Literature DB >> 23703542

Performance of the ultrasound examination in the early and late third trimester for the prediction of birth weight deviations.

Athena P Souka1, Ioannis Papastefanou, Athanasios Pilalis, Vasiliki Michalitsi, Perikles Panagopoulos, Dimitrios Kassanos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to define the optimal gestational age in the third trimester, early (30-33 weeks + 6 days) versus late (34-37 weeks), for performing an ultrasound examination for fetal biometry to predict birth weight deviations: small for gestational age (SGA ≤ 5th centile) and large for gestational age (LGA ≥ 95th centile) neonates.
METHODS: We used an observational cross-sectional study in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies that had a third trimester ultrasound for fetal biometry and umbilical and middle cerebral fetal Doppler studies. Estimated fetal weight and fetal Doppler parameters were the examined variables for the prediction of SGA and LGA.
RESULTS: Three thousand six hundred ninety women had an early examination, and 2288 women had a late one. For a screen-positive rate of 10%, estimated fetal weight achieved 58% and 53.4% sensitivity for the prediction of SGA [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.8578, p < 0.001] and LGA (AUC = 0.8547, p < 0.001), respectively, by the early examination. Accordingly, the sensitivities significantly increased to 75.2% and 63.2% for the prediction of SGA (AUC = 0.9074, p < 0.001) and LGA (AUC = 0.8782, p < 0.001), respectively, by the late examination. The inclusion of the Doppler indices did not improve the predictive models.
CONCLUSIONS: A late third trimester ultrasound was superior in the prediction of SGA and LGA, and this improvement was more pronounced for the prediction of SGA.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23703542     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  9 in total

1.  Ultrasound versus Clinical Examination to Estimate Fetal Weight at Term.

Authors:  Jan-Simon Lanowski; Gabriele Lanowski; Cordula Schippert; Kristina Drinkut; Peter Hillemanns; Ismini Staboulidou
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Personalized Model to Predict Small for Gestational Age at Delivery Using Fetal Biometrics, Maternal Characteristics, and Pregnancy Biomarkers: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Births Assisted at a Spanish Hospital.

Authors:  Peña Dieste-Pérez; Ricardo Savirón-Cornudella; Mauricio Tajada-Duaso; Faustino R Pérez-López; Sergio Castán-Mateo; Gerardo Sanz; Luis Mariano Esteban
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-08

3.  Identifying fetal growth disorders using ultrasound in obese nulliparous women.

Authors:  Annie M Dude; Berkley Davis; Katie Delaney; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-08-01

4.  Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  Alexander Ep Heazell; Dexter Jl Hayes; Melissa Whitworth; Yemisi Takwoingi; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-14

5.  Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Adi L Tarca; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Maynor Garcia; Zhonghui Xu; Steven J Korzeniewski; Homam Saker; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A prenatal standard for fetal weight improves the prenatal diagnosis of small for gestational age fetuses in pregnancies at increased risk.

Authors:  Silvia Visentin; Ambrogio P Londero; Ilaria Cataneo; Federica Bellussi; Ginevra Salsi; Gianluigi Pilu; Erich Cosmi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  A Predictive Model for Large-for-Gestational-Age Infants among Korean Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Maternal Characteristics and Fetal Biometric Parameters.

Authors:  Hee-Sun Kim; Soo-Young Oh; Geum Joon Cho; Suk-Joo Choi; Soon Cheol Hong; Ja-Young Kwon; Han Sung Kwon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Obstetric consequences of a false-positive diagnosis of large-for-gestational-age fetus.

Authors:  Marta Papaccio; Anna Fichera; Alessia Nava; Sonia Zatti; Vera Gerosa; Federico Ferrari; Enrico Sartori; Federico Prefumo; Nicola Fratelli
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.447

9.  Fetal biometric parameters: Reference charts for a non-selected risk population from Uberaba, Brazil.

Authors:  Alberto Borges Peixoto; Taciana Mara Rodrigues da Cunha Caldas; Fernando Felix Dulgheroff; Wellington P Martins; Edward Araujo Júnior
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2017-03-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.