Literature DB >> 31350691

Development of generalized empirical models for comparing effectiveness of wastewater nutrient removal technologies.

Brock Hodgson1, Sybil Sharvelle2.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of nutrient removal approaches was quantified at four wastewater treatment facilities (WWTFs) using mechanistic models. Generalized empirical models were developed applying statistical methods on the predicted values characterizing nutrient removal as a function of influent wastewater quality. The empirical models provide a framework to estimate nutrient removal effectiveness and inform system-level decisions on technology adoption. When carbon limited, more sophisticated approaches like five-stage Bardenpho and nitrite shunt provide the most notable benefit in removal efficiency (67% ± 3.3% and 89% ± 2.8%, respectively for total nitrogen (TN)), but little benefit is estimated under non-carbon-limited conditions between traditional solutions like anaerobic, anoxic, oxic (A2O), and advanced process configurations like five-stage Bardenpho (82% ± 2.8% and 85% ± 3.3%, respectively for TN). Sidestream physical/chemical processes can provide improvement in removal efficiency particularly at carbon-limited WWTFs, but negligible benefit is estimated with adoption of sidestream biological processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological nutrient removal; Empirical models; Nutrient pollution; Sidestream treatment; Technology comparison; Wastewater treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31350691     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05761-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  5 in total

1.  Effects of soluble and particulate substrate on the carbon and energy footprint of wastewater treatment processes.

Authors:  Riccardo Gori; Lu-Man Jiang; Reza Sobhani; Diego Rosso
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 2.  Aeration control - a review.

Authors:  L Åmand; G Olsson; B Carlsson
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.915

3.  Rethinking the Mechanisms of Biological Phosphorus Removal.

Authors:  James L Barnard; Patrick Dunlap; Mark Steichen
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.946

4.  Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems.

Authors:  Jeffrey Foley; David de Haas; Ken Hartley; Paul Lant
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Integrative microbial community analysis reveals full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal under tropical conditions.

Authors:  Yingyu Law; Rasmus Hansen Kirkegaard; Angel Anisa Cokro; Xianghui Liu; Krithika Arumugam; Chao Xie; Mikkel Stokholm-Bjerregaard; Daniela I Drautz-Moses; Per Halkjær Nielsen; Stefan Wuertz; Rohan B H Williams
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.