Literature DB >> 31355420

Does hallucination perceptual modality impact psychosis risk?

H F Niles1, B C Walsh1, S W Woods1, A R Powers1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Subthreshold perceptual abnormalities are commonly used to identify individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for developing a psychotic disorder. Predictive validity for modality-specific perceptual abnormality severity on psychosis risk is unknown.
METHODS: We examined prospectively collected data from 164 individuals age 12-35 meeting criteria for CHR followed for 6-24 months or until conversion to psychosis. Using intake interview notes, baseline perceptual abnormality scores were split into auditory, visual, somatic/tactile, and olfactory/gustatory components, and auditory scores were further split into those for verbal vs non-verbal content. Relationships between perceptual abnormality characteristics and conversion were assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Unusual thought content and paranoia were predictive of conversion, but no modality-specific perceptual abnormality score predicted conversion status or days to conversion. However, when auditory perceptual abnormalities were further categorized as verbal vs non-verbal, the severity of verbal experiences was predictive of conversion to psychosis (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Perceptual abnormality scores failed to meaningfully predict conversion to psychosis in either direction in this CHR sample. However, verbal auditory experiences may identify a group of CHR individuals at elevated risk of conversion. Further exploration of the relationship between phenomenological aspects of perceptual abnormalities and conversion risk is warranted.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical high risk; hallucinations; prodrome; psychosis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31355420      PMCID: PMC6752971          DOI: 10.1111/acps.13078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand        ISSN: 0001-690X            Impact factor:   6.392


  64 in total

1.  Testing the Ultra High Risk (prodromal) criteria for the prediction of psychosis in a clinical sample of young people.

Authors:  Alison R Yung; Carrie Stanford; Elizabeth Cosgrave; Eoin Killackey; Lisa Phillips; Barnaby Nelson; Patrick D McGorry
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability.

Authors:  Tandy J Miller; Thomas H McGlashan; Joanna L Rosen; Kristen Cadenhead; Tyrone Cannon; Joseph Ventura; William McFarlane; Diana O Perkins; Godfrey D Pearlson; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Risk factors for transition to first episode psychosis among individuals with 'at-risk mental states'.

Authors:  Oliver Mason; Mike Startup; Sean Halpin; Ulrich Schall; Agatha Conrad; Vaughan Carr
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States.

Authors:  Alison R Yung; Hok Pan Yuen; Patrick D McGorry; Lisa J Phillips; Daniel Kelly; Margaret Dell'Olio; Shona M Francey; Elizabeth M Cosgrave; Eoin Killackey; Carrie Stanford; Katherine Godfrey; Joe Buckby
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.744

5.  Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase.

Authors:  J Klosterkötter; M Hellmich; E M Steinmeyer; F Schultze-Lutter
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2001-02

6.  Hallucinatory experiences and onset of psychotic disorder: evidence that the risk is mediated by delusion formation.

Authors:  L Krabbendam; I Myin-Germeys; M Hanssen; R V Bijl; R de Graaf; W Vollebergh; M Bak; J van Os
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness-persistence-impairment model of psychotic disorder.

Authors:  J van Os; R J Linscott; I Myin-Germeys; P Delespaul; L Krabbendam
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Emotional and behavioural antecedents of young adults who screen positive for non-affective psychosis: a 21-year birth cohort study.

Authors:  J Welham; J Scott; G Williams; J Najman; W Bor; M O'Callaghan; J McGrath
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Hallucinations in Latino psychiatric outpatients: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  David Geltman; Grace Chang
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.238

10.  Cognitive and neural processes in non-clinical auditory hallucinations.

Authors:  Emma Barkus; John Stirling; Richard Hopkins; Shane McKie; Shôn Lewis
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl       Date:  2007-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Measuring Voluntary Control Over Hallucinations: The Yale Control Over Perceptual Experiences (COPE) Scales.

Authors:  Catalina Mourgues; Allison Hammer; Victoria Fisher; Eren Kafadar; Brittany Quagan; Claire Bien; Hale Jaeger; Rigi Thomas; Ely Sibarium; Alyson M Negreira; Elif Sarisik; Vasishta Polisetty; Hatice Nur Eken; Ayyub Imtiaz; Halsey Niles; Andrew D Sheldon; Albert R Powers
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 7.348

2.  Modeling perception and behavior in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: Support for the predictive processing framework.

Authors:  Eren Kafadar; Vijay A Mittal; Gregory P Strauss; Hannah C Chapman; Lauren M Ellman; Sonia Bansal; James M Gold; Ben Alderson-Day; Samuel Evans; Jamie Moffatt; Steven M Silverstein; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Philip R Corlett; Albert R Powers
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Clinical high-risk criteria of psychosis in 8-17-year-old community subjects and inpatients not suspected of developing psychosis.

Authors:  Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Petra Walger; Maurizia Franscini; Nina Traber-Walker; Naweed Osman; Helene Walger; Benno G Schimmelmann; Rahel Flückiger; Chantal Michel
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-19

4.  Measurement invariance between online and paper-and-pencil formats of the Launay-Slade Hallucinations scale-extended (LSHS-E) in the Chilean population: Invariance between LSHS-E formats.

Authors:  Yanet Quijada; Sandra Saldivia; Claudio Bustos; Antonio Preti; Susana Ochoa; Elvis Castro-Alzate; Sara Siddi
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-01-17

5.  Managing unusual sensory experiences: A feasibility trial in an At Risk Mental States for psychosis group.

Authors:  Guy Dodgson; Charlotte Aynsworth; Kaja J Mitrenga; Chistopher Gibbs; Victoria Patton; Charles Fernyhough; Robert Dudley; Carina Ewels; Louise Leach; Ben Alderson-Day; Stephanie Common
Journal:  Psychol Psychother       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.966

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.