Literature DB >> 20207971

Surface topographies of glaucoma drainage devices and their influence on human tenon fibroblast adhesion.

Lars Choritz1, Kaloian Koynov, Giulia Renieri, Keith Barton, Norbert Pfeiffer, Hagen Thieme.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to investigate the surface topography of different glaucoma drainage devices and to determine the effects of surface roughness on cell adhesion of cultured human tenon fibroblasts.
METHODS: The surface topography of four widely used devices (Ahmed FP7 and Ahmed S-2; New World Medical, Inc., Rancho Cucamonga, CA; Baerveldt BG101-350; Advanced Medical Optics, Irvine, CA; and Molteno S1; Molteno Ophthalmic Ltd., Dunedin, New Zealand) was investigated by scanning electron microscopy, and roughness was quantified by white-light confocal microscopy. Cells were grown for 72 hours on the surfaces of implants affixed to standard culture dishes. The cells were labeled with a fluorescent dye and detected by confocal laser scanning microscopy, while simultaneously imaging the surface reflectance. Collagen adsorption was quantified immunologically by using fluorescent beads coupled to a secondary antibody.
RESULTS: The root-mean-square roughness was 1.5 +/- 0.1 microm (mean +/- SE) for the silicone Ahmed model FP7 and 1.3 +/- 0.1 microm for the Ahmed with polypropylene base plate Ahmed model S-2. The Baerveldt was substantially smoother, with a mean roughness of 0.1 +/- 0.01 microm. The Molteno was the smoothest of all devices (0.07 +/- 0.01 microm). Cell adhesion was most prevalent on base plates with higher surface roughness, markedly less pronounced on the smoother base plates, and independent of collagen adsorption.
CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently implanted glaucoma drainage devices are of markedly different surface topography. Surface roughness appears to correlate with tenon fibroblast adhesion in vitro and also with the rate of occurrence of postimplantation hypertensive phase and failure due to fibrous encapsulation. Surface roughness may thus play a role in triggering excessive fibrovascular reactions. Smoother base plate surfaces may enhance the success rates of these devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207971     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  19 in total

1.  Intraoperative testing of opening and closing pressure predicts risk of low intraocular pressure after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation.

Authors:  F Bochmann; A Kipfer; J Tarantino; C Kaufmann; L Bachmann; M Thiel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Three-year treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study.

Authors:  Keith Barton; William J Feuer; Donald L Budenz; Joyce Schiffman; Vital P Costa; David G Godfrey; Yvonne M Buys
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Comparison of complications after Ahmed versus Baerveldt implant in glaucoma patients: one year follow-up.

Authors:  Sara Listyani Koentjoro; Widya Artini; Iwan Soebijantoro; Vira Wardhana Istiantoro; Emma Rusmayani; Rini Sulastiwaty; Zeiras Eka Djamal; Arini Safira Nurul Akbar; Muhammad Yoserizal
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  [Pathophysiology of fibrotic encapsulation of episcleral glaucoma drainage implants: modification for improvement of clinical results].

Authors:  L Choritz; M Wegner; R Förch; U Jonas; H Thieme
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Clinical results of encapsulated bleb removal after Ahmed glaucoma valve implants].

Authors:  J Rosbach; L Choritz; N Pfeiffer; H Thieme
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 6.  Current status of epibulbar anti-glaucoma drainage devices in glaucoma surgery.

Authors:  Hagen Thieme
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  [Tube versus trabeculectomy study].

Authors:  H Thieme; L Choritz; C Schuart; T Wecke
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 8.  Fouling in ocular devices: implications for drug delivery, bioactive surface immobilization, and biomaterial design.

Authors:  Onyinye J Uwaezuoke; Pradeep Kumar; Viness Pillay; Yahya E Choonara
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 4.617

9.  Histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of capsular tissue around failed Ahmed glaucoma valves.

Authors:  Alka Mahale; Fatma Fikri; Khitam Al Hati; Sami Al Shahwan; Ibrahim Al Jadaan; Hind Al Katan; Rajiv Khandekar; Azza Maktabi; Deepak P Edward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Preimplantation Flow Testing of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve and the Early Postoperative Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Emma Jones; Pouya Alaghband; Jason Cheng; Laura Beltran-Agullo; Kin Sheng Lim
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2013-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.