Jenny M Shao1, Yewande Alimi1, Dylan Conroy2, Parag Bhanot3. 1. Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road, Washington, DC, USA. 2. Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road, Washington, DC, USA. pxb129@gunet.georgetown.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Usage of intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) to assess skin flaps prior to abdominal wall closure has been shown to decrease postoperative wound-related complications. Primary outcome assessed is the utility of ICG in intraoperative decision making. Secondary outcomes analyzed are the incidence of surgical site occurrence (SSO) and hernia recurrence rates. METHODS: A retrospective study using the MedStar Georgetown University Hospital database was conducted, incorporating all consecutive patients undergoing complex incisional hernia repair from 2008 to 2018. 146 patients underwent perforator-sparing component separation (PSCST), 88 underwent flap assessment using intraoperative ICG angiography; they were then analyzed based on patient comorbidities, Ventral Hernia Working Group grade, operative factors, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were analyzed with no statistical difference in patient characteristics between the SPY and no SPY group except in BMI (30.2 vs. 33.2 kg/m2, p = 0.036). The no SPY group also had higher numbers of patients undergoing concurrent panniculectomy (12 vs. 1, p < 0.001), and extensive lysis of adhesions (30 vs. 31, p = 0.048). Of the 88 patients undergoing intraoperative SPY, 37 (42%) patients had a change of intraoperative management as defined by further subcutaneous skin flap debridement. Despite this change, there was no statistical difference in incidence of SSO between SPY and no SPY (24.3% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.12), and no difference in hernia recurrence rates 5.6% (n = 5) versus 13.7% (n = 8), p = 0.09. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative ICG assessment of subcutaneous skin flaps with a perforator-sparing component separation does not result in a decrease in surgical site occurrences.
BACKGROUND: Usage of intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) to assess skin flaps prior to abdominal wall closure has been shown to decrease postoperative wound-related complications. Primary outcome assessed is the utility of ICG in intraoperative decision making. Secondary outcomes analyzed are the incidence of surgical site occurrence (SSO) and hernia recurrence rates. METHODS: A retrospective study using the MedStar Georgetown University Hospital database was conducted, incorporating all consecutive patients undergoing complex incisional hernia repair from 2008 to 2018. 146 patients underwent perforator-sparing component separation (PSCST), 88 underwent flap assessment using intraoperative ICG angiography; they were then analyzed based on patient comorbidities, Ventral Hernia Working Group grade, operative factors, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were analyzed with no statistical difference in patient characteristics between the SPY and no SPY group except in BMI (30.2 vs. 33.2 kg/m2, p = 0.036). The no SPY group also had higher numbers of patients undergoing concurrent panniculectomy (12 vs. 1, p < 0.001), and extensive lysis of adhesions (30 vs. 31, p = 0.048). Of the 88 patients undergoing intraoperative SPY, 37 (42%) patients had a change of intraoperative management as defined by further subcutaneous skin flap debridement. Despite this change, there was no statistical difference in incidence of SSO between SPY and no SPY (24.3% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.12), and no difference in hernia recurrence rates 5.6% (n = 5) versus 13.7% (n = 8), p = 0.09. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative ICG assessment of subcutaneous skin flaps with a perforator-sparing component separation does not result in a decrease in surgical site occurrences.
Authors: K Itatsu; Y Yokoyama; G Sugawara; H Kubota; Y Tojima; Y Kurumiya; H Kono; H Yamamoto; M Ando; M Nagino Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Nimesh D Desai; Senri Miwa; David Kodama; Taadaki Koyama; Gideon Cohen; Marc P Pelletier; Eric A Cohen; George T Christakis; Bernard S Goldman; Stephen E Fremes Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2006-07-28 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Karl Breuing; Charles E Butler; Stephen Ferzoco; Michael Franz; Charles S Hultman; Joshua F Kilbridge; Michael Rosen; Ronald P Silverman; Daniel Vargo Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Edmund Q Sanchez; Srinath Chinnakotla; Tariq Khan; Dmitriy Nikitin; Sugam Vasani; Henry B Randall; Greg J McKenna; Richard Ruiz; Nicholas Onaca; Marlon F Levy; Robert M Goldstein; John C Docherty; David K Hurd; Göran B Klintmalm Journal: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) Date: 2008-07
Authors: Geoffrey C Gurtner; Glyn E Jones; Peter C Neligan; Martin I Newman; Brett T Phillips; Justin M Sacks; Michael R Zenn Journal: Ann Surg Innov Res Date: 2013-01-07
Authors: David C Bosanquet; James Ansell; Tarig Abdelrahman; Julie Cornish; Rhiannon Harries; Amy Stimpson; Llion Davies; James C D Glasbey; Kathryn A Frewer; Natasha C Frewer; Daphne Russell; Ian Russell; Jared Torkington Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sharbel A Elhage; Matthew N Marturano; Tanushree Prasad; Paul D Colavita; Kent W Kercher; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 4.584