H F Niles1, B C Walsh1, S W Woods1, A R Powers1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and the Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Subthreshold perceptual abnormalities are commonly used to identify individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for developing a psychotic disorder. Predictive validity for modality-specific perceptual abnormality severity on psychosis risk is unknown. METHODS: We examined prospectively collected data from 164 individuals age 12-35 meeting criteria for CHR followed for 6-24 months or until conversion to psychosis. Using intake interview notes, baseline perceptual abnormality scores were split into auditory, visual, somatic/tactile, and olfactory/gustatory components, and auditory scores were further split into those for verbal vs non-verbal content. Relationships between perceptual abnormality characteristics and conversion were assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression. RESULTS: Unusual thought content and paranoia were predictive of conversion, but no modality-specific perceptual abnormality score predicted conversion status or days to conversion. However, when auditory perceptual abnormalities were further categorized as verbal vs non-verbal, the severity of verbal experiences was predictive of conversion to psychosis (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Perceptual abnormality scores failed to meaningfully predict conversion to psychosis in either direction in this CHR sample. However, verbal auditory experiences may identify a group of CHR individuals at elevated risk of conversion. Further exploration of the relationship between phenomenological aspects of perceptual abnormalities and conversion risk is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: Subthreshold perceptual abnormalities are commonly used to identify individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for developing a psychotic disorder. Predictive validity for modality-specific perceptual abnormality severity on psychosis risk is unknown. METHODS: We examined prospectively collected data from 164 individuals age 12-35 meeting criteria for CHR followed for 6-24 months or until conversion to psychosis. Using intake interview notes, baseline perceptual abnormality scores were split into auditory, visual, somatic/tactile, and olfactory/gustatory components, and auditory scores were further split into those for verbal vs non-verbal content. Relationships between perceptual abnormality characteristics and conversion were assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression. RESULTS: Unusual thought content and paranoia were predictive of conversion, but no modality-specific perceptual abnormality score predicted conversion status or days to conversion. However, when auditory perceptual abnormalities were further categorized as verbal vs non-verbal, the severity of verbal experiences was predictive of conversion to psychosis (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Perceptual abnormality scores failed to meaningfully predict conversion to psychosis in either direction in this CHR sample. However, verbal auditory experiences may identify a group of CHR individuals at elevated risk of conversion. Further exploration of the relationship between phenomenological aspects of perceptual abnormalities and conversion risk is warranted.
Authors: Alison R Yung; Carrie Stanford; Elizabeth Cosgrave; Eoin Killackey; Lisa Phillips; Barnaby Nelson; Patrick D McGorry Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2006-04-21 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Tandy J Miller; Thomas H McGlashan; Joanna L Rosen; Kristen Cadenhead; Tyrone Cannon; Joseph Ventura; William McFarlane; Diana O Perkins; Godfrey D Pearlson; Scott W Woods Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2003 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Alison R Yung; Hok Pan Yuen; Patrick D McGorry; Lisa J Phillips; Daniel Kelly; Margaret Dell'Olio; Shona M Francey; Elizabeth M Cosgrave; Eoin Killackey; Carrie Stanford; Katherine Godfrey; Joe Buckby Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: L Krabbendam; I Myin-Germeys; M Hanssen; R V Bijl; R de Graaf; W Vollebergh; M Bak; J van Os Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Eren Kafadar; Vijay A Mittal; Gregory P Strauss; Hannah C Chapman; Lauren M Ellman; Sonia Bansal; James M Gold; Ben Alderson-Day; Samuel Evans; Jamie Moffatt; Steven M Silverstein; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Philip R Corlett; Albert R Powers Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Guy Dodgson; Charlotte Aynsworth; Kaja J Mitrenga; Chistopher Gibbs; Victoria Patton; Charles Fernyhough; Robert Dudley; Carina Ewels; Louise Leach; Ben Alderson-Day; Stephanie Common Journal: Psychol Psychother Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 3.966