modeling was used to identify trajectories in systolic, diastolic, and mid-BP over time. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Coronary artery calcification greater than or equal to Agatston score of 100 Hounsfield units (HU) at year 25. RESULTS: We identified 5 distinct mid-BP trajectories: low-stable (21.8%; 95% CI, 19.9%-23.7%; n=987), moderate-stable (42.3%; 40.3%-44.3%; n=2085), moderate-increasing (12.2%; 10.4%-14.0%; n=489), elevated-stable (19.0%; 17.1%-20.0%; n=903), and elevated-increasing (4.8%; 4.0%-5.5%; n=217). Compared with the low-stable group, trajectories with elevated BP levels had greater odds of having a CAC score of 100 HU or greater. Adjusted odds ratios were 1.44 (95% CI, 0.83-2.49) for moderate-stable, 1.86 (95% CI, 0.91-3.82) for moderate-increasing, 2.28 (95% CI, 1.24-4.18), for elevated-stable, and 3.70 (95% CI, 1.66-8.20) for elevated-increasing groups. The adjusted prevalence of a CAC score of 100 HU or higher was 5.8% in the low-stable group. These odds ratios represent an absolute increase of 2.7%, 5%, 6.3%, and 12.9% for the prevalence of a CAC score of 100 HU or higher for the moderate-stable, moderate-increasing, elevated-stable and elevated-increasing groups, respectively, compared with the low-stable group. Associations were not altered after adjustment for baseline and year 25 BP. Findings were similar for trajectories of isolated systolic BP trajectories but were attenuated for diastolic BP trajectories. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Blood pressure trajectories throughout young adulthood vary, and higher BP trajectories were associated with an increased risk of CAC in middle age. Long-term trajectories in BP may assist in more accurate identification of individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis.
Authors: P W Wilson; J M Hoeg; R B D'Agostino; H Silbershatz; A M Belanger; H Poehlmann; D O'Leary; P A Wolf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-08-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Seshadri; P A Wolf; A Beiser; R S Vasan; P W Wilson; C S Kase; M Kelly-Hayes; W B Kannel; R B D'Agostino Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2001-10-22
Authors: Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G D Friedman; G R Cutter; R P Donahue; G H Hughes; S B Hulley; D R Jacobs; K Liu; P J Savage Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1988 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Gabriel S Tajeu; John N Booth; Lisandro D Colantonio; Rebecca F Gottesman; George Howard; Daniel T Lackland; Emily C O'Brien; Suzanne Oparil; Joseph Ravenell; Monika M Safford; Samantha R Seals; Daichi Shimbo; Steven Shea; Tanya M Spruill; Rikki M Tanner; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Danielle M Crookes; Ryan T Demmer; Katherine M Keyes; Karestan C Koenen; Shakira F Suglia Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Muthiah Vaduganathan; Cian P McCarthy; Colby Ayers; Deepak L Bhatt; Dharam J Kumbhani; James A de Lemos; Gregg C Fonarow; Ambarish Pandey Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2020-01-01
Authors: Heather M Johnson; Lisa Sullivan-Vedder; KyungMann Kim; Patrick E McBride; Maureen A Smith; Jamie N LaMantia; Jennifer T Fink; Megan R Knutson Sinaise; Laura M Zeller; Diane R Lauver Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Lindsay R Pool; Hongyan Ning; John Wilkins; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Norrina B Allen Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Lisa B VanWagner; Samantha Montag; Lihui Zhao; Norrina B Allen; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Arighno Das; Anton I Skaro; Samuel Hohmann; John J Friedewald; Josh Levitsky Journal: Transplantation Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Teemu J Niiranen; Danielle M Enserro; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 6.053