| Literature DB >> 31339922 |
Fabricio J B Francischini1, Erick M G Cordeiro2, Jaqueline B de Campos1, Alessandro Alves-Pereira3, João Paulo Gomes Viana1, Xing Wu4, Wei Wei4, Patrick Brown4, Andrea Joyce5, Gabriela Murua6, Sofia Fogliata6, Steven J Clough4,7, Maria I Zucchi1,8.
Abstract
The sugarcane borer moth, Diatraea saccharalis, is one of the most important pests of sugarcane and maize crops in the Western Hemisphere. The pest is widespread throughout South and Central America, the Caribbean region and the southern United States. One of the most intriguing features of D. saccharalis population dynamics is the high rate of range expansion reported in recent years. To shed light on the history of colonization of D. saccharalis, we investigated the genetic structure and diversity in American populations using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) markers throughout the genome and sequences of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase (COI). Our primary goal was to propose possible dispersal routes from the putative center of origin that can explain the spatial pattern of genetic diversity. Our findings showed a clear correspondence between genetic structure and the geographical distributions of this pest insect on the American continents. The clustering analyses indicated three distinct groups: one composed of Brazilian populations, a second group composed of populations from El Salvador, Mexico, Texas and Louisiana and a third group composed of the Florida population. The predicted time of divergence predates the agriculture expansion period, but the pattern of distribution of haplotype diversity suggests that human-mediated movement was most likely the factor responsible for the widespread distribution in the Americas. The study of the early history of D. saccharalis promotes a better understanding of range expansion, the history of invasion, and demographic patterns of pest populations in the Americas.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31339922 PMCID: PMC6656350 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Diatraea saccharalis genomic diversity estimates based on 1,331 SNP loci by sampling locations.
| Location | N | A | AR | HO | HE | FIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LaCocha_Co | 10 | 1859 | 1.13 | 0.1 | 0.13 | 0.244 |
| LaCruz_Su | 5 | 1721 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.12 | 0.159 |
| Jujuy_Su | 7 | 1866 | 1.13 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.222 |
| Perga_Co | 2 | 1519 | 1.05 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.183 |
| Qui_Co | 4 | 1552 | 0.98 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.475 |
| Araras_Su | 2 | 1723 | 1.14 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.02 |
| Goias_TBD | 4 | 1856 | 1.1 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.324 |
| Jabo_Su | 52 | 2333 | 1.41 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.006 |
| Morr_Co | 4 | 1910 | 1.16 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.243 |
| MS_TBD | 9 | 2129 | 1.23 | 0.14 | 0.2 | 0.306 |
| MT_TBD | 5 | 1818 | 1.12 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.225 |
| PAf_Su | 3 | 1751 | 1.12 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.253 |
| Parana_TBD | 3 | 1847 | 1.16 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.175 |
| Pira_Co | 25 | 2118 | 1.32 | 0.19 | 0.19 | -0.009 |
| Pira_Su | 22 | 2296 | 1.38 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.046 |
| Rib_Su | 4 | 1916 | 1.11 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.246 |
| Rondo_Co | 3 | 1634 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.347 |
| SHG_Su | 4 | 1916 | 1.15 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.236 |
| SP_TBD | 18 | 2264 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.423 |
| ElNilo_Su | 4 | 1438 | 1.01 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.326 |
| ElPais_Su | 2 | 1277 | 0.89 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.727 |
| BGlade_Su | 9 | 1384 | 0.95 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.629 |
| Louis_Su | 15 | 1526 | 1.03 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.33 |
| Beaum_Su | 13 | 1556 | 1.07 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.149 |
| Wesl_Su | 7 | 1472 | 1 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.361 |
N = Number of individuals, A = Number of alleles, AR = Allelic Richness, HO = Observed heterozygosity, HE = Expected heterozygosity, FIS = Inbreeding coefficient
Fig 1Heatmap of pairwise FST values between Diatraea saccharalis populations, based on 1,331 SNP loci.
Dendrograms were plotted using the unweighted-pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). Colors indicate the degree of divergence from red (low FST values, little genetic divergence) to light yellow (high FST values, strong genetic divergence).
Fig 2Suggested D. saccharalis dispersion routes from its center of origin in the Orinoco Basin, Venezuela, based on historical information about maize dispersal and sugarcane introduction, and the genetic relationships observed in this study.
The neighbor-joining dendogram showing the relationships among D. saccharalis populations based on Nei’s genetic distance. A total of 1,331 SNP loci were used, and confidence of nodes was based on 1,000 bootstraps. On the map, numbers indicate major differentiation events and arrows represent putative routes for dispersal.
Fig 3Scatterplots from discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) based on 1,331 SNP loci showing the dispersion of 250 Diatraea saccharalis individuals across the first two principal components.
Individuals (dots) are colored according to (A) their country of origin; and (B) the host crop in which they were collected. Variation represented in x = 44.4% and in y = 15%.
Analyses of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) of Diatraea saccharalis populations based on the 1,331 SNP markers.
The analysis considered different host-plant species and geographic regions. φ statistics are indices of the amount of differentiation among populations, similar to Wright’s F statistics. d.f. = degrees of freedom.
| Source of Variation | D.f | S.S. | M.S. | Sigma | % of variation | φ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among countries | 3 | 39716.87 | 13238.96 | 329.12 | 52.59 | φst = 0.525** |
| Within countries | 192 | 56972.76 | 296.73 | 296.73 | 47.41 | |
| Total | 195 | 96689.62 | 495.84 | 625.86 | ||
| Between hosts | 1 | 5052.01 | 5052.01 | 66.05 | 12.27 | φst = 0.122** |
| Within hosts | 194 | 91637.61 | 472.36 | 472.36 | 87.73 | |
| Total | 195 | 96689.63 | 495.84 | 538.41 | ||
| Among countries | 3 | 39716.87 | 13238.96 | 290.58 | 46.51 | φst = 0.549** |
| Between host within countries | 2 | 3518.63 | 1759.32 | 52.79 | 8.45 | φsc = 0.157** |
| Within hosts | 190 | 53454.13 | 281.34 | 281.34 | 45.04 | φct = 0.465* |
| Total | 195 | 96689.62 | 495.84 | 624.71 |
Divergence time based on three arthropod mitochondrial divergence rates.
Trees are presented in supplemental material S3 Fig.
| 2.5%/my | 3.54%/my | 5.25%/my | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 0.923 | 0.613 | 0.427 |
| Group 2 | 0.685 | 0.455 | 0.316 |