Literature DB >> 12169972

Tube fenestrations in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant surgery: 1-year results compared with standard implant surgery.

Geoffrey T Emerick1, Steven J Gedde, Donald L Budenz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tube fenestrations in eyes undergoing polyglactin suture-ligated Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective nonrandomized comparative interventional study of consecutive cases of 111 eyes of 111 patients with refractory glaucoma who received polyglactin (Vicryl) suture-ligated Baerveldt 350 implants as a single procedure. In 69 of these cases (group 1), fenestrations were placed anterior to the ligature using a suture needle. In 42 cases (group 2), no fenestrations were performed. Main outcome measures included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and complications.
RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) preoperative intraocular pressure was 36.7 +/- 10.2 mm Hg in group 1 and 28.3 +/- 10.3 mm Hg in group 2 (P <0.001). Postoperative mean intraocular pressure was lower in group 1 than in group 2 at day 1 (20.2 +/- 12.8 vs. 29.3 +/- 1.9 mm Hg, P <0.001) and week 1 (18.3 +/- 10.4 vs. 23.7 +/- 8.6 mm Hg, P = 0.006), but was virtually identical at 1 year (12.7 +/- 4.9 vs. 12.6 +/- 4.4 mm Hg, P = 0.95). Number of glaucoma medications used by group 1 patients was significantly lower up to 3 months (P </=0.05). Complication rates were similar in both groups. After tube opening at a mean of 36 +/- 4.7 days, there was an equal and sustained intraocular pressure reduction in both groups in patients taking a similar number of glaucoma medicines up to 12 months after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Tube fenestrations provide safe and effective short-term intraocular pressure control with fewer glaucoma medications in a ligated nonvalved glaucoma drainage implant, with comparable intraocular pressure control and medications required at 1 year. However, not all patients have sustained reduction of intraocular pressure in the immediate postoperative period with fenestrations, making the effect somewhat unpredictable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12169972     DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200208000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  6 in total

1.  Treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study after 1 year of follow-up.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Keith Barton; William J Feuer; Joyce Schiffman; Vital P Costa; David G Godfrey; Yvonne M Buys
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Motility disturbances in the tube versus trabeculectomy study during the first year of follow-up.

Authors:  Frederick M Rauscher; Steven J Gedde; Joyce C Schiffman; William J Feuer; Keith Barton; Richard K Lee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Baerveldt tube implantation following failed deep sclerectomy versus repeat deep sclerectomy.

Authors:  C Bergin; A Petrovic; A Mermoud; E Ravinet; E Sharkawi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of Two Tube-Modification Techniques in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma.

Authors:  Purit Petpiroon; Thanyathorn Vijittrakarnrung; Wasu Supakontanasan; Apichat Tantraworasin; Yanin Suwan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-19

5.  Outflow Facility in Tube Shunt Fenestration.

Authors:  Jessica Olayanju; Teresa Borras; Bahjat Qaqish; David Fleischman
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2018 Sep-Dec

6.  Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant versus Ahmed Glaucoma Implant in a One-Year Follow Up, Comparative Study.

Authors:  Khaled Hamdi Elbaklish; Safaa Mohammed Saleh; Wael Adel Gomaa
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.