| Literature DB >> 31346257 |
Sho Torii1, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi1, Atsushi Sakamoto1, Matthew Kutyna1, Anne Cornelissen1, Salome Kuntz1, Liang Guo1, Hiroyoshi Mori1, Emanuel Harari1, Ka Hyun Paek1, Raquel Fernandez1, Diljon Chahal2, Maria E Romero1, Frank D Kolodgie1, Anuj Gupta2, Renu Virmani1, Aloke V Finn3,4.
Abstract
Implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) is the dominant treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. However, the first-generation DES had substantial drawbacks, including delayed healing, local hypersensitivity reactions and neoatherosclerosis, which all led to a steady increase in major adverse cardiovascular events over time. Subsequently, newer-generation DES were introduced with thinner struts, different scaffold designs (to improve deliverability while maintaining radial strength), different durable and biodegradable polymers - and in some cases no polymer (to improve vascular biocompatibility) - and new antiproliferative drug types and doses. Currently, >30 different DES are commercially available in Europe, with fewer available in the USA but with many new entrants coming onto the US market in the next few years. Never before have cardiologists been faced with so many choices of stent, each with its own unique design. In this Review, we detail preclinical and pathology studies for each stent design, examining thromboresistance, speed of neointimal coverage and completeness of healing, including endothelialization. We conclude by discussing how these design characteristics might affect the potential for shortening the minimum duration of dual antiplatelet therapy needed after coronary intervention.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31346257 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-019-0234-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol ISSN: 1759-5002 Impact factor: 32.419