Literature DB >> 32797284

Impact of perforator sparing on anterior component separation outcomes in open abdominal wall reconstruction.

Sharbel A Elhage1, Matthew N Marturano1, Tanushree Prasad1, Paul D Colavita1, Kent W Kercher1, Vedra A Augenstein1, B Todd Heniford2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anterior component separation (ACS) is a well-established, highly functional technique to achieve fascial closure in complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Unfortunately, ACS is also associated with an increased risk of wound complications. Perforator sparing ACS (PS-ACS) has more recently been introduced to maintain the subcutaneous perforators derived from the deep epigastric vessels. The aim of this study is to evaluate wound-related outcomes in patients undergoing open AWR after implementation of a PS-ACS technique.
METHODS: A prospectively collected database were queried for patients who underwent open AWR and an ACS from 2006 to 2018. Patients who underwent PS-ACS were compared to patients undergoing ACS using standard statistical methods. Patients undergoing concomitant panniculectomy were included in the standard ACS group.
RESULTS: In total, 252 patients underwent ACS, with 24 (9.5%) undergoing PS-ACS. Age and specific comorbidities were similar between groups (all p > 0.05) except for the PS-ACS groups having a higher rate of prior tobacco use (45.8% vs 19.6%, p = 0.003). Mean hernia defect area was 381.6 ± 267.0 cm2 with 64.3% recurrent hernias, and both were similar between groups (all p > 0.05). The PS-ACS group did have more complex wounds with more Ventral Hernia Working Group Grade 3 and 4 hernias (p = 0.04). OR time and length of stay were similar between groups (all p > 0.05). Despite increased complexity, wound complication rates were much lower in the PS-ACS group (20.8% vs 46.1%, p = 0.02), and all specific wound complications were lower but not statistically different. Hernia recurrence rate was similar between PS-ACS and ACS groups (4.2% vs 7.0%, p > 0.99) with mean follow-up of 27.7 ± 26.9 months.
CONCLUSIONS: In complex AWR, preservation of the deep epigastric perforating vessels during ACS significantly lowers the rates of wound complications, despite its performance in more complex patients with an increased risk of infection. PS-ACS should be performed preferentially over a standard ACS whenever possible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal wall reconstruction; Complication; Components separation; Hernia; Hernia repair; Perforator sparing

Year:  2020        PMID: 32797284     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07888-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia.

Authors:  R W Luijendijk; W C Hop; M P van den Tol; D C de Lange; M M Braaksma; J N IJzermans; R U Boelhouwer; B C de Vries; M K Salu; J C Wereldsma; C M Bruijninckx; J Jeekel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Repair of epigastric incisional hernia.

Authors:  D YOUNG
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1961-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  [Gigantic median xipho-umbilical eventration; method for treatment].

Authors:  A R ALBANESE
Journal:  Rev Asoc Med Argent       Date:  1951 Sep 15-30

4.  Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Justin H Booth; Patrick B Garvey; Donald P Baumann; Jesse C Selber; Alexander T Nguyen; Mark W Clemens; Jun Liu; Charles E Butler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  OPERATION FOR CURE OF LARGE VENTRAL HERNIA.

Authors:  C L Gibson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1920-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study.

Authors:  O M Ramirez; E Ruas; A L Dellon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research.

Authors:  B K Poulose; J Shelton; S Phillips; D Moore; W Nealon; D Penson; W Beck; M D Holzman
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Minimally invasive component separation results in fewer wound-healing complications than open component separation for large ventral hernia repairs.

Authors:  Shadi Ghali; Kristin C Turza; Donald P Baumann; Charles E Butler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Comparative radiographic analysis of changes in the abdominal wall musculature morphology after open posterior component separation or bridging laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Gayan S De Silva; David M Krpata; Caitlin W Hicks; Cory N Criss; Yue Gao; Michael J Rosen; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Variation of the Components' Separation Technique that Preserves the Semilunaris for Treatment of Abdominal Wall Deformities.

Authors:  Marcus Vinícius Jardini Barbosa; Fábio Xerfan Nahas; Lydia Masako Ferreira
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.