Sarah C MacDonald1, Jacqueline M Cohen1, Alice Panchaud1, Thomas F McElrath2, Krista F Huybrechts3, Sonia Hernández-Díaz1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to develop an algorithm to identify pregnancies in administrative databases and apply it to assess pregnancy rates and outcomes in women prescribed isotretinoin or tretinoin. METHODS: Using the 2011 to 2015 Truven Health MarketScan Database, we identified pregnancies, including losses and terminations. In a cohort design, nonpregnant women filling a prescription for isotretinoin or tretinoin were matched to five women without either prescription. Women were followed for 365 days or until conception, medication discontinuation, or enrollment discontinuation ("prescription episode"). Rates of pregnancy, risks of pregnancy losses, and prevalence of infant malformations at birth were assessed by exposure. RESULTS: We identified 2 179 192 livebirths, 8434 stillbirths, 2521 mixed births, 415 110 spontaneous abortions, 124 556 elective terminations, and 8974 unspecified abortions. There were 86 834 isotretinoin and 973 587 tretinoin episodes, matched to 5 302 105 unexposed women. Pregnancy rates were 3 (isotretinoin), 19 (tretinoin), and 34 (unexposed) per 1000 person-years. Risk of spontaneous pregnancy losses were similar; however, terminations were more common in the isotretinoin-exposed (28% [95% CI: 21%-36%]) than the tretinoin-exposed (10% [95% CI: 9%-11%]) or unexposed pregnancies (6%). Malformations occurred in 4.5% (95% CI: 3.5%-5.6%) of the tretinoin-exposed pregnancies and 4.2% of the unexposed pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio: 1.16 [95% CI: 0.85-1.58]); isotretinoin-exposed births were too few to assess malformations. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative databases can complement risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) for known teratogens and contribute to safety surveillance for other medications. Here, isotretinoin-exposed pregnancy rates were low, but existent, and many pregnancies were terminated. Tretinoin exposure was not associated with a meaningfully elevated risk of losses or malformations as compared with unexposed pregnancies.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to develop an algorithm to identify pregnancies in administrative databases and apply it to assess pregnancy rates and outcomes in women prescribed isotretinoin or tretinoin. METHODS: Using the 2011 to 2015 Truven Health MarketScan Database, we identified pregnancies, including losses and terminations. In a cohort design, nonpregnant women filling a prescription for isotretinoin or tretinoin were matched to five women without either prescription. Women were followed for 365 days or until conception, medication discontinuation, or enrollment discontinuation ("prescription episode"). Rates of pregnancy, risks of pregnancy losses, and prevalence of infantmalformations at birth were assessed by exposure. RESULTS: We identified 2 179 192 livebirths, 8434 stillbirths, 2521 mixed births, 415 110 spontaneous abortions, 124 556 elective terminations, and 8974 unspecified abortions. There were 86 834 isotretinoin and 973 587 tretinoin episodes, matched to 5 302 105 unexposed women. Pregnancy rates were 3 (isotretinoin), 19 (tretinoin), and 34 (unexposed) per 1000 person-years. Risk of spontaneous pregnancy losses were similar; however, terminations were more common in the isotretinoin-exposed (28% [95% CI: 21%-36%]) than the tretinoin-exposed (10% [95% CI: 9%-11%]) or unexposed pregnancies (6%). Malformations occurred in 4.5% (95% CI: 3.5%-5.6%) of the tretinoin-exposed pregnancies and 4.2% of the unexposed pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio: 1.16 [95% CI: 0.85-1.58]); isotretinoin-exposed births were too few to assess malformations. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative databases can complement risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) for known teratogens and contribute to safety surveillance for other medications. Here, isotretinoin-exposed pregnancy rates were low, but existent, and many pregnancies were terminated. Tretinoin exposure was not associated with a meaningfully elevated risk of losses or malformations as compared with unexposed pregnancies.
Authors: Scott Devine; Suzanne L West; Elizabeth Andrews; Pat Tennis; Susan Eaton; John Thorp; Andrew Olshan Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Janet Shin; T Craig Cheetham; Linda Wong; Fang Niu; Elizabeth Kass; Monica A Yoshinaga; Mike Sorel; Jeffrey S McCombs; Stephen Sidney Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Elizabeth C Ailes; Regina M Simeone; April L Dawson; Emily E Petersen; Suzanne M Gilboa Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2016-11
Authors: Kristin Palmsten; Krista F Huybrechts; Mary K Kowal; Helen Mogun; Sonia Hernández-Díaz Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: David Henry; Colin Dormuth; Brandace Winquist; Greg Carney; Shawn Bugden; Gary Teare; Linda E Lévesque; Anick Bérard; J Michael Paterson; Robert W Platt Journal: CMAJ Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: William O Cooper; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Patricia Gideon; Shannon M Dyer; Kathleen Hall; Judith Dudley; Marisa Cevasco; Amanda B Thompson; Wayne A Ray Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Yu-Han Chiu; Jennifer J Yland; Paolo Rinaudo; John Hsu; Sean McGrath; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Miguel A Hernán Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 7.490
Authors: Donna A Santillan; Heather A Davis; Elissa Z Faro; Boyd M Knosp; Mark K Santillan Journal: Clin Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 1.966
Authors: Christina M Ackerman; Jennifer L Nguyen; Swapna Ambati; Maya Reimbaeva; Birol Emir; Javier Cabrera; Michael Benigno; Deepa Malhotra; Jennifer Hammond; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Eva Tseng; Nowella Durkin; Jeanne M Clark; Nisa M Maruthur; Jill A Marsteller; Jodi B Segal Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Thalia K Robakis; Deirdre J Lyell; Reem Masarwa; Robert W Platt; Suzan L Carmichael Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Stephanie A Leonard; Chris J Kennedy; Suzan L Carmichael; Deirdre J Lyell; Elliott K Main Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 7.623