Literature DB >> 21943568

Effects of soluble and particulate substrate on the carbon and energy footprint of wastewater treatment processes.

Riccardo Gori1, Lu-Man Jiang, Reza Sobhani, Diego Rosso.   

Abstract

Most wastewater treatment plants monitor routinely carbonaceous and nitrogenous load parameters in influent and effluent streams, and often in the intermediate steps. COD fractionation discriminates the selective removal of VSS components in different operations, allowing accurate quantification of the energy requirements and mass flows for secondary treatment, sludge digestion, and sedimentation. We analysed the different effects of COD fractions on carbon and energy footprint in a wastewater treatment plant with activated sludge in nutrient removal mode and anaerobic digestion of the sludge with biogas energy recovery. After presenting a simple rational procedure for COD and solids fractions quantification, we use our carbon and energy footprint models to quantify the effects of varying fractions on carbon equivalent flows, process energy demand and recovery. A full-scale real process was modelled with this procedure and the results are reported in terms of energy and carbon footprint. For a given process, the increase of the ratio sCOD/COD increases the energy demand on the aeration reactors, the associated CO(2) direct emission from respiration, and the indirect emission for power generation. Even though it appears as if enhanced primary sedimentation is a carbon and energy footprint mitigation practice, care must be used since the nutrient removal process downstream may suffer from an excessive bCOD removal and an increased mean cell retention time for nutrient removal may be required.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21943568     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  3 in total

1.  Mass and energy balances of sludge processing in reference and upgraded wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  G Mininni; G Laera; G Bertanza; M Canato; A Sbrilli
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Development of generalized empirical models for comparing effectiveness of wastewater nutrient removal technologies.

Authors:  Brock Hodgson; Sybil Sharvelle
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Energy use and carbon footprints differ dramatically for diverse wastewater-derived carbonaceous substrates: An integrated exploration of biokinetics and life-cycle assessment.

Authors:  Yanbo Li; Xu Wang; David Butler; Junxin Liu; Jiuhui Qu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.