C Gani1,2, L Boldrini3,4, V Valentini3,4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 2. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Tübingen, Germany. 3. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italia. 4. Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia.
Rectal cancer might not be the first entity that comes into one’s mind when potential indications for online magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) with a MRI-linac are discussed. The treatment of the primary tumor and the pelvic lymphatics is relatively simple and even the benefit of intensity modulated radiotherapy over three-dimensional radiotherapy is a matter of debate [1]. However, as soon as we move beyond standard treatment protocols rectal cancer appears to be an indication for online MRgRT that teases out the full potential of MRI-linac hybrid devices.For organ preservation in rectal cancer (“wait & see”), various strategies to increase the clinical complete response rate have been tested in clinical trials [2]. Dose escalation with external beam radiotherapy is possibly the most intuitive approach, however various ongoing clinical trials rather favour alternative strategies such as total neoadjuvant therapy (NCT03561142) [3]. The reason for this is two-fold: first, very high doses are required in order to substantially increase the likelihood to achieve a complete response. Appelt et al. modelled that doses clearly beyond 70 Gy are required to achieve a complete response in 50% of patients [4]. In a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials that applied doses higher than 60 Gy a pooled pCR rate of 20.4% is reported which equals only a moderate increase compared to standard treatments [5]. Second, rectal primaries can only – if at all – poorly be visualized on cone-beam imaging. For this reason and due to considerable day-to-day inter-fractional motion, margins greater 10 mm to ensure adequate tumor coverage are not uncommon in trials that applied a boost [6], [7]. The superior image quality of MRI-Linac hybrid devices over cone-beam CT based linear accelerators permits the visualization of these tumors on a daily basis. Furthermore, the concept of online MR guided radiotherapy includes the daily adaptation of the treatment plan to the current anatomy and therefore has the potential to reduce doses in organs at risk, such as the bowel, the anal sphincter, the bladder or the normal rectal mucosa. Particularly patients with tumors in the mid rectum, who are candidates for sphincter sparing surgery, might benefit most from such daily online MR guided adaptive workflow via lower doses to the anal sphincter. Furthermore, in the setting of re-irradiation of recurrent rectal cancer a benefit of the daily adaptive strategy with reduced margins can be hypothesized.Innovative strategies with MRI-linac hybrid devices are however not limited to the superior visualization of soft tissues and the possibility of daily plan adaptation. Functional MR imaging, such as diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), can provide information about the biology of the target of interest. It has been shown previously that changes on DWI can be applied as an early predictor of response to radiotherapy and outperform volume changes [8], [9].In most of the studies that evaluated the predictive value of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) changes a single time point for re-assessment was chosen. Hybrid devices will permit the acquisition of functional imaging on a daily base during treatment. This data can be used to refine response prediction and generate response prediction models that do not rely on individual time points but include the changes over the entire course of treatment [10].While the acquisition of functional imaging per se does not require a hybrid device, novel adaptive strategies that define subvolumes for dose escalation based on functional imaging do require the online visualization of these areas for precise dose escalation. The hypothesis of such a so called “bio-boost” concept, is that areas with persistent diffusion restriction on functional imaging during treatment, harbor tumor cells, that do need a higher dose to overcome their radioresistant phenotype. It has been shown before that functional imaging from an MRI-linac is capable to detect such persistent areas of restricted diffusion [11].One of the challenges in the future will be to define optimal acquisition timepoints and ADC cut-offs for the definition of these areas and to implement this information in an online adaptive workflow. Even though phantom based studies showed favourable data in terms of accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative MRI data acquired at an MRI-Linac, more patient based data that confirms this is warranted [12].Self-evidently, the above mentioned strategies will have to be developed and tested within well-designed clinical trials, that are currently under development.
COI statement
LB received speaker honoraria and travel reimbursement from ViewRay Inc.VV has a research agreement with ViewRay Inc.CG: The department of Radiation Oncology Tübingen receives financial and technical support from Elekta AB (Stockholm, Sweden) under a research agreement and financial support for educational events from Dr. Sennewald GmbH, Munich, Germany. CG has received travel grants from Elekta AB (Stockholm, Sweden).
Authors: L Boldrini; G Chiloiro; A Pesce; A Romano; S Teodoli; L Placidi; M Campitelli; M A Gambacorta; V Valentini Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-10-25
Authors: Cihan Gani; S Boeke; H McNair; J Ehlers; M Nachbar; D Mönnich; A Stolte; J Boldt; C Marks; J Winter; Luise A Künzel; S Gatidis; M Bitzer; D Thorwarth; D Zips Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-11-30
Authors: C De-Colle; M Nachbar; D Mӧnnich; S Boeke; C Gani; N Weidner; V Heinrich; J Winter; S Tsitsekidis; O Dohm; D Zips; D Thorwarth Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-01-22
Authors: T Bostel; C Dreher; D Wollschläger; A Mayer; F König; S Bickelhaupt; H P Schlemmer; P E Huber; F Sterzing; P Bäumer; J Debus; N H Nicolay Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-07-11 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Vincent Grégoire; Matthias Guckenberger; Karin Haustermans; Jan J W Lagendijk; Cynthia Ménard; Richard Pötter; Ben J Slotman; Kari Tanderup; Daniela Thorwarth; Marcel van Herk; Daniel Zips Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Leila T Tchelebi; Paul B Romesser; Sebastian Feuerlein; Sarah Hoffe; Kujtim Latifi; Seth Felder; Michael D Chuong Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2020 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.302