Zoey Laskaris1, Stuart A Batterman2, John Arko-Mensah3, Bhramar Mukherjee4, Julius N Fobil3, Marie S O'Neill1,2, Thomas G Robins2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 3. Department of Biological, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Informal sector electronic waste (e-waste) recovery produces toxic emissions resulting from burning e-waste to recover valuable metals. OBJECTIVES: To identify high-risk worker groups by measuring relative levels of personal inhalation exposure to particulate matter (PM) of fine (≤2.5 µm) and coarse (2.5-10 µm) fractions (PM2.5 and PM2.5-10, respectively) across work activities among e-waste workers, and to assess how wind conditions modify levels of PM by activity and site location. METHODS: At the Agbogbloshie e-waste site, 170 partial-shift PM samples and time-activity data were collected from participants (N = 105) enrolled in the GeoHealth cohort study. Personal sampling included continuous measures of size-specific PM from the worker's breathing zone and time-activity derived from wearable cameras. Linear mixed models were used to estimate changes in personal PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 associated with activities and evaluate effect modification by wind conditions. RESULTS: Mean (±standard deviation) personal PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 concentrations were 80 (± 81) and 123 (± 139) µg m-3 , respectively. The adjusted mean PM2.5 concentration for burning e-waste was 88 µg m-3 , a 28% increase above concentrations during non-recovery activities (such as eating). Transportation-related and burning activities were associated with the highest PM2.5-10 concentrations. Frequent changes in wind direction were associated with higher PM2.5 concentrations when burning, and high wind speeds with higher PM2.5-10 concentrations when dismantling e-waste downwind of the burning zone.
BACKGROUND: Informal sector electronic waste (e-waste) recovery produces toxic emissions resulting from burning e-waste to recover valuable metals. OBJECTIVES: To identify high-risk worker groups by measuring relative levels of personal inhalation exposure to particulate matter (PM) of fine (≤2.5 µm) and coarse (2.5-10 µm) fractions (PM2.5 and PM2.5-10, respectively) across work activities among e-waste workers, and to assess how wind conditions modify levels of PM by activity and site location. METHODS: At the Agbogbloshie e-waste site, 170 partial-shift PM samples and time-activity data were collected from participants (N = 105) enrolled in the GeoHealth cohort study. Personal sampling included continuous measures of size-specific PM from the worker's breathing zone and time-activity derived from wearable cameras. Linear mixed models were used to estimate changes in personal PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 associated with activities and evaluate effect modification by wind conditions. RESULTS: Mean (±standard deviation) personal PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 concentrations were 80 (± 81) and 123 (± 139) µg m-3 , respectively. The adjusted mean PM2.5 concentration for burning e-waste was 88 µg m-3 , a 28% increase above concentrations during non-recovery activities (such as eating). Transportation-related and burning activities were associated with the highest PM2.5-10 concentrations. Frequent changes in wind direction were associated with higher PM2.5 concentrations when burning, and high wind speeds with higher PM2.5-10 concentrations when dismantling e-waste downwind of the burning zone.
Authors: Jonathan N Hogarh; Nobuyasu Seike; Yuso Kobara; Derick Carboo; Julius N Fobil; Shigeki Masunaga Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2018-04-29 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Roland Kofi Srigboh; Niladri Basu; Judith Stephens; Emmanuel Asampong; Marie Perkins; Richard L Neitzel; Julius Fobil Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2016-08-28 Impact factor: 7.086
Authors: Alessandra Cesaro; Vincenzo Belgiorno; Giuliana Gorrasi; Gianluca Viscusi; Mentore Vaccari; Giovanni Vinti; Aleksander Jandric; Maria Isabel Dias; Andrew Hursthouse; Stefan Salhofer Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 4.223