Ian G Hargraves1, Victor M Montori2, Juan P Brito2, Marleen Kunneman3, Kevin Shaw4, Christina LaVecchia4, Michael Wilson5, Laura Walker6, Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir7. 1. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. Electronic address: Hargraves.Ian@mayo.edu. 2. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. 3. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands. 4. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. 5. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Program in Bioethics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 7. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Program in Bioethics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patient involvement focused the growth of Shared Decision Making (SDM) in contemporary healthcare practice, research, and education. Whilst important, securing appropriate patient involvement or equipping patients to choose is not necessarily the principal purpose of SDM. The purpose of SDM like all medical decision making is to act well in response to a patient's problem, broadly conceived. In which situations and how SDM addresses patient problems is unclear. We seek to develop a purposeful approach to SDM that is oriented to the kinds of problems that SDM might help resolve. METHODS: Through vignettes of the experience of a patient, Rachel we demonstrate different kinds of situations in which Rachel, her family, and clinicians need to make decisions together. RESULTS: Different methods of SDM are needed in situations of: CONCLUSION: SDM may be understood as a range of methods that vary substantially with patients' situations and the purpose that they pursue. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians struggle to adopt SDM when they do not see it as relevant to clinical work. Orienting SDM to the problems that patients and clinicians routinely face may further SDM adoption, education, and research.
OBJECTIVE:Patient involvement focused the growth of Shared Decision Making (SDM) in contemporary healthcare practice, research, and education. Whilst important, securing appropriate patient involvement or equipping patients to choose is not necessarily the principal purpose of SDM. The purpose of SDM like all medical decision making is to act well in response to a patient's problem, broadly conceived. In which situations and how SDM addresses patient problems is unclear. We seek to develop a purposeful approach to SDM that is oriented to the kinds of problems that SDM might help resolve. METHODS: Through vignettes of the experience of a patient, Rachel we demonstrate different kinds of situations in which Rachel, her family, and clinicians need to make decisions together. RESULTS: Different methods of SDM are needed in situations of: CONCLUSION: SDM may be understood as a range of methods that vary substantially with patients' situations and the purpose that they pursue. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians struggle to adopt SDM when they do not see it as relevant to clinical work. Orienting SDM to the problems that patients and clinicians routinely face may further SDM adoption, education, and research.
Authors: Pål Gulbrandsen; Marla L Clayman; Mary Catherine Beach; Paul K Han; Emily F Boss; Eirik H Ofstad; Glyn Elwyn Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-07-07
Authors: Glyn Elwyn; Christine Dehlendorf; Ronald M Epstein; Katy Marrin; James White; Dominick L Frosch Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Glyn Elwyn; Marie Anne Durand; Julia Song; Johanna Aarts; Paul J Barr; Zackary Berger; Nan Cochran; Dominick Frosch; Dariusz Galasiński; Pål Gulbrandsen; Paul K J Han; Martin Härter; Paul Kinnersley; Amy Lloyd; Manish Mishra; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez; Isabelle Scholl; Kounosuke Tomori; Lyndal Trevena; Holly O Witteman; Trudy Van der Weijden Journal: BMJ Date: 2017-11-06
Authors: Marleen Kunneman; Megan E Branda; Ian G Hargraves; Angela L Sivly; Alexander T Lee; Haeshik Gorr; Bruce Burnett; Takeki Suzuki; Elizabeth A Jackson; Erik Hess; Mark Linzer; Sarah R Brand-McCarthy; Juan P Brito; Peter A Noseworthy; Victor M Montori Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Mina K Chung; Angela Fagerlin; Paul J Wang; Tinuola B Ajayi; Larry A Allen; Tina Baykaner; Emelia J Benjamin; Megan Branda; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Lin Y Chen; George H Crossley; Rebecca K Delaney; Lee L Eckhardt; Kathleen L Grady; Ian G Hargraves; Mellanie True Hills; Matthew M Kalscheur; Daniel B Kramer; Marleen Kunneman; Rachel Lampert; Aisha T Langford; Krystina B Lewis; Ying Lu; John M Mandrola; Kathryn Martinez; Daniel D Matlock; Sarah R McCarthy; Victor M Montori; Peter A Noseworthy; Kate M Orland; Elissa Ozanne; Rod Passman; Krishna Pundi; Dan M Roden; Elizabeth V Saarel; Monika M Schmidt; Samuel F Sears; Dawn Stacey; Randall S Stafford; Benjamin A Steinberg; Sojin Youn Wass; Jennifer M Wright Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2021-12-06
Authors: Sandra A Hartasanchez; Stuart W Grande; Victor M Montori; Marleen Kunneman; Juan P Brito; Sarah McCarthy; Ian G Hargraves Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2021-11-08
Authors: Nathan D Baggett; Kathryn Schulz; Anne Buffington; Nicholas Marka; Bret M Hanlon; Christopher Zimmermann; Jennifer Tucholka; Dan Fox; Justin T Clapp; Robert M Arnold; Margaret L Schwarze Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 16.681
Authors: Peter A Noseworthy; Megan E Branda; Marleen Kunneman; Ian G Hargraves; Angela L Sivly; Juan P Brito; Bruce Burnett; Claudia Zeballos-Palacios; Mark Linzer; Takeki Suzuki; Alexander T Lee; Haeshik Gorr; Elizabeth A Jackson; Erik Hess; Sarah R Brand-McCarthy; Nilay D Shah; Victor M Montori Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 6.106