Ernst S Kooreman1, Petra J van Houdt1, Marlies E Nowee1, Vivian W J van Pelt1, Rob H N Tijssen2, Eric S Paulson3, Oliver J Gurney-Champion4, Jihong Wang5, Folkert Koetsveld1, Laurens D van Buuren1, Leon C Ter Beek1, Uulke A van der Heide6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States. 4. Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 5. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: u.vd.heide@nki.nl.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Systems for magnetic resonance (MR-) guided radiotherapy enable daily MR imaging of cancer patients during treatment, which is of interest for treatment response monitoring and biomarker discovery using quantitative MRI (qMRI). Here, the performance of a 1.5 T MR-linac regarding qMRI was assessed on phantoms. Additionally, we show the feasibility of qMRI in a prostate cancer patient on this system for the first time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four 1.5 T MR-linac systems from four institutes were included in this study. T1 and T2 relaxation times, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, as well as dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) images were acquired. Bland-Altman statistics were used, and accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility were determined. RESULTS: Median accuracy for T1 ranged over the four systems from 2.7 to 14.3%, for T2 from 10.4 to 14.1%, and for ADC from 1.9 to 2.7%. For DCE images, the accuracy ranged from 12.8 to 35.8% for a gadolinium concentration of 0.5 mM and deteriorated for higher concentrations. Median short-term repeatability for T1 ranged from 0.6 to 5.1%, for T2 from 0.4 to 1.2%, and for ADC from 1.3 to 2.2%. DCE acquisitions showed a coefficient of variation of 0.1-0.6% in the signal intensity. Long-term repeatability was 1.8% for T1, 1.4% for T2, 1.7% for ADC, and 17.9% for DCE. Reproducibility was 11.2% for T1, 2.9% for T2, 2.2% for ADC, and 18.4% for DCE. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that qMRI on the Unity MR-linac is feasible, accurate, and repeatable which is promising for treatment response monitoring and treatment plan adaptation based on daily qMRI.
PURPOSE: Systems for magnetic resonance (MR-) guided radiotherapy enable daily MR imaging of cancerpatients during treatment, which is of interest for treatment response monitoring and biomarker discovery using quantitative MRI (qMRI). Here, the performance of a 1.5 T MR-linac regarding qMRI was assessed on phantoms. Additionally, we show the feasibility of qMRI in a prostate cancerpatient on this system for the first time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four 1.5 T MR-linac systems from four institutes were included in this study. T1 and T2 relaxation times, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, as well as dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) images were acquired. Bland-Altman statistics were used, and accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility were determined. RESULTS: Median accuracy for T1 ranged over the four systems from 2.7 to 14.3%, for T2 from 10.4 to 14.1%, and for ADC from 1.9 to 2.7%. For DCE images, the accuracy ranged from 12.8 to 35.8% for a gadolinium concentration of 0.5 mM and deteriorated for higher concentrations. Median short-term repeatability for T1 ranged from 0.6 to 5.1%, for T2 from 0.4 to 1.2%, and for ADC from 1.3 to 2.2%. DCE acquisitions showed a coefficient of variation of 0.1-0.6% in the signal intensity. Long-term repeatability was 1.8% for T1, 1.4% for T2, 1.7% for ADC, and 17.9% for DCE. Reproducibility was 11.2% for T1, 2.9% for T2, 2.2% for ADC, and 18.4% for DCE. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that qMRI on the Unity MR-linac is feasible, accurate, and repeatable which is promising for treatment response monitoring and treatment plan adaptation based on daily qMRI.
Authors: Benjamin Lewis; Anamaria Guta; Stacie Mackey; H Michael Gach; Sasa Mutic; Olga Green; Taeho Kim Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Ernst S Kooreman; Petra J van Houdt; Rick Keesman; Floris J Pos; Vivian W J van Pelt; Marlies E Nowee; Andreas Wetscherek; Rob H N Tijssen; Marielle E P Philippens; Daniela Thorwarth; Jihong Wang; Amita Shukla-Dave; William A Hall; Eric S Paulson; Uulke A van der Heide Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Brigid A McDonald; Sastry Vedam; Jinzhong Yang; Jihong Wang; Pamela Castillo; Belinda Lee; Angela Sobremonte; Sara Ahmed; Yao Ding; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Peter Balter; Neil Hughes; Daniela Thorwarth; Marcel Nachbar; Marielle E P Philippens; Chris H J Terhaard; Daniel Zips; Simon Böke; Musaddiq J Awan; John Christodouleas; Clifton D Fuller Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Niloufar Zakariaei; Yongsheng Chen; E Mark Haacke; Newton J Hurst; M Salim Siddiqui; Lonni R Schultz; James M Snyder; Tobias Walbert; Carri K Glide-Hurst Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Travis C Salzillo; Nicolette Taku; Kareem A Wahid; Brigid A McDonald; Jarey Wang; Lisanne V van Dijk; Jillian M Rigert; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jihong Wang; Stephen Y Lai; Clifton D Fuller Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-10 Impact factor: 5.421
Authors: Rosie J Goodburn; Marielle E P Philippens; Thierry L Lefebvre; Aly Khalifa; Tom Bruijnen; Joshua N Freedman; David E J Waddington; Eyesha Younus; Eric Aliotta; Gabriele Meliadò; Teo Stanescu; Wajiha Bano; Ali Fatemi-Ardekani; Andreas Wetscherek; Uwe Oelfke; Nico van den Berg; Ralph P Mason; Petra J van Houdt; James M Balter; Oliver J Gurney-Champion Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-09-21 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Petra J van Houdt; Hina Saeed; Daniela Thorwarth; Clifton D Fuller; William A Hall; Brigid A McDonald; Amita Shukla-Dave; Ernst S Kooreman; Marielle E P Philippens; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Rick Keesman; Faisal Mahmood; Catherine Coolens; Teodor Stanescu; Jihong Wang; Neelam Tyagi; Andreas Wetscherek; Uulke A van der Heide Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 10.002