Jessica Olayanju1, Teresa Borras1, Bahjat Qaqish2, David Fleischman1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2. North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
AIM: Determination of the effect of varying fenestration technique, and simulated patch graft on outflow facility for Baerveldt tube. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Silicone tubing similar to Baerveldt implant (AMO, Santa Ana, CA) with different fenestrations techniques was connected to a digital manometer in a closed system with a fluid-filled syringe on a stand to adjust pressure. The venting slits included: (A) 4 piercings with 7-0 TG140-8 needle; (B) a 2-mm slit with a 15° blade; (C) 4 piercings with a 15° blade; (D) 9-0 Nylon on CS140-6 needle with suture stenting the fenestration. RESULTS: For pressures of 10, 20, 30, 40 mm Hg in groups A to D, the average outflow facility (mL/min/mm Hg) were group A: 0.11, 0.20, 0.28, 0.40; group B: 0.30, 0.69, 0.98, 0.93; group C: 0.73, 0.80, 0.81, 0.88; group D: 0.58, 0.65, 0.80, 0.87. For external compression with 10 gram weights at pressures of 10, 20, 30, 40 mm Hg, outflow were group A: 0.0, 0.18, 0.20, 0.53; group B: 0.75, 0.70, 0.97, 1.21. Group C: 0.18, 0.03, 0.57, 0.04. Group D: 0.73, 0.90, 1.13, 0.91. CONCLUSION: Effectivity of venting slits in maintaining adequate IOP in the early postoperative period for non-valved glaucoma implant is variable, multifactorial and largely intraocular pressure (IOP) dependent. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study explores methods of producing fenestration and the effects on outflow at different pressures in an attempt to determine which fenestration technique has more reproducible results that can be made applicable in clinical practice. This is also the first study to evaluate the effect of external pressures similar to scleral patch graft on the tube fenestrations. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Olayanju J, Borras T, Qaqish B, Fleischman D. Outflow Facility in Tube Shunt Fenestration. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2018;12(3):113-118.
AIM: Determination of the effect of varying fenestration technique, and simulated patch graft on outflow facility for Baerveldt tube. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Silicone tubing similar to Baerveldt implant (AMO, Santa Ana, CA) with different fenestrations techniques was connected to a digital manometer in a closed system with a fluid-filled syringe on a stand to adjust pressure. The venting slits included: (A) 4 piercings with 7-0 TG140-8 needle; (B) a 2-mm slit with a 15° blade; (C) 4 piercings with a 15° blade; (D) 9-0 Nylon on CS140-6 needle with suture stenting the fenestration. RESULTS: For pressures of 10, 20, 30, 40 mm Hg in groups A to D, the average outflow facility (mL/min/mm Hg) were group A: 0.11, 0.20, 0.28, 0.40; group B: 0.30, 0.69, 0.98, 0.93; group C: 0.73, 0.80, 0.81, 0.88; group D: 0.58, 0.65, 0.80, 0.87. For external compression with 10 gram weights at pressures of 10, 20, 30, 40 mm Hg, outflow were group A: 0.0, 0.18, 0.20, 0.53; group B: 0.75, 0.70, 0.97, 1.21. Group C: 0.18, 0.03, 0.57, 0.04. Group D: 0.73, 0.90, 1.13, 0.91. CONCLUSION: Effectivity of venting slits in maintaining adequate IOP in the early postoperative period for non-valved glaucoma implant is variable, multifactorial and largely intraocular pressure (IOP) dependent. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study explores methods of producing fenestration and the effects on outflow at different pressures in an attempt to determine which fenestration technique has more reproducible results that can be made applicable in clinical practice. This is also the first study to evaluate the effect of external pressures similar to scleral patch graft on the tube fenestrations. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Olayanju J, Borras T, Qaqish B, Fleischman D. Outflow Facility in Tube Shunt Fenestration. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2018;12(3):113-118.
Authors: Panos G Christakis; Jeffrey W Kalenak; David Zurakowski; James C Tsai; Jeffrey A Kammer; Paul J Harasymowycz; Iqbal I K Ahmed Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Sukesh Kansal; Marlene R Moster; David Kim; Courtland M Schmidt; Richard P Wilson; L Jay Katz Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Manishi A Desai; Steven J Gedde; William J Feuer; Wei Shi; Philip P Chen; Richard K Parrish Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Date: 2011 May-Jun