| Literature DB >> 31357573 |
Leandro V B Carvalho1, Sandra S Hacon2, Claudia M Vega2,3, Jucilene A Vieira4, Ariane L Larentis4, Rita C O C Mattos4, Daniel Valente4, Isabele C Costa-Amaral4, Dennys S Mourão2, Gabriela P Silva2, Beatriz F A Oliveira2.
Abstract
Oxidative stress can be induced by mercury (Hg) exposure, including through fish consumption (diet), leading to health risks. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between oxidative stress biomarkers and dietary Hg exposure levels in riverine children and adoluiaescents at Madeira River (RO/Brazil). Population from three riverine local communities presenting different fish consumption frequencies was sampled. Hg was determined in blood (ICP-MS) and glutathione (GSH); glutathione S-transferases (GST) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were determined in serum (spectrophotometry). Statistical analyses were performed using parametric and non-parametric tests. Multiple linear regression models and generalized additives models were also used to estimate the relationships between oxidative stress biomarkers and blood Hg. The juvenile riverine population from Cuniã RESEX presented the highest levels of oxidative stress and Hg levels in blood (GST = 27.2 (4.93) U/L, MDA = 1.69 (0.27) µmol/L, Hg = 20.6 (18.0) µg/L). This population also presented the highest frequency of fish consumption. The positive relation between Hg and GST and MDA, adjusted for individual characteristics, suggests an oxidative effect. This study shows the importance of oxidative stress biomarkers in the evaluation of dietary Hg exposure since initial and reversible metabolic changes were observed, enriching health risk assessments.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; juvenile riverine communities; mercury exposure; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31357573 PMCID: PMC6696106 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16152682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Map of the study area. Cuniã and Belmont are located downstream of Porto Velho city, in the state of Rondônia, Brazil. The circles represent the three communities (Belmont, Cuniã and Porto Velho) sampled in this study [29]. Reproduced with permission from Claudia M. Vega, Biological Trace Element Research; published by Springer Link, 2017.
Figure 2Flow diagram displaying the selection of the study population (children and adolescents, between 5 and 17 years old) in the Madeira basin, Rondônia/Brazil.
Sociodemographic variables and biomarker results in the study population per juvenile community.
| Communities | Belmont | Cuniã | Porto Velho | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) or Means (SD) | N (%) or Means (SD) | N (%) or Means (SD) | N (%) or Means (SD) | ||
|
| |||||
| Male | 19 (46.3%) | 22 (42.3%) | 37 (35.6%) | 78 (39.6%) | 0.492 |
| Female | 22 (53.7%) | 30 (57.7%) | 67 (64.4%) | 119 (60.4%) | |
|
| 11.3 (3.07) | 10.9 (2.51) | 11.1 (2.61) | 11.1 (2.68) | 0.807 |
|
| |||||
| 5–11 yrs | 22 (53.7%) | 30 (57.7%) | 52 (50.0%) | 104 (53.0%) | 0.657 |
| 12–17 yrs | 19 (46.3%) | 22 (42.3%) | 52 (50.0%) | 93 (47.0%) | |
|
| 18.5 (3.73) | 17.5 (2.79) | 18.4 (3.74) | 18.2 (3.52) | 0.455 |
|
| 6.36 (2.42) | 5.00 (1.56) | 5.54 (2.34) | 5.60 (2.25) | 0.255 |
|
| |||||
| 0–3 times/week | 33 (82.5%) | 12 (23.1%) | 100 (96.2%) | 145 (74.0%) | 0.000 1 |
| 3 or + times/week | 7 (17.5%) | 40 (76.9%) | 4 (3.8%) | 51 (26.0%) | |
|
| |||||
| GSH (mmol/L) | 0.53 (0.22) | 0.46 (0.04) | 0.47 (0.05) | 0.48 (0.11) | 0.196 |
| GST (U/L) | 22.4 (7.77) | 27.2 (4.93) | 15.2 (4.42) | 19.8 (7.50) | 0.000 2 |
| MDA (µg/L) | 1.34 (0.28) | 1.69 (0.27) | 1.37 (0.31) | 1.45 (0.32) | 0.000 3 |
|
| 7.84 (11.0) | 20.6 (18.0) | 5.22 (6.04) | 9.86 (13.1) | 0.000 2 |
1 Chi-Square test - Difference between Cuniã vs. Belmont vs. Porto Velho; 2 Kruskal–Wallis; and Mann–Whitney Test with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons—Difference between Cuniã vs. Belmont vs. Porto Velho for GST (U/L) and difference between Cuniã vs. Belmont and Porto Velho for Hg (µg/L); 3 ANOVA One-Way Test; and post hoc Tukey HSD for multiple comparisons—Difference between Cuniã vs. Belmont and Porto Velho; BMI = body mass index.
Figure 3Boxplots displaying the results of the analyzed biomarkers (GSH, GST, MDA, and Hg), in the study population, per juvenile community and fish consumption frequency at the Madeira basin. Small dots outside the boxplots represent the outliers.
Spearman correlations between the evaluated biomarkers, age, and BMI.
| GSH | GST | MDA | Hg | Age | BMI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | |||||
|
| 0.128 | 1 | ||||
|
| −0.048 |
| 1 | |||
|
| 0.142 |
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 0.081 | −0.113 |
| −0.072 | 1 | |
|
| −0.064 |
| −0.051 | −0.035 |
| 1 |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Ln-transformed: GSH, GST, Hg, Age, and BMI.
Figure 4Smoothed function of oxidative stress biomarkers and their relationship with Hg. (A) GSH as a smoothed function of total mercury concentrations in blood (Hg-B), coefficient of ln (Hg): 0.024 (p-value = 0.052). (B) GST as a smoothed function of Hg-B. (C) MDA as a smoothed function of Hg-B. The relationship between GSH and Hg was linear. The relationship between Hg and GST was established using a spline with 2 knots inserted in the ln-transformed values of Hg (1 and 2.5 ≅ 2.72 and 12 µg/L of Hg). The relationship between Hg and MDA was established using a spline with df = 2.