| Literature DB >> 31337885 |
Anthony J Bleyer4, Kendrah Kidd4,5, Victoria Robins4, Lauren Martin4, Abbigail Taylor4, Annie Santi6, Georgeanna Tsoumas7, Alese Hunt8, Elizabeth Swain9, Marwan Abbas10, Ebun Akinbola11, Sri Vidya12, Shahriar Moossavi4, Anthony J Bleyer4, Martina Živná5, Hana Hartmannová5, Kateřina Hodaňová5, Petr Vyleťal5, Miroslav Votruba5, Maegan Harden13, Brendan Blumenstiel13, Anna Greka13,14,15, Stanislav Kmoch4,5,13.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate self-referral from the Internet for genetic diagnosis of several rare inherited kidney diseases.Entities:
Keywords: autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease; internet; mucin-1; rare disease; uromodulin
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31337885 PMCID: PMC6946861 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0617-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Med ISSN: 1098-3600 Impact factor: 8.822
Figure 1.Flow diagram of all referrals for evaluation for autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (ADTKD).
Flow diagram of 828 family referrals for ADTKD evaluation.
Outcomes according to referral type.
| Direct Family Referrals[ | Academic HCP[ | Non-academic HCP[ | Total[ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Declined participation or lost to follow-up | 29 (16.5) | 57 (21.2) | 59 (26.8) | 145 (21.8) | .04 |
| Genetic diagnosis not pursued due to low likelihood of ADTKD | 54 (30.7) | 48 (17.8) | 33 (15.0) | 135 (20.3) | .0003 |
| In progress | 7 (4.0) | 21 (7.8) | 19 (8.6) | 47 (7.1) | .16 |
| ADTKD- | 11 (6.3) | 36 (13.4) | 18 (8.2) | 65 (9.8) | .03 |
| ADTKD- | 30 (17.1) | 33 (12.3) | 35 (15.9) | 98 (14.7) | .32 |
| ADTKD- | 1 (0.6) | 4 (1.5) | 2 (0.9) | 7 (1.1) | .63 |
| Genetic testing negative for ADTKD; pursuing other genes | 19 (10.8) | 32 (11.9) | 28 (12.7) | 79 (11.9) | .84 |
| Other clinical diagnosis | 25 (14.2) | 38 (14.1) | 24 (10.9) | 87 (13.1) | .45 |
| 0 | 0 | 1 (0.45) | 1 (0.15) | .36 | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 (0.45) | 1 (0.15) | .36 | |
| Total | 176 (26.5) | 269 (40.5) | 220 (33.1) | 665 (100) |
Data shown as number (%).
Characteristics of first affected contact in families who underwent sample collection for the study.
| Direct Family Referrals | Academic HCP | Non-academic HCP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 68 | 120 | 101 | |
| Gender (% male) | 40(58.8) | 63(52.5) | 52(51.5) | .6 |
| Race (% white) | 67(98.5) | 111(92.5) | 93(92.1) | .045 |
| Age (y) | 47.9 ± 15.8[ | 43.7 ± 17.2 | 44.7 ± 14.6 | |
| End-stage kidney disease at referral (%) | 32(18.2) | 47(17.5) | 38(17.3) | .97 |
| Estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73m2) [ | 14.8 ± 20.1[ | 22.4 ± 27.1 | 24.3 ± 26.7 | |
| US referrals (%) | 134 (76.1) | 191(71.0) | 179 (81.4) | .03 |
| Mean median income by zip code ($) | 77,316 ±±34,014[ | 65,301± 29,741 | 63,934 ± 24,403 |
There were no statistical differences between groups.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate defined as 0 ml/min/1.73 m2 for individuals with end-stage kidney disease at the time of referral.
The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly different for direct family referrals vs. nonacademic referrals (P=.03), but not significantly different vs. academic referrals (P=.08).
Median income was significantly different for direct family referrals vs. non-academic referrals (P=.03) and vs. academic referrals (P=.04).
Figure 2.Temporal distribution for referral type.
Red represents direct family referrals, blue represents academic healthcare providers (HCP), and aqua represents non-academic HCP.
Figure 3.Temporal distribution for method of referral.
Red represents direct family referral via the Internet, with all family referrals being generated through Internet searches. Blue represents health care provider (HCP) personal contact, including personal contact between the first author and the provider, colleague referral, and also lectures given by the first author. Green represents HCP referrals via Internet searches. Purple represents HCP referrals via reading of the literature. Aqua represents HCP referrals via mass mailing.