Literature DB >> 31341088

Homotypic cooperativity and collective binding are determinants of bHLH specificity and function.

Christian A Shively1,2, Jiayue Liu1,2, Xuhua Chen1,2, Kaiser Loell1,2, Robi D Mitra3,2,4.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells express transcription factor (TF) paralogues that bind to nearly identical DNA sequences in vitro but bind at different genomic loci and perform different functions in vivo. Predicting how 2 paralogous TFs bind in vivo using DNA sequence alone is an important open problem. Here, we analyzed 2 yeast bHLH TFs, Cbf1p and Tye7p, which have highly similar binding preferences in vitro, yet bind at almost completely nonoverlapping target loci in vivo. We dissected the determinants of specificity for these 2 proteins by making a number of chimeric TFs in which we swapped different domains of Cbf1p and Tye7p and determined the effects on in vivo binding and cellular function. From these experiments, we learned that the Cbf1p dimer achieves its specificity by binding cooperatively with other Cbf1p dimers bound nearby. In contrast, we found that Tye7p achieves its specificity by binding cooperatively with 3 other DNA-binding proteins, Gcr1p, Gcr2p, and Rap1p. Remarkably, most promoters (63%) that are bound by Tye7p do not contain a consensus Tye7p binding site. Using this information, we were able to build simple models to accurately discriminate bound and unbound genomic loci for both Cbf1p and Tye7p. We then successfully reprogrammed the human bHLH NPAS2 to bind Cbf1p in vivo targets and a Tye7p target intergenic region to be bound by Cbf1p. These results demonstrate that the genome-wide binding targets of paralogous TFs can be discriminated using sequence information, and provide lessons about TF specificity that can be applied across the phylogenetic tree.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gene regulation; transcription factor binding; transcription factor cooperativity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31341088      PMCID: PMC6689977          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1818015116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  69 in total

1.  Rap1p requires Gcr1p and Gcr2p homodimers to activate ribosomal protein and glycolytic genes, respectively.

Authors:  S J Deminoff; G M Santangelo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast.

Authors:  Won-Ki Huh; James V Falvo; Luke C Gerke; Adam S Carroll; Russell W Howson; Jonathan S Weissman; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Bicoid cooperative DNA binding is critical for embryonic patterning in Drosophila.

Authors:  Danielle Lebrecht; Marisa Foehr; Eric Smith; Francisco J P Lopes; Carlos E Vanario-Alonso; John Reinitz; David S Burz; Steven D Hanes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Transcriptional enhancers: Intelligent enhanceosomes or flexible billboards?

Authors:  David N Arnosti; Meghana M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 4.429

5.  A chromatin-mediated mechanism for specification of conditional transcription factor targets.

Authors:  Michael J Buck; Jason D Lieb
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-11-12       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Whole-genome comparison of Leu3 binding in vitro and in vivo reveals the importance of nucleosome occupancy in target site selection.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Cheol-Koo Lee; Joshua A Granek; Neil D Clarke; Jason D Lieb
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Reverse recruitment: the Nup84 nuclear pore subcomplex mediates Rap1/Gcr1/Gcr2 transcriptional activation.

Authors:  Balaraj B Menon; Nayan J Sarma; Satish Pasula; Stephen J Deminoff; Kristine A Willis; Kellie E Barbara; Brenda Andrews; George M Santangelo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The E-box DNA binding protein Sgc1p suppresses the gcr2 mutation, which is involved in transcriptional activation of glycolytic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T Sato; M C Lopez; S Sugioka; Y Jigami; H V Baker; H Uemura
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-12-17       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome.

Authors:  Christopher T Harbison; D Benjamin Gordon; Tong Ihn Lee; Nicola J Rinaldi; Kenzie D Macisaac; Timothy W Danford; Nancy M Hannett; Jean-Bosco Tagne; David B Reynolds; Jane Yoo; Ezra G Jennings; Julia Zeitlinger; Dmitry K Pokholok; Manolis Kellis; P Alex Rolfe; Ken T Takusagawa; Eric S Lander; David K Gifford; Ernest Fraenkel; Richard A Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  An overview of the basic helix-loop-helix proteins.

Authors:  Susan Jones
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  7 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of transcription factor binding and expression using calling cards reporter arrays.

Authors:  Jiayue Liu; Christian A Shively; Robi D Mitra
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Transcription factors perform a 2-step search of the nucleus.

Authors:  Max Valentín Staller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Inferring TF activities and activity regulators from gene expression data with constraints from TF perturbation data.

Authors:  Cynthia Z Ma; Michael R Brent
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  A hydrophobic residue stabilizes dimers of regulatory ACT-like domains in plant basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors.

Authors:  Yun Sun Lee; Andres Herrera-Tequia; Jagannath Silwal; James H Geiger; Erich Grotewold
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Dual threshold optimization and network inference reveal convergent evidence from TF binding locations and TF perturbation responses.

Authors:  Yiming Kang; Nikhil R Patel; Christian Shively; Pamela Samantha Recio; Xuhua Chen; Bernd J Wranik; Griffin Kim; R Scott McIsaac; Robi Mitra; Michael R Brent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 6.  Transcription factor 4 and its association with psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  José R Teixeira; Ryan A Szeto; Vinicius M A Carvalho; Alysson R Muotri; Fabio Papes
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Predicting which genes will respond to transcription factor perturbations.

Authors:  Yiming Kang; Wooseok J Jung; Michael R Brent
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.542

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.