Literature DB >> 35089361

Measuring Voluntary Control Over Hallucinations: The Yale Control Over Perceptual Experiences (COPE) Scales.

Catalina Mourgues1, Allison Hammer1, Victoria Fisher1, Eren Kafadar1, Brittany Quagan1, Claire Bien1, Hale Jaeger1, Rigi Thomas2, Ely Sibarium1, Alyson M Negreira3, Elif Sarisik4, Vasishta Polisetty5, Hatice Nur Eken6, Ayyub Imtiaz7, Halsey Niles1, Andrew D Sheldon1, Albert R Powers1.   

Abstract

Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) frequently cause significant distress and dysfunction, and may be unresponsive to conventional treatments. Some voice-hearers report an ability to fully control the onset and offset of their AVH, making them significantly less disruptive. Measuring and understanding these abilities may lead to novel interventions to enhance control over AVH. Fifty-two voice-hearers participated in the pilot study. 318 participants with frequent AVH participated in the validation study. A pool of 59 items was developed by a diverse team including voice-hearers and clinicians. After the pilot study, 35 items were retained. Factorial structure was assessed with exploratory (EFA, n = 148) and confirmatory (CFA, n = 170) factor analyses. Reliability and convergent validity were assessed using a comprehensive battery of validated phenomenological and clinical scales. CFA on the final 18 items supported two factors for a Methods of Control Scale (5 items each, average ω = .87), and one factor for a Degree of Control Scale (8 items, average ω = .95). Correlation with clinical measures supported convergent validity. Degree of control was associated with positive clinical outcomes in voice-hearers both with and without a psychosis-spectrum diagnosis. Degree of control also varied with quality of life independently of symptom severity and AVH content. The Yale control over perceptual experiences (COPE) Scales robustly measure voice-hearers' control over AVH and exhibit sound psychometric properties. Results demonstrate that the capacity to voluntarily control AVH is independently associated with positive clinical outcomes. Reliable measurement of control over AVH will enable future development of interventions meant to bolster that control.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Development; auditory hallucinations; control; questionnaire; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35089361      PMCID: PMC9077437          DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbab144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   7.348


  59 in total

1.  Measurement of delusional ideation in the normal population: introducing the PDI (Peters et al. Delusions Inventory).

Authors:  E R Peters; S A Joseph; P A Garety
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Can you experience 'top-down' effects on perception?: The case of race categories and perceived lightness.

Authors:  Chaz Firestone; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

4.  Robust Coefficients Alpha and Omega and Confidence Intervals With Outlying Observations and Missing Data: Methods and Software.

Authors:  Zhiyong Zhang; Ke-Hai Yuan
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 5.  Hallucinations and Strong Priors.

Authors:  Philip R Corlett; Guillermo Horga; Paul C Fletcher; Ben Alderson-Day; Katharina Schmack; Albert R Powers
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Does hallucination perceptual modality impact psychosis risk?

Authors:  H F Niles; B C Walsh; S W Woods; A R Powers
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.392

7.  The revised Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R).

Authors:  P Chandwick; S Lees; M Birchwood
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Cognitive biases and auditory verbal hallucinations in healthy and clinical individuals.

Authors:  K Daalman; I E C Sommer; E M Derks; E R Peters
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness-persistence-impairment model of psychotic disorder.

Authors:  J van Os; R J Linscott; I Myin-Germeys; P Delespaul; L Krabbendam
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Real-time fMRI neurofeedback to down-regulate superior temporal gyrus activity in patients with schizophrenia and auditory hallucinations: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Natasza D Orlov; Vincent Giampietro; Owen O'Daly; Sheut-Ling Lam; Gareth J Barker; Katya Rubia; Philip McGuire; Sukhwinder S Shergill; Paul Allen
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 7.989

View more
  1 in total

1.  Voice-Hearing Across The Continuum: A Phenomenology of Spiritual Voices.

Authors:  Peter Moseley; Adam Powell; Angela Woods; Charles Fernyhough; Ben Alderson-Day
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 7.348

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.