Literature DB >> 22627104

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial.

Claus Rödel1, Torsten Liersch, Heinz Becker, Rainer Fietkau, Werner Hohenberger, Torsten Hothorn, Ullrich Graeven, Dirk Arnold, Marga Lang-Welzenbach, Hans-Rudolf Raab, Heiko Sülberg, Christian Wittekind, Sergej Potapov, Ludger Staib, Clemens Hess, Karin Weigang-Köhler, Gerhard G Grabenbauer, Hans Hoffmanns, Fritz Lindemann, Anke Schlenska-Lange, Gunnar Folprecht, Rolf Sauer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy, total mesorectal excision surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil is the standard combined modality treatment for rectal cancer. With the aim of improving disease-free survival (DFS), this phase 3 study (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) integrated oxaliplatin into standard treatment.
METHODS: This was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study in patients with histologically proven carcinoma of the rectum with clinically staged T3-4 or any node-positive disease. Between July 25, 2006, and Feb 26, 2010, patients were randomly assigned to two groups: a control group receiving standard fluorouracil-based combined modality treatment, consisting of preoperative radiotherapy of 50·4 Gy plus infusional fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2) days 1-5 and 29-33), followed by surgery and four cycles of bolus fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2) days 1-5 and 29; fluorouracil group); and an experimental group receiving preoperative radiotherapy of 50·4 Gy plus infusional fluorouracil (250 mg/m(2) days 1-14 and 22-35) and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 22, and 29), followed by surgery and eight cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2) days 1 and 15), leucovorin (400 mg/m(2) days 1 and 15), and infusional fluorouracil (2400 mg/m(2) days 1-2 and 15-16; fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin group). Randomisation was done with computer-generated block-randomisation codes stratified by centre, clinical T category (cT1-4 vs cT4), and clinical N category (cN0 vs cN1-2) without masking. DFS is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints, including toxicity, compliance, and histopathological response are reported here. Safety and compliance analyses included patients as treated, efficacy endpoints were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00349076.
FINDINGS: Of the 1265 patients initially enrolled, 1236 were evaluable (613 in the fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin group and 623 in the fluorouracil group). Preoperative grade 3-4 toxic effects occurred in 140 (23%) of 606 patients who actually received fluorouracil and oxaliplatin during chemoradiotherapy and in 127 (20%) of 624 patients who actually received fluorouracil chemoradiotherapy. Grade 3-4 diarrhoea was more common in those who received fluorouracil and oxaliplatin during chemoradiotherapy than in those who received fluorouracil during chemoradiotherapy (73 patients [12%] vs 52 patients [8%]), as was grade 3-4 nausea or vomiting (23 [4%] vs nine [1%]). 516 (85%) of the 606 patients who received fluorouracil and oxaliplatin-based chemoradiotherapy had the full dose of chemotherapy, and 571 (94%) had the full dose of radiotherapy; as did 495 (79%) and 601 (96%) of 624 patients who received fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy, respectively. A pathological complete response was achieved in 103 (17%) of 591 patients who underwent surgery in the fluorouracil and oxaliplatin group and in 81 (13%) of 606 patients who underwent surgery in the fluorouracil group (odds ratio 1·40, 95% CI 1·02-1·92; p=0·038). In the fluorouracil and oxaliplatin group, 352 (81%) of 435 patients who began adjuvant chemotherapy completed all cycles (with or without dose reduction), as did 386 (83%) of 463 patients in the fluorouracil group.
INTERPRETATION: Inclusion of oxaliplatin into modified fluorouracil-based combined modality treatment was feasible and led to more patients achieving a pathological complete response than did standard treatment. Longer follow-up is needed to assess DFS. FUNDING: German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe).
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22627104     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70187-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  210 in total

Review 1.  [R1 resection in rectal cancer].

Authors:  H-R Raab
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Therapeutic results of abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position for T3-4 low rectal cancers.

Authors:  Xiang Hu; Liang Cao; Jian Zhang; Pin Liang; Ge Liu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The impact of surgical quality on prognosis in patients undergoing rectal carcinoma surgery after preoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Marcus Kiehlmann; Klaus Weber; Jonas Göhl; Rainer Fietkau; Abbas Agaimy; Werner Hohenberger; Susanne Merkel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer: Is it needed?

Authors:  Kristijonas Milinis; Michael Thornton; Amir Montazeri; Paul S Rooney
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

5.  The status of targeted agents in the setting of neoadjuvant radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancers.

Authors:  Rob Glynne-Jones; Maher Hadaki; Mark Harrison
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

6.  Therapeutic management and outcome of locoregional recurrence after curative colorectal cancer therapy-a single-center analysis.

Authors:  Pamela Kogler; Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch; Michael Sieb; Arpad Sztankay; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Zitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer and the role of adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Valerie M Nelson; Al B Benson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Safety and factors contributing to the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  S Ishihara; T Watanabe; Y Fukushima; T Akahane; A Horiuchi; R Shimada; K Nakamura; T Hayama; H Yamada; K Nozawa; K Matsuda; Y Hashiguchi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Controversies in the multimodality management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert Díaz Beveridge; Dilara Akhoundova; Gema Bruixola; Jorge Aparicio
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 10.  Advances and challenges in treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Joshua Smith; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.