| Literature DB >> 27193869 |
Yingyu Law1, Rasmus Hansen Kirkegaard2, Angel Anisa Cokro1, Xianghui Liu1, Krithika Arumugam1, Chao Xie3, Mikkel Stokholm-Bjerregaard2, Daniela I Drautz-Moses1, Per Halkjær Nielsen1,2, Stefan Wuertz1,4,5, Rohan B H Williams3.
Abstract
Management of phosphorus discharge from human waste is essential for the control of eutrophication in surface waters. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is a sustainable, efficient way of removing phosphorus from waste water without employing chemical precipitation, but is assumed unachievable in tropical temperatures due to conditions that favour glycogen accumulating organisms (GAOs) over polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs). Here, we show these assumptions are unfounded by studying comparative community dynamics in a full-scale plant following systematic perturbation of operational conditions, which modified community abundance, function and physicochemical state. A statistically significant increase in the relative abundance of the PAO Accumulibacter was associated with improved EBPR activity. GAO relative abundance also increased, challenging the assumption of competition. An Accumulibacter bin-genome was identified from a whole community metagenomic survey, and comparative analysis against extant Accumulibacter genomes suggests a close relationship to Type II. Analysis of the associated metatranscriptome data revealed that genes encoding proteins involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle and glycolysis pathways were highly expressed, consistent with metabolic modelling results. Our findings show that tropical EBPR is indeed possible, highlight the translational potential of studying competition dynamics in full-scale waste water communities and carry implications for plant design in tropical regions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27193869 PMCID: PMC4872125 DOI: 10.1038/srep25719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Chemical transformation occurring (A) in a lab-scale batch experiment conducted with activated sludge collected on the 25th July 2013 and (B) at Ulu Pandan South Works on the 25th July 2013. Dashed line indicates a change of redox conditions from, in (A), anaerobic to aerobic conditions, and in (B), anoxic to aerobic conditions. Anoxic condition indicates the presence of nitrate, but not oxygen, as an electron acceptor.
Figure 2FISH image of activated sludge from Ulu Pandan South Works collected on the 25th July 2013.
Bacteria hybridised with the general probe EUBMix (green), Accumulibacter–PAOs hybridized with the PAOmix (red), and Accumulibacter–PAOs Type II hybridized with ACC–II–444 (blue). Cells hybridized to both PAOmix and ACC–II–444 appear magenta.
Figure 3Metagenome analysis and comparative genome analysis against Ca.
Accumulibacter phosphatis reference genome. (A) eFISH analysis (see Methods). gDNA read counts for instances of FISH probes from PAO and GAO (normalised to the EUB338 universal probe; see also Table S1 for relevant data). (B) Distribution of percent identity (amino acid identity) between ORF and proteins in the Accumulibacter reference genome.
Figure 4The effect of (A) decrease in dissolved oxygen concentration in the aerobic zone on the (B) phosphate and nitrogen removal efficiency at Ulu Pandan South Works and the specific phosphate and acetate uptake activity of Ulu Pandan biomass determined in lab–scale batch experiments conducted with freshly collected full–scale plant biomass; (C) community composition (operational taxonomic units (OTU) defined by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data); and (D) poly–β–hydroxyalkanoate (PHA) content and ratio and glycogen content in the biomass throughout the two month sampling period between the 29th May–14th August 2013. Relative abundances of OTUs in (C) are plotted on a square root scale; OTUs annotated to Accumulibacter PAO and Competibacter GAO are highlighted. Dashed line indicates the sampling point when dissolved oxygen was decreased in the aerobic zone of Ulu Pandan South Works.
OTUs differentially abundant between high and low aeration epochs.
| denovo886 | −0.32 | 104.85 | 7.11E-06 | 1.36E-03 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Betaproteobacteria |
| denovo474 | −0.65 | 54.49 | 7.76E-05 | 7.44E-03 | k__Bacteria; p__Bacteroidetes; c__[Saprospirae]; o__[Saprospirales] |
| denovo4523 | 0.33 | 40.11 | 2.25E-04 | 1.44E-02 | k__Bacteria |
| denovo4670 | 0.32 | 29.01 | 6.57E-04 | 2.52E-02 | k__Bacteria |
| denovo5306 | 0.44 | 29.64 | 6.13E-04 | 2.52E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Actinobacteria; c__Actinobacteria; o__Actinomycetales; f__; g__; s__ |
| denovo464 | 0.30 | 23.31 | 1.31E-03 | 2.79E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Betaproteobacteria; o__Ellin6067; f__; g__; s__ |
| denovo890 | 0.40 | 23.43 | 1.29E-03 | 2.79E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Gammaproteobacteria; o__Salinisphaerales; f__Competibacteraceae; g__; s__ |
| denovo2451 | 0.19 | 26.50 | 8.77E-04 | 2.79E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Gammaproteobacteria; o__Salinisphaerales; f__Competibacteraceae; g__; s__ |
| denovo2882 | −1.09 | 25.22 | 1.03E-03 | 2.79E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Acidobacteria; c__[Chloracidobacteria]; o__PK29; f__; g__; s__ |
| denovo3239 | 0.21 | 19.86 | 2.12E-03 | 4.07E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Alphaproteobacteria; o__Rhizobiales; f__; g__; s__ |
| denovo16 | −0.33 | 17.19 | 3.23E-03 | 4.80E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Betaproteobacteria |
| denovo51 | 0.31 | 16.87 | 3.40E-03 | 4.80E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Actinobacteria; c__Actinobacteria; o__Actinomycetales; f__Mycobacteriaceae; g__Mycobacterium |
| denovo854 | −0.20 | 16.83 | 3.43E-03 | 4.80E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Bacteroidetes; c__Cytophagia; o__Cytophagales; f__Cytophagaceae; g__; s__ |
| denovo2139 | 0.33 | 16.70 | 3.50E-03 | 4.80E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Chloroflexi; c__Anaerolineae; o__Caldilineales; f__Caldilineaceae; g__Caldilinea; s__ |
| denovo3503 | 0.35 | 15.58 | 4.25E-03 | 4.86E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Betaproteobacteria; o__Rhodocyclales; f__Rhodocyclaceae; g__Candidatus Accumulibacter; s__ |
| denovo3915 | 0.37 | 15.50 | 4.31E-03 | 4.86E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Gammaproteobacteria; o__Salinisphaerales; f__Competibacteraceae; g__; s__ |
| denovo4686 | 0.33 | 16.16 | 3.84E-03 | 4.86E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Deltaproteobacteria; o__Myxococcales; f__Nannocystaceae; g__Nannocystis |
| denovo5418 | −0.18 | 14.65 | 5.03E-03 | 5.36E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Bacteroidetes; c__[Saprospirae] |
| denovo2368 | 0.26 | 13.59 | 6.17E-03 | 6.23E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Gammaproteobacteria; o__Salinisphaerales; f__Competibacteraceae; g__; s__ |
| denovo1196 | 0.38 | 12.90 | 7.07E-03 | 6.47E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Betaproteobacteria; o__Rhodocyclales; f__Rhodocyclaceae; g__Candidatus Accumulibacter; s__ |
| denovo4321 | 0.43 | 12.89 | 7.08E-03 | 6.47E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Actinobacteria; c__Actinobacteria; o__Actinomycetales |
| denovo1045 | −0.49 | 11.11 | 1.03E-02 | 7.91E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Bacteroidetes; c__[Saprospirae] |
| denovo2808 | 0.36 | 11.13 | 1.03E-02 | 7.91E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Betaproteobacteria; o__Burkholderiales; f__Comamonadaceae; g__Methylibium; s__ |
| denovo2874 | −0.41 | 10.78 | 1.11E-02 | 7.91E-02 | k__Bacteria |
| denovo3702 | 0.27 | 10.82 | 1.10E-02 | 7.91E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Betaproteobacteria; o__Burkholderiales; f__Comamonadaceae; g__Roseateles; s__depolymerans |
| denovo3949 | 0.12 | 10.85 | 1.10E-02 | 7.91E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Alphaproteobacteria; o__Rhizobiales; f__; g__; s__ |
| denovo5370 | 0.21 | 11.18 | 1.02E-02 | 7.91E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Actinobacteria; c__Actinobacteria; o__Actinomycetales; f__Nocardioidaceae; g__; s__ |
| denovo56 | 0.58 | 10.08 | 1.31E-02 | 8.98E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Bacteroidetes |
| denovo1915 | −0.27 | 9.75 | 1.42E-02 | 9.37E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Bacteroidetes |
| denovo843 | 0.41 | 9.20 | 1.63E-02 | 9.62E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Betaproteobacteria |
| denovo3134 | −0.36 | 9.14 | 1.65E-02 | 9.62E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__SR1; c__; o__; f__; g__; s__ |
| denovo5082 | −0.21 | 9.01 | 1.70E-02 | 9.62E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Chloroflexi; c__Chloroflexi; o__[Roseiflexales]; f__[Kouleothrixaceae]; g__Kouleothrix; s__ |
| denovo5114 | −0.21 | 9.14 | 1.65E-02 | 9.62E-02 | k__Bacteria |
| denovo5130 | 0.25 | 9.05 | 1.69E-02 | 9.62E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Betaproteobacteria; o__Rhodocyclales; f__Rhodocyclaceae; g__Candidatus Accumulibacter; s__ |
| denovo4776 | 0.18 | 8.80 | 1.79E-02 | 9.84E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Alphaproteobacteria; o__Rhodospirillales |
| denovo2836 | −0.43 | 8.57 | 1.91E-02 | 9.89E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Bacteroidetes |
| denovo3464 | 0.32 | 8.65 | 1.87E-02 | 9.89E-02 | k__Bacteria; p__Chloroflexi; c__Anaerolineae; o__Caldilineales; f__Caldilineaceae; g__Caldilinea; s__ |
1Internal identifier for operational taxonomic units (OTUs) generated from analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing reads.
2Difference in log10 normalised abundance between high and low-aeration epochs.
3Value of test statistic from change-point model (Reeve et al.69).
4Estimated (unadjusted) p-value.
5Significance feature estimated using Storey-Tibshirani false discovery rate estimator.
6Taxonomic assignment for OTUs was made from Greengenes or MIDAS.
7The annotation to “k__Bacteria; p__Proteobacteria; c__Gammaproteobacteria; o__Salinisphaerales; f__Competibacteraceae; g__; s__ ” was provided by MIDAS; all other annotations are from Greengenes.
Comparison of the aerobic and anaerobic biochemical transformation with metabolic model predictions during high and low aeration epochs.
| Experimental | |||||||
| High Aeration Period | |||||||
| Date | |||||||
| 29th May | 0.92 | 0.74 | 0.51 | 0.06 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| 5th June | 0.80 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.07 | 0.76 | 0.90 | 0.52 |
| 12th June | 1.01 | 0.58 | 0.84 | 0.13 | 0.97 | 0.73 | 0.60 |
| 19th June | 0.83 | 0.44 | 1.30 | 0.20 | 1.50 | 0.73 | 0.64 |
| Mean of period (s.d.) | 0.89 (0.09) | 0.60 (0.12) | 0.83 (0.34) | 0.11 (0.06) | 0.95 (0.40) | 0.76 (0.10) | 0.61 (0.07) |
| Low Aeration Period | |||||||
| 26th June | 0.82 | 0.34 | 0.94 | 0.17 | 1.11 | 0.82 | — |
| 3rd July | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.96 | 0.20 | 1.16 | 0.84 | 0.53 |
| 10th July | 0.86 | 0.34 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 1.21 | 0.72 | 0.49 |
| 16th July | 0.93 | 0.37 | 1.01 | 0.21 | 1.22 | 0.75 | 0.51 |
| 25th July | 0.94 | 0.44 | 0.90 | 0.19 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 0.47 |
| 14th August | 0.81 | 0.38 | 0.81 | 0.19 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.65 |
| Mean of period (s.d.) | 0.89 (0.07) | 0.38 (0.04) | 0.94 (0.08) | 0.19 (0.01) | 1.13 (0.08) | 0.82 (0.12) | 0.56 (0.09) |
| Model | |||||||
| Comeau | 0.5 | 0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | N/A | N/A |
| Smolder | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.33 | 0 | 1.33 | N/A | N/A |
| Pereira | 0.16 | 0.7 | 1.02 | 0.46 | 1.48 | N/A | N/A |
| Hesselmann | 0.37 | 0.6 | 1.11 | 0.29 | 1.4 | N/A | N/A |
| Yagci | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||
| Smolder | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| Zeng | 0.00 | 1.12 | 1.36 | 0.46 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
1P/HAc, phosphorus/acetate; Gly/HAc, glycogen/acetate; PHB/HAc, poly–hydroxybutyrate/acetate; PHV/HAc, poly-hydroxyvalerate/acetate; PHA/HAc, poly–β–hydroxyalkanoates/acetate; P/PHA, phosphorus/ poly–β–hydroxyalkanoates; Gly/PHA, glycogen/poly–β–hydroxyalkanoates.
2αPAO is the energy required to transport one C mole of acetate across the cell membrane. fGLY is the fraction of acetyl-CoA going through the glycoxylate pathway to produce reducing power. Values are in C or P mole.